Bagian II – Sambungan 7

Semua ayat-ayat atau bagian ayat dimana kami telah menemukan kesalahan-kesalahan yang disertakan dengan tiga pengecualian:

  1. Pasti ada yang kesalahan yang kita telah diabaikan.
  2. Ada beberapa kesalahan yang perlu penjelasan panjang. Jika mereka tidak penting, mereka sering telah diabaikan – penjelasan panjang untuk hal-hal kecil yang membosankan bagi kebanyakan pembaca – – – dan juga sering menjadi ciri khas bagi seseorang yang mencoba untuk memimpin Anda dengan hidung Anda.
  3. Ada semua kasus perbatasan: Apakah mudah untuk melihat bahwa ini adalah salah? Atau mungkin ada ada penjelasan yang dapat membuatnya kurang jelas apakah ini benar-benar kesalahan? Jika tidak kita biasanya tidak disertakan di sini. Adapun menggunakan “ensiklopedi dari kesalahan”, hanya mencari nomor surat dan ayat dalam Quran Anda, dan mudah untuk temukan di sini jika ada fakta salah dalam ayat itu.
    1. Jelas informasi yang salah / laporan diberi nomor dengan nomor seri – 3 angka, kadang-kadang diikuti dengan huruf kecil.
    2. Sangat mungkin informasi yang salah / laporan diberi nomor dengan huruf.
    3. Angka-angka yang tidak nomor serial nomor surat dan nomor ayat dalam terjemahan Abdullah Yusuf Ali dari Quran ke Bahasa Inggris.
    4. Komentar di () dalam kutipan dan ditandai dengan * yang dimasukkan oleh kami, seperti ini: (* xxxxxx). Dan * di depan nomor seri: Big atau “baru” kesalahan – meskipun sebenarnya semua kesalahan yang besar bahkan jika mereka kecil, sebagai dewa maha tahu hanya tidak boleh membuat kesalahan. ** Atau *** = NB atau NB! Selain itu kami menggunakan warna dan / atau menulis khusus pada beberapa yang signifikan.

Surah 1-5:

Surah 1:

** 001 1 / 1 – 7. “Dalam nama Allah, Maha Pemurah lagi Maha Penyayang. Segala puji bagi Allah yang semesta dan Pemelihara semesta alam, Maha Pemurah lagi Maha Penyayang, Master hari kiamat. Thee kita menyembah dan bantuan Mu yang kita cari. Tunjukilah kami jalan yang lurus, Jalan mereka yang telah Engkau anugerahkan Mu Grace, mereka yang (bagian) tidak murka, dan yang pergi tidak sesat “.

Ini benar-benar adalah buruk karena ini adalah doa kepada Allah, tidak berbicara Allah (Ketika Muhammad adalah untuk mengulangi apa yang Allah berfirman, Allah memberikan perintah “Katakan”) – dan selain Allah tidak berdoa untuk dirinya sendiri! Sebuah kesalahan yang jelas dibandingkan dengan apa yang Islam klaim: Itu semua diturunkan oleh Allah (Al Qur’an dikatakan dibuat oleh Allah, atau tidak pernah dibuat, tapi selalu ada – klaim terakhir adalah mustahil, meskipun, sebagai malaikat yang berbicara pada setidaknya satu tempat di Quran (juga menurut ulama Islam), yang membuktikan bahwa Quran tidak bisa dilakukan sampai setelah setidaknya malaikat pertama diciptakan).

Ada lebih banyak tempat di mana jelas bahwa itu adalah Muhammad yang berbicara – juga dalam kontradiksi dengan pernyataan bahwa Quran adalah dari Surga, yang dibuat oleh Allah atau tidak pernah dibuat tetapi ada dari keabadian.

Ia mengatakan sesuatu yang pada awal, dan dalam apa yang dikatakan dengan cara menjadi esensi dari buku ini, ada sesuatu yang tidak beres, dibandingkan dengan Islam yang sangat mendasar – tetapi tidak terbukti – pernyataan bahwa buku ini diturunkan oleh sebuah tuhan mahatahu, dan sempurna dan tanpa kesalahan.

Surah 1: Setidaknya 1 kesalahan.

Surah 2:

001 2 / 1: “- – – semesta alam – – -“. Sudah referensi ke 7 Bumi yang ada sesuai dengan Quran. (Salah satu di atas yang lain, menurut Hadis). Salah – tidak ada 7 Bumi meskipun 65/12. Lihat 2/22a.

* 002 2 / 2: “Ini adalah Kitab (yang * Quran); di dalamnya adalah panduan yakin, tanpa ragu – – -“. Seperti yang akan Anda lihat, ada banyak fakta yang salah, kontradiksi, dan argumen belum terbukti, dll dalam Quran. Itu berarti bahwa pedoman ini jauh dari pasti. Semua dll kesalahan juga menghasilkan banyak keraguan tentang sisa teks.

* 003 2 / 4: “- – – Wahyu (yang * Quran) kepadamu (Muhammad *), dan dikirim sebelum waktu Mu (= Taurat / Alkitab *) – – -.” Salah. Quran tidak sama dengan Taurat atau Alkitab, dan ilmu pengetahuan telah dibuktikan tanpa ada keraguan atau peradilan yang PB dalam Alkitab tidak pernah dipalsukan + bahwa jika Taurat / PL yang dipalsukan, maka harus telah terjadi setidaknya 300 tahun SM, dan kemungkinan besar minimal 500 – 800 SM atau sebelumnya, jika pernah. Hal ini juga sangat jelas bahwa Islam tidak sedikit pun dokumentasi untuk klaim ulang mereka – kira jika mereka telah cepat untuk menghasilkan kalau mereka bahkan sedikit wee kecil bukti!

004 2 / 5: “Mereka (orang-orang percaya *) adalah pedoman benar – – -“. Dengan begitu banyak fakta yang salah, bimbingan di terbaik adalah sebagian benar.

005 2/22a: “- – – langit, Anda kanopi – – -“. Jamak dan salah – mengacu pada 7 langit dari Quran – – – dan astronomi Yunani dan Persia yang salah pada saat Muhammad. Lihat 2 / 29 – 23/17 – 23/86 – 41 / 2 – 65/12 – 67 / 3 – 78/12, dan juga 10 / 6 – 31/10.

* 006 2/22b: “- – – dan langit (jamak dan salah – lihat 2/22a tepat di atas) kanopi Anda – – -“. Langit / langit kanopi tidak. The “surga” kita lihat di siang hari, benar-benar adalah suatu ilusi yang disebabkan oleh lentur dan pemecahan sinar matahari, dan “halus” surga kita lihat pada malam hari, juga adalah ilusi, karena kita tidak dapat melihat dimensi ketiga pada saat-jarak , dan mendapatkan kesan bahwa bintang-bintang semua berada pada jarak yang sama dari kami. Setiap dewa sudah mengetahui hal ini, tetapi Muhammad tidak. Juga lihat 67/3a – 67/3b – 67/5a – 67/5b. Muslim cenderung untuk menjelaskan langit (jamak dan salah) dengan klaim wague tentang ruang dan bintang-bintang dan galaksi – tetapi setiap kali mereka kemudian “lupa” untuk menjelaskan f. ex. bagaimana bintang-bintang erat pada paling bawah dari 7 langit Quran mengatakan ada. Dan mereka lupa bulan (dan matahari?) Di antara langit – luar bintang! Mereka juga kadang-kadang mengatakan bahwa 7 langit = 7 lapisan di atmosfer. Tidak ada komentar – tetapi berpikir tentang bintang seperti Aldebaran – bintang raksasa – tetap ke lapisan di atmosfer kita di bawah bulan kita. Sebuah lelucon.

007 2/22c: “- – – hujan dari langit – – -“. Jamak (7 langit) dan salah. Lihat 2/22b di atas.

008 2/22d: “- – – ketika kamu (orang *) mengetahui (kebenaran (yang * Quran)” Quran paling mewakili sebagian kebenaran, karena anda akan melihat Lihat 13 / 1 – 40 / 75 – 41.. / 12.

** 009 23/02: “- – – apa yang Kami (Allah *) telah mengungkapkan (yang * Quran) – – -“. Salah. Tidak ada tuhan maha tahu telah membuat atau dihargai (cfr. “Kitab Ibu – f. ex 13/69.) Sebuah buku dengan fakta banyak salah, kontradiksi dan kesalahan lainnya. Entah itu tidak dibuat oleh Allah atau Allah tidak maha tahu – kalau dia ada.

010 2 / 24: “Tetapi jika kamu tidak dapat – dan kamu jaminan (non-Muslim *) dapat tidak (surah menghasilkan kualitas yang sama seperti dalam Quran *) – – -“. Al Quran ada literatur yang baik – salinan lebih atau kurang dari cerita rakyat Arab, legenda, dongeng, dan hal-hal Muhammad telah diceritakan dari Alkitab – dan terutama bukan dari Alkitab itu sendiri tetapi dari apokrif (dibuat) cerita. Selain komposisi dan penyajian teks termasuk dalam sekolah dasar. Banyak penulis yang baik bisa mengumpulkan cerita tersebut dan melakukan jauh lebih baik (pada titik-titik ini f. ex Alkitab itu. Jauh lebih baik tertulis). Bahasa Arab itu sendiri dikatakan sangat baik – tapi ketika kamu tahu bahwa bahasa itu dipoles untuk beberapa 250 tahun oleh atas orang-orang terpelajar yang cerdas dan atas, sampai mendapat bentuknya yang agak akhir sekitar 900 AD (abjad Arab belum selesai sampai saat itu ), titik yang menceritakan apa-apa tentang Qurans asli dari sekitar 650 – kalifah Utsman dan ‘lain-lain. Klaim salah.

** 011 25/02: “- – – kabar gembira – – -.” Salah. Di satu yang terbaik dapat mengatakan bahwa Quran membawa beberapa kabar gembira untuk semua yang buruk, ingin menjarah dan budak dan kekuasaan, dan untuk beberapa kerinduan untuk agama yang kuat – – – kalau bukan karena Quran sendiri membuktikan 100% bahwa sesuatu yang sangat salah dalam buku ini. Jadi yang salah itu tidak dapat dibuat atau dihormati oleh dewa – bahkan oleh mini kecil dewa. Terlalu banyak yang salah dalam buku ini. Juga lihat 61/13.

012 2/29a: “- – – langit – – -“. Jamak dan salah – tidak ada 7 langit. Lihat 2/22b.

* 013 2/29b: “- – – Dia memberi perintah dan kesempurnaan ke tujuh langit – – -“. Cakrawala adalah kata lain untuk surga yang kita lihat, meskipun banyak digunakan untuk langit malam. Banyak tempat Al Qur’an menceritakan tentang tujuh langit atau firmaments atau saluran (kata “langit” atau yang sama digunakan dalam bentuk jamak dalam Al-Qur’an setidaknya 199 kali) – tidak ada keraguan bahwa menurut Quran terdapat 7 (bahan) langit . (Islam juga “tahu” yang mendiami langit yang berbeda – f. ex Yesus di surga 2, Joseph dalam 4, 5 Harun, Musa di 6, dan Abraham di surga 7, dan Allah di atas…… 7 surga,. untuk menyebutkan beberapa. Hal ini tidak dikatakan dalam Quran, meskipun). Ada juga ada keraguan bahwa Quran percaya bahwa langit bahan – jika bukan tidak mungkin untuk membangun atau untuk memperbaiki bintang-bintang ke langit paling bawah, seperti Quran menyatakan beberapa tempat. dewa ada yang percaya ini – tapi Muhammad lakukan, karena ini adalah apa yang diyakini di Timur Tengah pada saat Muhammad. Tujuh langit ini diambil dari astronomi Yunani kuno – atau mungkin dari astronomi Persia, yang juga percaya pada 7 langit. Setiap dewa, tapi tidak Muhammad, akan tahu itu sangat salah. Islam memiliki beberapa “penjelasan” tentang kesalahan ini sangat jelas, tapi kami tidak pernah melihat atau mendengar Muslim bahkan menyebutkan kemungkinan bahwa gambaran Muhammad tentang astronomi dapat dijelaskan oleh-Nya percaya kepada astronomi Yunani atau Persia.

Muslim kadang-kadang menjelaskan bahwa 7 di Arab tua itu sinonim untuk “banyak” (dan 70 untuk “sangat banyak”), dan bahwa Quran sehingga tidak berarti 7 tetapi banyak. Tapi jujur ​​”banyak” paling tidak salahnya dengan “7”.

* 014 2 / 32: “- – – itu adalah Engkau (Allah *) yang seni sempurna dalam pengetahuan dan kebijaksanaan”. Semua kesalahan membuktikan bahwa pembuat Quran tidak sempurna dalam pengetahuan, dan semua logika tidak valid membuktikan dia juga tidak sempurna dalam kebijaksanaan. Setidaknya ada sesuatu yang salah.

015 2 / 39: “- – – Tanda – – -” juga ditulis “Daftar”, “Tanda-Nya”, “(* Allah) kami ayat” atau “Saya (* Allah) Tanda” atau variasi lainnya. Dalam “Quran-berbicara” itu berarti indikasi atau bukti untuk Allah dan / atau keberadaan Quran. Dalam kenyataannya membuktikan apa-apa, karena tanpa pengecualian mereka hanya kehilangan pernyataan atau sebagai klaim longgar hanya tergantung di udara kosong, semua dibangun di atas apa-apa, karena tidak pernah terbukti atau didokumentasikan bahwa Allah benar-benar mengatakan atau melakukan atau menciptakan apa Quran di masing-masing kasus klaim dia katakan atau lakukan atau diciptakan, dan kemudian menggunakan sebagai “tanda”. Atau mereka beristirahat di klaim lain yang tidak terbukti. Menurut semua pemikiran manusia, semua hukum peradilan, dan juga menurut undang-undang bahkan lebih ketat logika seperti “bukti” tegas dan hanya tidak valid dan tanpa nilai apapun:. Setelah semua bukti yang valid adalah “Satu atau lebih fakta terbukti yang dapat memberi satu kesimpulan “, dan dalam Quran semua” tanda “tanpa pengecualian didasarkan pada mengklaim” fakta “bahwa baik buku maupun Islam membuktikan – atau mampu membuktikan (baik, mungkin ada beberapa pengecualian dalam” tanda “diambil dari Alkitab, tetapi mereka dalam kasus membuktikan Yahweh, bukan Allah – kita tahu bahwa umat Islam dan Quran suka mengatakan bahwa kedua saja adalah nama-nama berbeda untuk dewa yang sama, tetapi itu tidak benar kecuali dewa ini sangat sakit mental (skizofrenia ), sebagai ajaran-ajaran fundamental terlalu berbeda (lebih banyak tentang tempat-tempat lain di “1000 + Kesalahan dalam Quran “.)).

Selain itu ada fakta bahwa setiap imam dalam agama apapun dapat mengklaim persis sama untuk dewa-Nya (s) sebagai Muslim klaim untuk Allah, dalam benar-benar semua kasus di mana kata “tanda (s)” dalam Quran tidak dipinjam dari Alkitab, selama tidak ada bukti nyata atau tidak ada dokumentasi nyata dituntut melahirkan – kata adalah bahwa murah. “Baal membuat matahari terbit di timur. Allah tidak bisa membuatnya muncul di barat. Kemudian Baal adalah dewa nyata dan Allah satu palsu “Infantile” bukti “, tapi ini adalah jenis tingkat Anda temukan pada” tanda-tanda “dan” bukti “dalam Quran (Contoh ini diambil dari Quran -. Abraham membuktikan nya Allah dewa, tapi tentu saja dengan Allah sebagai pahlawan Totally valid sebagai bukti a)..

*** Seperti kata klaim secara logis benar-benar tanpa nilai sebagai indikasi / bukti untuk dewa, belum lagi untuk pesan tertentu dewa – f. ex. Allah. Dan dokumen fakta menarik: Islam tidak punya satu bukti tunggal tidak untuk Allah, atau untuk verifikasi dari Quran, atau untuk koneksi Muhammad untuk dewa. JIKA MEREKA SUDAH SUDAH SATU BUKTI TERSEBUT SATU – SATU KECIL BAHKAN A – BET ANDA SUDAH MEMBERITAHU MEREKA TENTANG IT DAN DIGUNAKAN IT! Islam hanya dibangun di atas kehilangan kata-kata dan sebagai klaim longgar dan belum terbukti – – – dibuat oleh seorang pria yang kata-kata tidak akan diterima sebagai “bonafide” bukti di Old Bailey, London. Mendasari mengklaim bahwa tanda-tanda yang disebut memiliki nilai sebagai bukti atau indikasi setidaknya untuk Allah hanya salah kecuali Islam pertama kali membuktikan bahwa Allah benar-benar / ada di balik “tanda”.

Anda menemukan kata yang digunakan banyak tempat dalam Quran.

016 2/41a: “Dan percaya pada apa yang saya (Allah *) mengungkapkan (yang * Quran) – – -“. Sebuah tuhan maha tahu tidak mengungkapkan buku dengan begitu banyak kesalahan.

017 2/41b: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

** 018 2/41c: “(The * Quran), membenarkan wahyu (PL – * Perjanjian Lama) yang dengan kamu (Yahudi *) – – -“. Quran tidak mengkonfirmasikan PL dan sama sekali tidak NT – pemikiran fundamental dan pengajaran terlalu berbeda terutama dari NT dan perjanjian baru (Matius 26/28, 14/24 Markus, Lukas 22/20) – perjanjian baru bahwa Muslim tidak menyebutkan, dan kecuali untuk yang berpendidikan tidak pernah diberitahu tentang.

019 2/42a: “- – – mencakup tidak Kebenaran dengan kepalsuan – – -“. Lihat 40/75.

* 020 2/42b: “- – – atau menutupi Kebenaran bila Anda tahu (apa itu)”. Untuk “kebenaran” lihat 40/75. Isi dari ini dan pintu masuk di atas: Hal ini dikatakan ditujukan pada orang-orang Yahudi yang tidak ingin salah paham 5 Mos. 18/15 (dan 18/18) yang berarti bahwa ayat ini menubuatkan Muhammad – (diterjemahkan dari Swedia): “Seorang nabi dari antara orang-orang sendiri, dari saudara Anda, Tuhan, Allahmu, biarkan datang kepada Anda. Dengarkanlah Dia “. Itu berarti Tuhan berkata: “Aku akan membiarkan seorang nabi muncul dari antara saudara-saudaramu – – -” Muslim berkata “saudara” di sini berarti orang Arab, dan bahwa Alkitab di sini berbicara tentang Muhammad.. Tapi sangat jujur: Saudara laki-laki Yahudi adalah Yahudi lain terutama karena konon ia akan datang “dari antara orang-orang sendiri” – orang-orang Yahudi sendiri ‘. (Kami menggunakan kata Yahudi, karena itu adalah kata normal hari ini, bahkan jika kata tersebut jauh lebih muda dari zaman Musa juga Yusuf Ali. Menggunakannya). Ini mungkin hanya meramalkan tentang Yesus, tetapi umat Muslim telah “disesuaikan” yang berarti.

Sebenarnya kata “saudara” atau yang sama digunakan dalam arti kiasan paling tidak 55 kali dalam PL, hampir selalu berarti lain orang Yahudi atau orang Yahudi lainnya (1 pengecualian: Sebuah pembicaraan raja kepada raja lain A pengecualian lainnya sangat sedikit:. Tentang orang Lot dan tentang Edom – keturunan Esau, saudara laki-laki patriark Yakub), dan benar-benar tidak pernah tentang orang Arab. Arab dan Arab yang disebutkan setengah lusin kali dalam Alkitab – tanpa terkecuali, baik dalam bentuk netral atau sebagai musuh, tidak pernah sebagai teman atau kerabat. Lebih buruk lagi – dan tidak pernah disebutkan oleh Muslim: Kata ini digunakan dalam Quran sekitar 30 kali, dan selalu tentang sesama (Muslim) Arab (satu pengecualian, di mana titik utama adalah bahwa orang-orang munafik yang buruk tetap bersatu). Sama sekali tidak ada tempat yang baik dalam Alkitab maupun di Quran mengekspresikan persaudaraan antara orang Yahudi dan Arab (tapi banyak yang bertentangan). Selain 5. Mos. 15. dan 18. terus ke 21. (PERNAH disebutkan oleh Muslim) yang menjelaskan bahwa seseorang akan mengenali nabi Tuhan di bahwa mereka membuat bernubuat, dan bernubuat benar. Muhammad tidak pernah membuat ramalan nyata – dia bahkan tidak berpura-pura atau mengaku memiliki karunia itu, tidak satu kali pun di seluruh Qur’an. (Dia hanya ada nabi sejati, tetapi meminjam yang mengesankan dan judul mengesankan.) Sebaliknya ia sibuk menjelaskan tentang mengapa ia tidak mampu membuat mukjizat (bernubuat adalah jenis keajaiban). Muhammad sehingga tidak bisa – juga karena 21. – Menjadi nabi Yahwe dijanjikan. Dan ketika ia dalam kenyataannya adalah seorang nabi sama sekali – dia sebagai disebutkan di atas tidak bahwa hadiah – dia benar-benar tidak bisa menjadi nabi khusus sebagaimana ia dalam kenyataannya tidak nabi (well, ada yang dibuat definisi lain untuk seorang nabi, tetapi tanpa bisa untuk membuat bernubuat sejati Anda ada nabi sejati), dan klaim yang keluar dari pertanyaan.

Ini hanya merupakan kasus dari sebuah kata yang mungkin untuk memberikan lebih dari satu arti, dan agama sangat membutuhkan dari kurangnya bukti untuk dianggap dewa mereka, dan dari kebutuhan tipis karena mereka palsu dijanjikan untuk menemukan bukti atau setidaknya indikasi di Alkitab, berpegang teguh pada pengertian yang asing bagi penggunaan normal Alkitab tentang kata, dan kutipan itu keluar dari konteks (5 Mos.. 18/21 bahkan membuat mustahil Muhammad sebagai penjelasan di sini), namun penuh angan-angan.

** Islam harus menghasilkan bukti yang kuat. Setelah semua itu adalah mereka yang menghasilkan klaim ini tidak mungkin, dan kemudian terserah kepada mereka untuk membuktikan itu – tidak sampai kepada orang lain untuk membuktikan kebalikannya. (Tapi kemudian kehidupan Islam di klaim belum terbukti dan pernyataan dan keyakinan buta).

00a 2 / 50: “- – – Kami (Allah *) dibagi laut untuk Anda (Musa dan orang Yahudi itu) – – -“. Dari tempat-tempat lain dalam Quran (dan dalam sebagian besar terjemahan Alkitab) itu adalah mengatakan bahwa ini adalah Laut Merah. Tapi dalam nama Ibrani asli adalah Yam Suph, yang juga bisa berarti “Lautan Alang-Alang” (ini juga ditegaskan dalam banyak catatan kaki NIV (“New International Version” dari Alkitab)). Laut dengan alang-alang (juga disebut Timsah Laut) digunakan untuk menjadi sebuah danau besar dimana Terusan Suez sekarang berjalan – tidak jauh dari Laut Bitter. Nama mengatakan itu hanya sebuah danau dangkal – di buluh terpanjang kami telah mampu menemukan, adalah jenis beras yang bisa sampai dengan 5 -7 m panjang dan tumbuh di laut besar Tonle Sap di Kamboja, dan alang-alang tumbuh di daerah Mesir lebih pendek – – – dan air tidak bisa lebih dalam dari buluh mendapatkan mereka “kepala” di atas air “.

Juga melihat peta: Gosyen di mana orang-orang Yahudi menetap berada di delta sungai Nil. Untuk sampai ke Sinai mereka harus pergi ke selatan-selatan-timur. Ini akan menjadi kebodohan melampaui kredibilitas untuk pergi sejauh barat bahwa mereka berakhir di sebelah barat Laut Merah, dan dengan demikian gaya seperti sejumlah besar orang dan hewan untuk menyeberangi laut dengan perahu mereka tidak memiliki (ingat mereka tidak tahu tentang pembukaan laut – api / asap-kolom atau tidak (= pathfinder di / Yahweh sesuai dengan Alkitab)). Setelah semua mereka menurut Alkitab 600ooo laki-laki + perempuan + + anak-anak hewan dan barang. (Secara teoritis sangat mungkin untuk 70 – 100 (tergantung pada seberapa banyak istri 11 anak laki-lakinya dalam kelompok itu) orang yang datang dengan Jacob + Yusuf dan keluarganya, menjadi mungkin 2000ooo “Yahudi” 430 tahun kemudian.)

Sains mengatakan bahwa – jika Keluaran berlangsung – yang “Yahudi” sangat mungkin itu menyusul saat mereka berjalan atau berkemah di sepanjang danau itu.

* 021 2 / 53: “- – – Kami (Allah *) berikan kepada Musa kitab – – -“. Buku-buku dinamai Musa (Taurat) tidak ditulis oleh Musa. Musa hidup (jika dia tidak fiksi a) sekitar 1300-1200 SM (jika Keluaran dari Mesir benar-benar terjadi, itu mengambil tempat ca 1235 SM masa pemerintahan Ramses II. Menurut ilmu), dan buku-buku itu ditulis tidak lebih cepat dari ca. 800 SM – mungkin hingga akhir 500 SM – juga menurut ilmu. dewa A sudah tahu bahwa, sementara Muhammad tahu apa-apa tentang usia asli mereka, dan harus menebak. (Untuk menjadi tepat: Alkitab mengatakan bahwa Yahweh menyuruh Musa hukum – tidak ada bahan kecuali dua tablet batu dimana sepuluh Perintah tertulis, dibawa turun dari gunung – dan bahwa ia diberitahu hukum dan dirinya sendiri menuliskannya sesudahnya. PL juga mengatakan bahwa ketika Salomo memindahkan Tabut Perjanjian ke Bait Allah di Yerusalem (1.Kings 8 / 9), hanya berisi dua tablet batu ada apa-apa tentang “Kitab Musa”, meskipun PL membuatnya jelas. bahwa ada hukum secara tertulis dan ditemukan lagi nanti -. tapi ilmu adalah sepakat bahwa Kitab Musa (anda juga melihatnya ditulis dalam bentuk tunggal) yang ditulis lebih kemudian Jika Muslim mengklaim sesuatu yang lain, mereka harus menghasilkan bukti-bukti) The. hukum benar-benar merupakan bagian dari Taurat / Kitab Musa.

022 2 / 61: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00b 2/65-66: “Kami (Allah *) berkata kepada mereka:” Jadilah kamu kera yang hina dan ditolak ‘. Maka Kami menjadikannya sebagai contoh untuk waktu mereka sendiri dan keturunan mereka, dan pelajaran bagi orang-orang yang takut Allah “. Bahwa manusia diubah menjadi kera adalah pernyataan yang luar biasa. Sebuah pernyataan yang luar biasa membutuhkan bukti luar biasa. Quran di sini menawarkan bukti sama sekali.

00C 2 / 73: “Allah berfirman:” Pukullah (tubuh) dengan sepotong (sapi) ‘. Demikianlah Allah bringet orang mati hidup – – – “. Hal ini tidak mungkin untuk bangun yang mati dengan cara ini. Islam akan harus menghasilkan bukti kuat – terutama karena cerita ini tidak dalam Alkitab, dan dengan demikian diambil dari legenda.

** 023 2 / 75: “- – – melihat bahwa segolongan dari mereka (orang-orang Yahudi di Madinah *) mendengar firman Allah, dan menyimpang itu sadar setelah mereka memahaminya – – -.” Salah. Sains telah menunjukkan dengan sangat jelas bahwa Alkitab tidak dipalsukan – akibatnya yang belum pernah sesuatu seperti Quran. Dan Jika Islam berarti sesuatu yang lain, mereka harus membawa bukti-bukti, tidak hanya mengklaim toilet dan laporan bahkan lebih longgar. Jika Islam bahkan punya bukti kecil, dunia telah dipaksa untuk mendengarnya setiap dua jam atau lebih – setidaknya.

* Kita dapat menambahkan bahwa Islam dan Muslim di sini mencoba untuk menggunakan Alkitab untuk membuktikan kata-kata mereka – f. ex. Yeremia 23/36: “Kamu telah menyimpang kata-kata dari Allah yang hidup.” Adalah salah satu ini ketidakjujuran pada dua tingkatan:

  1. Ini adalah untuk satu hal dikutip di luar konteks. Yeremia mengatakan: “Jika seorang nabi atau imam atau orang lain klaim, ‘Ini merupakan peramal TUHAN (Yahweh *), I (Yahweh *) akan menghukum bahwa manusia dan rumah tangganya. – – – Tapi Anda tidak harus menyebutkan ‘peramal TUHAN’ lagi karena (jika Anda lakukan *) setiap kata manusia menjadi oracle dan sehingga Anda mengubah kata-kata dari Allah yang hidup “. (NIV). Ada jurang antara makna dan arti di atas dipelintir sedikit kutipan dari Alkitab. Jujur dan sedikit menjijikkan – dan cukup mengungkapkan tentang beberapa metode Muslim dan tidak memiliki fakta-fakta nyata dan argumen.
  2. * (Muhammad hidup kehilangan semua anaknya kecuali satu anak perempuan – hukuman untuk mengklaim untuk mewakili alias Yahweh Allah?)
  3. Bahkan jika sudah benar – bahkan jika Yeremia mengatakan bahwa Yahudi telah sesat (walaupun “sesat” adalah kata kuat daripada “menyimpang”) ini tidak mengatakan satu milimeter tentang teks Quran menyimpang, seperti ditunjukkan di sini adalah, distorsi hanya Taurat.

Mengetahui bahwa ini diambil dari luas dan sangat berharga “Pesan dari Quran”, dikanonisasi atau setidaknya disertifikasi oleh lembaga-lembaga intelektual Islam terkemuka di dunia, kasus seperti ini memberi kita rasa buruk pada nama mereka: Untuk resor untuk ketidakjujuran intelektual semacam ini memalukan ketika tahu.

Dan untuk alasan apa? Hanya untuk menjadi benar, bukan untuk mencoba mencari tahu apa yang benar. Hal ini terlepas dari fakta bahwa harga jika mereka salah, adalah hilangnya jiwa masing-masing dan setiap Muslim – – – jika ada Neraka dalam kehidupan mungkin berikutnya.

* 024 2 / 79: “Maka kecelakaan yang besarlah bagi mereka yang menulis Al Kitab dengan tangan mereka sendiri (= memalsukan *) – – -.” Lihat 2 / 75 di atas. (Dan Tuhan tidak membuat buku dengan fakta begitu banyak salah dan kesalahan lain seperti Anda temukan dalam Quran:? Bagaimana jika itu adalah sebuah pemalsuan – itu kemudian “Celakalah” Muhammad – ia f. ex punya hampir tidak ada anak dengan semua. istri-istrinya dan kehilangan hampir semua beberapa anak ia sampai Dan tidak ada bukti untuk apakah dia berakhir di neraka atau surga -.. jika orang tersebut ada)

025 2 / 87: “Kami (Allah *) memberikan Musa Kitab – – -“. Lihat 2 / 53.

* 026 2/89a: “Kemudian datang kepada mereka (orang-orang Yahudi di Madinah *) Buku (yang * Quran) dari Allah – – -“. Sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan, tidak valid “bukti” dsb, bukan dari tuhan maha tahu? Lihat 41/12.

* 027 2/89b: “- – – (a Book (Quran *)) membenarkan apa dengan mereka (Yahudi dan Kristen *) (Taurat dan Alkitab) – – -“, yang berarti bahwa Quran menegaskan Taurat dan kitab suci Yahudi lainnya dan sisanya dari Alkitab. Tapi terlalu banyak prinsip-prinsip dasar berbeda – Quran ada konfirmasi dari baik Taurat, dll, bukan dari Alkitab, belum lagi dari Perjanjian Baru (NT) di mana agama Kristen dibangun. F. ex. “Jangan membunuh” vs “Kau tidak boleh membunuh tanpa alasan yang baik”, nilai dan perselisihan untuk “domba hilang”, vs “Anda tidak akan meratapi zalim yang berakhir di Neraka”, “Kasihilah musuhmu “vs” Bunuh musuh mana pun Anda menemukannya “, dan” Cinta musuh Anda “vs hasutan dan perintah perang dan kebencian dan diskriminasi dari” kafir “, hanya untuk menyebutkan beberapa perbedaan yang besar. Belum lagi “kerajaan saya bukan dari dunia ini” dan “memberikan pada Tuhan apa yang milik Allah, dan ke Kaisar apa yang menjadi milik Kaisar” – yang berarti uang terakhir – (diterjemahkan dari Swedia), dibandingkan dengan: Berjuang untuk Allah dan Muhammad sampai semua non-Muslim yang benar-benar ditekan dan membayar pajak tambahan.

028 2/89c: “- – – ketika datang kepada mereka (orang-orang Yahudi di Madinah *) yang (teks yang kemudian menjadi * Quran) yang mereka seharusnya diakui (yang menunjukkan mereka harus mengakui teks dari Muhammad dalam mereka PL / Torah ). Salah – pemikiran dasar yang mendasari dan banyak rincian yang begitu berbeda, bahwa satu-satunya yang mungkin untuk mengenali, adalah sesuatu yang sangat salah.

029 2 / 90: “- – – (wahyu (Al Qur’an *)) yang diturunkan Allah – – -“. mahatahu Tidak ada tuhan yang pernah dibuat, dikirim ke bawah atau dihormati sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan dan bahwa logika tidak valid banyak.

030 2/91a: “Percayalah pada apa yang telah diturunkan Allah (= para * Al-Quran)”. Apakah benar-benar Allah yang diturunkan sebuah buku dengan begitu banyak fakta salah? Cukup no – tidak jika dia mahatahu.

031 2/91b: “- – – namun mereka menolak semua selain itu, bahkan jika itu kebenaran (dalam * Al-Quran)”. Sebuah buku dengan begitu banyak fakta-fakta salah paling-paling hanya sebagian kebenaran.

032 2/91c: “- – – mengkonfirmasikan apa yang dengan mereka (Taurat, dll, (= PL *) dan Alkitab *)”. Quran ada konfirmasi dari baik Taurat maupun Alkitab – lihat 2 / 89 di atas + 3 / 3 di bawah ini.

*** 00d 2 / 93: “Kami (orang-orang Yahudi di Madinah *) mendengar dan kami taat”. Muhammad Asad menambahkan (com.77): “Bahkan jika mereka tidak mengucapkan kata-kata, perilaku kemudian mereka membenarkan kutipan”. Tapi kata-kata yang tidak dikatakan, tidak berkata, dan tidak dapat dikutip dalam kejujuran – akan sebuah resor dewa untuk argumen seperti itu? Dan kenapa bahwa kutipan ini adalah dalam Quran – mungkin miliaran tahun dan sempurna dan dihormati oleh Allah – jika mereka tidak mengatakannya? – Dan berapa banyak argumen jadi lainnya yang Anda dalam hal temukan dalam Quran?

*** 033 2 / 94: “Jika yang terakhir Home, dengan Allah (Yahweh *), bagi Anda (Yahudi *) khusus, dan bukan untuk orang lain, kemudian mencari kematian kamu, jika kamu memang tulus – – -” . Salah. Seorang Yahudi (atau seorang Kristen) tidak dapat mencari maut untuk pergi ke Surga, karena pembunuhan diri – juga secara tidak langsung – adalah dosa serius (menghancurkan karunia dari Tuhan – hidup Anda) = berakhir di neraka. Setiap dewa sudah tahu – tetapi jelas bukan Muhammad. Lebih buruk: Muslaim ulama hari ini mengetahui hal ini, tetapi gunakan bagaimanapun argumen dalam jemaat mereka.

00e 2 / 95: “Tetapi mereka (Yahudi *) tidak akan mencari kematian, pada rekening (dosa) yang tangan mereka telah dikirim sebelum mereka.” Alasannya lebih mungkin adalah satu disebutkan dalam 2 / 94 di atas.

034 2/97a: “- – – dia (Gabriel *) membawa turun (wahyu (Al Qur’an *)) untuk Mu jantung oleh Allah akan – – -“. Tidak ada tuhan maha tahu turunkan sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan dan kontradiksi dan bahwa logika tidak valid banyak.

035 2/97b: “- – – konfirmasi dari apa yang terjadi sebelumnya (Taurat + Injil *)”. Salah. Lihat 2 / 89 di atas dan 3 / 3 di bawah ini.

* 036 2/97c: “- – – kabar gembira – – -“. Salah. Di satu yang terbaik dapat mengatakan bahwa Quran membawa beberapa kabar gembira kepada semua yang buruk, ingin menjarah dan budak dan kekuasaan, dan kerinduan some0nes bagi sebuah agama yang kuat – – – kalau bukan karena Quran sendiri membuktikan 100% bahwa sesuatu yang sangat salah dalam buku ini. Jadi yang salah itu tidak dapat dibuat atau dihormati oleh dewa – bahkan oleh mini kecil dewa. Terlalu banyak yang salah dalam buku ini. Juga lihat 61/13.

037 2/99a: “Kami (Allah *) telah menurunkan kepadamu (orang *) nyata Tanda – – -” “. Quran kelebihan beban dengan apa yang disebutnya sebagai” tanda “(ditunjukkan untuk menjadi bukti) dan Clear” Tanda-tanda atau seperti di sini “Tanda-tanda yang nyata” (ditunjukkan untuk menjadi bukti kuat) – dan tidak satu pun dari mereka membuktikan apa-apa tentang Allah atau Al-Quran atau Muhammad, sebagai buku PERNAH membuktikan, klaim hanya, bahwa Allah melakukan ini atau yang kemudian panggilan “tanda” atau “tanda yang jelas” atau “bukti” (mungkin ada beberapa pengecualian untuk tanda-tanda yang diambil dari Alkitab, tetapi mereka dalam kasus membuktikan Yahweh, bukan Allah – dan hanya Islam mengklaim bahwa Yahweh dan Allah adalah tuhan yang sama (yang mereka tidak bisa, kecuali tuhan adalah penderita skizofrenia – terlalu berbeda, terutama ketika Yahweh adalah bertindak sesuai dengan Perjanjian Baru dari NT (f. ex. mereka Lukas 22/20), yang datang sekitar 580 tahun sebelum Muhammad mulai khotbah-Nya , tetapi umat Islam tidak pernah menyebutkan) Khusus klaim untuk “Hapus Tanda” begitu jelas salah, bahwa tidak mungkin untuk tidak menyertakan mereka dalam kolom ini: “fakta keliru” Mereka bukan tanda – dan pasti ada tanda-tanda yang jelas – untuk.. dewa, dan bahkan jika mereka, mereka benar-benar ada tanda-tanda yang jelas bagi Allah,

karena setiap imam di agama apapun bisa membuat klaim yang sama hanya untuk dewa atau dewa – kata adalah bahwa murah – – – juga bagi Muhammad.

* 038 2/99b: “Kami telah turunkan kepadamu (orang *) manifest Tanda (ayat), dan tidak menolak mereka, tetapi mereka yang sesat – – -” Salah.. Untuk pertanyaan “tanda-tanda” yang tidak terbukti berasal dari Allah, dan dengan demikian secara logis tidak valid sebagai tanda, belum lagi sebagai bukti, bukan tanda yang buruk – sebaliknya; membuta untuk percaya di dalamnya tanpa bertanya adalah yang kuat indikasi yang naif, terutama ketika ada yang tahu bagaimana moral merosot sumber hanya untuk Quran – Muhammad – itu.

* 039 2/101a: Dan ketika datang kepada mereka Rasul dari Allah – – – “.” Bisakah seorang pria membuat banyak kesalahan sehingga dalam buku yang didiktekan – mungkin atas nama Allah – benar-benar menjadi utusan dari dewa maha tahu? Atau jika ia tidak membuat kesalahan, dan Quran palsu – adalah ia kemudian dari Allah? Sebuah tuhan maha tahu hanya tidak menurunkan buku dengan banyak kesalahan, dll

040 2/101b: “- – – pihak dari Ahli Kitab (di sini orang-orang Yahudi – Ahli Kitab = Yahudi dan Kristen, dan” Kitab “dalam hubungan ini adalah Alkitab *) melemparkan Kitab Allah (yang * Quran), seolah-olah (sudah sesuatu) mereka tidak tahu! “Quran di sini mengatakan bahwa orang Yahudi mengakui Quran dari PL. Itulah salah – ada perbedaan begitu mendasar dan begitu banyak poin yang berbeda antara Quran dan Alkitab, bahwa satu-satunya yang mungkin untuk mengetahui, adalah sesuatu yang sama sekali salah. Salah satu bukti untuk ini, adalah bahwa mayoritas mutlak dari ribuan orang Yahudi di wilayah tersebut menolak untuk menerima Islam – bahkan dalam menghadapi kehancuran atau perbudakan atau kematian.

041 2 / 101: “(Muhammad *) membenarkan apa (Alkitab, dll *) adalah dengan mereka (Yahudi dan Kristen *)”. Salah. Lihat 2 / 89.

042 2 / 102: “- – – pembeli (sihir) – – -“. Magic hanya takhayul – tuhan manapun telah mengetahui hal ini.

* 00f 2 / 105: “Tetapi Allah akan memilih untuk Mercy khusus-Nya siapa yang Dia kehendaki – – -“. Muhammad Asad sini menjelaskan bahwa hal ini menyatakan bahwa orang Yahudi dan Kristen menolak untuk percaya pada Muhammad dan Quran, karena Muhammad adalah dari “luar” – Quran, Islam dan Muslim mengulangi dan mengulangi klaim belum terbukti dan disuses sebagai sebuah “penjelasan” , sedangkan alasan utama sebenarnya kenapa mereka tidak menerima agama baru Muhammad, adalah bahwa ada seperti jumlah dan perbedaan mendasar tersebut dari Alkitab, sesuatu yang jelas sangat salah. Selain itu, orang-orang Yahudi – yang mayoritas mutlak non-Arab di daerah itu – percaya bahwa mereka memiliki perjanjian dengan Yahweh, dan keduanya Quran dan modern waktu Islam dan Muslim cukup jujur ​​tidak pernah lagi fakta ini sebagai alasan utama mengapa orang-orang Yahudi tidak tertarik dengan ajaran Muhammad: Pembatasan dan agama sangat berbeda adalah dua alasan mengapa mereka tidak tertarik dalam Islam – bukan apa yang klaim Quran dan Islam dan klaim dan klaim (seperti biasa bagi mereka benar-benar tanpa bukti atau dokumentasi): – bahwa alasan adalah bahwa Muhammad bukanlah seorang Yahudi.

043 2/107a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah (tidak ada 7 langit). Lihat 2/22a.

* 00g 2/107b: “Dan selain-Nya kamu (orang *) tidak memiliki pelindung dan penolong.” Well, Yesus mengatakan berkali-kali dan di depan banyak saksi bahwa ia dapat membantu, dan bahkan Quran mengakui bahwa Yesus adalah jujur.

044 2 / 108: “Tetapi barangsiapa changeth dari Faith (Islam *) untuk Ketidakpercayaan, telah menyimpang tanpa keraguan dari cara bahkan (jalan menuju surga *)”. Dengan semua kesalahan, contrasictions, dan logika yang salah dalam Quran, ada keraguan yang paling nyata, dan alasan untuk ragu, untuk itu Islam dapat menjadi “jalan bahkan” untuk Paradise – ini lebih dari itu jika orang tahu bahwa satu-satunya sumber untuk cerita-cerita dalam Quran, adalah orang sangat moral merosot dan menyatakan diri Nabi Muhammad (yang tidak memiliki karunia dapat melakukan bernubuat, namun menggunakan judul bagus semua sama) – hampir semua nabi memproklamirkan diri melalui waktu telah berubah menjadi nabi-nabi palsu ingin sesuatu dalam hidup ini – biasanya uang, perempuan dan / atau kekuasaan – tanpa peduli terlalu banyak untuk berarti mereka digunakan. Muhammad di sedikitnya perempuan ingin dan kekuasaan. (Dan mana semua end Muslim jika Islam adalah cara yang salah dan mereka menemukan sudah terlambat?)

045 2 / 109: “- – – setelah Kebenaran (Al Qur’an *) telah menjadi nyata – – -“. Quran di terbaik adalah sebagian kebenaran – terlalu banyak kesalahan, terlalu banyak kontradiksi, logika bengkok juga bubur, dll

046 2/113a: “- – – mereka (Yahudi dan Kristen *) mengaku mempelajari Kitab (yang sama).” Salah karena dua alasan: Pertama: orang-orang Yahudi hanya memiliki Perjanjian Lama (PL). Two: The Christian religion is built on NT, with OT mainly as historical background – a fact that opponents often forget or “forget”.

**047 2/113b: “Yet they (Jews and Christians*) (profess to) study the same Book”. Ini hanya sebagian benar. Studi Yahudi hanya PL. Christians build their religion on the much milder and more human NT and the new covenant (Luke 22/20) – the covenant Muslims never mention – with OT mainly as historical background. Ini adalah fakta yang sering dilupakan atau “lupa” ketika seseorang berbicara tentang agama Kristen – terutama bila seseorang ingin cat agama sehitam mungkin.

*048 2/116a: “They say; ‘Allah has begotten a son”, (which the Quran vehemently denies*). But Jesus often called God/Yahweh father – there were many, many witnesses to this. If he spoke the truth – and even the Quran says he was an honest person – this in case means the Quran is wrong here. (Yahweh is called the father of Jesus at least 163 times in the Bible, and Jesus the son of Yahweh at least 66 times. And remember: In spite of undocumented claims from Islam, science has shown that the Bible is not falsified).

049 2/116b: “And on earth: everything renders worship to Him.” From other places in the Quran one knows that “everything” is meant literally – every living being and all inanimate things. As one never observes any other living beings, not to mention inanimate things, than Muslims worship Allah – and except for humans even no god – and the same for inanimate things, and the nature thus shows that the claim is not true, this is one of the claims that must be deemed untrue unless Islam proves it. Proves, not only states or claims. (To quote remark 120 in Abdullah Yusuf Ali: “The Meaning of the Quran”: “- – – everything in heaven and earth celebrates the glory of Allah”. But like normal for Muslims it only is a claim – no documentation, no proof, and no real explanation).

050 2/117a: “Verily, We (Allah*) has sent thee (Muhammad*) in truth – – -“. All the mistakes, etc. in the Quran tells that this cannot be true – that he was not sent by an omniscient god.

051 2/117b: “- – – We (Allah*) have sent thee (Muhammad*) in truth – – -“. Well, that is a very central question: How much of what Muhammad told, was true?

052 2/118: “We (Allah*) have indeed made clear the Signs unto any people who hold firmly to Faith – – -.” There simply are no valid clear signs – proofs – for Allah anywhere in the Quran. See 2/99 above.

053 2/119a: “Verily, We (Allah*) have sent thee (Muslims/people*) in truth a bearer of glad tidings and a warner (= Muhammad) – – -.” No omniscient god has sent a bearer of tidings in which so much is wrong.

054 2/119b: “- – – glad tidings – – -“. That the Quran is “glad tidings” at very best is only partly true. See 2/97c above and 61/13 below.

055 2/120: “The Guidance of Allah (the Quran*) – that is the only Guidance”. A book with so many mistakes, so much invalid logic, and so much inhumanity is not at all a guidance – at best a misguidance.

056 2/125a: “- – – take ye the Station of Abraham (in/near Kabah*) – – -”. Abraham never was in Mecca. See 2/127 below.

057 2/125b: “- – – the Station of Abraham – – -“ is a mark in a stone. Muhammad indicated and Islam says that mark was made from Abraham’s feet when he stood there and built the Kabah. Let the fact that Abraham never was in Mecca (unless Islam proves it – see 2/127 below) aside: No worker building something ever stood so long at one and the same place, that his feet made a mark in a solid natural stone – marks visible centuries later. Now, Islam tells the mark (actually 2 – one for each foot) is a result of a miracle, as they claim the stone turned so soft that Abraham’s feet sank into it. (They also claim that the stone is from Jannah – (the gardens of Heaven)). Well, Islam has till now even proved that Abraham even ever visited Mecca, a place that was very prohibitting for him and his big flocks of animals – a barren desert to quote Muslims, and his claimed first trip even before the Zamzam well even was found, according to Islam – laying behind forbidding desert lands through which he had to lead all his sheep, goats, cows, etc. and find food and water for them – and he had many as he was a rich man. And on top of all a place very far from where he lived and a place without any attractions for a big owner of cattle, etc. Believe it whoever wants – but go to a doctor if you believe this and the rest of that story (big mosque built by 2 nomads, Ishmael bringing a big stone – too big to lift – for his father to stand on, and a stone shining so strongly that Allah had to switch off its light) without reasonable proofs.

058 2/125c: “- – – We covenanted with Abraham and Ishmael, that they should sanctify my House (Kabah in Mecca*)”. Abraham and Ishmael had nothing to do with the building of the Kabah – see 2/127 below.

059 2/126: “- – – Abraham said: ‘Make this (Mecca*) a City Of Peace – – -.” Wrong. Abraham never was in Mecca, unless Islam produces solid proofs for it. See 2/217 just below.

**060 2/127a: “And remember that Abraham and Ishmael raised the foundations of the House (Kabah*) (with this prayer): – – – “. Abraham never built the foundation of Kabah (and a contradiction; other verses say he built the building, not only the foundation of it) – and there are several reasons for that:

  1. Ia lahir di Ur di Kasdim (jika dia benar-benar ada) di tempat yang sekarang Irak selatan. Together with his father, (Tarah according to the Bible), he later travelled northwest up along the Euphrates valley to Karan in what is now north Iraq. Bertahun-tahun kemudian ia terus selatan barat daya untuk Kaanan dan Sikem kota yang sekarang disebut Israel (Sikem adalah utara Yerusalem itu. Sekarang bernama Nablus). Artinya ia melakukan perjalanan bersama Bulan Sabit Subur disebut – rute alam ketika Anda bepergian dengan kawanan hewan. alternatif adalah untuk mengambil jalan pintas melalui padang pasir Arab, tetapi hanya sedikit banyak domba dan kambing dan sapi akan bertahan seperti perjalanan. Dia tidak pernah mengunjungi Mekah dalam perjalanan dari Ur ke Sikem. (Selain ini terlalu dini dalam cerita – Ismail belum lahir, dan ia merupakan bagian dari bangunan Kabah menurut Quran).
  2. Abraham kemudian menetap di bagian barat Kaanan (sekarang sekitar Israel), sedangkan keponakannya Lot menetap di lembah Yordan lebih ke timur. Later Abraham moved south to Negev in Sinai. Negev saat ini paling dikenal untuk gurun, tetapi tidak semua adalah padang pasir. All this is according to the Bible, but the Quran has no conflicting information, except that his father had another name. The point is that between Kaanan and Mecca and even more between Negev and Mecca are hundreds and hundreds of kilometres of the tough and dry and hot Arab desert. Abraham kaya dan memiliki hewan ternak besar. Dia tidak bisa mengambil orang-orang besar kawanan domba, dll, melalui padang pasir itu.
  3. Abraham tinggal ratusan kilometer dari Mekah – dan harus melewati daerah yang keras untuk mendapatkan ke dan dari. Nobody builds a big temple for himself and his family at a place they can never or nearly never visit.
  4. Abraham was a nomad. Nomads do not have the know-how and technology to build large stone buildings.Abraham simply was not involved in the building of Kabah, and it is highly unlikely he ever visited Mecca and even the Arab peninsula. It looks like a fairy tale made up to give weight to Kabah and to Islam. And not least to Muhammad, who 2500 years later could tell he was direct descendant from Abraham – without the slightest written paper from all those years. 2500 years of mostly an-alphabetic nomads without any written history. Believe it if you want – and if you know who was your forefather the year 500 BC (= ca. 2500 years ago).

    It also is worth adding that Muslims say that Mecca was where Abraham’s (or actually Sarah’s) slave, Hagar, and his and her child Ismael (Ishmael) were sent away from Abraham’s camp, that the two lived there, and that Abraham frequently visited them later. There is no source of information for this. The OT says they lived in Negev, which is weeks by camel from Mecca – and much, much longer for large flocks of sheep, goats, and cattle (American cowboys driving flocks of cattle to the railway, made 10-12 miles – 16-20 km – a day. The nomads in the south hardly moved any faster – – – if they could find water). In addition to the long time it would take, many animals hardly would survive the long trek through the harsh Arab desert. And there was in addition no reason for him and his family to take such a dangerous and meaningless trip with their animals to a barren and dry valley. And as he never visited Mecca, he could not have left Hagar and Ismael there (this even more so as the Bible mention that Ishmael lived near the border of Egypt and got his wife from Egypt (see just below) – – – and science has proved that the Bible is not falsified – the easy way out for Muslims when the Bible mentions things they do not like). If Islam wants to insist that he ever visited Mecca, they have to produce strong proofs, as it is extremely unlikely – and “special statements demands special proofs”. It is highly likely this just is a story made up or “borrowed” from f. ex. folklore to give the teachings of Muhammad credence.

  5. One more fact: The Bible – a book that Islam insists is correct every time there is some text they like, but that may be the truth other times, too, says (1. Mos. 21/21): “While he (Ishmael*) was living in the Desert of Paran, his mother got a wife for him from Egypt”. Except for religious Muslims that strongly wishes this to be a reference to Paran or Faran near Mecca, all serious scientists say that this was Paran in Sinai – – – which also made it easier for his mother (who was from Egypt) to find him a wife from Egypt even though that made his children ¾ Egyptian and only ¼ descendants of Abraham’s stock (there is mentioned only one wife for Ishmael).
  6. Further (1. Mos. 25/18): “His (Ishmael’s) descendants settled in the area from Havila to Shur, near the border of Egypt, as you go toward Asshur”. The border of Egypt means near the Red Sea. Just where most scientists place Paran. (It is a bit ironic that Islam say the Bible has the name correct, but all the rest of the information about place, wife from (neighbouring) Egypt, etc. wrong. But if you go looking, you will find that according to Islam, the Bible never has a mistake and is reliable when what it says fits Islam. But when it tells things or facts that contradicts Islam, the Bible is falsified – or like here one simply omits the contradicting facts – – – which one safely can do, as hardly any Muslim knows tha Bible well enough to see the cherry-picking of information). And NB: This was written 1000 or more years before Muhammad, and with no reason to place Ishmael far from Arabia if it was not the truth.

To go all the way to Mecca was too forbidding for a man with large flocks of animal – and there never was a reason to go there for Abraham. On the contrary: Little food for his animals, no water in Mecca before the Zamzam was found later (?) – and Ishmael living “near the border of Egypt”. He never was in Mecca and consequently never built the Kabah – the big temple that he anyhow did not have the know-how to build, and worse; could not use, because he lived the better part of 1000 km away.

061 2/127b: “And remember Abraham and Ishmael raised the foundations of the House (Kabah*)”. See 2/127.

062 2/129: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

00h 2/130: “- – – the religion of Abraham (= Islam*) – – -.” The Quran often claims that Islam = the religion of Abraham. But it always was and only is a claim – no proof, no documentation – not even a try to explain, except the undocumented and not proved claim that everyone that say something else are lying, and that other scriptures that science deems more reliable (not proven 100%, but far more likely to be true) are falsifications, even though science has shown that they are not falsified – may be are not everything true in the Bible, too, but science has clearly shown it is not falsified. (To prove it 100.0% of course is impossible – there always will be theoretical or made up possibilities. But it is proved at least 99.5% – far beyond any judicial definition of the word – and if Islam claims something else, they will have to produce proofs, not only claims that are not even based on a likely theory about how all the thousands of different manuscript shall have had so many chapters and verses falsified in exactly the same way – spread over all the world one knew at that time. All that Islam offers, is a stubborn claim – not even a theory about how it should be possible to falsify everything, or about why all the thousands of old manuscripts that science knows, show it is not falsified. For comparison: Islam’s claims about falsifications of the Bible are not proved even 0,5%. They only are claims.

No proof. No documentation even though there exist thousands of documents. Only a stubborn claim based on nothing but a book with lots of mistakes dictated by a man with questionable moral and a lust for power to say the least of it.

063 2 / 131: “Tuhan semesta alam”. The Quran tells about 7 (flat) worlds (65/12) – one above the other according to Hadith. Wrong (One small detail: In Abdullah Yusuf Ali (the same Yusuf Ali, but revised after his death): “The Meaning of the Holy Quran”, 11. edition, the word is changed from “the Worlds” to “the Universe” – one my guess why.

064 2/135: “- – – the Religion of Abraham, the True (religion*) – – -“. Menurut Quran tersebut, Abraham adalah seorang Muslim. Tapi melihat semua kesalahan lainnya dan logika bengkok dan cerita-cerita dalam Quran – Islam harus menghasilkan bukti nyata bahwa itu benar. Juga lihat 2 / 130 di atas.

065 2/136a: “- – – the revelations (the Quran*) given to us (Muhammad/Muslims*)”. Were they really given? – and were they really revelations? Under no circumstances did such revelations/the Quran come from an omniscient god – not that full of mistakes, etc.

*66 2/136b: “We (Allah*) make no difference between one or another of them (prophets*) – – -“. There is one distinction at least Yahweh makes: Between real and false prophets. The criterion for being a real prophet, is that you make prophesies – and that the prophesies come true. If not he is a false prophet (5. Mos. 18/21). Muhammad made during all his life not one real prophesy. (There were a few sayings that were remembered because they happened to become true – the others were forgotten like normal in such cases – but no real prophesies. He never – no place in the Quran and hardly in all the Hadiths – even claimed to have the gift of making prophesies). Was he then really a prophet – or did he simply “borrow” an impressive title? He simply was not a prophet. A messenger for someone or something perhaps – or an apostle, but no prophet. But if either the Quran or the Bible or both speak the truth concerning this, Jesus clearly was. The Quran, though, reduces Jesus as much as possible, and simply skips the question of Muhammad’s right to the title – as so often the book treats things for a fact without the slightest proof or documentation.

067 2/136b: “We (Allah*) make no difference between one or another of them (prophets*) – – -“. Wrong. The Quran makes a great difference between Muhammad – even though he was no real prophet, as he did not have the gift of being able to make prophesies – and all other prophets. If Allah made no difference between them, then why is there so big difference in the Quran?

00i 2/137: “- – – (Muslims are*) on the right path – – -“. Can a “path” based on a book full of mistakes and dictated by a man of very doubtful moral, really be said to be “the right path”?

068 2/139: “- – – (Allah*) is our (Muslims’*) Lord and your (non-Muslim’s*) Lord – – -“. As this claim only is based on other, not proven claims, and especially as there exists other possibilities where at least some are based on stronger traditions, this is an invalid statement, unless it is proved.

00j 2/140: “- – – do ye know better than Allah?” (- about the old patriarchs, etc. of Israel.)

  1. Tidak – jika Allah benar-benar ada dan mahatahu dan dihubungi Muhammad. Semua yang tampaknya perlu ragu menilai dari semua kesalahan, dll dalam Quran.
  2. Mungkin – jika Allah benar-benar ada, namun tidak maha tahu, tetapi dihubungi Muhammad – yang Muhammad hanya mengaku, tidak pernah terbukti, meskipun harus mungkin bagi Allah.
  3. Yes – if Allah really exists, but did not contact Muhammad. Ilmu pengetahuan modern tahu lebih banyak daripada Muhammad lakukan – dan tidak akan semua keluar untuk listrik, dll = lebih handal.
  4. Ya, pasti – jika Allah tidak ada dan hanya merupakan fiksi dari seorang laki-laki mungkin sakit (TLE?) Membangun landasan kekuasaan.

069 2/144a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

*070 2/144b: “The people of the Book (= Jews, Christians and Sabeans*) know very well that that (the reason for changing the kiblah = direction of praying*) is the truth from their Lord”.

  1. Jews and Christians definitely do not know this – and neither did the Sabeans know it (Sabeans lived in Sabah, in what now is Yemen. They had become Christians via influence from Christians in East Africa. (Though Islam says the Sabeans were a sect in Arabia – though with very vague ideas about where and who.))
  2. As the Quran contains a lot of mistakes, it is a question if also the rest is wrong.
  3. As the Quran contains a lot of mistakes, it also is a question if this is from our Lord, Yahweh. It even is a question if a god was involved in the Quran at all – a god does not make mistakes, not to mention such a number of mistakes – or loose statements and false “signs“ and “proofs“ – the hallmarks of cheats and deceivers.

071 2/145: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

*072 2/145+146: “If thou, after the knowledge (of the new qiblah = what direction to face when you are praying*), wert to follow their (the People of the Book’s*) (vain) desire – then wert thou indeed (clearly) in the wrong. The People of the Book know this as they know their own sons.” But it is most obvious that this is not true – neither Jews nor Christians know this – – – and especially not Christians, who have no qiblah (churches mostly make their congregation face east, but there is no qiblah).

073 2/146: “- – – but some of them (Jews, Christians*) conceals the truth (the teachings of the Quran*) – – -“. With that many mistaken facts and that much wrong logic, it at best is partly the truth. See 40/75.

074 *2/146: “- – – the truth (the teachings of the Quran*) which they (Jews, Christians*) themselves know.” There are so many and so fundamental differences between the Quran and the Bible – especially the NT – that the only thing that is possible to know, is that something is very wrong in Islamic claims like this (as normal; a not proved claim).

075 2/147a: ”The Truth – – -”, see 40/75.

076 2/147b: “The Truth is from thy (people’s*) Lord (Allah*) – – -”. With so many mistakes in the Quran, it is not from a god, as gods do not make mistakes.

077 2/147c: “The Truth (the Quran*) is from thy (people’s*) Lord, so be not at all in doubt”. With that many mistakes and that much wrong logic, etc., there is every reason for doubt.

00k 2/149: “- – – that (the new qiblah) is indeed the truth from thy Lord”. With so many mistakes in the Quran, it is an open question if this is the truth or not. It is worth mentioning that Muslims states that the direction towards Kabah was Abraham’s kiblah. We have been unable to find out why they say so – there is no reliable source telling that Abraham even had a kiblah, not to mention that it in case was direction Mecca, a place he hardly had ever heard about (it was only during the last few generations before Muhammad that Mecca had grown to a reasonable wealthy town of some size).

078 2/159: “- – – clear (Signs) – – -.” See 2/99a and 2/99b.

079 2/160: “Except those who repent and make amends and openly declare (the Truth)”. With so many mistakes in the Quran, the book at the very best is partly true. See 40/75.

080 2/164a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

*081 2/164b: “- – – the rain which Allah sends down from the skies and the life which He gives to an earth which is dead”. Any god had known it was alive with roots or seeds, not dead – it only looked so.

082 2/164c: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

083 2/173: “He (Allah*) hath only forbidden you dead meat, and blood, and the meat of swine, and that on which another name hath been invoked besides that of Allah”. Salah. You also are forbidden to eat meat from animals you kill by strangulation, or are gored to death, and Hadiths – f. ex. Al-Bukhari – very clearly prohibits you to eat meat from donkey.

084 2/176a: “- – – Allah sent down the Book”. With so many mistaken facts, it is impossible that the Quran is sent down by a god.

085 2/176b: “- – – Allah sent down the Book (the Quran*) in truth”. With that many mistakes and other dubious arguments, it at best is partly true.

086 2/177: “- – – to believe in Allah and the last day, and the Angles, and the Book, and the Messengers – – -“. Muhammad Ali says this is like accepting the “heavenly revelations” as facts – clearly Islam’s meaning also today is, even though absolutely nothing is proved or documented, it all rests well on blind belief in what a morally very suspect and perhaps sick (TLE?) person once told.

087 2/185: “- – – clear (Signs) – – -“. There exist no clear sign (proof for Allah or Muhammad) in all the Quran – see 2/99.

088 2/187: “- – – Allah makes clear His Signs to men – – -“. There exists no clear sign (proof for Allah or Muhammad) in all the Quran – see 2/99.

*089 2/189: “They (the new moons*) are but signs to mark fixed periods of time in (the affairs of) men, – – -”. Wrong – the new moons simply is a natural phenomenon. Man often uses to calculate time but it is not made for that purpose. Jika Islam menekankan pada itu, mereka harus membuktikannya.

090 2/213a: “Mankind was one single nation – – -.” Mankind never was a single nation. Some 160ooo-200ooo years ago PERHAPS one tribe, but never one nation – and absolutely not within these last few millennia that is covered by the Quran.

091 2/213b: “- – – glad tidings – – -“. Salah. See 2/97c and 61/13.

092 2/213c: “He (Allah*) sent the Book (the Quran*) – – -”. An omniscient god did not send a book with that many mistakes, contradictions, and invalid proofs, etc.

093 2/213d: “He (Allah*) sent the Book in truth, – – -”. With so many mistaken facts at best it is only partly the truth. See 40/75.

094 2/213e: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. There are no clear signs – proofs for Allah or Muhammad – in all the Quran. See 2/99.

095 2/213f: “Allah by His Grace guided the believers (by means of the Quran*) – – -“. A book with that many mistakes and invalid proofs, etc. is no guidance.

096 2/213g: “Allah by his Grace guided the believers to the Truth, – – -”. Allah’s presumed book containing so many mistakes, is not the truth. At best the book is partly true.

097 2/219: “Thus does Allah make clear to you His Signs – – -“. There is not one clear sign – proof for Allah or Muhammad – in all the Quran. See 2/99.

098 2/221: “But Allah – – – makes his Signs clear to mankind – – -“. There is not one clear sign – proof for Allah of Muhammad – in all the Quran, as it nowhere is proved that Allah makes the signs. See 2/99.

099 2/231a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

100 2/231b: “- – – the fact that He (Allah) sent down to you the Book – – -”. Is it a fact that a god has sent down a book with so many mistaken facts? Impossible.

*101 2/231c: “- – – the Book of Wisdom, – – -”. A book with so many mistaken facts is no book of wisdom. At best partly a book of wisdom. (But which parts are wisdom and which not?)

102 2/242: “Thus doet Allah make clear His Signs for you – – -“. There is not one single clear sign – proof for Allah or Muhammad – in the entire Quran. See 2/99.

00m 2/247a: “Allah hath appointed Talut (Saul*) king over you (Jews around 1100 – 1000 BC*)”. Most likely it was Yahweh (God) that did so, or what? Allah and Yahweh is not the same god no matter what Islam wants – the fundamental differences are too big and too many. Not unless the god is mentally ill – if he exists.

00n 2/247b: “- – – there shall come to you (the Jews) the Ark of Covenant”. Well, according to the Bible the Ark of Covenant did not come to the Jews – they built it themselves in accordance with a description they got from Yahweh. That was done around 1330 BC under Moses.

103 2/248a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

00o 2/248b: “- – – there shall come to you the Ark of the Covenant – – – carried by angles – – -”. This needs strong proof, especially since the Bible has a much more likely explanation. See 2/247b above.

104 2/248c: “- – – a Symbol (= Sign*) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

105 2/252: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

106 2/255: “- – – all the things in the heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

*107 2/253a: “- – – We (Allah*) gave Clear (Signs) – – -.” There does not exist one single clear sign (in Quran-speak = proof) for neither the Quran, nor for Allah, nor for Muhammad’s connection to a god in all the Quran – only loose claims and demands for blind belief.

108 2/225b: “- – – after Clear (Signs) had come to them – – -.” Wrong. See 2/253a just above.

109 2/255: “- – – over the heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

***110 2/256: “- – – no compulsion in religion – – -“. This “flagship” for “proving” the peaceful Islam, disused daily by most Muslims and very frequently by Islam itself, is very wrong, because it is abrogated (made invalid) by at least these (ca. 30 all together) from the more bloody and inhuman later Medina surahs: 2/191 – 2/193 – 3/28 – 3/85 – 4/91 – 5/33 – 5/72 – 5/73 – 8/12 – 8/38-39 – 8/39 – 8/60 – 9/3 – 9/5 – 9/14 – 9/23 – 9/29 – 9/33 – 9/73 – 9/123 – 14/7 – 25/36 – 25/52 – 33/61 – 33/73 – 35/36 – 47/4 – 66/9 (as for 5/33: Remember that all the wars and raids Muhammad fought, were wars of aggression, even if he called it jihad – even Badr, Uhud and the Trench (Medina) were battles of defence in a war of aggression started and kept alive by Muhammad’s raids. Non-Muslims should not defend themselves and their belongings, according to 5/33).

In addition to this there are other kinds of compulsion than the sword – economy, brutal taxes, social stigma, “Berufsverbot” (good jobs prohibited), physical insecurity, etc. And all of them were backed by the sword – “conform and obey and pay or else – – -“!!

It must be added that some Muslims say this nonsense in good faith. But not one single Muslim educated in his religion, does not know he is lying each time he says that there is no compulsion in religion under Islam – but then defending and promoting Islam are two of the cases where Al-Taqiyya (the lawful lie) and Kitman (the lawful half-truth), are not only lawful, but compulsory in Islam, if it is necessary to use it. (A small PS: One or two of the verses abrogating 2/256 may or may not be a little older than 2/256 itself, but there once was a long debate in Islam if an older verse could abrogate a younger, and the conclusion was that that was possible).

Beisdes Muslims normally misquote the verse, and tell you it says: “There is no compulsion in religion”. What it really says is: “Let there be no compulsion in religion” – a wish or a demand, not a fulfilled fact.

Jika ayat ini belum dibatalkan, itu sudah “berita gembira”. Yes, even if Muslims had been honest and told the verse is abrogated by at least some 30 harsh later verses it had helped – at least it had helped the moral standard of Muslims to be that honest.

111 2/259: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

112 2/266: “Thus doth Allah make clear to you (people*) (his) Signs”. There are no clear signs for Allah or Muhammad in the Quran – not one. See 2/99.

113 2/284: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

114 2/286: “(Pray:) ‘Our Lord! – – -‘“. The word (Pray:) does not exist in the original Arab text – Yusuf Ali has added it to “camouflage” the fact that this is Muhammad praying to Allah. How is it possible to explain that Muhammad is praying to Allah in a book made by Allah or may be never made, but existed since eternity?

There are a few more places where it clearly is not Allah who is speaking. See 6/114a.

Surah 2: At least 114 mistakes + at least 15 likely mistakes.

SURAH 3:

001 3/3a: “It is He (Allah*) Who sent down to thee (Muhammad*) (the Quran*) – – -”. A book with that many mistakes, etc. is not sent down by an omniscient god.

002 3/3b: “It is He Who sent down to thee (step by step), in truth – – -”. It at best is partly the truth. See 13/1, 41/12 and especially 40/75.

**003 3/3c: “- – – the Book, confirming what went before it; (the Torah and the Bible*) – – -”. There are so many fundamental differences between the Quran and the Torah/Bible (especially NT), that the Quran definitely is no conformation of any of the two others (see 2/89). The Quran and Islam tell that it is because those books are falsified, but for 1400 years no Muslim has ever offered proofs for that – only statements – and today it is proved by science that those statements are wrong. Acrually it also is proved by Islam: If there had existed any proof for falsification, Islam had screamed about it at once – but the only thing they serve, is claims.

Be sure: Had Muslims found any proof for this, it had been written with BIG words every relevant and many irrelevant places.

Never any proof for that the Quran – or Muhammad – really was from a god. Tidak pernah.

004 3/4a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above.

00a 3/4b: “The Message of the Quran” here tells that the sign here refers to the Gospel (or Evangelion – both words mean “glad tidings”. “The Message of the Quran” in English pretends that “Evangelion” is something special, but it simply is Greek for the same meaning. In Swedish (and some other languages) – this kind of small dishonesty that you meet too often in Islamic religious literature, is not possible in just this case, as they do not use the word “Gospel” – they use the word “Evangelium”) that Jesus got. Our remark about that simply is that absolutely nowhere there is found a trace of an Evangelion/Gospel that existed at the time of Jesus (science say there may have been one older than the existing ones, but this one in case also had to be written after Jesus’ death, as an Evangelion – Gospel in English – is the story about Jesus’ life, death and resurrection, and could not be written until after this had happened. The absolute only place you find this claim – and only as a not documented claim – is in the Quran (and later Islamic relevant (?) literature built on or around the Quran). A book with lots and lots of mistakes, told by a man with a very doubtful moral who on top of all used the stories as his platform of power – and a book made 600 – 650 years later using mainlyreligious legends, etc. as sources, Islam will have to produce solid evidences to make this claim believable – not necessarily true, bur at least believable.

005 3/5: “- – – heavens – – -.” Plural and wrong. See 2/22a.

006 3/7a: “He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book: – – -”. There are too many mistakes in the Quran – it cannot possibly be sent down by a god, not to mention by an omniscient god.

**007 3/7b: “- – – the whole of it (the Quran*) is sent down from our Lord: – – – “. See 2/231 and 3/7a.

We also want to add a little more from this verse, as the addition is essential in some of all the places Islam/Muslims try to “explain” away statements, etc., that obviously are not true, by saying they are allegories:

***00b 3/7c “It is He (Allah*) Who has sent down to thee the Book (the Quran*): in it are verses basic or fundamental (of established meaning) (= to be read literally*); they (the verses to be read literally*) are the foundation of the Book (the Quran*) : others are allegorical (there are a number of allegorical or similar verses in the Quran – they either are easy to see are allegorical, or the meaning is explained, or both*). But those in whose hearts is perversity (,*) follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking disorder, for its hidden meaning (= only bad persons seek the hidden meanings – also from the allegories*), but no one knows the hidden meanings except Allah (= the possibly hidden meanings are not for humans*)”.

****In clear text: The Quran is to be read literary if nothing else is said or indicated – hidden meanings are for Allah and trying to find hidden meanings are done by perverts. This is very essential for Muslims to remember when they are tempted to explain away mistakes and blunders as allegories with hidden meanings ever so often. There is no hidden meaning unless it is indicated this verse says, and only the bad humans looks for such.

008 3/9: “- – – a Day about which there is no doubt – – -“. Salah. Once the end of the world will come. But if it will happen like told in the Quran, well, there is a good reason for doubt about, as so much more is wrong in that book.

009 3/11: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

010 3/13: “- – – Sign – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

011 3/15: “- – – glad tidings – – -“. Salah. See 2/97c above.

*012 3/18: “- – – that is the witness of Allah – – -.” The problem is that there exists not one single witness from Allah – no miracle that could have been a witness, and nothing else. Only the words of a very doubtful man written in a book with very many errors, contradictions, etc. Muslims her often talk about “signs” from the nature, but the nature is not a proof for Allah until it first is proved that it is created by a god, and then is proved that that god is Allah – words are very cheap. This claim is wrong until Islam proves that Allah really made it – and proves, not only claims like Muslims nearly always do.

013 3/19: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

014 3/21: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

**015 3/24: “- – – their (Jews, Christians*) forgeries (of the Bible*) – – -“. The Quran, Muhammad, Islam and most Muslims claim that the Bible is falsified – claim, but NEVER document or in other ways prove it. Not only claim it is falsified, but that it is falsified on purpose. This in spite of the fact that science long since has proved it is not falsified – one knows literally thousands of relevant old papers and scraps of paper (some 13000 older than 610 AD + some 32000 relevant references to the Bible), which documents it has not been falsified – and with royal disregard for the fact that as the Bible was spread over enormous distances, here, there and everywhere. It was physically impossible to co-ordinate the falsification of each and every copy all over so that all the falsifications were identical, not to mention that all similar points and all references to all these in other papers also had to be falsified correspondingly.

***Demand proofs next time a Muslim tells you this. His game is to throw not documented claims around,and demand proofs from you for the opposite – which can be difficult if you do not have enough knowledge. But it his duty to prove his claims – not yours to disapprove them. NB: They do not have such proofs – if they had had only a feeble one, be sure you and the rest of the world had heard about it by some ones using big letters (actually the lack of documentation from Islam is the best of proofs for that the claim is something made up. And as actually; to throw loose claims and statements around, pretending that they are facts, are typical for Muslims and Islam in religious debates not to mention in religious propaganda).

But to claim that the Bible was falsified, was the only way out for Muhammad – and it still is the only way out for Islam. If they admit that the Bible is not falsified each and every place the Quran “collides” with it, that means to admit that Islam is a made up religion – which is too difficult for the believers, and too expensive for the leaders.

We may add that it is quite normal for fringe sects – which Islam once was – to claim that the mother religion(s) is wrong and they themselves are the only ones that are right. To be believed on this point by us, Islam will have to produce real proofs, not only cheap and loose words to back up their claim. As there exist so many old papers, proving it should be very easy – – – if it were true.

Islam’s claim here simply is proved wrong by science – unless Islam produces proofs showing the opposite. But proofs, not only loose claims like they normally use.

016 3/25: “- – – a Day about which there is no doubt – – -“. Salah. See 3/9 above.

017 3/27: “Thou (Allah*) causest the Night to gain on the Day, and Thou causest the day to gain on the Night – – -“. Night and day is a natural result of the Earth spinning in the light from the sun. If Islam claims what the Quran says above, they will have to prove it.

017 3/29: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

*018 3/35: ”Imran’s wife said”. The Quran here is talking about the mother of Mary (see also 3/36 in the Quran: “I have named her Mary”). But Imran was the father of Aaron, Moses and Miriam, who lived some 1200 years earlier! Muhammad did not know the Bible very well, and it is clear that he thought Mary was the sister of Aaron and Moses. In 19/28 this is directly said, when talking about Mary: “O sister of Aaron”. It is likely that the reason for this mistake is that in Arab Mary and Miriam (the older sister of Moses and Aaron) are written the same way: Maryam. Dengan pengetahuan yang terbatas tentang Alkitab dia percaya itu adalah wanita yang sama. Setiap dewa tahu yang lebih baik. We may add that some Muslims say it is not the same Imran, but scientists agree on that Muhammad meant the same man – the Imran that was chosen by Allah like Adam, Noah and Abraham (see 3/33 in the Quran) – the father of Aaron, Moses – – – and Maryam/Miriam/Mary. Bahwa Muhammad benar-benar salah di sini, dan pikiran Maria adalah saudara perempuan Harun dan Musa, yang didokumentasikan oleh kenyataan bahwa menurut Hadis (Muslim sumber informasi lain tentang agama mereka dan tentang Muhammad) Muhammad telah diperbaiki, dan ia mencoba untuk menemukan penjelasan untuk memperbaiki kesalahan (tanpa sukses). He also did not add information showing that he and Allah for some reason was right in his mistaken statement all the same.

You will also meet Muslims telling that the Quran does not mean that Mary really was the sister of Aaron (they say it was meant figuratively – the normal way out for Muslims, when things are difficult to explain), and that the book does not mean that she was the daughter of Imran – only a descendant of him. Islam setelah begitu banyak harus ratusan tahun telah menemukan lebih baik “penjelasan” – “penjelasan” yang di atas semua dikatakan bertentangan dengan fakta yang sudah Muhammad sendiri berusaha untuk memperbaiki kesalahan, tetapi tidak berhasil seperti yang disebutkan. Namun tidak ada penjelasan lain, mereka dapat mencoba menggunakan. Also see 19/28.

**** There also is another aspect of all the points which are wrong or helplessly expressed or something – may be unbelievable some 3000 places – very roughly one in every second verse on average (there is said to be 6247 verses). Who is willing to believe that an omniscient and intelligent god is so helpless expressing himself in a book where he tells he uses a language simple to understand, and so uneducated that he uses hundreds of mistaken facts, so that mere humans time and again and again and again have to step in and explain or “explain” what he “really means”? – not to mention “explain” or explain away mistakes? It takes a lot of naivity, brainwashing and plain old blindness and lack of moran curage not to at least ask questions. You believe just because your grandmother told you so, and it is difficult to question your old beliefs and the basis of your “facts of life”?

019 3/37: “Every time he (Zakariyya*) entered (her) chamber to see her, he found her supplied with sustenance. Dia berkata: “Hai Maryam! Mana (datang) ini untuk Anda? ” Dia berkata: “Dari Allah: Sesungguhnya Allah memberikan rezeki kepada siapa yang Dia kehendaki tanpa hisab ‘”. Ini berarti bahwa ia dengan keajaiban mendapat makanan dia dari dewa. Ini adalah dibuat dongeng. There is not one single chance that a miracle like this had been omitted from the NT – this even more so if Islam had been right in their statements that Christians (and Jews) had falsified the Bible and made Jesus “bigger” – though how do you make Jews falsify their copies of scriptures to make Jesus “bigger”? (Muhammad was not well versed in the Bible, and frequently made mistakes when he referred to it or took stories from it. He always explained such mistakes with that he was right, and that the unholy Jews and Christians had falsified the Bible. Actually just this story is one the many the Quran has not “borrowed” from the Bible at all, but from one of the made up religious legends that flourished at that time. These mistakes were the reason why the Jews did not accept him when he came to Yathrib/Medina – the Jews said his teachings were wrong and that he consequently was a false prophet. (Muslims have “a tendency” not to mention this fact, but to instead tell a, to Muhammad, more flattering story: He was not accepted because the Jews were angry because Allah had called a non-Jew for a prophet.))

Tetapi jika orang Kristen telah memalsukan Alkitab, obyek utama akan memperkuat posisi Yesus dan koneksi ke Yahwe – dewa Yahudi dan Kristen. There is no chance at all that they had omitted a wonder connected to his mother, telling about a direct connection between Yahweh and her. (That she served in the Temple, which also is told in the Quran, also is new to the Bible – and had never been omitted there if it was true).

It also tells something that when Muhammad differs from the Bible, his/the Quran’s stories often correspond with proven untrue religious fables and legends (often based on apocryphal scriptures – and often Gnostic). Ini memberitahu bukan Alkitab yang salah, tetapi bahwa Quran mungkin telah digunakan sebagai sumber dongeng. Would a god need fairy tales as sources?

020 3/41a: “- – -a Sign – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

021 3/41b: “- – -Thy Sign – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*022 3/45: “- – – his name will be Christ Jesus – – – “. Namanya hanya Yesus. The word Christ was not even a name, but a title of honour, and it only emerged years after his death – originally in what is now Turkey. Tapi Muhammad tidak tahu Alkitab dengan baik. (Christ in Greek means the same as Messiah in Hebrew – the anointed one. Because of this some editions of the Bible use Christ instead of Messiah in NT, but the name – or title really – Christ in reality did not exist connected to Jesus, until well after his death).

**023 3/48: “And Allah will teach him (the child Jesus*) – – – the Gospel”. Satu hal adalah bahwa kata “Injil” adalah dalam tunggal – ada 4 Injil. It is not uncommon to use “Gospel” in singular, but it seems that Muhammad did not know there were more than one. But the real screamer is that the Gospels did not exist at that time – could not exist, as they are the story of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection. The oldest one is written some 25 years after his death (or may be a little earlier, according to new science – source: New Scientist). Tampilkan kita satu dewa tunggal yang tidak tahu itu. Tetapi seperti dikatakan sebelumnya: Muhammad tidak tahu Alkitab dengan baik. Juga lihat 3 / 3.

Kita dapat menambahkan bahwa banyak seorang Muslim akan mengatakan bahwa Quran tidak berbicara tentang 4 Injil dikenal, tetapi tentang yang lebih tua mereka klaim telah menghilang. And they may be partly right on one point – it may be that once there was another and older Gospel, (though not so old that Jesus could read it, neither as a child, nor as an adult). 3 dari Injil sangat mirip, yang jelas ada sambungan, dan salah satu penjelasan yang mungkin adalah bahwa mereka semua mengambil bahan dari Injil yang lebih tua. Tapi anehnya muslim tidak pernah menyebutkan penjelasan lainnya: Bahwa dua bungsu hanya mengambil materi dari tertua dari 3. Dan anehnya para Imam tidak pernah mengatakan kepada jemaat mereka apa yang Injil sebenarnya. For the for Muslims damaging points are:

  1. Sebuah Injil adalah sejarah, kehidupan kematian dan kebangkitan Yesus, dengan titik utamanya adalah kematian dan kebangkitan – bukti terakhir untuk koneksi ke sesuatu yang supranatural. Ada telah banyak bukti-bukti sebelum baik menurut Alkitab dan Quran – banyak mukjizat-Nya. But his resurrection made any dispute about or denial of the involvement of something supernatural impossible. But as the main points in all Gospels are his trial, his death, and his resurrection, no Gospel could exist until after his death. And no tale not including his trial, death and resurrection is a Gospel, because the very points that make it a Gospel – his resurrection and thus the final proof and the final victory over the dark forces – are not there. (Also see point C below).
  2. It is known that Muhammad did not really know the Bible, and especially not NT, and it seems like he used the word “Gospel” without really knowing what it meant. Juga Muslim modern – setidaknya yang dengan sedikit pendidikan – memiliki ide jelas tentang apa yang Injil, dan hanya menyatakan bahwa pasti ada yang lebih tua satu bahwa Yesus membaca, yang seperti yang Anda lihat adalah mustahil. (Tentu saja beberapa kemudian mencoba semua argumen-menaklukkan bahwa Allah tahu dan bisa tahu – – – tapi kemudian kita sekali lagi adalah melawan fakta bahwa clairvoyance penuh untuk Allah dikombinasikan dengan kehendak bebas bagi manusia, juga merupakan suatu kemustahilan, sebuah fakta yang bahkan ulama Islam mengakui, meskipun sebagian besar enggan, dan dengan tambahan yang sangat lemah bahwa “semua sama itu pasti benar, karena diceritakan dalam Quran” (!!!))
  3. Kita tahu bahwa jika ada pernah ada sebuah Injil yang lebih tua, kita secara otomatis tahu yang juga ini ditulis setelah kematian Yesus, jadi Yesus tidak bisa mempelajarinya. This because a Gospel as said is the story of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection (which most Muslims do not seem to know), and thus cannot have been written until after his death and resurrection – and thus we know it in case was not written until after the year 33 AD. (A small scientific correction: It is known that Jesus was 33 years old when he died. But when Rome later calculated when Jesus was born, they made a mistake of may be as much as 5 – 6 years. Therefore Jesus in reality was born some 5 – 6 years before our time-table has its point of zero – and his death correspondingly may have been around 27 – 28 AD).
  4. Jika pernah ada seperti Injil yang lebih tua, yang berarti bahwa itu lebih dekat pada waktunya untuk apa yang terjadi, dan dengan demikian membuat 3 Injil disebutkan bahkan lebih dapat diandalkan ketika mereka dalam kasus mengambil materi mereka dari Injil yang ditulis sangat lama setelah Yesus meninggal, dan sehingga pada saat apa yang terjadi bahkan lebih segar dalam pikiran orang-orang dan masyarakat dan penulis. Tapi tetap tidak mungkin bagi Yesus untuk belajar, karena tidak – tidak bisa – eksis sampai setelah kematiannya.

(We may add that “Gospel” means “good news” or “glad news” or “glad tidings”. You meet the word used like that in some Bibles and other literature, but then it normally is written “gospel” not “Gospel”.)

*024 3/49: “I have come to you, with a Sign from your Lord, in that I make for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah’s leave”. Juga heran ini tidak pernah dihilangkan dari NT jika sudah benar – lihat 3 / 37. But actually it is taken from the made up legends in one of the “fairy tale” Child Gospels (actually it came from Thomas Child Gospel – also called “The Thomas’ Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ“- an apocryphal one from 2. century ). A god had known the Child Gospels were made up. Selain: Apa memberitahu dunia bahwa Quran menggunakan kisah dibuat sebagai bukti tidak langsung bagi Allah? And what does it tell about the reliability of Muhammad’s many statements when there is divergence between the Bible and the Quran, that the reason is that the Bible is falsified, when it is clear that the reason is that the Quran often is referring to fairy tales?

**025 3/51: (Jesus said*): “It is Allah who is my Lord and your Lord; then worship Him”. This must be written/told by someone with no knowledge of Israel at the time of Jesus. It was one of the periods when the Jewish religion was strong and the religious establishment powerful. Further the name of the (Muslim) god was not Allah until after Muhammad changed his name slightly – it was al-Lah (which means “the god” – not “god”, but “the god”. Muslim missionaries in the west, today often use the word God instead of Allah, because then a number of the differences between Yahweh (our god) and Allah are more difficult to see. They say that Allah means God, but strictly speaking “al-Lah” = “the god“). The Jews of that time were a travelling people, and they knew Arabia and the polytheistic religion there.

  1. If Jesus had preached that people should pray to a known polytheistic god from another country (and remember that at that time gods in addition were at least to a degree thought to take care mostly of their own country or tribe or whatever) – call him al-Lah or the older El – he would have gotten very few followers.
  2. If Jesus had preached about al-Lah – a known polytheistic foreign god – the Jewish religious establishment had had him killed years before for heresy, disrespect for Yahweh and things like that.

The statement is made up by someone not knowing the religious and political situation in Israel around 30 AD (the purpose for making it up is very obvious).

026 3/52a: “(Jesus*) said: ‘Who will be the helpers to (the work) of Allah?” See 3/51.

027 3/52b: “Said the Disciples (of Jesus*): ‘We are Allah’s helpers:” See 3/51.

028 3/52c: Said the disciples: “- – – we believe in Allah, – – -”. Lihat 3 / 51.

*029 3/52d: Said the disciples: “- – – and thou (Jesus*) bear witness that we are Muslims”. Lihat 3 / 51. Besides the word hardly had a meaning 600 years before Muhammad.

030 3/58: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00c 3/59: “The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam – – -”. That is to say in “Quran-speak”: He was a prophet, but but for that an ordinary human. Well, Jesus called God/Yahweh “father”, which Adam could not. And according to science, Adam never existed.

*031 3/59: “He (Allah*) created him (Adam*) from dust, – – -”. Al Qur’an menceritakan tentang banyak cara manusia diciptakan – 13 berbeda jika Anda ketat, 5 – 7 jika Anda kurang ketat. Hanya 1 bisa benar, sebagai manusia (Adam) telah dibuat hanya sekali. Actually all of them are wrong. Beberapa Muslim bangga bahwa arkeolog telah menemukan bahwa ras manusia telah melewati apa yang disebut hambatan, dan bahwa semua mungkin memiliki satu “ibu” yang sama – Hawa arkeologi – dan satu bersama “ayah” – Adam yang kurang arkeologi dikenal. “Hip, Hurray! Science has proved the Adam and his wife in the Quran!!” What not a single of them has ever mentioned as far as we have heard, is the fact that this “Eve” lived some 160ooo to 200ooo years ago in Africa, whereas the corresponding “Adam” lived much later – may be as late as 60ooo – 70ooo (64ooo?) years ago and in Asia. Some marriage!!! (And actually the Adam from the Bible and the Quran most likely never existed – man developed from a primate, he was not created into sudden existence). Lihat juga 6 / 2.

032 3/60: “The Truth (comes) from Allah alone; – – -”. With so many mistaken facts that you find in that book, it can at most be partly true, if this refers to the presumed truths in the Quran. Also see 40/75.

033 3/61: “- – – now after (full) knowledge hath come to thee – – -”. With so many mistakes in the Quran, it is at best partly knowledge.

*034 3/64: “- – – that we (Muslims and Jews/Christians*) worship none but Allah (= Yahweh and Allah is claimed to be the same god*)”. This is not possible as the fundamental differences between the Quran and the Bible/NT are too big and too many – not unless the god is schizophrenic. Mainly only Muslims say this – and they will have to bring strong proofs.

00d 3 / 67: “Ibrahim bukan seorang Yahudi atau belum seorang Kristen – – -“. Dia pasti tidak Kristen, karena ia tinggal – kalau dia pernah hidup – beberapa 1800 – 2000 tahun terlalu dini. Tapi mungkin benar untuk panggilan nenek moyang semua orang Yahudi seorang Yahudi. (We know the word did not exist at that time, but it is normal to use the word also for the people who later got the name Jews. The word “Jew” is made from “Judah” – the name of one of the sons of the Jewish patriarch Jacob – grandson of Abraham.)

00e 3 / 68: “Tanpa keraguan, antara laki-laki, saudara terdekat kepada Abraham, adalah mereka yang mengikuti-Nya – – -“.

  1. Anda tidak bisa berhubungan dengan seorang pria hanya karena Anda pengikut.
  2. Is Islam really following Abraham’s real religion? – only the Quran says so, and the Quran has proven that it has lots of mistakes – lots of.
  3. If Muhammad included himself here: Was he really a descendant of Abraham? – Abraham lived some 2500 years earlier, and how many even today know their forefathers 2500 years back? – people have lied for political or personal reasons throughout both history and pre-history, also about honourable ancestors.
  4. Even if Muhammad had been a descendant of Abraham – then how close after 2500 years? His first forefather in case was Ishmael. Ishmael was half Egyptian (his mother Hagar was a slave maiden from Egypt (1.Mos. 16/1), and Ishmael himself married a woman (only one wife is mentioned) from Egypt (1. Mos. 21/21) and his family settled near the border of Egypt (1. Mos. 25/18) in Sinai. The border of Egypt never was in the middle of Arabia, even though Muslims want Hagar and Ishmael to have settled in Mecca). In addition modern DNA has shown that Arabs far from is a pure race. Arabs were traders – and brought home wives and slaves and got children with them. Also foreign traders crossed Arabia and made a child now and then – the sexual taboos were far looser before Muhammad. The Arabs simply is a mix of local and a lot of not local DNA – in addition to the already mentioned fact that already after 2 generations only ¼ of the relationship was with Abraham – – – and the 25oo years up to Muhammad meant some 100 generations.

There is much reason for doubt.

035 3/70: “Why do ye (the Jews*) reject the Signs of Allah, of which ye are (yourselves) witnesses?” The word “Sign” may here refer to these statements:

  1. Islam mengatakan bahwa Muhammad dinubuatkan dalam Alkitab, dan terutama mengacu kepada 5 Mos. 18/15 dan 18/18. Tetapi saudara seorang Yahudi adalah seorang Yahudi, bukan Arab, dan orang-orang sebangsanya orang Yahudi juga orang-orang Yahudi, bukan Arab. Lihat bab tentang “Muhammad dalam Alkitab?” Salah.
  2. The other “main” claim is that when Jesus talked to his disciples about a helper that should come to them, Muslims claim that that meant Muhammad, even though they have to twist their “explanation” not a little (they need at least one from GT and one from NT, because it is said that Muhammad is foretold in both) – and even though Muhammad was born 500 years after the disciples were dead! – how could he be the helper of the disiples?!!(Jesus was talking about The Holy Ghost/Holy Spirit/etc. that came to the disciples some days later).
  3. Quran merujuk kepada satu atau dua belajar orang-orang Yahudi bahwa Islam klaim diterima Muhammad sebagai nabi. But even if this may be (or may be not) was true, it is in no way correct to say that “ye” (all the Jews) did so. Salah.

See the chapters “Muhammad in the Bible?” and “Falsified Bible?”

*Islam only has produced claims and twisted logic for this – well, claim. Mereka akan harus menghasilkan dokumentasi atau bukti jika mereka ingin dipercaya oleh orang lain daripada dicuci otak dan naif itu.

036 3/71: “- – – conceal the Truth (of what the Quran tells*) – – -”. With so many mistakes, the Quran at best is only partly true. Also see “Muhammad in the Bible?”

037 3/71a: “Why do you clothe the truth with falsehood (= falsify the Bible, the Torah, and the other Jewish scriptures – this is strongly stated in the Quran (if it is not true, then the Quran is a falsified book*)*), and conceal the Truth, – – -?” Always when there was a discrepancy between the Quran and the Bible, Muhammad said it was he who was right and the Jews and the Christians who had falsified the Bible (even in cases where it is clear the story in the Quran corresponds to a made up legend known in Arabia at that time) – a most convenient explanation for a man that knew little about the Bible. But does the Quran represent the truth? – with that many obvious mistakes, etc., it at most can be partly true.

038 3/71b: “- – – conceal the Truth (of what the Quran tells*) – – -”. With so many mistakes, the Quran at best is only partly true. Also see “Muhammad in the Bible?” and 3/71a just above.

039. 3/75: “But they (Jews and Christians*) tell a lie against Allah (= they have falsified the Bible*), and well they know it.” Wrong. See 2/75 above.

**040 3/78: “(Many Jews and Christians*) distort the Book (the Bible) – – -“. This an unproven claim without which Islam is dead. But the fact is that in 1400 years Islam have been unable to produce only claims and words – both of which are very cheap – whereas science has some 13000 relevant old papers and fragments (of them some 300 from the 4 Gospels) from all over the then known world, plus some 32000 relevant quotations from the Bible in other manuscripts, which document that the Bible is not distorted. ( And you bet: If Islam had found a single real proof for their claim, they had screamed about it ). This actually is the best of all proofs for that no proofs exist. Also see “Muhammad in the Bible”, and “Falsified Bible?”

*041 3/83a: “- – – all creatures (= angels, jinns, man and animals*) in the heavens and on the earth have, willing or unwilling (what about 2/256: “- no compulsion in religion –“?*) bowed to His (Allah’s*) will (accepted Islam)”. Muslims will have to produce very strong proofs to make us believe that everything, included snails and flatworms and mosquitoes pray to Allah.

042 3/83b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Lihat 2/22a.

*043 3/84: “- – – in (the Books) given to Moses”. Salah. Moses (if he existed) lived 1300-1200 BC (if the exodus from Egypt ever happened, it took place ca. 1235 BC – during the reign of pharaoh Ramses II according to science). These 5 books (the Torah) were written not earlier than ca. 800 BC, and may be as late as 500 BC, but named after Moses. Moses was never given those books (though he was oraly given the law, which he himself wrote down later, according to the Bible – the laws later became part of “The Book of Moses” some hundred years later) – but this Muhammad did not know – – – whereas a god had known it. Lihat 2 / 53.

044 3/75: “But they (Jews/Christians*) tell a lie against Allah (= they have falsified the Bible)”. Salah. See 3/24 above.

045 3/78: “- – – distort the Book (= falsify the Bible*) – – -.” Wrong. See 3/24 above.

046 3/86: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. See 2/99.

*047 3/96: “The first House (= Kabah*) (of worship) appointed for man was that at Bakkah (= Mecca*)”. Salah. Even if we should accept that Abraham “made the foundations” of the Kabah in Mecca, he lived (if he is not fiction) around 2000-1800 BC. At that time the first temples, etc. in f. ex. Egypt and Mesopotamia were old. Today it is possible to find the real age of many things. It is symptomatic that as far as we know, Islam has not tried to see if it is possible to find the real age of the oldest parts of the Kabah. Wagging tongues insinuates that may be the reason is that they are afraid it is younger than 3800 years. – what if it turns out it is built around 100 BC – or AD – f. ex? Islam also have one problem concerning measuring the age of the Kabah: They will have to use qualified western experts. If they use Muslim experts – who may be well qualified to do it – and find that it f. ex. is 5630 years old, not one single soul will believe them uncondotianally, because of “al-Taqiyya” – the lawful lie – that Muslims not only are permitted to use, but are obliged to use if necessary, when it comes to promoting or defending Islam. (And non-Muslims are not permitted to visit Mecca.) We may also add that it is further said that Abraham built on the even older ruins of a temple made by Adam – of course Adam like Abraham went all the way to the desert proto-Mecca and built a big temple he never could visit from his home a thousand kilometres off (Adam – and his Paradise – real of fiction, mostly are believed to have been placed somewhere in the rich wetlands in what is now South Iraq), but destroyed at the time of Noah – but as often before Muslims only tell, seldom prove, so believe it who wants.

(We may ad that some Muslims have corrected this verse to that the Quran is talking about the first house of worship for a monotheistic god, but that is not what the Quran says. Besides: If the Quran or the Hadiths is correct and there have been prophets to all times and every people – 124ooo the Hadith says – Islam will have a though time to prove that not one single all those prophets or their followers in the very early time before Abraham, have ever built even a small house for worship.” Also see 2/127.

048 3/97a: “- – – Signs manifest – – -“. See 2/99.

049 3/97b: “In it (Kabah in Mecca*) are Signs manifest; (for example), the Station of Abraham – – -“. Untuk satu hal Abraham tidak pernah berada di Mekah (lihat 2 / 127) dan tidak pernah membangun Ka’bah atau yayasan tersebut. Dan jika ia pernah ke sana dan dibangun: Ada batu di sana, dengan tanda di dalamnya. Islam menyebutnya Stasiun Abraham dan dikatakan untuk memberitahu bahwa tanda dari kaki Ibrahim ketika ia membangun Ka’bah. Pekerja yang membangun rumah yang pernah di seluruh sejarah dan jauh sebelumnya, telah berdiri begitu lama pada batu alam yang sama keras, bahwa kakinya membuat tanda di batu yang berlangsung selama ribuan tahun?

This is the kind of sure proofs the Quran tells about and some of the Muslims even believe in.

050 3/98a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

051 3/98b: “(Jews and Christians*) ye were yourselves witnesses (to Allah’s covenant)”. Salah. They were witnesses to Yahweh’s covenant(s). Allah is not the same god as Yahweh, unless the god is seriously schizophrenic, as the teachings fundamentally are too different. If Islam still insists on the opposite, they will have to bring proofs, not only the old and still not documented loose claims.

00f 3/101: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

052 3/103: “Thus doth Allah make His Signs clear – – -“. There is not one single real sign/proof not to mention clear sign or proof for neither Allah nor Muhammad in the Quran – see 2/99.

053 3/105: “- – – clear Sign – – -“. See 3/103 just above and 2/99.

054 3/108: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

055 3/109: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong – see 2/22a.

056 3/112: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

057 3/113: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

058 3/118: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

059 3/128: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong – there are no 7 heavens. Lihat 2/22a.

060 3/132: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong – see 2/22a.

*00g 3/137a: “- – – travel through the earth, and see what was the end of those who rejected the truth”. In Arabia there were scattered old ruins. Muhammad told they were all remnants after peoples Allah had punished for their sins. There are more likely explanations.

061 3/137b: “- – – those who rejected the Truth”. With that many mistaken facts in the Quran, it at best tells partly the truth.

**062 3/154a: “Even if you had remained in your homes (instead of taking part in the battle of Uhud, where many were killed), those for whom the death was decreed would certainly have gone forth to the place of their death (= they had died anyhow*)”. Disini kita memiliki predestinasi tersebut. You can as well do battle, because Allah has decided long time ago (5 months before you were born according to Hadith) when you are to die. Jika waktu Anda sudah habis, Anda akan mati tidak peduli, bahkan jika Anda berbaring di tempat tidur Anda. Itu berarti bahwa untuk melakukan pertempuran adalah tidak berbahaya, tetapi Anda dapat memenangkan banyak kekayaan – dan budak – dan jika Anda mati dalam pertempuran, Anda yakin untuk pergi ke surga dengan kehidupan mewah dan houries bersedia (selain istri Anda) , yang Anda tidak yakin jika Anda mati di rumah. Satu-satunya hal cerdas untuk dilakukan adalah berjuang untuk nabi Anda – atau penerusnya. “The religion of Peace”? – or a religion of war?

Hari ini adalah mudah untuk membuktikan dengan statistik bahwa sangat salah – tapi Muhammad tidak tahu tentang statistik (dan dewa bahkan tidak perlu statistik untuk tahu itu kebodohan). On the other hand this claim is so contra all logic, that this is one of the points where Muhammad knew he was lying – he was too intellighet to believe in this. Actually Islam today back-pedals very much concerning predestination telling f. ex. that the Quran does not mean real predestination (but not explaining what they claim it means). But in some cases the book is so clear, that it is impossible to explain it away.) f. ex. many places connected to statements that when your time is out, you will die anyhow, and therefore you can as well go to war. See f. ex. 3/154b below).

**063 3/154b: “Even if you had remained in your homes, those for whom death was decreed would certainly have gone forth to the place of their death”. This is one of the arguments Muhammad used to incite to battle; predestination. Today it as said is very easy to prove by means of statistics that it is utterly wrong – it is far less likely to die in your home, compared to spending the same time in a battle. ( But Muhammad needed – or at least wanted – warriors, even if he had to know he was lying. )

064 3/161a: “- – – prophet – – -“. But Muhammad was not really a prophet – he just “borrowed” the impressing title: He did not have the ability to make prophesies – he did not even pretend or claim he had it. Even Islam admits this indirectly: Prophesies is a special kind of miracles, and Islam says that the only miracle connected to Muhammad, is the making of the Quran.

00h 3/16b1: “No prophet could (ever) be false to his trust.” Some of Mohammad’s highwaymen (this was in 625 AD when the Muslims lived from stealing/robbing and extortion) were dissatisfied and told Mohammad cheated when splitting the spoils. Then this verse arrived very conveniently from the veneered Mother Book in Heaven written by Allah or existed since eternity. Islam says it proved Mohammad did not cheat. That may be correct if Allah made the Quran, but not if Mohammad or someone else did so.

**There also is another and much more serious fact here: Through the times most – not to say (nearly?) all – self-proclaimed prophets have been false prophets. Sebagian besar nabi palsu telah (dan) laki-laki, dan dalam agama mereka telah menemukan cara untuk uang, perempuan, harga diri, dan kekuasaan – 4 alasan normal untuk penipu. Beberapa mental khusus atau sakit – Muhammad adalah di antara mereka jika ia TLE (lihat bab “Apakah TLE – Temporal Lobe Epilepsi”). Some really believe they are prophets, others just are cheats – if Muhammad had TLE, he may honestly have believed he had some connection to a god, but it also is very clear from the Quran that he at least sometimes knew he was cheating; some of the arguments he used in the book, any intelligent person knows are lies (f. ex. that miracles would not make doubters believe), and Muhammad was an intelligent man. And some of the self proclaimed “prophets” simply were/are cold and calculating – sometimes even psychopathic – – – and when one looks at Muhammad’s cold-blooded treatment of victims and opponents, his total disregard for the life and well-being of everybody that stood between him and power and riches (to use for bribing greedy warriors and chiefs to come to his religion and his army), and his clever psychological (every clever salesman knows much about human nature and psychology) manipulation of his uneducated, naïve early followers, it is easy to believe Muhammad belonged to these – may be combined with the effect of the possible TLE or something.

00i 3/164a: “- – – He (Allah) sent among them (Muslims*) a Messenger (Muhammad*) from among themselves – – -“. The Quran and all the mistakes and wrong logic, etc. there, makes it clear that Muhammad was not sent by any omniscient or omnipotent god (f. ex. no miracles – even though any god knows it is a lie that miracles would not give lots of followers – – – and so did Muhammad). But there is a small possibility that he was contacted by a minor god, and a larger possibility that what he believed was Gabriel, in reality was the Devil/a devil in disguise (Muhammad’s inhuman behaviour and the inhuman religion he introduced – stealing/robbing, raping, enslaving, torture, murder, mass murder, hate, discrimination, and war – may indicate this). Finally there is a not small possibility that it was all man-made.

065 3/164b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

066 3/180: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2 / 22.

067 3/183: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. There are no clear signs (= proofs for Allah or Muhammad) in the Quran – not one. See 2/99.

068 3/184: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. Salah. See 2/99.

069 3/189: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

070 3/190a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong – there are no 7 material heavens. Lihat 2/22a. Setiap dewa sudah tahu, tetapi Muhammad tidak. Siapa yang membuat Quran?

071 3/190b: “- – – Signs – – -.” As long as it is not proved that it really was Allah who created it, it is invalid as sign or indication or proof for Allah or anything related to Islam. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*072 3/190c: “- – – there are indeed Signs for men of understanding – – -“. Psikologis slogan yang baik, yang tidak ingin menjadi bagian di antara orang-orang bijak, dan siapa yang tidak tersanjung dengan menjadi termasuk di antara orang yang bijaksana oleh-demi dewa pemimpin? – Terutama para pengikut tidak berpendidikan dan naif – – – atau yang dicuci otak. But the only two things a man of real understanding can learn from statements that are clearly invalid, because they just are cheap words that never are proved – only backed by demands and flattery for blind belief:

  1. A. And the first possible conclusion a man of understanding can make is: Muhammad had no valid arguments – if he had had real and true arguments, he had not had to use invalid ones.
  2. B. The other possible conclusion a man of understanding can make from this is that something is seriously wrong. Wrong information, invalid logic, and sometimes lies, after all are the hallmarks of a deceiver, a cheat, and a swindler.

Juga lihat 2 / 99.

073 3/191: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

Surah 3: 73 mistakes + 9 likely mistakes.

SURAH 4:

001 4/1a: “Reverence your Guardian-Lord, who created you (people*) – – – “. Manusia tidak diciptakan, menurut ilmu pengetahuan, tetapi dikembangkan dari primata sebelumnya. Besides: Even if man had been created, Islam has never brought a proof for that he was created by a god (not by f. ex. a devil), and neither for that the god in case was Allah.

002 4/1b: “- – – created you from a single person – – -“. Manusia tidak bisa datang dari satu orang, harus ada di jangan 2 – laki-laki dan perempuan. Tapi bahkan jika ada pasangan, yang akan terlalu sedikit – variasi DNA akan terlalu kecil untuk “suku” masih layak. Man simply developed little by little – like the Quran – from earlier primates (as for the archaeological Eve and the archaeological Adam that science talks about, and that some Muslims disuse trying to “prove” something: See the chapter: “Some wrong arguments – and their answers”.)

003 4/11+12: The verses about inheritance are far from clear in Islam. Muhammad menyatakan proporsi tetap. Tapi masalahnya adalah bahwa proporsi dapat menambahkan hingga lebih dari nilai penuh dari properti. Jika ada f. ex. yang ini setelah kematian pewaris laki-laki: 1 istri = 1 / 8 (3 / 24), 3 anak perempuan = 2 / 3 (16/24), 1 ayah = 1 / 6 (4 / 24) dan 1 ibu = 1 / 6 (4 / 24). If you ad these you will see that they are to inherit 27/24, which is mathematically and practically impossible. Atau jika seorang pria mati dan meninggalkan hanya seorang saudara perempuan dan seorang saudara: Saudara perempuan mendapat ½ dan saudara dua kali lipat dari apa yang adik mendapatkan = 3 / 2, yang merupakan lelucon absurd. And what if a man had 2 wives, one with a child and the other not? Does the one with child get 1/8 and the other ¼? Dll Yuridis masalah tentang warisan rumit dalam Islam karena kesalahan-kesalahan ini. Tetapi saham dikatakan ditahbiskan oleh Allah, Maha Mengetahui!

003a 049 4/29 (A38): “Eat not up your property among yourselves in vanity”. But is that the correct meaning? “The Message of the Quran” has: “Do not devour one another’s possessions wrongfully – not even by way of trade based on mutual agreement” – which roughly says the same (something like “do not cheat each other” or worse) in a few more words. But the Arab word “illa” in front means “except” or “unless it be”, which means that the literal meaning in reality is “do not eat up one another’s possessions wrongfully, unless it be (an act of) trade based on mutual agreement” – – – which means that wrongful profit is ok if the parts agree on it – f. ex. by sheer a swindle where the buyer believes he/she gets a fair deal. This strongly contradicts other Islamic laws. It takes some highly advanced verbal gymnastics to explain it away. Every scholar agrees that the literal meaning must be wrong, but words have to be used in special meanings to make that meaning disappear. At very best very unusual use of the language – in spite of that the Quran itself boasts of that the language it to be understood literal, and that it is easy to understand. More likely it simply is a big mistake a la 6/151.

***004 4/40: “Allah is not unjust in the last degree – – -.” Wrong. Examples: Suppression of others is “good and lawful and just”. The same is stealing and robbing if it is possible to find an excuse to call it jihad – and the same for rape of any not pregnant female prisoner or slave. But the top of injustice is: A raped woman is to be punished strongly for indecency if she cannot produce 4 male witnesses to the actual rape. Allah in the Quran at times is extremely unjust.

*005 4/47: (The Quran is*) “confirming what was (already) with you (= the Bible, the Torah, etc.*) “. There are too many basic thoughts that are different between the Quran and the Bible – especially compared to the NT and the new covenant (f. ex Luke 22/20). Incitement to war against non-believers, the “lost lamb”, “do not kill” vs. “do not kill except for a good reason”, all the incitements to war, etc., etc. The Quran is no confirmation of the Bible, and definitely not of NT. It is also not possible that the same god is behind so different ideas, unless he is mentally ill. See also 2/89 and 29/46.

006 4/56: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

**007 4/82: “Had it (the Quran*) been from other than Allah, they would surely therein found much discrepancy.” What a proof!!! In addition to all the mistakes, contradictions, etc. (roughly at least unbelievable 3000(!!!) everything included), there is so much discrepancy in the Quran, that Islam has a special rule how to solve such problems – the so called rule of abrogation: If there is discrepancy between two (or more) places in the Quran, the youngest one normally is the correct one – the omniscient Allah so often had to change his mind or got new information that forced him to change his words, that one needs a special rule how to behave in such cases (this is one of the reasons why it is essential for Islam to know the age of the surahs and verses, or at least which is older than which). And there is so much discrepancy between the Quran and modern knowledge, that it is clear that either Islam has a lot of good explaining to do, or the Quran is not made by an omniscient god. (Islam has a lot of explanations, but most of what is concerning explaining away mistakes, etc. is invalid or highly dubious – use your brain and knowledge when you listen or read, and you will see this is true). Kalimat dikutip benar-benar adalah bukti tidak langsung, tapi kuat dari Quran sendiri bahwa Quran tidak diturunkan dari mahatahu dewa – dan alasan mengapa umat Islam tidak mampu mengakui ada satu kesalahan tunggal dalam buku ini, tidak peduli penjelasan bagaimana tidak mereka harus gunakan untuk “menjelaskan” kesalahan: Jika ada kesalahan, ada sesuatu yang secara fundamental salah dengan agama.

(It should be mentioned that some Muslims denies there is a rule of abrogation (an omniscient god would not need to adjust or further specify his own rules – it spoils the picture of perfection and of omniscience), but anyone can read and see for him/herself: Many points are adjusted, extended or given other limits – larger or smaller – in the Quran. We have never counted, but we have read numbers from ca. 100 to more than 500 abrogations depending on how strictly you judge. Actually it is said by some Islamic scholars that only 9/5 – “the Verse of the Sword” – abrogates 124 older mild verses).

Selain itu salah satu memiliki semua kesalahan yang disebutkan – mereka perbedaan dibandingkan dengan kenyataan.

008 4/105a: “We (Allah*) have sent down to thee the Book (the Quran*) – – -”. With so many mistakes and dubious arguments – can it really be sent down by a god? No

009 4/105b: “We (Allah*) have sent down to thee the Book (the Quran*) in truth, – – -”. With so many mistakes, it is without doubt that it at best can be only partly true (if not there had been no mistakes).

010 4/113a: ”For Allah hath sent down to thee the Book (the Quran*). See 4/105.

011 4/113b: “For Allah hath sent down to thee the Book (the Quran*) and Wisdom – – – “. As said before – f. ex. in 4/105 – there is reason for doubt as to if the Quran is sent down by a god, and no reason for doubt that some of the contents are not true.

012 4/126: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

013 4/131a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

014 4/131b: “- – – We (Allah*) have directed the People of the Book (Jews and Christians*) before you (Muslims*) – – -.” Wrong. Allah and Yahweh is not the same god – not unless the god is seriously ill mentally – the teachings are too different and Islam also never has been able to do anything but claiming that it is the same god – never a proof or any kind of documentation. They only show you to a book with very many mistakes, (told by a very doubtful man who also never was able to prove anything) and claim – without documentation also here – that this is a proof. After all a proof is “one or more proven facts that can give only one conclution”. The “signs” and “proofs” in the Quran proves invalid mostly because they do not build on proven facts, only on claims.

015 4/131c: “- – – heavens – – -“. Even if the statement is repeated 2 times in the same verse, there still are no 7 material heavens (see 2/22a). Any god had known, but Muhammad believed in the contemporary Greek and Persian wrong astronomy – Muslims NEVER mention that 7 heavens was the astronomy of the area at the time of Muhammad, and neither does Islam. Setiap orang bebas untuk bertanya-tanya mengapa.

016 4/132: “- – – heavens – – -“. See 4/132 just above and 2/22a.

00a 4/136a: “Believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad*) – – -”. Tidak ada tempat membuktikan bahwa Muhammad adalah utusan dewa. Not even that he really had any connection to a god.

017 4/136b: “- – – and the scripture which He (Allah*) hath sent to his Messenger”. It is very obvious to anybody with some knowledge and the ability to read and think, that there are many mistakes in the Quran. It is a question if it is advisable to believe in a book where you know there are many mistakes – and may be many more you do not see. The fact that there are many mistaken facts – and dubious statements + contradictions + numbers of invalid “signs” and “proofs”, also makes one doubt the not proven claim that the book is sent down by an omniscient god and a copy of a book revered in Heaven. It simply is impossible that it can be true.

*00b 4/136c: “Any who denieth Allah, His Angels, His Messengers, and the Day of Judgement, hath gone far, far astray”. Hampir tidak. When you know how full of mistakes and wrong logic the book that all Islam rests on is, it takes some more proof to decide that it is the non-Muslims that are “far, far astray”.

018 4/140 “Already has He (Allah*) sent you word in the Book (the Quran*).” Wrong. A book with so many mistakes and so much invalid logic is neither made nor sent down by a god – omniscient or not.

*019 4/156: “- – – they uttered against Mary a grave false charge (that Jesus was crucified and dead*)”. There were so many witnesses, included many that knew Jesus, and included so many that hated him and definitely had made revolt if he was not executed – the Jewish clergy was powerful – that this charge was definitely not false. If Islam says something else, they will have to provide good proofs, not only bring forth lofty statements taken out of thin air 600 years later. Because that is all the Quran has got to offer: A few lofty statements backed by nothing – no proofs and not even an indicium indicating that all those witnesses – and the rulers and the hateful Jewish clergy – were wrong. Words are very cheap – – – and the only fact Islam can produce is that neither Muhammad nor Islam can accept that Jesus died and was resurrected – in that case he clearly was a greater prophet and/or had closer connections to the god than Muhammad, and that is taboo for Muslims. It simply is unacceptable for them.

020 4/157a: “We killed Christ Jesus – – -”. Wrong name. The word Christ did not exist as a name for Jesus until many years later, and then it came from Asia Minor, and then as a title, (the Turks had not arrived at that time), not from Jerusalem originally (see 3/45). Setiap dewa sudah mengetahui hal ini. (Christ in Greek = Messiah in Hebrew (= the anointed one). Because of that some translations of the Bible use Christ instead of Messiah in the NT. But the title Christ – not a name originally, but a title – in reality was not used for Jesus until years after his death.)

021 4/157b: “- – – (Jesus*) the Messenger of Allah”. It is absolutely sure the Jews did not say this. Lihat 3 / 51.

*022 4/157c: “- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear for them – – -”. See 4/156. In addition: If no one else made sure that it was no impostor and that the execution really took place, the angry and spiteful Jewish clergy would see to that. This claim is made up by someone that could not accept that Muhammad was not the greatest prophet (even though Muhammad in reality was not really a real prophet – he did not have the gift of being able to make prophesies). If Islam wants to say something else, they will have a lot of explanation and proving to do – this even more so as the Quran always demands proofs for what non-Muslims say about their religion, but it NEVER itself offers any real proofs for Islam or Allah. In spite of all the “signs” it boasts of, not one single of those “signs” – with the possible exception of some taken from the Bible – proves any god at all, and definitely not one single one proves anything about Allah or the teachings of Muhammad. Words are very cheap, and there is not one single of those “signs” that can not as well and as easy be used by priests or believers or prophets of other religions: Manito did this, Thor did that, Kali made something, Osiris something else, Baal created the Earth, and al-Uzza is great. Islam always only claims that Allah did this and this and that this is a “sign” or a “proof” for Allah. But they NEVER prove that it really was Allah that did this and this. Because of that each and every such “sign” and “proof” are intuitively and logically invalid as an indication or a proof – and for the same reason any priest in any religion can say exactly the same valueless words about his god(s). The claims are totally invalid as indications or indicia, not to mention as proofs. There is not one single valid proof for Allah or for the teachings of Muhammad anywhere – – – or for that Jesus was not crucified and died.

023 4/157d: “- – – of a surety they killed him (Jesus*) not – – -”. If Islam is not able to produce really hard proofs for this statement, it is very obviously wrong. See 4/156 and 4/157c for further explanations.

*024 4/159: “And there is none of the People of the Book but must believe in him (Allah*) before his death – – -.” Wrong. If some of the People of the Book believe, they believe in Yahweh, not in Allah. It is not the same god unless something is very wrong with the god. Islam will have to prove so in case.

025 4/163: “- – – to David We (Allah*) gave the Psalms”. Wrong: According to science they are some centuries younger than King David. (And besides – Allah hardly was involved. If there was a god, it was Yahweh).

00c 4/167: “Those who reject Faith (Islam*) – – – have verily strayed far, far away”. See 4/136.

00d 4/170a: “The Messenger (Muhammad*) hath come – – – from Allah – – -”. There is no place proved that Muhammad is a messenger from any god – Allah or someone else.

*026 4/170b: “The Messenger (= Muhammad*) hath come to you in truth from Allah: – – -”. With so many mistaken facts in Mohammad’s tales (the Quran), it is impossible he really got the surahs and verses from a god, at least not from an omniscient god. Also see 40/75.

027 4/170c: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

00e 4/171a: “- – – Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, was (no more than) a Messenger- – -.” Well, he frequently called Yahweh (the Jewish and Christian god) his father.

028 4/171b: “Christ Jesus was – – – a Messenger of Allah, – – -”. If Islam does not have strong proofs for this, he definitely was no messenger of Allah – for explanations about this see 3/51.

00f 4/171c: “- – – (far Exalted is He (Allah*)) above having a son”. If the Quran here talks only about Allah, that may be correct. But if it talks about an Allah identical to Yahweh, we have to remind Muslims of the fact that Jesus many times and in front of many witnesses called Yahweh his father – the word “father” as a statement of the relationship between Jesus and Yahweh is used at least 163 times in the NT, and the word “son” at least 66 times, many of those times by Jesus himself. And even the Quran agrees to that Jesus was reliable. And we remind you that in spite of what Islam and the Quran claim without any documentation about falsifications of the Bible, science clearly has documented that those undocumented claims are not correct.

029 4/171d: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

030 4/172: “Christ disdaineth not to serve and worship Allah.” In 3/51 is implicated in the explanation why this is wrong. Satu-satunya pengecualian mungkin adalah jika Yahweh dan Allah benar-benar adalah tuhan yang sama. But only Islam states that, and the teachings of Yahweh (especially in NT and the new covenant – f. ex. Luke 22/20) are so different at essential points from the teachings of Allah, that they cannot be the same god. Islam will in case have to prove it, not only to claim it.

031 4/174: “- – – there hath come to you (Jews, Christians*) a convincing proof (the Quran*) from your Lord (Allah*) – – -“. With that many mistakes, contradictions, etc., and so much wrong logic, etc., etc. the Quran is not very convincing, and its “proofs”/”signs” no more convincing. See 2/99.

032 4/176: “And Allah hath the knowledge of all things”. Obviously not in this case. F. ex.: Given the right combination of inheritors, their shares add up to 112.5% and even 125% or 150% of the inheritance (this has given lawyers and lawmakers much work – and at least the lawyers much money – through the times.)

Surah 4: At least 32 mistakes + 6 likely mistakes.

Surah 5.

001 5/1 (A2): “Lawful (as food*) for you (Muslims*) are all four-footed animals, with the exceptions named – – -“. But the literal meaning of Arab “bahimat al-an’am” is “four-footed cattle” or “beast of cattle”. But “cattle” is something very different to “all four-footed animals”. To add to the mystery Rezi and others say: “- – – all animals that resembles (domesticated) cattle insofar as it feeds on plants and is not a beast of prey.” (One essence of this is that Muslims cannot eat marine mammals – not 4-footed and most of them are beasts of prey. But we have not seen any prohibition about this.) The main essence of this verse is that no Arab scholar really is sure how to understand exactly what it means, but that they agree on that “four-footed cattle” is a tautology that must be wrong – one more case where the majority agrees on that some text in the Quran is wrong (there are a few like this – see separate small chapter. And when not even the greatest Muslims scholars understand what the text really means, it is not “a clear and easily understood language”.

It must be added to the defence of the Muslims scholars who try to “adjust” the meaning of this verse, that the Quran clearly permits hunting, and mostly they did go hunting for food – – – and you do not go hunting for cattle. It thus is very clear that they are right when they say this tautology is wrong.

001a 5/10: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

002 5/12: “Allah did aforetime take a covenant from the Children of Israel – – -.” Wrong. See 4/159. The covenant was with Yahweh.

**003 5/13: “- – – they (the Jews*) change the words (of the OT*) and forget a good part of the Message that was sent them (OT*)”. There exist some 13000 scriptures or fragments older than 610 AD (when Muhammad declared himself a messenger) plus some 32000 references to Biblical verses in other manuscripts. They show that neither OT nor NT is falsified – nor is anything forgotten (omitted). But Islam HAS to insist on this. For one thing this was the excuse Muhammad used when explaining the differences between the Bible and the Quran – and Muhammad and the Quran has to be speaking only the truth, because if not the very foundation under the religion collapses. And for another thing – if the Quran is wrong and the Bible correct, Islam is a made up religion. But one fact remains: Islam has not found any proof for their claim, even though they have searched for it for 1400 years. They have trumped up a number of arguments, but like so often Islam only have cheap words behind their claims – if they had found one single real proof for their claim among the 13000 scriptures or other places, you can bet large money on that the world had been informed quickly and thoroughly about it. When science then tells that the Bible is unabridged except for better translations and the small varieties normal for handwritten manuscripts spread over hundreds of years and thousands of kilometres – and there were many thousands of scriptures spread all over – and each and every single one had to be falsified in just the same ways (facts Muslims never mention or explain) – well, when all this is added up, it is up to you to decide which – if any – of the two books is most reliable. (Also see 2/75 and 3/24).

004 5/14: “- – – but they (Christians*) forgot a good part of the Message (Bible/NT*) that was sent them – – -“. See 3/24 and 5/13 (just above). When it comes to NT, science is on even more secure “ground” than for OT, as one has original documents going back nearly to the first churches – included some 300 Gospels or fragments of Gospels – and there are found no falsifications. The texts simply are the same as today. Islam will have to offer proofs, not only claims taken out of the air like they normally only do. With so many old documents it should have been easy enough to find falsifications – – – if it had been true. Also see 2/75!

005 5/15a: “- – – revealing to you (Jews and Christians*) much of that ye used to hide in the Book (the Bible*) – – -“. To believe in the theory that the Bible is falsified, one has to know very little about how to make identical falsifications of thousands of copies of many different manuscripts, where on top of all all the different falsifications have to be synchronized in all the different manuscripts, so that the different manuscripts do not tell widely different facts. And not least: All references to and from the different papers must have been synchronized – try to do that even today with 100ooo papers spread over large areas and with no mass communications, not even a good post office (with 13ooo relevant papers or scraps of papers still existing today, there must have been at least 100ooo and many more in the old times, spread all over – papers are destroyed or rot or disappear over the centuries, all identically falsified, because at that time nobody knew which papers would survive until today!!!)

Judge for yourself after you also have read 2/75, 3/24, 5/13 and 5/14.

*00a 5/15b: “- – – there hath come to you (Jews, Christians*) from Allah a (new) light (Muhammad*) – – -“. Well, that is one of the questions: Did a man so morally degenerated and preaching a religion based on a book with so many mistakes, etc. and so much wrong logic, really represent a god? And did a war religion represent a benevolent god?

006 5/15c: “- – – (Allah has sent down*) a perspicuous Book (the Quran*)”. No god has sent down – not to mention revered it as the Mother Book in his own Heaven – a book with that many mistakes and that much wrong and invalid logic.

**00b 5/17a: “Why then doth He (the god*) punish you for your sins (if he loves you*)”. Wrong psychology, and a naïve question, as anyone knows you sometimes have to punish even children you love.

*007 5/17b: “In blasphemy indeed are those that say that Allah is Christ, the son of Mary”. No Christian says that Jesus is Allah. Neither do they say that Jesus is Yahweh. Muhammad never understood the trinity dogma of the Christians. (He also believed the trinity consists of Yahweh, Jesus and Mary!!!). But if one looks only at that dogma, Islam may be right that it is not correct – may be. It is only a dogma decided on by humans after much quarrel and discussion; it is not part of the Bible. But no-one in his right mind and with some knowledge about the Bible, would ever believe Mary was part of the trinity.

008 5/17c: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

*009 5/18a: “(Both) the Jews and the Christians say: ‘We are sons of Allah, and His beloved’”. Neither Jews nor Christians say they are real sons – or daughters – of Yahweh (not of Allah) (though they often figuratively – but only figuratively – refer to him as the “Father in Heaven” or humans as “Children of God”.).

010 5/18b: “(Both) the Jews and the Christians say: ‘We are sons of Allah, and His beloved’. Katakanlah: “Mengapa Allah menyiksa kamu karena dosa-dosamu? – – – ‘”. Pertanyaannya adalah bahkan tidak retorika, tetapi naif – kadang-kadang Anda harus menghukum bahkan anak-anak tercinta untuk mengajarkan perbedaan antara benar dan salah, baik dan buruk.

011 5/18b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

012 5/19a: “O People of the Book (mainly Jews and Christians, but also Sabeans – a Christian sect in Sabah, now part of Yemen (Islam also have another explanation) – and later after a fashion and in some circles also Zoroastrians*)! Now hath come unto you, making (things) clear unto you, Our Messenger (Muhammad*) – – -”. Some may question if really Muhammad was the messenger of a god – he did not always behave like the representative of a good and forgiving god, and his message (the Quran) is full of mistakes an omniscient god had not made. But what is not possible to doubt, is that a message with so many mistaken facts at best can make things partly clear (and at worst really mess up things).

013 5/19c: “- – – glad tidings – – -.” Wrong. See 2/97c and 61/13.

00c 5/19b: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Messenger (Muhammad*) – – -“. Can a man so morally degenerated like Muhammad – and preaching a book so full of mistakes and invalids logic – really represent a good and omniscient god?

*014 5/20: “Remember Moses said to his people: – – – Allah – – – made you kings”. Salah. The first Jewish kings were Saul (Talut in the Quran) and then David some 200 years after Moses. Any – even minor – god had known this. We have heard Muslims explain that this is not what the Quran means, but that Allah made all Jews like kings. But anyone who knows a little about Jewish history and about Jews before and now, knows very well that most Jews never were or are or behave(d) like kings. It is an obvious “explanation”.

00d 5/21: “- – – the holy land which Allah hath assigned unto you (Moses and his Jews*) – – -“. Allah atau Yahweh? (See also 3/51).

00e 5/23a: “- – – two (of Moses’ Jews*) on whom Allah hath – – -“. Allah atau Yahweh? Lihat juga 3 / 51.

00f 5/23b: “- – – but on Allah put your (Jews*) trust if you have faith”. Hal ini sangat tidak mungkin orang Yahudi pada saat Musa mengatakan kepada orang-orang Yahudi sesama mereka mempercayai Allah, sebagai nama dewa orang Yahudi adalah Yahweh (dan di samping nama Allah diperkenalkan oleh Mohammad hanya beberapa 2000 tahun kemudian (sebagai pengganti untuk al -Lah)).

015 5/40: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

016 5/44: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00g 5/46a: “We (Allah*) sent Jesus the son of Mary, confirming the Law (of Moses*)”. According to the Bible Jesus was not sent to change the old laws – that was not his main purpose. All the same he did so – changed some and even nullified some of them, especially of all the additions made through the times by Jewish religious thinkers and leaders. This was more or less formalized during his last Easter, when the new covenant (f. ex. Luke 22/20) was introduced. (This covenant is never mentioned by Islam, and most Muslims without religious education have not even heard about it. This even though it is one of the main and most central facts in the Christian religion).

*017 5/46b: “We (Allah*) sent him (Jesus’) the Gospel”. Any god had known that the Gospels did not exist at that time. See 3/3 and 3/48.

018 5/48a: “To thee (Muhammad*) We (Allah*) sent the scripture – – -”. As there are many mistakes in the Quran, there are reasonable doubts about if a god really sent down the Quran. These even more so as a number of the mistakes are in accordance with what one believed to be true at the time of Muhammad in the Middle East. Muhammad would have believed it was the truth, a god had known it was wrong. Lalu siapa yang membuat Quran?

Islam will have to prove the statement to be believed by rational thinkers with some knowledge.

019 5/48b: “- – – We (Allah*) sent the scripture in truth – – -”. With all the mistaken facts – and perhaps other mistakes – in the Quran, it is at most partly the truth.

*021 5/48c: “- – – confirming the scripture (the Bible*) that came before it, – – -”. There are so many and so fundamental differences between the Quran and the Bible – especially NT – that the Quran is no confirmation of the Bible, and especially not of the NT. See 2/89 and 3/3.

022 5/48d: “- – – diverging from the Truth (the Quran*) that hath come to thee.” With that many mistakes, the Quran at best is only partly the Truth. Islam repeats and repeats and repeats the claim that this is “the Truth”. It is tempting to remember Minister of Propaganda (!) in “Das Reich” – Nazi Germany – Joseph Goebbels: “If you repeat a lie often enough, people starts believing it”. (There also are many other similarities between Islam and Nazism, and Nazism was liked and respected in large parts of the Muslim populations in the Nazis’ satanic days.)

00h 5/59: “- – – the revelation (the Quran*) that hath come to us (Muhammad) – – -“. Well, one of the central questions about Islam is if there really were revelations – and if there were: From whom? There are these alternatives:

  1. Revelations from a god – which the Quran proves is not the case, as no god, omniscient or not, had made so many mistakes and contradictions, etc., and so much wrong logic, etc.
  2. Atau wahyu dari penipu – f. ex. the Devil – pretending to be Gabriel or working on Muhammad’s brain (an illness like TLE easily would explain that – see BBC “God on the Brain”, 20. March 2003) – and the inhuman and on some points highly immoral religion Muhammad founded, may indicate that this really is a possibility.
  3. Or the “revelations” simply came from a human brain with an illness – if Muhammad f. ex. had TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy) like medical experts according to f. ex. BBC suspect, that easily explains his “experiences”.
  4. Atau itu semua “skenario” yang dibuat oleh otak dingin dan licik – dan kekejaman tidak manusiawi Muhammad dan nafsu mudah dikenal untuk kekuasaan (lihat f. ex bagaimana dia lem dirinya kepada Allah.) Bisa menunjukkan ini.

A combination of points 3 and 4 also is possible.

00i 5/60: “Those who incurred the curse of Allah and his wrath, those of some he transformed into apes and swine – – -”. Hampir tidak mungkin. Ini perlu bukti yang kuat.

023 5/64: “The revelation (the Quran*) that cometh to thee (Muhammad*) from Allah – – -“. A book with that many mistakes, etc. is not from an omniscient god. See 5/59 above.

024 5/67: “- – – the (message) which hath been sent to thee (Muhammad*) from thy Lord.” There is no chance that a message (the Quran) that full of mistakes, wrong logic, etc. is from an omniscient god. See 5/59.

*025 5/72a: “They do blaspheme who say: ‘God is the son of Mary’”. Tidak ada orang Kristen mengatakan bahwa Yahweh adalah anak Maria, Yesus. (Meskipun orang-orang Katolik menggunakan istilah “Bunda Allah” berarti “Bunda (yang kudus) Yesus”, tetapi mereka jelas mengetahui perbedaan antara Allah / Yahweh dan Yesus).

**026 5/72b: “But said Christ; ‘O Children of Israel! Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord’”. If Jesus had tried to teach about the in Israel known polytheistic god al-Lah from a heathen neighbouring country, he had got very few followers and had been quickly killed by the clergy in the religious climate in Israel at that time.

00j 5/73: “They do blaspheme who say: Allah is one of three in a trinity”. Sumber kami mengatakan bahwa 3 kata-kata terakhir tidak ada dalam edisi Arab, tetapi ditambahkan oleh Yusuf Ali. Then the correct text in case ends: “Allah (Yahweh*) is one of three (gods*).” Which obviously is wrong, as Christians only believe in one god. Selain itu adalah praksis yang paling meragukan untuk membuat penambahan teks tanpa membuat para pembaca menyadari bahwa itu adalah sebuah tambahan – f. ex. by at least putting the addition in ( ).

00k 5/75a: “Christ, the son of Mary, was no more than a messenger; – – -”. The Bible says something else – that Jesus called Yahweh his father (this relationship is mentioned at least 163 times as “father” + 66 times as “son” in the NT – frequently by Jesus himself), and far from always only his spiritual father – and as the Bible is written relatively short time after Jesus’ death, and on this point on the basis of thousands of witnesses that could tell what Jesus said, and protest if the narrators quoted Jesus falsely, it is likely that the Bible is more reliable here, than the Quran. The Quran is written 600 years later, and offers only unfounded statements and claims without any proof or even indicia backing up the claims. This even more so as the only Islamic source for the claims was a man who demanded to be the greatest prophet of all times, something he definitely could not be if Jesus was a relative of Yahweh – and this even more so as Muhammad in relity was not a prophet: He did not have the gift of being able to make prophesies (he did nor even claim to or pretend to have it) – perhaps a messenger for someone or something, or an apostle, but not a prophet.

Also as mentioned Jesus himself frequently called Yahweh his father – and Jesus is reliable also according to the Quran (but as said the Quran/Mohammad cannot accept that Jesus may be the son of Yahweh, because then Muhammad is not the greatest of “prophets” – and the defence of Muhammad also is essential, as he in reality was a dubious and immoral character).

027 5/75b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00l 5/75c: “- – – deluded – – -.” The mistakes, etc. in the Quran makes it an open question who is deluded and who not.

028 5/75d: “- – – they (the non-Muslims*) are deluded away from the truth.” With all the mistaken facts – and perhaps other mistakes – in the Quran, it at best tells only partly the truth.

****029 5/81: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. **** Has the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. ****Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true. If not he is a false prophet.
  3. ****Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories).

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

030 5/83: “- – – they (Christians*) recognised the truth (corresponding to the Quran*)”. As said before: With that many mistakes in the Quran, the teachings of Muhammad at best are partly the truth.

*00m 5/84a: “What cause can we (Muhammad and the people*) have not to believe in Allah – – -?” Well, there are strong answers to that – all the mistakes in the Quran, the inhumanity of Muhammad and Islam, the at some points sick morality of Muhammad and Islam, etc., etc., etc. But the main point is that the question is wrong. The correct and relevant question had been: “What cause can we have to believe in Allah?”

**031 5/84b: “What cause can we have not to believe in Allah and the truth (the Quran*) which has come to us, – – -?” See among others 5/75 and 5/83. In addition – to answer the question: There are heavy reasons for not believing: The fact that the Quran – the basis of the religion – contains so many mistaken facts in a book that claims to be sent down from their god. Then how many mistakes are there in the religious points that are wrong? Is it really sent down from a god, or is it made up by someone here on Earth? And if it is sent down: In that case Allah very clearly is not omniscient – and not benevolent.

032 5/86: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

033 5/89: “- – – Signs – – -“. Invalid as proof for Allah or anything. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

034 5/97: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

**035 5/110a: “I (Allah*) thought thee (Jesus*) – – – the Gospel”. Salah. The Gospels did not exist until some 25 years after Jesus died (the oldest Gospel). See 3/3 and 3/48.

036 5/110b: “And behold, thou (the child Jesus*) makest out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, by My leave, and you brethest into it and it becometh a bird by My leave, – – – “. Sebuah dibuat bentuk cerita yang dibuat legenda di (apokrif) terdiri Anak Injil Thomas. See 3/49 – Muhammad often repeats himself, even if that makes no good literature. Selain: Sebuah heran seperti ini tidak pernah terlupakan dalam Alkitab – dan terutama bukan dengan “zalim” ingin memalsukan Alkitab untuk membuat Yesus lebih suci, seperti Quran sering mengatakan / menunjukkan.

037 5/111: “(the Disciples*) said: “We have faith, and do thou bear witness that we bow to Allah as Muslims”. cerita Made up – lihat 3 / 51 untuk penjelasan.

038 5/114a: “Send us (Jesus and the Disciples*) from heaven a Table set (with viands), – – -”. Cerita yang dibuat – tidak ada kesempatan yang seperti mukjizat yang jelas menunjukkan hubungan Yesus kepada Yahweh, akan dihilangkan dari Alkitab. Tidak satu pun kesempatan. Even if Muhammad had been right and Christians had falsified the NT, this is the kind of stories they had added, not omitted. Some Muslims say this may refer a little to “The Prayer of God” – give us our daily bread – in the Bible. Jauh lebih besar kemungkinan adalah versi berkerut dari makan Paskah terakhir.

039 5/114b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

040 5/116a: “Didst thou (Jesus*) say unto men, ‘worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah’?” Jesus was not involved with Allah – see 3/51 for explanation. As for a divine Jesus, that is not explicitly said in the Bible, but many places it is understood that he was (f. ex. if Yahweh really was his father in some way, and also all his miracles – confirmed by the Quran – indicates something). But when it comes to Mary, Islam is right – saints are not a part of the teaching of the Bible (on the other hand also some Muslims have saints, notably the Shi’ites). But no Christian – not one single – prays to Mary as a god.

*041 5/116b: Mohammad believed the Trinity consisted of God/Yahweh, Jesus and Mary. Salah. Baik Muhammad dan Quran salah secara ekstrim ketika ia / mereka sehingga percaya Maria adalah bagian dari Trinitas. (It consists (?) of God/Yahweh, Jesus and the Holy Spirit – also called the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of truth, the Spirit of God, or only the Spirit). Muhammad never the trinity and he never understood the Holy Spirit, even though he used the Spirit a few times in the Quran – and some Muslims refer to the Holy Spirit in the Quran as another name for the arch angel Gabriel(!) as it is “known” that Gabriel brought surahs and verses, but it is also said in the Quran that the Spirit brought some. Juga lihat 5 / 117.

*042 5/117: (Jesus said*): “Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord”. A story made up to strengthen Islam. If Jesus had said things like that about al-Lah, he had had very few followers – – – and had been killed within months by the Jewish clergy. See 3/51 for further explanation.

043 5/120: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural and wrong. Lihat 2/22a.

Surah 5: At least 41 mistakes + 13 likely mistakes.

Subtotal till here: At least 263 mistakes + 43 likely mistakes.

About siapmurtad

Siap memaparkan kesalahan alquran
This entry was posted in KESALAHAN QURAN. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s