Bagian II – Sambungan 9

1000Mistakes.com – Surah 11:

* 001 11 / 1: “- – – dari satu Yang Maha Bijaksana dan Yah-Berkenalan (dengan segala sesuatu)”. Fakta-fakta keliru dalam Quran menunjukkan ia tidak cukup akrab dengan segala sesuatu. Atau seseorang yang lain membuat Quran.

** 002 11 / 2: “(Katakanlah) ‘Sesungguhnya, saya (diutus) kepadamu (orang *) dari-Nya (Allah *) – – -“. Menurut Ibn Warraq kata “(Katakanlah)” tidak ada dalam bahasa aslinya Arab. Itu berarti bahwa di sini adalah Muhammad yang berbicara. Ada beberapa tempat (8 + malaikat? Berbicara) seperti itu di Quran. Tetapi bagaimana mungkin bahwa Muhammad berbicara dalam sebuah buku (pura-pura () dilakukan oleh Allah atau ada sejak keabadian -? Dan diturunkan oleh Allah (Beberapa Muslim mengatakan bahwa kata itu hanya dilupakan – tetapi kata-kata lebih berapa banyak kemudian mungkin? dilupakan dalam Quran?)

003 11/7a: “Dia (Allah *)-lah yang menciptakan langit (jamak dan salah) dan bumi dalam enam hari” – dan tempat lain mengatakan 8 hari (kontradiksi). Sekali lagi: Butuh banyak waktu lagi. Dan tuhan manapun tahu bahwa – tetapi Muhammad tidak. Muslim (kadang mengatakan bahwa kata Arab untuk hari, juga dapat berarti aeon, tetapi seperti yang telah kita menemukan terjemahan kata tidak dalam kualitas buku dan mendengar dari orang yang benar-benar tidak berpendidikan, ini tampaknya menjadi jelas mencoba menjelaskan kesalahan ini away). Juga melihat 4 Kesalahan Mega.

004 11/7b: “- – – langit – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2/22a.

00a 11/14a: “- – – ini wahyu (yang * Quran) diturunkan – – -“. Itu hanya pertanyaan untuk Islam: Tidak ada tuhan turunkan sebuah buku begitu penuh kesalahan, dll

005 11/14b: “- – – ini wahyu (Quran) yang diturunkan (penuh) dengan pengetahuan Allah, – – -“. Yah, semua kesalahan menunjukkan bahwa baik itu tidak dibuat oleh tuhan maha tahu atau sesuatu yang lain yang salah.

* 006 11/14c: “Jika kemudian mereka (dewa-dewa palsu Anda) menjawab tidak Anda (panggilan), kamu tahu bahwa ini Wahyu (yang * Quran) yang diturunkan (penuh) dengan pengetahuan Allah, – – -“. Hal ini secara logis 100% salah, seperti apakah tuhan-tuhan palsu atau lainnya jawaban dewa atau tidak, membuktikan apa-apa tentang Allah. Satu-satunya hal yang dapat membuktikan Allah, adalah jawaban jelas atau perbuatan dari Allah. Apakah Tuhan mencoba untuk menipu nya – sebagian besar buta huruf dan tidak berpendidikan – penonton dengan cara yang murah dan primitif seperti ini? Dalam hal, mengapa dia harus menipu mereka? Dan: Tidak pernah ada jawaban yang jelas jelas-jelas bentuk Allah.

007 11/17a: “- – – Hapus (Daftar) – – -“. Lihat 2 / 99.

Selain: Dalam buku “Pesan dari Quran”, bersertifikat oleh Al-Azhar Al-Sharif Akademi Riset Islam di Kairo (salah satu 2-3 universitas ternama di dunia Muslim pada subyek tersebut) dalam surat tertanggal 27. Desember 1998, diakui agak enggan bahwa tidak ada bukti untuk Allah, dan bahwa tidak mungkin untuk membuktikan bahwa dia. Jalur tambahan yang di sini adalah bahwa jika tidak ada ptoof bagi Allah dan tidak mungkin untuk membuktikan dia, secara otomatis ada juga ada bukti untuk, dan tidak mungkin untuk membuktikan hubungan Muhammad mengaku kepada Allah.

008 11/17b: “Jadilah tidak diragukan lagi daripadanya (Kebenaran – Quran – dari Allah *))”. Salah. Quran begitu penuh dengan kesalahan, dll, bahwa itu sama sekali tidak naif untuk meragukan.

009 11/17c: “- – – Kebenaran dari Tuhanmu (Allah *) – – -“. Entah itu adalah kesalahan bahwa Quran dari tuhan maha tahu, atau itu adalah kesalahan bahwa Allah adalah maha tahu. Terlalu banyak yang salah dalam buku ini.

* 010 11/22: “Tanpa diragukan lagi, ini (non-muslim *) adalah orang-orang yang sangat yang akan kehilangan sebagian besar di akhirat”. Semua kesalahan, logika yang salah, dll dalam Quran membuatnya sangat jelas ia bukan dari tuhan. Sebagian karena itu – dan ini sendiri adalah bukti 100% untuk sesuatu yang salah – ada banyak alasan untuk meragukan Islam adalah agama yang asli. Dan jika itu adalah agama yang dibuat – dan Islam akan memiliki pekerjaan berat membuktikan yang sebaliknya – ada banyak alasan untuk meragukan umat Islam akan tarif lebih baik daripada yang lain. Sebaliknya: Jika ada memang ada agama yang nyata dan jika ini dijalankan oleh seorang dewa yang baik, umat Islam tidak akan membaik dengan jika mereka hidup sesuai dengan etika mengerikan Quran, bahkan lebih buruk codex moral, perlakuan tidak manusiawi dari manusia sesama, tapi non-Muslim, makhluk, dll

011 11 / 28: “- – – Tanda Clear – – -“. Dalam kasus ini dikatakan Nuh yang berbicara, dan menurut Quran Nuh adalah seorang Muslim dikhususkan – – – tapi tidak pernah ada tanda yang jelas / bukti untuk apa pun terhadap Allah – tidak apa-apa terbukti. (Itu adalah salah satu alasan utama mengapa keyakinan buta dituntut dan dimuliakan oleh Muhammad dan oleh Islam).

012 11/40a: “- – – dan semua mata bumi dipancarkan keluar (dan membuat banjir untuk Nuh *) – – -.” Al-Qur’an tidak eksplisit mengatakan bahwa banjir itu menutupi seluruh dunia, dan karena tidak ada jejak seperti banjir yang ditemukan, banyak umat Islam mencoba untuk memberitahu Anda bahwa banjir hanya daerah. Tidak Islam terpelajar jujur ​​mungkin percaya begitu, tapi yang berpendidikan tahu bahwa satu lagi cerita yang tidak benar – lain-al taqiyya atau Kitman – karena Quran jelas mengatakan bahwa bahtera berakhir pada sebuah gunung yang tinggi di Suriah, sesuatu yang menuntut tingkat begitu tinggi air yang secara fisik tidak mungkin kecuali banjir itu universal (air telah menghilang ke tempat-tempat non-banjir jika tidak). Mungkin 1000 m di atas permukaan laut kita?

Tetapi yang membuat masalah bagi ayat ini. Sungguh jumlah besar air – mungkin memberi air 1000 m di seluruh dunia – tidak bisa menyembur keluar dari bumi tanpa meninggalkan lubang kosong yang besar di sana – baik benar-benar kosong, atau setidaknya dengan tekanan yang sangat berkurang, (meskipun kemungkinan besar kosong , karena hampir mustahil untuk kompres air dan kemudian menjelaskan memancar dengan ekspansi air (untuk kompres air untuk menggandakan densitas, kita telah membaca bahwa Anda memerlukan tekanan 44000ooo kg/cm2 – atau sangat sekitar 30 kali tekanan pada pusat bumi)). Lubang ini akan terlalu besar (dalam rangka untuk mengandung cukup air) yang akan stabil, dan akan runtuh. Tidak ada tempat di Bumi jejak dari runtuh besar tersebut.

(Hal ini di sini di antara tempat lain yang Anda akan bertemu dengan penjelasan seperti banjir = ke atas pengisian Basin Mediterania – cerita begitu jelas al-taqiyya (bohong halal) bahwa itu adalah disukai Itu terjadi mengisi 4 -. 5 juta tahun lalu, dan jauh sebelum manusia modern ada Selain itu terjadi karena Afrika dan Eropa perlahan-lahan hanyut terpisah dan Selat Gibraltar sangat perlahan membuka -. sentimeter setahun -. yang berarti bahwa pembukaan dan dengan demikian aliran air kecil yang mengisi waktu seratus tahun dan mungkin banyak lagi, dengan tingkat air naik perlahan – satu atau beberapa meter setahun -. dan tidak seperti bencana dari banjir Nuh tidak ada Sesuatu Muslim berpendidikan memiliki alasan untuk tidak memeriksa sebelum menceritakan cerita-cerita seperti ini, terutama karena ini adalah fakta yang dikenal di kalangan orang berpendidikan, dan kemungkinan besar mereka menyadari fakta-fakta riil sebelum kisah berputar seperti itu.

** 013 11/40b: “Kami (Allah *) berkata (kepada Nuh *): ‘memulai dalamnya (tabut *), dari jenis masing-masing (binatang *) dua – laki-laki dan perempuan, dan keluarga Anda – – -” . Quran mengatakan apa-apa tentang ukuran bahtera. Tetapi Alkitab menurut Leksikon majalah ilmiah mengatakan hampir 200 m panjang, sekitar 30 m lebar dan beberapa 12 m tinggi dengan 3 lantai. Yang membuat beberapa 18000 meter persegi berbicara kasar. (NIV mengatakan 300 hasta panjangnya, 50 hasta lebar dan 30 hasta tinggi = 140 m panjang, 23 m dan lebar 13, 5 m tinggi. Dengan 3 lantai yang berarti beberapa 9600 m. persegi saja.) Tapi ada lebih dari 10ooo macam “normal” binatang, hampir 2ooo jenis burung, dan setidaknya 10 juta jenis serangga dan hewan serangga-seperti lainnya, dan mudah satu juta hewan kecil lainnya – seperti siput, cacing, dll hanya tidak akan cukup ruang untuk begitu banyak, belum lagi 2 masing-masing. Selain itu akan menjadi pertanyaan tentang makanan untuk semua binatang. Quran mengatakan apa-apa tentang berapa lama waktu perjalanan berlangsung, tetapi menurut Alkitab butuh lebih dari satu tahun. Itu akan mengambil satu HEC dari banyak makanan bagi yang banyak hewan – dan bagaimana mereka f. ex. toko daging untuk karnivora, atau hidup serangga untuk beberapa laba-laba, dll? Semua makanan yang akan mengambil banyak ruang – lebih dari binatang itu sendiri. Mustahil dalam perahu “kecil”. Dan di atas itu, ada pertanyaan tentang makanan khusus untuk hewan khusus – daun kayu putih untuk koala f. ex. Lebih lanjut ada kemungkinan bahwa Taman Eden berada di selatan Irak (jika pernah ada) menurut ilmu – – – dan kemudian ada pertanyaan di mana mereka menemukan f. ex. rusa, beruang kutub, caribous, condors, biksu, pumas, kanguru, orang utan dll, dll, hanya untuk menyebutkan beberapa. Dan ada pertanyaan tentang siapa yang makan dan memberikan air untuk semua binatang, belum lagi yang terus semuanya bersih – keluarga Nuh setelah semua agak kecil (8 menurut Alkitab). Juga hukum alam mengatakan bahwa salah satu pasangan masing-masing tidak akan cukup untuk menetapkan semua ras binatang – tidak ada variasi DNA. Sebenarnya berbagai ilmu DNA telah ditemukan, pembicaraan panjang tentang sangat berbeda waktu sejak kelompok hewan sebagian besar hanya beberapa orang. Cerita ini tidak benar. Ada kemungkinan kecil bahwa orang seperti Nuh pernah tinggal dan selamat dari banjir besar cukup baginya tampak untuk menutupi seluruh dunia – f. ex. ia selamat dengan keluarganya dan ternaknya, dll Sains tahu banjir sekitar satu atau dua benar-benar besar di sekitar waktu yang tepat (satu di Mesopotamia dan banjir di Laut Hitam – lihat di bawah)). Tapi semuanya berada dalam setelah semua skala yang lebih kecil, dan tidak seperti diceritakan dalam Quran.

Muslim mencoba mengurangi masalah dengan menceritakan bahwa Nuh hanya harus membawa dua dari masing-masing ternak dijinakkan – tetapi bukan itu yang Quran katakan. Mereka lebih lanjut mengatakan bahwa itu hanya adalah banjir besar, tapi daerah – yang tidak dikatakan dalam Quran, tetapi juga tidak mengatakan itu adalah satu di seluruh dunia (tapi rhe melihat akhir dari “perjalanan” di bawah). Tapi kemudian beberapa membuat sebuah kesalahan yang nyata – atau mencoba menipu – karena apa yang berikut di bawah ini tidak dikenal oleh kebanyakan orang, hanya ke yang lebih berpendidikan, dan kecurangan dari “pangkat dan file” karena itu mudah: ex F.. “Pesan dari Quran”, bersertifikat oleh sebuah universitas Muslim atas (Al-Ahzar Al-Sharif Islamic Research Academy, Kairo) mengatakan:

  1. banjir harus telah menjadi mengisi dari Laut Mediterania – tanpa menyebutkan bahwa yang terjadi (ketika Selat Gibraltar dibuka) beberapa 4-5.000.000 tahun lalu. (Lihat di atas).
  2. Semua ini juga tanpa menyebutkan bahwa mengisi waktu bertahun-tahun (lihat di atas) – dapat sebanyak 100 atau lebih – sebagai pembuka itu kecil di awal dan sungai melambat jauh sebelum itu penuh. Dekat yang sekarang disebut Israel dan Mesir air naik hanya beberapa meter per tahun – tidak banjir sangat kasar, seperti dijelaskan dalam Al-Qur’an (f. ex 11/42.).
  3. Bagaimana mungkin lambat pengisian dari laut tersebut, memberikan banjir bandang di tempat yang sekarang Irak, dimana hal ini seharusnya telah terjadi? – Di atau dekat Irak di suatu tempat.
  4. Mungkin mereka mencampurnya dengan pengisian dari Laut Hitam (juga disebutkan oleh Muslim)? Tapi juga yang mengambil waktu – dan jauh dari Irak. Itu terjadi setelah zaman es terakhir yang berhenti 10ooo – mungkin sebagai terlambat sebagai di bawah periode hangat (bahkan es kurang) 5700 tahun yang lalu. Waktunya mungkin ok, tapi kemudian baik Nuh atau kisah dalam hal ini telah melakukan perjalanan – dan juga ini lambat mengisi tidak dapat menjelaskan cuaca dan gelombang.
  5. Ada juga teori yang sangat spekulatif tentang asteroide atau sesuatu jatuh ke Samudera Hindia – sebuah kisah lama menyebutkan sebuah constallation astronomi khusus dalam kasus titik-titik awal banjir sampai 10. Mei 2807 SM. Tapi itu adalah teori yang sangat spekulatif hanya dibangun di legenda tua dan sedikit sejarah Chineese.
  6. Akhirnya ada ekstrim, tetapi banjir yang kurang dikenal di Mesopotamia – sekarang sekitar Irak – beberapa 5200 tahun yang lalu. Dengan mudah dapat menjelaskan banjir itu sendiri, dan jika ini adalah luar biasa “biasa” banjir, itu mungkin juga menjelaskan cuaca. Tetapi bahkan jika besar, itu terjadi lokal. (Tapi Quran tidak langsung menyatakan bahwa itu mencakup seluruh dunia – tapi di sisi lain melihat tepat di bawah – akhir perjalanan).
  7. Dan satu teka-teki yang tidak sesuai dengan Islam “penjelasan” tentang banjir “lokal”:.. Quran mengklaim bahwa bahtera terdampar di sebuah gunung di Syria (Gunung Al-Judi (11/44) – tidak Ararat di Turki Mt al- . Judi hari ini adalah identifiead sebagai 2.089 m tinggi “Jabal Judi” atau “Dagh Judi” di dekat kota modern Cizre selatan perbatasan Turki) Untuk tabut untuk memiliki terdampar di sebuah gunung yang tinggi, banjir harus universal – jika tidak air telah mengalir pergi untuk kosong, tempat yang lebih rendah – pengetahuan dasar tentang fisika.

Untuk universitas untuk kembali menggertak seperti banjir = mengisi Laut Mediterania, dll tidak jujur ​​dan mengatakan sesuatu – para profesor di universitas harus tahu fakta-fakta tersebut, dan tahu itu salah, atau setidaknya mereka tidak memiliki alasan untuk tidak memeriksa apakah itu mungkin. Ini adalah fakta yang dikenal di kalangan berpendidikan. Serupa klaim dalam 23/27 – 26/119

* 014 11 / 42: “Jadi Tabut melayang dengan mereka pada gelombang (menjulang tinggi) seperti gunung, dan Nuh memanggil anaknya (yang berada di pantai *) – – -“. Ketika perahu mengapung di antara gelombang seperti gunung, tidak mungkin untuk berkomunikasi dengan orang darat. Muhammad, hidup di padang pasir, mungkin tidak tahu. Tapi tidak ada tuhan telah melakukan kesalahan seperti ini – mengatakan mereka bisa berkomunikasi. Bahwa jenis gelombang terlalu berisik, dan begitu juga angin yang biasanya menyertai semacam itu laut, plus Anda harus tinggal jauh dari pantai tidak akan diambil oleh gelombang dan menghancurkan terhadap pantai yang disebutkan. Drama dongeng dengan fakta yang salah.

Ini juga merupakan bukti untuk itu skenario dramatis dalam Quran tidak dapat dijelaskan dengan pengisian Mediterania atau Laut Hitam: Bahkan air terjun yang sangat besar tidak menghasilkan gelombang “seperti gunung” – aliran relatif stabil air tidak melakukannya kecuali dekat dengan air terjun, bahkan ketika itu sangat besar, dan karena mereka dikurangi sebanding dengan jarak mereka menjalankan – jarak berganda = setengah energi per meter depan gelombang, karena mereka tersebar di lingkaran (semi) (NB: Ini tidak pergi untuk gelombang tertiup angin dengan front gelombang linier, dan pasti tidak kalau angin masih bertiup dan mentransfer energi gelombang – satunya di mana sumber gelombang adalah “titik” seperti air terjun – atau sebuah batu yang dilemparkan ke dalam air) . Dan air terjun – tidak peduli seberapa besar – tidak pernah menghasilkan badai yang mengerikan (disebutkan tempat-tempat lain).

015 11 / 43: “Anak (dari Nuh *) menjawab – – -“. Dalam jenis cuaca baik panggilan atau jawaban itu mungkin – deru angin dan menerjang ombak yang terlalu berisik bahkan jika jarak yang telah mungkin. Selain itu Anda memiliki pengaruh angin “bertiup pergi” suara Anda. Juga lihat 11/42 tepat di atas.

016 11 / 44: “O, bumi menelan air Mu – – -“. Fisik tidak mungkin dengan jumlah air. Tapi kalau banjir itu lokal, air bisa pergi ke laut. .. (Tapi fakta bahwa Quran mengatakan tabut berakhir di gunung al-Judi (sebelumnya Mt Qardu menurut Muhammad Asad: “Pesan dari Quran) di Suriah, menunjukkan bahwa itu adalah sesuatu yang sangat besar – air tidak dapat mencapai tinggi di sebuah gunung di Suriah, kecuali tingkat air kira-kira sama di seluruh dunia.

017 11 / 53: “- – – Hapus (Daftar) – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2 / 99.

018 11 / 59: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

019 11 / 63: “- – – Hapus (Daftar) – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2 / 99.

020 11 / 64: “Ini unta betina Allah – – -“. Hal ini merujuk pada sebuah legenda Arab tua Muhammad digunakan dalam Quran: unta datang keluar dari tebing yang solid dan menjadi nabi. Percayalah jika Anda inginkan.

* 021 11/67: “A (besar) Blast menyalip yang zalim (kaum Tsamud *), dan mereka berbaring bersujud (* mati) di rumah mereka sebelum pagi – – -.” Nah, dalam 7 / 78 mereka dibunuh oleh gempa bumi. Salah satunya pasti salah – hanya satu kontradiksi lagi, meskipun tidak mengklaim adanya kontradiksi yang dikatakan dalam Quran untuk membuktikannya diturunkan dari Allah. Kehadiran contrasictions concequently kemudian harus membuktikan ia bukan dari Allah.

022 11 / 69: “- – – kabar gembira – – -“. Paling-paling hanya sebagian benar. Lihat di atas 2/97c dan 61 / 3 di bawah ini.

023 11 / 88: “- – – Hapus (tanda) – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2 / 39.

* 024 11 / 92: “! Dia (* Lot) berkata, ‘Hai kaumku,” Lot adalah seorang imigran dari jauh (Ur di Kasdim di Irak Selatan – sekarang ia tinggal dekat Laut Mati, kemungkinan besar apa yang sekarang jordan). Hal ini sesuai dengan baik Alkitab dan Quran. Orang-orang Sodom dan Gomora bukan orang Lot. Dan baik Quran dan Alkitab menunjukkan ada jarak antara Lot dan penduduk lokal – mereka pasti tidak menjadi umat-Nya. Namun karena Quran menyatakan bahwa nabi (yang Lot menurut Quran) kecuali Muhammad hanya dikirim kepada orang-orang mereka sendiri, buku ini perlu membuatnya menjadi lokal di daerah tersebut, milik warga setempat.

025 11 / 93: “Dan O saya (Lot’s *) orang!” Lihat 11/92 tepat di atas.

026 11 / 103: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

027 11 / 107: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

028 11 / 108: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

029 11 / 110: “Kami (Allah *) tentu memberikan Kitab kepada Musa, – – -“. Menurut ilmu pengetahuan ia jelas tidak – buku-buku yang ditulis 400-700 tahun kemudian. (Alkitab mengatakan Musa mendapat 10 perintah-perintah yang tertulis di loh batu + ia mendapat hukum secara lisan dan menuliskannya kemudian. Hukum kadang-kadang digunakan sebagai nama bagi Kitab Musa, tetapi dalam kenyataannya hukum hanya merupakan bagian kecil itu).

030 11 / 120: “- – – di dalamnya (kisah dalam Al-Qur’an *) ada datang kepadamu (Muhammad / kaum muslimin *) Kebenaran – – -“. Dengan semua fakta salah, tata bahasa salah, dll, dan kesalahan bahkan mungkin lebih dalam buku ini, dapat di terbaik menjadi sebagian benar – dan kemudian masalah ini adalah untuk mencari tahu apa yang benar dan yang tidak, dari cerita Anda tidak positif tahu salah.

031 11 / 123: “- – – langit – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2 / 29.

Surah 11: Setidaknya 31 kesalahan + 1 kesalahan mungkin.

Surah 12:

001 12 / 1: “- – – Buku yg mudah dipahami (Quran *)”. Sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan, titik logis tidak valid, dll, hampir tidak yg mudah dipahami.

002 12/2a: “Kami (Allah *) telah mengirimkan itu (Quran) down – – -“. Tidak ada tuhan maha tahu yang diturunkan buku dengan banyak kesalahan, kontradiksi, kasus logika yang salah, dll Yang berarti bahwa baik Allah tidak maha tahu, atau seseorang yang lain telah membuat Quran.

003 12/2b: “- – – dalam urutan itu kamu dapat belajar kebijaksanaan”. Tidak ada yang belajar kebijaksanaan dari sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan dan logika yang salah.

004 12 / 7: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

005 12/19 +20: Berikut adalah sesuatu yang salah – atau satu lagi kontradiksi. Ayat 19 mengatakan bahwa “pelancong” menemukan Yusuf dalam sumur tempat saudara-saudaranya telah dilemparkan ke bawah, dan membawanya untuk budak dan tersembunyi dia. Ayat 20 memberitahu saudara-saudaranya menjual Yusuf dengan beberapa dirham (koin perak kecil). Keduanya tidak mungkin benar.

00a 12/31: Ada sedikit logika dalam 2 poin di sini: Mengapa memberikan mereka pisau sebelum menunjukkan mereka Yusuf? (Beberapa Muslim mengatakan itu untuk memotong buah, tetapi ketika Anda memotong buah, Anda memotong buah dan berbaring pisau kebanyakan – beberapa punya pisau di tangan mereka pada saat tertentu, dan lebih sedikit memegang pisau Dan itu tidak. reaksi alami menjadi begitu terpesona oleh wajah, bahwa semua dan setiap dari mereka melukai jari mereka – satu atau paling banyak dua bisa melakukannya, meskipun tidak mungkin, tetapi tidak lebih.

00b 12/32: Apa logika menempatkan Yusuf di penjara ketika itu terbukti dia tidak bersalah? Ini setelah semua itu pada saat di mana istri seharusnya berhati-hati. (Muslim memiliki semacam penjelasan, tetapi hanya semacam). Tapi penjara diperlukan untuk cerita.

* 006 12 / 40: “(Islam *) adalah agama yang benar – – -“. Dapatkah sebuah agama yang berdasarkan buku dengan kesalahan begitu banyak, dan dengan tidak bukti yang sah tunggal untuk apa yang penting, benar-benar menjadi “agama benar”? Cukup no. Terutama ketika semua buku terletak hanya pada kata-kata manusia dengan sangat diragukan moral – mencuri / merampok, main perempuan, memperkosa, memperbudak, membunuh, berbohong – bahkan tidak menghormati sumpahnya sendiri – dll

007 12 / 41: “- – – ia akan menggantung dari lintas – – -“. Mesir pada waktu Yusuf tidak menggunakan eksekusi oleh penyaliban.

008 12 / 49: “Kemudian akan datang setelah tahun itu (periode) di mana orang akan memiliki air aboundant – – -“. Tapi kata Arab yang digunakan, dan yang diterjemahkan dengan “air aboundant” adalah “yughathu” atau “yughath” yang pada kenyataannya dikatakan berarti “menjadi lega oleh hujan” (Yusuf Al-Fadi (Kristen)). Seperti juga “Pesan dari Quran” telah bahwa terjemahan (diterjemahkan dari Swedia): “- – – satu tahun ketika orang-orang akan diberkati oleh hujan – – -“, dan memiliki komentar yang sama dengan kata dan seperti yang kita telah bertemu terjemahan ini sebelumnya, kami menilai bahwa Yusuf Ali telah “ditarik” transkrip-nya sedikit. Tapi di Mesir seseorang sedikit hujan dan tidak ada – itu adalah banjir di sungai Nil yang membawa air. (“Pesan dari Quran elegan menjelaskan bahwa itu harus berarti hujan lebih jauh ke selatan di Afrika, yang membuat Nil besar, tapi bukan itu yang teks Arab mengatakan).

009 12/51a: “Apa urusan Anda (* para wanita ‘) ketika Anda kamu tidak mencoba untuk merayu dia (Yusuf *) – – -“. Menurut 12/23 hanya adalah istri dari Aziz yang mencoba ini. Kesalahan dan kontradiksi.

* 010 12/51b: Para wanita di Potifar’s (? Nama ini adalah dari Alkitab – yang Aziz (judul atau pekerjaan) dalam Quran) rumah berkata: “Allah melindungi kita”. Nama dan tuhan Allah tidak ada di jajaran politeistik lama di Mesir – dan jelas bukan kalangan kelas atas (dari budak dan pedagang mereka mungkin telah mendengar tentang Yahweh, tetapi tidak Allah, dan hampir tidak bahkan al-Lah yang awal). dewa mereka Osiris, Aton, Amon, dan yang lainnya. Sebenarnya ada ternyata tidak satu pun jejak monoteisme kalangan kelas atas di Mesir dalam waktu yang lama. (Kecuali akn-Aton dan dewa matahari)

011 12/52: Istri Potifar (yang Aziz): “- – – Allah tidak akan membimbing – – -“. Lihat 12/51b.

00C 12/69: Yusuf mengatakan Benjamin: “Lihatlah! Akulah (sendiri) kakak – – – “. Ini tidak sesuai dengan ayat 70-77 bahwa ia mengatakan hal itu saat ini.

012 12 / 77: “Jika ia (Benjamin *) mencuri, ada saudara-Nya (Yusuf *) yang melakukan mencuri sebelum (nya)”. Di sini ada sesuatu yang salah: Si anak / pemuda Yusuf tidak dituduh mencuri. (Adapun umur Yusuf ketika dia dibawa ke Mesir, Yusuf Ali dalam “Arti Quran” mengatakan bahwa ia 16 atau 17 atau mungkin bahkan 18 Kami tidak menemukan alasan untuk percaya apa pun -. Ia mungkin telah usia itu atau muda atau bahkan jauh lebih muda).

013 12 / 84: “Dan (* Yakub) matanya menjadi putih dengan kesedihan – – -“. Mata tidak bisa menjadi putih (dan lebih atau kurang buta) dari kesedihan. Itu terjadi karena sakit atau kerusakan fisik pada mata – terkadang berkaitan dengan usia. Setiap dewa sudah tahu – Muhammad mungkin tidak.

014 12 / 94: “Ketika meninggalkan Caravan (Mesir), ayah mereka (Yakub *) berkata (kepada anak-anaknya *) – – -“. Tetapi 12/87 mengatakan: “Ya saya (* Yakub) anak! Pergilah kamu (ke Mesir *) dan menanyakan tentang Yusuf dan saudaranya – – – “. Yakub tidak hanya datang ke Mesir pada perjalanan itu – Yakub tidak dapat berbicara dengan anak-anaknya ketika mereka meninggalkan Mesir. Sebuah kesalahan dan kontradiksi dari situasi nyata. (Ini juga jelas dari 12/96: “Ketika pembawa kabar baik datang (ke * rumah Yakub) – – -.” Yakub bisa mengatakan apa-apa untuk anak-anaknya sampai mereka pulang dengan dia.)

015 12 / 95: “Mereka (anak-anak Yakub) mengatakan (= menjawab ketika kafilah meninggalkan Mesir *): ‘Demi Allah (?*)! Sesungguhnya engkau dalam pikiran mengembara Mu tua ‘”. Lihat 12/94 tepat di atas.

00d 12/99: “- – – dia (Yusuf *) menyediakan rumah untuk orang tuanya – – -“. Tidak mungkin, sebagai ibunya (Rachel) sudah meninggal ketika Benjamin lahir – dia bisa menyediakan rumah hanya untuk ayahnya. (Islam menjelaskan atau “menjelaskan” ini dengan mengklaim bahwa ia diperhitungkan saudara perempuan ibunya (Lea -. Juga istri dari Yakub) untuk menjadi ibunya, tetapi tidak ada dalam Quran mengatakan demikian Tapi kemudian cukup normal bagi Islam membuat pernyataan tanpa fakta) Juga:. Bagaimana mungkin Abraham menjadi Muslim yang baik ketika ia menikahi 2 saudara pada waktu yang sama? – Ketat dilarang melakukan oleh Allah dalam Syariah.

00e 12/100: “- – – tua – – -“. Lihat 12/99 tepat di atas.

015a 12/100 (A95 – A98 edisi tahun 2008, A99): “- – – dan mereka Yakub dan keluarganya *) jatuh dalam sujud, (semua) sebelum dia (Yusuf *) – – -.” Berikut ini adalah besar teka-teki di dalam teka-teki dikelilingi oleh teka-teki bagi Islam. Seorang nabi saleh seperti Yakub mustahil bisa sujud dirinya sebelum manusia. Dan seorang nabi sebagai saleh seperti Yusuf mustahil bisa menerimanya. Sesuatu harus salah dalam teks. Ini meskipun teks Arab “sudjdjadah lahu wa-kharru” secara harfiah berarti “- – – dan mereka jatuh di hadapan-Nya (alternatif” seperti di “) sujud (atau” berdoa untuk dia “menurut salinan Swedia)”. Islam tidak memiliki penjelasan yang baik yang kami temukan. Menurut Abbas untuk ‘Abd Allah ibn’ itu “dia” dalam “sebelum dia” harus merujuk kepada Allah – yang paling jelas tidak lakukan. Razi menjelaskan bahwa mimpi Yusuf tidak sepenuhnya terpenuhi, dll Sebenarnya di sini teks sangat jelas – dan satu-satunya cendekiawan Muslim setuju, adalah bahwa arti harfiah pasti salah, dan ini tanpa memiliki makna alternatif yang baik.

016 12 / 101: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

017 12 / 104: “Dan tidak ada apakah Junjungan pahala (Muhammad *) minta mereka (orang / Muslim *) untuk ini (agama baru *) – – -“. Tidak, tidak ada kecuali 20% dari semua nilai dicuri / dirampok dan budak dari serangan dan perang, 100% dari semua nilai yang diambil dari korban yang menyerah tanpa pertarungan, banyak perempuan dan banyak dan banyak kekuasaan mutlak dan tak terbantahkan / kediktatoran, dan banyak dan banyak prajurit bebas – ia hanya harus membayar mereka dengan janji-janji tentang surga dan janji-janji merusak tentang kaya perang dicuri dari manusia, negara dan budaya yang kaya. Dan “miskin-pajak” (kebanyakan 2,5-10% – sebagian besar sekitar 2,5% – dari apa yang Anda dimiliki setiap tahun jika Anda tidak terlalu miskin) – yang ia jauh dari hanya menghabiskan bagi masyarakat miskin – dan kadang-kadang brutal zakat – yang pajak dari non-Muslim (meskipun baik 20% maupun 100% maupun pajak semua untuk penggunaan pribadinya – banyak yang dikeluarkan untuk peperangan yang lebih dan untuk “hadiah” untuk membuat Arab tetangga muslim yang baik + beberapa diberikan kepada orang miskin ),

Dan harga itu budaya masyarakat sekitarnya dan manusia dan kehidupan mereka hancur – untuk mendapatkan kekuasaan lebih untuk dia. Hal ini disangkal jelas dari Quran bahwa dia paling tidak suka wanita dan kekuasaan.

018 12/105a: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

019 12 / 105: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

020 12 / 108: “- – – bukti yang jelas – – -“. Tidak ada satu bukti yang jelas tunggal baik untuk Allah atau untuk Muhammad adalah seorang nabi di semua Quran. Tidak satu. (Mungkin ada beberapa pengecualian untuk bukti untuk dewa dalam poin yang diambil dari Alkitab, tetapi mereka dalam kasus yang bukti-bukti untuk Yahweh, bukan untuk Allah – dua dewa tidak bisa menjadi orang yang sama, kecuali tuhan yang secara mental sakit – skizofrenia – sebagai ajaran pada dasarnya terlalu berbeda, terutama seperti satu bertemu Yahweh dalam “perjanjian baru” dalam NT – f. ex Lukas 22/20).. Juga lihat 2 / 99.

021 12 / 109: “juga tidak Kami (Allah *) mengutus engkau (sebagai Utusan) setiap tetapi laki-laki, yang Kami tidak mengilhami – (pria) yang tinggal di pemukiman manusia.” Salah. Menurut Quran juga malaikat dikirim, f. ex. kepada Abraham, kepada Lot, dan kepada Maria, dan setidaknya untuk jin jin dikirim sebagai utusan.

00f 12/111a: “. Ini adalah – – – instruksi untuk orang yang berakal” Ini mungkin begitu – banyak pemikir muslim dan orang-orang terpelajar telah dan laki-laki cerdas. Tapi untuk apa gunanya? – Ketika Anda memberikan bahkan orang-orang yang paling cerdas informasi yang salah dari awal, kesimpulan mereka pasti menjadi hanya kesalahan dan kesalahan, tidak peduli seberapa cerdas mereka. Mengutip akhir Henrik Ibsen dalam “Peer Gynt”: “naar utgangspunktet er som galest, blir resultatet tidt originalest” – yang berarti sesuatu seperti “ketika fakta-fakta yang Anda gunakan adalah benar-benar salah, hasilnya sering menjadi sangat ‘asli'”. Juga: “Benar fakta dikalikan dengan satu mahasiswa memberikan jawaban yang lebih baik daripada fakta palsu dikalikan dengan sejumlah pria wice”.

00g 12/111b: “Ini bukan kisah diciptakan – – -“. Bila ada begitu banyak kesalahan dalam sebuah buku, apa yang Anda harapkan pembaca untuk percaya? – Di rincian setidaknya harus diciptakan.

** 022 12/111c: “- – – konfirmasi dari apa yang terjadi sebelumnya (Alkitab) – – -“. Bila ada kesalahan begitu banyak dan begitu serius dalam sebuah buku, tidak diharapkan bahwa pembaca bisa percaya terlalu banyak. Hanya cerita tentang Josef diambil dari Alkitab (yang “berjalan di depan”). Tapi cerita ini banyak berubah (mungkin ia pada kenyataannya telah diceritakan kembali legenda setempat tentang Josef, sedikit berdasarkan Alkitab) – hal ini tidak ada konfirmasi. Di latar belakang semua kesalahan didokumentasikan dalam Quran, yang paling mudah untuk percaya, jika ada – Quran atau Alkitab? Setidaknya beberapa rincian dalam cerita dalam Quran tidak logis. Lebih ke titik: Ada terlalu banyak dan terlalu fundamental perbedaan – Quran tidak mengkonfirmasi Alkitab.

023 12/111d: “- – – sebuah penjelasan rinci tentang segala sesuatu – – -“. Salah. Ada banyak hal yang diperlukan untuk hidup normal – belum lagi kehidupan modern – yang tidak dibuat jelas, dan bahkan lebih lagi untuk rincian. F. ex. hukum Muslim warisan jauh dari jelas dalam Quran, dan dalam banyak, banyak hal Islam tidak memiliki garis pedoman dari Allah – mereka harus ekstrapolasi dari hal-hal lain atau similare dikatakan atau dilakukan dalam Quran atau di Hadist.

024 12/111e: “- – – Panduan a – – -“. Lihat 12/111d tepat di atas.

Surah 12: Setidaknya 24 kesalahan + 6 kesalahan mungkin.

Surah 13:

001 13/1a: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00a 13/1b: “- – – Buku yang telah diwahyukan – – -“. Itulah salah satu pertanyaan: Apakah terungkap – dan dalam hal oleh siapa? Lihat 13/1b tepat di bawah.

** 002 13/1c: “- – – Kitab: apa yang telah diturunkan kepadamu dari Tuhanmu (Allah *) – – -“. Itu adalah pertanyaan, mengutip Hamlet: Apakah seorang dewa benar-benar menghasilkan sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan dan tidak valid “bukti”? No

Alternatif adalah bahwa f. ex. Iblis menyamar sebagai Gabriel dan dalam kasus lain mengatakan kepada Muhammad “oleh inspirasi” (mengutip “Arti Quran” oleh Yusuf Ali) apa dengan demikian adalah “diturunkan” padanya. Kekejaman agama yang kemudian akan dijelaskan. Secara pribadi kita meragukan hal ini, jika tidak ada alasan lain, maka karena bahkan setan tidak akan membuat kesalahan begitu banyak, kontradiksi, dll – ia hanya tidak ingin diketahui oleh korbannya cepat ot nanti.

Alternatif lain adalah bahwa hal itu semua berasal dari otak sakit – TLE (Temporal Lobe Epilepsy) + nafsu akan kekuasaan dengan mudah bisa menjelaskan semuanya.

Namun alternatif lain adalah bahwa hal itu tidak diungkapkan, tetapi dibuat dengan darah dingin. Kenyataan bahwa banyak dari kesalahan yang sesuai dengan ilmu yang salah dari waktu dan area Muhammad, dan juga fakta bahwa Muhammad tidak cukup bodoh untuk percaya semua yang dikatakan dalam Quran, dapat menunjukkan bahwa itu dibuat.

Adapun argumen terakhir: ex F.. bahwa mukjizat tidak akan membuat beberapa orang percaya, Muhammad terlalu cerdas dan terlalu banyak tahu tentang orang-orang untuk percaya diri – f. ex. Yesus adalah bukti yang baik dari sebaliknya: Banyak yang tidak percaya meskipun semuanya, tapi cukup nomor datang untuk percaya karena apa yang mereka lihat dan saksikan. Hal yang sama adalah kesimpulan dari cerita yang Muhammad sendiri bercerita tentang para penyihir dan Musa: Mereka datang (menurut kata-kata Muhammad sendiri) untuk percaya setelah keajaiban kecil.

*** 003 13/1d: “(dengan * Quran) adalah Kebenaran”.

  1. Ada banyak salah fakta bahwa sejarah, geografi, arkeologi, sastra, seni, dll, membuktikan salah. (Setidaknya 1700 dipercaya +! Tempat dengan fakta salah, dan mungkin 3000 + error semua bersama-sama).
  2. Ada “lebih dari 100 divergensi (kesalahan *) dari aturan dan struktur bahasa Arab yang normal”, menurut Ali Dashi “Dua puluh tiga tahun”.
  3. Ada banyak ayat di mana ia jelas adalah Muhammad yang berbicara, dalam kontradiksi sekali dengan semua pernyataan bahwa buku tersebut dibuat oleh Allah atau telah ada dari kekekalan (meskipun beberapa tempat -. F. ex 6 / 114 dalam Yusuf Ali atau 27 / 91 di Pikthall atau Dawood – kesalahan yang disamarkan oleh penerjemah yang tidak jujur ​​memasukkan kata “Katakanlah”, menurut Ibn Warraq).
  4. Quran menyatakan bahwa Quran dalam bahasa Arab murni. Tetapi menurut al-Suyuti setidaknya ada 107 kata-kata asing yang digunakan dalam buku, dan Arthur Jeffery (spesialis di Arab dan dalam kata-kata non-Arab dalam Quran) mengatakan ca. 275 kata dari bahasa Aram, Ibrani, dan Yunani, dan juga dari Suriah, Ethiopia, dan Persia. Bahkan kata Quran dikatakan dari Suriah. (Orang-orang Arab kemudian ditemukan alasan bagi mereka kesalahan: Al-Tha’alibi mengatakan bahwa Arab mulai menggunakan kata-kata dan membuat mereka Arab Penjelasan mudah tapi tidak jujur..)
  5. There was used an alphabet without vowels, and to make it even worse, when writing the Quran/surahs in the old time, they did not even use the small points newer Arab uses to specify different letters. Because of this it often is difficult or impossible to know which word is meant. To use an English example: If you only have the consonants “h” and “s” and put in vowels, the result may be “house” or “hose” or “his” or “has”. Because of this there are thousands of possibilities for mistakes – or different meanings. Muslims tell the Quran was finished not later than 656 AD, but that is not true – only the simplified version using the old unfinished alphabet was used then, and lots of versions were written as the language and the alphabet were completed. Not until 900 AD was the Quran finished, and by then there existed numbers of versions. Muslims under the very learned Ibn Mohair (died 935 AD) finally canonized 14 versions (see Preface). Over the centuries 11 fell out of use, and then one more – today there are mainly two – one dominant (Hafs) and one somewhat used in parts of Africa (Warsh). After all that, how can anybody pretend that the Quran of today is sent down from Allah letter-by-letter and comma-by-comma? – the comma did not even exist!
  6. The language in the original Quran was so little exact, that there frequently is necessary to insert explanations.
  7. And how then can anyone pretend that the language in the Quran of today is perfect and correct language word for word and meaning for meaning just as dictated by Allah, when one knows that they spent 250 years “de-coding” the original texts and polishing the language?
  8. And even more so: How can anyone pretend with a straight face that the Quran(s) of today is the one and perfect one from Allah, when the clergy/religious leaders and the educated elite at least, know that there were at least 14 “correct” versions earlier (to camouflage that they were different versions, Muslims call them “ways of reading” – you meet the word even today, because even today there are “different ways of reading”) – versions that over the centuries by an arbitrary process was reduced to 3 and then to 1-2. (The one dominating today, most likely dominates because it happened to be used when Egypt printed Qurans in 1924, according to Ibn Warraq).
  9. Of the 14 and more versions that existed, how can one be sure that the most correct versions were the ones that finally came to dominate? – or that those version (Hafs and Warsh) had all interpretations of the primitive writings correct (especially as they are not quite similar)?
  10. There are lots of places in the Quran where the logic is wrong – mainly because Muhammad draws conclusions or make statements without first proving that it really is Allah that made this and this. F.ex. the sun and the moon and night and day may be good proofs for Allah, but ONLY if it first is proved that it really is Allah that made them and runs them. Muhammad never really proves anything. Tidak pernah. He just claims or states. The results are invalid claims with invalid logic, not real “signs” or “proofs”. Valueless. Or even worse, as the use of such arguments proves to the entire world that he has no real and true facts/arguments. Even worse: The use of bluffs is the hallmark of cheats and deceivers.
  11. Fakta-fakta di atas titik bahkan lebih penting di sini, di titik ini – di tempat-tempat di mana ia menunjukkan atau bahkan menggunakan kata “bukti”. Masalahnya adalah sama, dan kesimpulan hanya mungkin adalah sama: demagogi berharga yang membuktikan bahwa ia tidak memiliki fakta-fakta nyata dan benar / argumen. Lebih buruk lagi: Penggunaan tebing adalah ciri khas menipu dan penipu.

Ada alasan untuk percaya bahwa Quran pernah ada kesalahan sempurna dan withut, dan alasan yang kecil untuk percaya bahwa Quran hari ini begitu (itu hanya tidak). Hal ini bahkan jika Anda menghilangkan semua kesalahan yang kita ketahui. Pada buku yang terbaik hanya sebagian benar. Juga lihat 13/39.

004 13/2a: “- – – langit – – -.” Plural dan salah. Lihat 2 / 22.

** 005 13/2b: “Allah-lah yang mengangkat langit (jamak dan salah) tanpa tiang yang kamu dapat melihat: – – -“. Sebuah organisasi Muslim informasi 1-2 tahun yang lalu diminta untuk menjelaskan kalimat ini. Mereka menjawab tidak 100% sopan, orang yang dengan IQ 60 atau lebih harus memahami bahwa ini berarti bahwa tidak ada pilar. Orang yang meminta menjawab bahwa ia tahu perbedaan antara tidak ada dan tak terlihat – artinya dalam kalimat di atas adalah “tak terlihat” – dan meminta mereka silahkan untuk memberinya penjelasan yang nyata. Mereka tidak pernah dijawab.

There exist no pillars – visible or invisible. And actually the idea is ridicules, as there exists no material heaven that needs to be kept in position – the heaven we see is just an optical illusion. Any god – even small ones – would know this, but Muhammad naturally not. Selain tidak ada manusia atau hewan atau burung yang pernah menggedor menjadi seperti salah satu pilar tak terlihat – dan tidak ada pesawat bertabrakan dengan satu.

006 13/2c: “- – – explaining the Signs in detail – – -“. Wrong and/or logically invalid “explanations” in reality are not explanations at all – even if they were in detail, which they in many cases are not.

*007 13/3a: “And it is He (Allah*) Who spread out the earth, – – -”. Similare things are said some places in the Quran – the earth is flat and spread out. It may be round or roundish, but like a pancake, not like a sphere. That was the geography of the Arabs at the time of Muhammad – though it hardly was the geography of any god. (There is one translator to English that says “egg-shaped” – but it is a wrong translation (the Quran there talks about an ostrich’s nest on the flat ground, but the translator says it is about an ostrich’s egg). All the same he often is quoted by Muslims – some may honestly want to believe him, others know they are using “al-Taqiyya” – the lawful lie – that is an integrated part of Islam (but of none other of the big religions)).

008 13/3b: “He draweth the Night as a veil o’er the Day”. Salah. The night simply is lack of sunlight. Lack of something can never be a veil over anything. And even more so: Lack of light cannot hide sunshine.

009 13/4: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*010 13/13: “- – – the thunder repeateth His praises – – -“. Hampir – guntur hanya reaksi alami dan otomatis untuk petir (yang lagi-lagi merupakan reaksi alami dan otomatis untuk muatan listrik). Islam will have to prove that the thunder – vibrations in the air – has enough brain to be able to prise Allah in this way, in order to be believed.

00b 13/14: “Untuk Dia (Allah *) (saja) doa yang benar – – -“. Ya, tetapi hanya jika Allah ada (dan satu-satunya tuhan). Ada alasan bagus mengapa Muhammad menuntut dan dimuliakan keyakinan buta: Tidak ada dan tidak ada bukti nyata dan tidak ada dokumentasi untuk keberadaan Allah – atau dalam kasus untuk koneksi Muhammad untuk tuhan. Dan ini keyakinan buta hanya didasarkan pada kata-kata seorang pria moral tersangka seperti Muhammad. (The, sesungguhnya Muhammad historis hanya jauh terkait dengan cat dimuliakan Islam suci.)

011 13/15a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

*012 13/15b: “Whatever beings there are in the heavens and in the earth do prostrate themselves to Allah (acknowledging subjection)”. Adapun di Surga, sulit untuk mengatakan ya atau tidak. Tapi untuk Bumi: No-non-Muslim pernah sujud bagi Allah. The same goes for all animals, fishes and insects, etc.: None of them has ever been observed prostrating themselves to any god, Allah included – and for Allah it should be extra easy to observe, as he prefers 5 prayers with prostrations a day, some by day and some by night (even more easy to notice as few animals, etc. normally are awake and active both day and night). Islam memiliki beberapa bukti-bukti berat untuk menghasilkan di sini untuk membuat titik ini dalam Quran kredibel.

013 13/15c: “- – – so (prostrate themselves for Allah*) do their (the living beings’*) shadows in the mornings and evenings”. Shadows are just lack of sunlight – and they for natural reasons are long and flat in the mornings and evenings. Islam will have to prove that this result of the Earth’s spin in the sunshine, makes the lack of sunlight some places consciously decide to prostrate “themselves” for a god. Jika tidak ada bukti yang dihasilkan, ini jelas adalah sebuah dongeng pada tingkat intelektual cocok untuk anak-anak kecil.

014 13/16: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

015 13/17a: “Thus doth Allah (by parables) show forth – – -”. Dapat itu benar-benar menjadi dewa maha tahu yang menunjukkan kesalahan sebagainya begitu banyak? Nyet – a good English word that means no with some lines under.

016 13/17b: “- – – show forth Truth and Vanity.” As said before: The Quran can at very best only be partly true.

017 13/18: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

00c 13/19a: “- – – that which hath been revealed – – -“. Well, has it been revealed? – and in case by whom? (A god had not sent down something with that many mistakes, etc., but the Devil in disguise could – but might have been too intelligent to do so, as there sooner or later would come questions about the mistakes and wrong logic, etc., and hence about his inhuman and bloody religion. He then would loose credence. May be the whole book was made up?)

018 13/19b: “- – – that which hath been revealed unto thee from thy Lord (Allah*) – – -”. See 13/17.

019 13/19c: “- – – that which hath been revealed unto thee from thy Lord (Allah*) is the Truth, – – – “. Well, at best it is partly true – as said before. Lihat f. ex. 13/17.

020 13/28: “- – – for without doubt in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find satisfaction”. This only is true for some Muslims, and in difficult times also some more Muslims seeking comfort in religion – and also some because of social or other reasons only. Science tells that a minor fraction of the people (may be 10%) has an internal drive for a god, and some more that resort to such thinking when life is difficult – in 2006 or 2007 they even found which gene in our DNA that produces this drive. One theory is that religion is favoured by evolution because it makes the group closer knit and then the chances for survival bigger. These people find satisfaction in their religion – any religion – if they do believe in it. Dan jika mereka kebetulan adalah Muslim, mereka kemudian menemukan kepuasan kepada Allah. Tapi NB: kepuasan tidak berasal dari dewa mereka percaya – dia juga mungkin sebuah fiksi, seperti Allah tampaknya (kuat ditunjukkan oleh semua kesalahan dalam Quran) – tetapi dari kepercayaan mereka sendiri, seperti yang cukup kuat untuk membuat mereka merasa yakin itu benar, dan kemudian merasa aman di keamanan yang (palsu atau tidak tidak masalah, asalkan mereka sendiri percaya bahwa kepercayaan mereka benar). Ada kemungkinan bahwa rasa aman, dan karenanya gugup keselamatan dan berkurang, merupakan alasan lain Darwin untuk ini sifat yang diturunkan – mungkin dalam beberapa cara memberikan keunggulan dalam perjuangan untuk bertahan hidup.

Pertanyaan ini menghasilkan gagasan tentu saja adalah: Apakah ada tuhan atau mereka semua terdiri dari kebutuhan kita untuk sesuatu yang supranatural?

We should try to find out, because if it all stems from inside us, we should at least try to find something better than inhuman and immoral war religions. And if there is a real religion one should search for that one.

00c 13/31: “If there ever was a Quran with which mountains were moved – – – (it would be this one)“. Well, hitherto the Quran itself has not moved even one grain of sand. Ok, it has guided or misguided many humans, and they have done things, but the Quran itself has done nothing.

021 13/36: “Those to whom We (Allah*) have given the Book (the Quran*) – – -”. The infernal question: Is a book with that many mistakes sent down by a god? No – simply out of the question.

022 13/37a: “Thus We (Allah*) revealed it (the Quran*) – – -“. Did Allah reveal it? See 13/1b and 13/19a.

023 13/37b: “Thus We (Allah*) revealed it (the Quran*) to be a judgement of authority in Arabic.” A book with that many mistakes and contradictions, that much invalid logic, that inhuman moral and without ethical or moral philosophy, is no basis for “judgement of authority”. If Muslims disagree, they will have to bring strong proofs to be believed.

024 13/38a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

025 13/38b: “For each period is a book revealed”. Hampir tidak. Homo sapiens – manusia modern – adalah mungkin 200ooo tahun (dan ada manusia atau makhluk manusia jauh sebelum itu). There is no trace of any book or of monotheism from all those years up to the next major step, that happened may be 60ooo+ years ago. At that time something happened – nobody knows what – that started Homo Sapiens on his course towards Modern Man (it is likely it happened somewhere in the western part of Asia, perhaps in the Caspian area and perhaps ca. 64ooo years ago). Then no book up to the next major step: Agricultural Man, 15ooo years ago, give or take a few thousand years – probably somewhere in the Middle East. Tidak ada buku dan tidak ada jejak monoteisme manapun di dunia. Langkah berikutnya: Kota. Tidak ada buku untuk mengatur kehidupan atau agama untuk Urbanus Homo (manusia di kota) – tidak sampai waktu lama setelah kota dan bahkan kota-kota sudah mulai muncul, dan masih ada jejak monoteisme dalam bentuk apapun, belum lagi Allah. The first traces of real monotheism – and later a book about a monotheistic god – came with the Jews (the name is used in wide understanding chronologically), and perhaps the Zoroastrians in Mesopotamia. And even then it is highly unlikely that they (Israel) had books before the period in Egypt and may be much later (that Abraham had a book or books, is so unlikely that Islam will have to prove it if they will insist on that – it is extremely unlikely that a nomad of that time even knew how to read.) Also the Zoroastrians had a book, but that Muhammad did not know – at least not until late in his life. After that – and before the Quran – science knows about only one or two books (depending on whether you reckon the “Bible” of the Jews + NT to be one or two – or many – books) as basis for monotheism – add one if you include the Zoroastrians.

Selama periode itu dan sebagian besar aeon ada tidak menemukan jejak lain seperti buku tersebut atau monoteisme dalam setiap jenis ilmu: Arkeologi (dengan tanda-untuk akn-Aton dan matahari?), Sastra, cerita rakyat, sejarah, seni, arsitektur. Islam will have to produce very strong proofs for the opposite – till now they just have produced cheap statements and even cheaper words and claims – – – and not one real proof.

Worse: When there finally came a book, it only built on the (wrong) knowledge in a tiny and underdeveloped part of the world – whereas the Quran states that every people in all times have had their prophets (and a book). Worse: If the Quran is a copy of the Mother Book, and all the 124ooo+ prophets through the times and all over the world got a somewhat similar copy (a revered Mother Book that may be existed since eternity cannot change?), that must have been a strange experience for many of them – “all” is about Arabia and Muhammad.

Terburuk: Islam mengatakan bahwa alasan mengapa “Kitab” harus diremajakan pada interval, adalah bahwa dunia dan masyarakat berubah (selain klaim tidak pernah terbukti atau didokumentasikan bahwa Alkitab adalah palsu). Tapi bagaimana mengubah “Ibu Kitab” bahwa kitab suci diklaim adalah salinan? And the world and the cultures and the societies have changed more the last 300 years – yes, even the last 100 years – than in all the 200ooo or more years before. Mengapa kita tidak perlu sebuah buku baru setelah semua perubahan ini? – if Allah is omniscient, he 13.7 billion or more years ago (when the universe was created) knew that at least parts of the Quran would be hopelessly inadequate (f. ex. some laws) and too dangerous (f. ex. atomic, chemical and bacteriological weapons combined with a most ruthless and inhuman war religion), not later than around 1900 AD. Kita adalah masa yang benar-benar membutuhkan cinta buku ajar dan perdamaian di antara manusia dan bangsa – bukan kebencian dan penindasan dan kekejaman dan perang (seperti f. mantan Quran dan agama Gjingis Chan dan beberapa perang agama lain.).

**00d 13/39: “- – – with Him (Allah*) is the Mother of the Book (the original book of which the Quran is said to be a copy of*) “. Mere humans like us thinks it is unlikely in the extreme that an omnipotent and omniscient god has a book awash with mistakes as a revered Mother Book in his Heaven. There also are a lot of problems to explain, if it was made by the god a long time ago – not to mention if it is an unmade book that has existed forever, like many Muslims insists:

  1. Jika buku tersebut adalah bahwa tua dan ada sebelum, mengapa dewa harus turunkan buku sempurna – Torah, OT, NT? Or was the “Mother Book” changed now and then to be able to send down different copies?
  2. How to explain that in some surahs it is Muhammad that is speaking?
  3. How to explain that the god some times has to change – abrogate – his message? – and did he really get everything right in the book this last time? Especially if he is copying the Mother Book he ought to? Or does the revered Mother Book change?
  4. Bagaimana ia bisa mengubah pesan, jika itu semua ditulis lama – atau selalu ada – di sebuah Buku Ibu ia disalin? Or does the revered Mother Book change?
  5. Bagaimana mungkin bahwa begitu banyak ayat yang jawaban atau komentar untuk hal-hal yang terjadi di Mekah dan Madinah kepada Muhammad dan selama kehidupan Muhammad? – Muhammad f. ex. bertengkar dengan istri-istrinya, dan Allah menurunkan Al Quran menjelaskan bahwa Muhammad sebagai selalu benar – dan seperti selalu sedikit untuk terlambat untuk menghindari masalah, namun relevan dengan kebutuhannya saat itu? – remember the free will of man. Nearly all of it is about Muhammad and Arabia and little about rhe other claimed 124ooo prophets and their needs and cultures and countries.
  6. How to explain that it could have been written aeons ago, when Allah had given the humans (a certain amount of?) free will? – Tindakan manusia akan kecewa teks dengan cara yang kacau. (Predestination and human free will are 100% incompatible and 100% impossible to combine). The point is: The human with free will can always change his mind once more.
  7. Islam mengatakan teks harus diubah sedikit dari waktu ke waktu, karena perubahan kali – karena kitab-kitab suci baru. Tapi waktu 300 tahun terakhir telah berubah lebih dari dari Adam sampai 1700 AD. Well, even the last 100 years as mentioned. Mengapa tidak ada nabi dan tidak ada kitab suci yang diperlukan? (Juga lihat 13/38).
  8. If the “mother book” is aeons old, why then is nearly the all talk to Muhammad, a little to a few others, and nothing to the other 124ooo (according to Hadiths)? Yang pertama nabi – ketika semuanya masih baru – setelah semua informasi yang paling dibutuhkan dan membantu.
  9. Bagaimana menjelaskan bahwa sebagian besar cerita dalam Quran didasarkan pada dongeng agama? – Tuhan manapun tahu mereka tidak benar.
  10. Bagaimana menjelaskan semua kesalahan? – Tuhan manapun tahu lebih baik.
  11. Bagaimana menjelaskan semua laporan tidak valid? – Tuhan manapun tahu lebih baik.
  12. Bagaimana menjelaskan semua tidak valid “tanda” (diperlakukan sebagai bukti)?
  13. Bagaimana menjelaskan “bukti” tidak valid? – Tuhan manapun tahu lebih baik.
  14. How to explain the directly wrong statements, “signs” and “proofs”?
  15. How to explain the contradictions? – no god contradicts neither himself nor reality.

Juga lihat 13 / 1.

Surah 13: At least 25 mistakes + 4 likely mistakes.

SURAH 14:

001 14/1a: “A Book (the Quran*) which We (Allah*) have revealed – – -”. The same old question: Can a book with so many very clear mistakes really be revealed by an omniscient god? And is it a coincident that many of the mistaken facts are in accordance with what one believed in Arabia at the time of Muhammad – even with fairy tales? A god’s stories? – impossible.

002 14/1b: “- – – revealed – – -“. See 13/1a and 13/19a above.

*003 14/1c: “- – – in order that thou (Muhammad – by means of the Quran*) mightest lead mankind out of the depths of darkness and into light – – -“. No book with that many mistakes and that doubtful moral can lead anyone into light. The same goes for any religion so suppressing, inhuman and full of hate, discrimination, blood and war, and “all power to Muhammad/the leader”.

004 14/2: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

005 14/4: “We (Allah*) sent not a Messenger except (to teach) in the language of his (own) people – – -.” Wrong. If you can call Moses a Messenger, he had to speak Egyptian in Egypt – not Hebrew. And Lot was from Ur in Chaldea (not too far from the Persian Gulf in Iraq), not from Sodom or Gomorrah – when the Quran says the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were his people, also that is wrong, this even more so as the Quran makes it very clear that not only was he a stranger, but also he was not integrated with the locals. And Jonah was not from Nineveh where he had to preach. Also Abraham was a foreigner with a language foreign to the place he settled down (Canaan and Sinai) – if one reckons him to be a messenger. The same goes for Joseph in Egypt in case. And not to forget Jonah in Niniveh.

006 14/5a: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

007 14/5b: “- – – in this there are Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

008 14/9: “- – – Clear (Sign) – – -“. There are no clear signs for Allah or for Muhammad in the Quran – not one. Lihat 2 / 99.

009 14/10: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

010 14/12a: “No reason have we (Muslims*) why we should not put our trust in Allah”. Salah. All the mistakes, etc. in the Quran proves 100% that it is not from a god, and all the mistaken facts that are in accordance with wrong science in the Middle East at the time of Muhammad, strongly indicate that it is made by one or more humans in Arabia at the time of Muhammad. In both cases the religion is a made up one, and Allah may not even exist.

011 14/12b: “For those who put their trust should put their trust in Allah.” Wrong. See 14/12a just above.

00a 14/19a: “- – – Allah created the heavens (plural and wrong*) and the earth in Truth – – -”. It is impossible to know if it is true, as long as the Quran only offers words and not a single proof. Words are very cheap – especially when it is clear that there are MANY mistakes etc. in the book.

012 14/19b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

013 14/22: “It was Allah who gave you a promise of Truth (the Quran*) – – -.” With that many mistakes the Quran at best is partly true.

014 14/24: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

00b 14/27: “- – – with the Word (the Quran*) that stands firm – – -.” Can words with that many mistakes and bent logic, etc. stand firm on other platforms than cheating, brain washing, pressure and wish for power?

015 14/32: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

016 14/35: “Remember Abraham said: ‘O my Lord! Make this city (Mecca*) one of peace and security; – – – “. Abraham pernah mengunjungi Mekah. Besides: There was no city at the time of Abraham – this both according to reality and to the Quran. Remember how Hagar run back and forth there without finding people and without finding water. Mecca as a city was only a few generations old as a town at the time of Muhammad – some 2500 years after Abraham. Also see 2/127.

017 14/48: “- – – Heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. See2/22.

Surah 14: At least 17 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 15:

00a 15/1a: “These are the ayat (verses*) of Revelation – – -“. Well, is the Quran a revelation? – and in case by whom? There theoretically are 4 possibilities:

  1. A god – but the Quran proves that is not the case; too many mistakes, etc.
  2. Some dark forces, f. ex. the Devil – perhaps in disguise. The inhuman religion of war may point in this direction.
  3. Humans at the time of Muhammad. The fact that many of the mistakes in the book are in accordance with wrong science in the Middle East at that time, may point in this direction.
  4. Muhammad himself. Muhammad’s lust for power – and women – may point this way. It also easily will explain rhe point above. Add his lack of ethics and moral and it also may explain point above that one, too.
  5. The clear conclusion is that it at least was not revealed by a god, like the Quran claims.

001 15/1b: “- – – a Quran that makes things clear.” With that many mistakes, it makes few things clear and some things very unclear – f. ex. the foundation that Islam rests on.

00b 15/6: “O thou (Muhammad*) to whom the Messages is being revealed”. See 15/1a above.

002 15/9: “We have, without doubt, sent down the Message (the Quran*)”. Salah. There is a lot of well-founded doubt about that. Too many mistakes, among other things.

003 15/14 + 15: “- – – They would only say (when experiencing a miracle*): ‘Our eyes have been intoxicated – – -”. Salah. At least some had come to believe. Dua ayat ini adalah sepotong cepat-talk. Ada beberapa cepat berbicara dalam Quran – mencoba untuk menjelaskan hal-hal dan fakta-fakta dan ide-ide dan tidak sedikit pertanyaan yang sulit untuk menjelaskan atau menjawab. Lihat bab tentang berbicara cepat dalam Quran. Dan ada bahkan lebih cepat-talk di kalangan umat Islam hari ini, mencoba untuk menjelaskan kesalahan, pencabutan, perubahan dalam Islam sekitar 622, dll, belum lagi berusaha menghadirkan Islam sebagai agama yang damai. Just in this case one tries to explain away questions for proofs for Allah and for Muhammad’s connection to a god.

**But the really bad thing about this point is that it is one of the points where Muhammad himself knew he was lying – at least some would believe in Islam if he produced miracles. He was too intelligent and knew too much about people not to know this – this even more so as he himself told about heathens becoming Muslims after they had experienced miracles (f. ex. the magicians of Pharaoh), and he also had a good example in Jesus – some refused to believe no matter, but quite a number of others did after miracles made by Jesus (made also according to the Quran).

004 15/16: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

*005 15/17: “- – – We (Allah*) have guarded them (the Zodiacal Signs*) from every evil spirit accursed:” According to the Quran, the stars – included the Zodiacal signs – are fastened to the lowermost of 7 (material – they have to be so if the stars can be fastened to one of them) heavens. But jinns/bad spirits wanted to spy on the heavens, and had to be chased away by shooting stars = guarded. Dan kemudian tanda-tanda mintaku’lburuj dijaga pada waktu yang sama. Menurut ilmu ini adalah omong kosong untuk setidaknya kekuatan kelima. Setiap dewa sudah tahu – bahkan yang bayi – tetapi Muhammad tidak. Kemudian yang membuat Quran dengan segala fakta keliru nya, dll?

**006 15/18: “But any (jinn/bad spirit*) that gains a hearing (by spying on the heavens*) by stealth, is pursued by a flaming fire, bright (to see).” According to the Quran, the stars are fastened to the lowest of 7 material (see 15/17 just above) heavens. The stars are lights and decoration, but are also used for shooting stars for weapons to chase away jinns and bad spirits. Muhammad did not know that the mass of a star is somewhere in the range of 1 shooting star x 10 to the 20. or more power and utterly impossible to use as a shooting star in our atmosphere – for the reason of size, for the reason of heat, for the reason of irradiation, for the reason of gravity, for the reason of sheere size, etc. As said in 15/17 just above: Scientific nonsense and insanity to at least the 5. kekuasaan. No god uttered this faity tale stuff – but Muhammad did not know any better. Lalu siapa yang membuat Quran?

007 15/19a: “And the earth We (Allah*) have spread out (like a carpet); – – -”. In the Quran the Earth is flat – which is wrong. Just ask any god.

*008 15/19b: “- – – set thereon (on the Earth*) mountains firm and immoveable – – -.” But no mountain was ever set down – not to mention from somewhere above. They without exception did grow up, no matter whether they grew up because of volcanism or because of tectonic activity (the only two ways mountains are made). Any god had known – but Muhammad not.

009 15/26: “We (Allah*) created man from sounding clay, – – -“. Datar yang salah. Lihat 6 / 2.

010 15/26: “We (Allah*) created man from – – – mud – – -”. Salah. Lihat 6 / 2.

011 15/27: “And the Jinn race, We (Allah*) created before, from the fire of a scorching wind.” Here is something wrong. It is said several places in the Quran that the Jinns were created from fire – and one place it is said from fire without smoke.

012 15/28: “I (Allah*) am about to create man, from sounding clay, – – -.” Wrong. Lihat 6 / 2.

013 15/28: “I (Allah*) am about to create man, from – – – mud – – -”. Salah. Lihat 6 / 2.

014 15/33: “- – – man, whom Thou didst create from sounding clay, – – -”. Salah. Lihat 6 / 2.

015 15/33: “- – -man, whom Thou didst create from – – – mud, – – -”. Salah. Lihat 6 / 2.

016 15/71: “There are my daughters (to marry)”. Berikut kerendahan hati telah mendapat lebih baik dari Quran (atau penerjemah). Orang-orang Sodom Gomora atau tidak akan pernikahan – tidak mungkin seorang anak perempuan menikah beberapa banyak pria. Ini adalah berbicara tentang pelecehan seksual. Kemungkinan besar terjemahan yang tidak jujur ​​- tetapi dalam kasus ini: Berapa banyak tempat lainnya dalam Quran dijelaskan secara tidak jujur?

017 15/75: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

018 15/77: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

019 15/81: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

020 15/85: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

021 15/86: “For verily it is thy Lord (Allah*) who is the Master-Creator, knowing all things.” The mistakes in the Quran means that someone else has made the book – or that Allah knows not all things.

022 15/99: “- – – the Hour that is Certain (the Day of Doom*)”. Because of all the mistakes in the Quran, certainly also the Day of Doom is uncertain – at least in the form described by the Quran – as this easily may be an error, too. This even more so as all the mistakes in the book prove that it is not made by a god, and Muhammad was a prophet unable of prophesying, and who then is left to tell us the true future? (By the way: What is a prophet unable to prophesy? – a title stolen because it sounds impressive? Muhammad never made real prophesies (there were a few sayings that are remembered because they happened to become true, but no real prophesying). Whereas a real prophet is a man/person making prophesies. The only possible conclusion: Muhammad was no real prophet; he only “borrowed” the title – like so many other things. May be a messenger for someone or something – perhaps for himself(?) – but not a genuine prophet.)

Surah 15: At least 22 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 16:

001 16/2a: “He (Allah*) sent down His angels with inspiration (“ruh”*) – – -.” But the Arab word “ruh” does not mean “inspiration” but “Spirit”.

00a 16/2b: “He (Allah*) doth send down His angels with inspiration (“ruh”) – – -.” But the Arab word “ruh” does not really mean inspiration – it means the Spirit or the Holy Spirit. We may add that Muslims often claims that the Holy Spirit just is another name for the angel Gabriel. But here it is clear that the (Holy) Spirit – “ruh” – is not included among the angels (the angels “transported” ruh). (Actually Muhammad never quite understood what the Holy Spirit – one of it’s at least 5 names – was). Also see 70/4, 78/38 and 97/4 where the same word – “ruh” – is used.

002 16/3: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

003 16/4: “He (Allah*) has created man (the word “man” used like this, means the human race = in this case Adam*) from a sperm-drop – – -”. Salah. Even if it dhould really mean not Adam, but men generally, it is wrong. Sebuah sperma-drop hanya setengah penjelasan – juga merupakan sel telur diperlukan. Tapi Muhammad tidak tahu itu. (Human egg cells are too small to be seen with only eyes when it is lying in human tissue, blood and gore). Juga lihat 6 / 2.

00b 16/5: “And cattle He (Allah*) has created for you (men) – – -“. Hampir tidak. Ternak dan nenek moyang mereka mungkin ada selama jutaan tahun. Man only after long aeons found ways of utilizing them – some 15ooo years ago only.

00c 16/8: “And (He (Allah*) has created horses, mules, and donkeys for you to ride and use for show – – -“. See 16/5 just above.

004 16/11: “- – – verily this (different food plants*) is a Sign for those who are given thought.” Verily it will be – – – but not until the day when Islam proves it really was Allah that created these food plants. Until that day it only is a clear sign that Islam and the Quran only have claims and cheap words and no proofs to show. Because if they had real arguments, they did not have to resort to logically invalid claims only. (This is an unavoidable conclusion from some persons giving things thoughts).

005 16/12: “- – – verily this (sun, moon, stars, day, night*) are Signs for men that are wise.” Wrong. See 16/11 just above.

006 16/13: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*007 16/15a: “And He (Allah*) has set upon the earth mountains standing firm, lest it should shake with you; – – -”. Mountains do not hinder earthquakes (really other places in Islamic literature seems to indicate that what the book really means, is that the Earth can become unstable and capsize – impossible for a globe, but possible for a flat Earth). Some Muslims vaguely tries to find a way around the Quran and “explain” that mountains grow (are not “set upon earth”), but that in case is no explanation in this case – both growth from tectonic movements and from volcanic activity may result in earthquakes – – – the opposite effect of what the Quran says.

008 16/15b: “(Allah has made*) roads – – -“. Wrong – if Islam does not really prove it. The roads in the Middle East at the time of Muhammad in reality only were tracks most places – made not by Allah, but by the walking of men and animals through centuries and millennia.

*009 16/36a: “For We (Allah*) assuredly sent amongst every people a Messenger, (with the command),’Serve Allah, and eschew Evil’: – – -”. The Quran insists that every people everywhere and every time through history has been sent prophets for Allah. The Hadiths mention that through the times there have been 124ooo prophets or more, and even that number is just an expression for innumerably many. But nowhere in the world – except in Israel (and in a way in Egypt under pharaoh Akn-Aton, who only accepted the sun as god – not Allah, and the Zoroastrians in Persia) – at any time or under any circumstances there are traces of prophets preaching monotheism before year one AD. Not in history, not in folklore, not in traditions, not in history, not in art, not in literature, not in archaeology, not any place – not even in fairy tales or legends. Especially when you compare this to the results of just two “prophets”: Jesus and Muhammad, it is not possible that 124ooo or more prophets through the times have left not a single trace. This statement about all the prophets for Allah simply is not true.

010 16/36b: “So travel through the earth, and see what was the end of those who denied (the Truth)”. There were scattered ruins in Arabia. The Quran/Muhammad tells they all are results of Allah’s punishment of infidels. Hardly true – at least not for all of them.

011 16/36c: “- – – those who denied (the Truth)”. With all the mistakes in the Quran, it is impossible to believe that the book or Islam represents the full truth and only the truth. (That is one of the main reasons why Islam can accept not a single mistake in the Quran no matter how obvious the mistake is – if there are mistakes, something is wrong with the book – – – – and consequently with the religion).

00d 16/38: “- – – a promise (binding) on Him in Truth, – – -”. What is true in a book full of mistakes?

012 16/39: “- – – the rejecters of the Truth – – -”. See 16/38 just above.

013 16/48a: “- – – Allah’s creations, (even) among (inanimate) things – how their (very) shadows turn round, – – -, prostrating themselves to Allah”. Wrong – see 13/15c.

014 16/48b: “- – – Allah’s creations, (even) among (inanimate) things – how their very shadows turn round, from right to left – – -“. Salah: Ini bukan hukum umum – hanya benar di belahan bumi utara. Di selatan itu dari kiri ke kanan – dan Islam berpura-pura menjadi agama universal. Bahkan dewa keterbelakangan mental telah dikenal ini – tapi Muhammad tentu saja tidak. Siapa yang membuat Quran?

015 16/49a: “And to Allah doth obeisance all that is in the heavens (plural and wrong*) and on earth, whether moving (living) creatures or the angels – – -“. Wrong – if Islam does not prove the opposite. Animals, birds, insects, fish, worms, etc. – they never are observed making obeisance to Allah (or to any other god). No rituals, no 5 prayers a day/night (even more so: Few animals are naturally active both night and day – “prayers” should be easy to notice), no servility except sometimes towards their own leaders, etc. And surely non-Muslim humans do not do obeisance to Allah – though sometimes to other real or made up god or gods.

016 16/49b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

017 16/50: “They all (all living beings*) revere their Lord (Allah*)”. Wrong – if Islam does not produce good proofs. See 16/49a above.

018 16 / 52: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

019 16/62: “- – – they (people*) attribute to Allah what they hate (daughters*)”. Wrong – if Islam pretends to be a universal religion. Some places on Earth – like in Arabia – girl babies may have been hated. But most places they only were of lower value, and far from hated. Then some places they were valued more or less equally. There also were places where daughters were valuable – f. ex. because they meant money/valuables to their parents when they married. There even were a few places were the societies were matriarchates, and the girls the main sex. (This is one of the many points in the Quran that points to some human(s) in Arabia as the maker(s) of the Quran – there are too many points like this.)

020 16/64a: “And We (Allah*) sent down the Book (the Quran*) – – -”. The old and impertinent – but very pertinent – question is: Did an omniscient send down a third rate book? – third rate because it has so many mistakes and so much invalid/twisted logic that you cannot rely on anything you cannot control via other sources + not well written. The simple fact is: No god would make a book like this.

021 16/64b: “(The Quran was sent down*) for the express purpose, that thou (Muhammad*) shouldst make clear to them things – – -”. How is it possible to make things clear by means of a book full of mistakes, contradictions, and invalid/false “proofs“?

022 16/64c: “- – – and that it (the Quran*) should be a guide – – – to those who believe”. A book with so many mistakes etc. is no guide for anybody.

00e 16/64d: “- – – and that it (the Quran*) should be a guide and a mercy to those who believe.” Can a book with so much inhumanity, hate and blood be a mercy to anyone? – except perhaps to Muhammad himself and to his successors and helpers who gained/gains riches and power?

023 16/65a: “And Allah sends down rain from the skies, and gives therewith life to the earth after its death: – – -”. If rain is all it takes to make earth flourish, it was not dead before the shower – there was lots of live seeds and may be roots. And is it Allah or some other god – or nature – that sends it down?

024 16/65b: “And Allah sends down rain from the skies, and gives therewith life to the earth after its death: verily in this is a Sign for those who listen.” See 16/65a just above. Ini adalah beberapa tanda untuk menggunakan bukti valid. Quran sering berbicara tentang Tanda-tanda bahwa harus mendokumentasikan atau membuktikan Allah. Hal menyesal adalah bahwa setiap dan setiap satu dari mereka, dengan kemungkinan pengecualian beberapa diambil dari Alkitab, adalah tanpa nilai sebagai bukti untuk dewa, dan tak satu pun membuktikan apapun tentang keberadaan Allah. The two most frequent reasons are that they in reality are just claims taken from thin air, or they build on statements that are not proved. Lihat bab tersendiri tentang hal ini.

025 16/65c: “- – – verily in this (rain, etc.*) is a Sign for those who listen.” Possibly so for those who only listens and do not think. For those who also think, it actually is a sign of nothing, until Islam proves that it really is Allah that makes the rain, etc., and that all the unproven and undocumented claims in the Quran are not just so much thin air and cheap words. Well, actually it proves one thing: That the Quran, Muhammad, Islam, the Muslims, all have nothing more to show for the religion than unproven and undocumented claims – if they had had some reliable proof, they had used them instead of just words and twisted logic.

026 16/66: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

027 16/67: “- – – in this (fruits, etc.*) also is a Sign for those who are wise”. Salah. See 16/65b and 16/65c just above.

028 16/69: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

029 16/73: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

030 16/77: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

*031 16/79a: “Nothing holds them (the birds*) up but (the power of) Allah”. Salah. What hold them up are the laws of aerodynamics. Muhammad would not know this, but all gods would.

032 16/79b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah – especially as the initial claim is wrong (see 16/79a just above). Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00f 16/81a: ”He (Allah*) made you garments – – -”. Proofs for that Allah did this?

00g 16/81b: “He (Allah*) made you garments to protect you from the heath”. Ini adalah titik di mana seseorang mungkin bertanya-tanya: Apakah pembuat Quran hanya mengetahui Timur Tengah? – most garments are made to protect humans from the cold.

033 16/82: “- thy (Muhammad’s*) duty is only to preach the Clear Message”. It is not possible to preach a clear message from a book full of mistakes.

034 16/89a: “- – – We (Allah*) have sent down to thee the Book (the Quran*) – – -”. Yes, that is the big question for Islam. If Allah exists, and if he sent down the Quran, and if Muhammad retold everything correctly – f. ex. did not “doctor” the surahs in Medina to get warriors or peace in his family – Islam is a religion. If it is not true, what then? – and what happens in case to all Muslims if there is a next life run by a real god they have been prohibitted to search for? Can a book full of mistakes be sent down by a god – not to say an omniscient one? Flatly no.

035 16/89b: “- – – the Book (the Quran*) explaining all things, – – -”. Except that some of the explanations obviously are wrong. And except that many things are not explained.

036 16/89c: “- – – (the Quran is*) a Guide – – – to Muslims”. A book with that many mistakes and that much twisted logic and that much hate and inhumanity cannot be a real guide to anyone (and if someone all the same uses it as a guide, it tells volumes about them).

00h 16/102a: “- – – the Holy Spirit has brought the revelation – – -“. Muhammad Azad: “Pesan dari Quran” mengatakan bahwa kata Arab “ruh al-qudus” (= Roh Kudus) digunakan 3 kali dalam Quran (2 / 87, 5 / 110 – keduanya terhubung ke Yesus – dan di sini ), dan bahwa di sini itu berarti malaikat Jibril. The Holy Spirit in Arab = Gabriel? That in case means that in 2/87 and 5/110 Jesus is strengthened with the angel Gabriel – a bit far from what the Bible tells. (It is likely Islam sets the Holy Spirit = Gabriel because the Quran tells that Gabriel brought large parts of the Quran (other parts came to him in dreams, etc.), so that when it says that the Holy Spirit brought him verses, that must mean that the book is talking about Gabriel – not 100% logical.”

037 16/102b: “- – – revelations from thy Lord (Allah*) – – -”. Once more: Can the revelations be from an omniscient god, when so many of them are wrong or contain mistakes? Out of the question!

038 16/102c: “- – – revelations from thy Lord (Allah*) in Truth – – -”. With all the mistakes, the revelations told in the Quran, at best are partly true.

039 16/102d: “- – – revelations from thy Lord (Allah*) in Truth, in order to strengthen those who believe – – -”. It is a strange way for a religion to strengthen its believers at least partly with wrong and/or not reliable “information”. There are far too many mistakes in the Quran for any sentient educated being with fresh eyes, to believe it is reliable.

040 16/102e: “- – – revelations from thy Lord (Allah*) in Truth, in order to strengthen those who believe, and as a Guide – – – to Muslims”. It tells volumes about Islam, if they use a book full of mistakes + discrimination, hate and war against non-Muslims as a guide for their believers – the Muslims. And even more if the religion/religious leaders try to “explain” away even obvious mistakes instead of finding out what is true and what not.

041 16/102f: “- – – revelations from thy Lord (Allah*) in Truth, in order to strengthen those who believe, and as a Guide and Glad Tidings to Muslims”. What kind of glad tidings can be built on at least to a large part mistaken and/or valueless statements and as wrong facts? It is bad if Islam really believes everything – that means they are too blind – or blinded – to see even the most obvious mistakes. But it is much worse if (some of) the leaders and learned men/teachers see the mistakes and bluff their audiences. And not least: If all the mistakes means that Islam is a made up religion – such religions do happen – and blocks the way for its (mis-) believers to a true religion (if such one exists), what then? Besides: Is it permission to steal and rob and rape and take slaves that are “glad tidings”? – fighting, women and looting are very central in the Quran.

042 16/103: “- – – this (the Quran*) is in Arabic, pure and clear”. Salah dalam berbagai cara: Ada kata-kata asing, ada kesalahan ortografis, ada kesalahan tata bahasa dan ada banyak dan banyak tempat di mana bahkan hari ini Islam tidak tahu arti yang tepat dari kata atau ayat (yang terakhir sebagian karena buku awalnya ada ditulis oleh cara suatu abjad yang belum selesai).

043 16/104: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

044 16/105: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

045 16/109: “Without doubt, in the Hereafter it is they (non-Muslims*) who will perish.” Because of all the mistakes, etc. in the Quran, there is real reason for doubt about the hereafter – and even more so about if it really is like described in the Quran. Because of this – and because of all the other mistakes in the Quran – there is real reason for doubt about who will perish.

046 16/115: “He (Allah*) has only forbidden you dead meat, and blood, and the flesh of swine, and any (food) over which the name of other than Allah has been invoked”. Salah. Hadiths – f. ex. Al-Bukhari and Muslim – are very clear on the fact that also meat from donkey is forbidden. (This is one of the cases where Hadiths abrogate the Quran. Perhaps Allah forgot that donkey meat was forbidden in the Mother Book, or Muhammad forgot to mention it?)

047 16/123: “So We (Allah*) has thought thee (Muhammad/Muslims*) the inspired messages (the Quran*) – – -“. No omniscient god has thought anyone so much mistakes, invalid logic, invalid signs, invalid proofs, like what you find in the Quran.

048 16/125: “- – – the Way of thy Lord (Allah*) – – -“. The Quran does not represent the way of an omniscient god – not a good one at least: Too many mistakes, etc.

Surah 16: At least 48 mistakes + 8 likely mistakes.

SURAH 17:

001 17/1: “(Allah took Muhammad*) to the Farthest Mosque” = the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem according to Islam – but they still disagree on whether it was a real trip or a dream. But anyhow: The old Jewish temple was destroyed by Titus and his Roman Army in 64 AD, and nothing of any consequence was built on this small mountain until the Dome of the Rock was built in 690 AD, some 630 years later – – – and some 60-70 years after surah 17 – “The Night Journey” – was dictated around or after 621 AD. There simply was no mosque to visit around 621-630 AD. Is this a later addition to the Quran? – after all the book existed in many versions which were copied and copied by hand and thus could change a little now and then, and it was not really finished until around 900 AD. (Muslims explains this away with that the few walls of the old Jewish temple is what is meant, but that definitely is not what the Quran says.)

002 17/2: “We (Allah*) gave Moses the Book (the Quran), – – -”. According to all information and to science this is wrong. God /Yahweh gave him (according to the Bible) the 10 commandments only + he told him the law (later a part of the Torah) that he himself wrote down. The Book of Moses in reality is several hundred years younger.

00a 17/4: “- – – (and twice they (the Jews*) should be punished)!” The Jews have been “punished” at least twice during history – does that mean they are in reality are safe now, except for minor episodes?

003 17/9a: “Verily the Quran doth guide to that which is most right (or stable) – – -”. That is not possible on basis of a book with may be 3000+ mistakes, contradictions, invalid logic, and worse. It is worth adding that “The Message of the Quran” (remark 10 to this surah) specifies that “most right” includes “ethical principles and everything that promotes human life”. A bit special for a religion that has no ethical or moral philosophy, only the dictates from the morally very special war lord and robber baron Muhammad – and reckons robbing, enslavement, rape of slaves, suppression, discrimination, murder, hate, war as “lawful and good” and very clearly permitted, and even encouraged by the god and the religion. (Well, Allah and Muhammad got many warriors – and for free). Similar claims, see 2/213 – 48/28.

004 17/9b: “- – – and (the Quran*) giveth the glad tidings to the Believers – – -”. What kind of glad tidings can be built on a book containing hundreds of mistakes? – tidings of a fool’s paradise? And can even such tidings be reliable, when built on some hundreds of mistakes + hundreds and hundreds of unproven statements hanging in the air, resting on unproven words? (See separate chapters). And what kind of glad tidings are built on moral and etics like what you find in the Quran – live a good life at the expences of catastrophes for many others?!

*005 17/12: “- – – all things have We (Allah*) explained in detail”. Salah. A lot of things are not explained in detail – f. ex. Muslim laws has had to be supplemented with many more paragraphs than the ones in the Quran and in Hadith – and still Muslim law are far from perfect concerning modern life and societies, and even concerning daily life. And just? – A man telling that a woman has behaved indecently is lying to Allah according to Allah and the Quran, if he cannot produce 4 witnesses, EVEN IF HE SPEAKS THE FULL TRUTH, AND THE OMNISCIENT ALLAH KNOWS THIS. And much worse: A raped woman is to be punished if she cannot produce 4 MEN who witnessed the very act – normally absolutely impossible. (For one thing rape normally happens in hidden places, and for another: How many men will come forth to tell: “We saw that she was raped, but did not try to help her” – and then be strictly punished for that omission? Those two points in the Quran are the most horribly unjust and inhuman paragraphs we have ever seen or heard about in any even half civilized law. Is sharia half civilized? Is Allah good or/and just?

00b 17/15: “- – – nor would We (Allah*) visit with Our Wrath until We had sent a Messenger (to give warning)”. This Islam will have to prove – see 17/16 just below.

00c 17/16: “When We (Allah*) decide to destroy a population, We (first) send a definite order to those among them who are given the good things of this life (= the rich and/or leaders*) and yet transgress – – -”. This Islam will have to prove, because f. ex. many a natural catastrophe has happened absolutely without a warning – f. ex. the tsunami that in December 2004 hit Muslims far, far harder than any other religion. We never heard that f. ex. Malaysia or Indonesia or Sumatra or Ashe had received warnings.

006 17/41: “- – – their flight (from the Truth)!” At best from partly true statements – the Quran at best is only partly true.

007 17/42: “If there had been (other) gods with Him (Allah*) – – – behold, they would certainly have sought out a way to the Lord of the Throne”. Salah – itu adalah kemungkinan, tapi sangat jauh dari kepastian. F. ex. are hierarchies possible, or splitting the “job”.

*008 17/44a: “The seven heavens – – -”. There are no seven heavens. See 10/6.

00d 17/44b: “- – – there is not a thing but celebrates (= all things celebrates*) His (Allah’s*) praise – – -”. This Islam will have to prove – it is an unlikely statement built on no obvious fact(s).

009 17/46: “- – – (the unbelievers*) turn on their backs, fleeing (from the Truth)”. At most from what is partly the truth, as the Quran has lots and lots of mistakes.

010 17/55: “We (Allah*) gave David (the gift of) the Psalms”. According to science the psalms are a lot younger than King David – at least most of them. A god had known.

011 17/59: “And We (Allah*) refrain from sending the Signs (miracles that would prove Allah and Muhammad’s connection to him*), only because the men of former generations treated them as false – – -“. This is a flat lie – and Muhammad was too intelligent not to know it. Not all, but a lot of people came to believe (f. ex. during the times of Jesus and Moses according also to the Quran) because of clear miracles in the old times – and a lot would come to believe at the time of Muhammad and at the time of today if there were clear miracles connected to a religion.

012 17/61: “- – – one (Adam*) whom Thou (Allah*) didst create from clay – – -”. Wrong simply and plainly. Lihat 6 / 2.

013 17/73: “- – – that (the Quran*) which We (Allah*) had revealed to you (Muhammad*)”. A book with so many mistakes, etc. like you find in the Quran, is not made by a god.

014 17/77: “(This was Our (Allah’s*)) way with the messengers We sent before thee (Muhammad*), thou wilt find no change in Our ways.” Wrong. There is so much difference between especially NT and the Quran, that it is not the same religion at all. F. ex. Jesus was for peace, Muhammad for war. And science has clearly shown that the Bible is not falsified – Islam in case will have to prove it, and after 1400 years of thorough searching they have found not one single proof, only loose claims. (Guess if they had told the world about it if they really had found a proof!!)

015 17/81: “Truth (the teachings of Muhammad*) has (now) arrived, – – -”. As these teachings build on the Quran, and the Quran contains lots of mistakes, the teachings are at best partly the truth.

016 17/82: “We (Allah*) sent down – – – in the Quran – – -”. Islam will have to prove that the Quran really is sent down, and sent down from an omniscient god. Without VERY good proofs, it is difficult to believe an omniscient god has sent down such a mess, and especially if he intended to save people for his Heaven. Yes, without such proofs, it simply is impossible to believe it.

*017 17/88: “If the whole mankind and Jinns (originally figures from Arab folklore and fairy tales – and not mentioned by any other prophet throughout times, even though they are pretty active and part of what Islam claims is the same basic religion as the Jewish and the Christian one*) were gathered together to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like thereof”. Salah. A flock of naïve primitives or people indoctrinated from childhood might believe this. But a number of good writers today and through history would be able to do that – this everyone knows who have read some good books. The Quran is not especially good literature to be polite, in spite of what Islam declares – rather dull, repeating the same stories time and time again, and using the same points and the same finish over and over, and not least: There are few if any original thoughts or ideas – they are “borrowed” from other sources, included made up sctiptures, legends and faity tales. See also 10/37a and 10/37b.

018 17/92: “Or thou (Muhammad*) cause the sky to fall in pieces, as thou sayest (will happen) – – – “. No matter what Muhammad says will happen, and Allah accepts to repeat in his (?) book thousands and millions of years before Muhammad said it (!), it is wrong. The sky is an optical illusion, and cannot fall down in pieces.

019 17/95: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. See 2/2a.

020 17/98: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

021 17/99a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

022 17/99b: “- – – of which there is no doubt – – -”. With this many mistakes – something like three or four pr. page in our book when you count just the surely mistaken facts – there is nothing in the Quran that can be no doubt about, unless it is really proved correct. And nearly nothing in the book is proved.

00e 17/101: “To Moses We (Allah*) did give nine Clear Signs – – -.” According to the Bible he got his staff cum snake + 10 plagues = 11 “signs”. Which book is most reliable – if any?

*023 17/102a: “- – – I (Moses*) consider thee indeed, O Pharaoh, to be one doomed to destruction!” Pharaoh Ramses II was not doomed to destruction, at least not this time. He did not drown, in spite of what the Quran says. – and he lived for several years after the possible exodus. (Which may be one of the reasons why some Muslims want the exodus from Egypt to have happened under pharaohs we do not know as well as Ramses II – preferably one we do not know if he may have drowned or not).

024 17/102b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

***025 17/103: “- – – We (Allah*) did drown him (pharaoh Ramses II) and all who were with him.” The pitiful fact is that we know from history that Ramses II did not drown. He even did not die until some years after possible the exodus, according to history.

026 17/105a: “We (Allah*) sent down the (Quran) – – -”. If Allah is omniscient, he did not make such a second or third-rate book – only all the mistaken facts makes it at least second rate, and then there are f. ex. all the invalid statements and proofs, not to mention the simply wrong ones and the contradictions.

027 17/105b: “We (Allah*) sent down the (Quran) in Truth, – – -”. Perhaps – and perhaps not. The stumbling stone for these statements in the Quran is the large collection of mistaken facts and invalid signs, etc. in the book. It at best is partly true.

028 17/105c: “- – – and in Truth it has descended – – -”. See 17/105 just above.

029 17/105: “- – – Glad Tidings – – -.” At best only partly right. See 2/97c and 17/9b above and 91/13 below.

030 17/106a: “- – – a Quran which We (Allah*) have divided – – -“. If any omniscient god has had anything at all to do with a sorry work like making or “sending down” the Quran, Islam will have to prove it.

031 17/106b: “We (Allah*) have revealed it (the Quran*) by stages.” See 17/106a just above.

***032 17/107: “Say: ‘Whether you believe it or not, it is true that those who were given knowledge beforehand (= Christians and Jews mainly*), when it (the Quran*) is recited to them, fall down on their faces in humble prostration”. Satu kata: Omong kosong. Dan apa yang buruk: Salah satu yang terdiri ayat ini tahu itu bohong – yang juga Muhammad tahu kapan ia membuat atau membacanya. A few Jews and Christians are said to have converted by 656 AD when the Quran is said to be written, though very few if any in 621 when this surah was made, but as a general rule: Utter nonsense. Tengok saja sejarah konflik antara Islam, Yahudi dan Kristen, belum lagi semua orang Yahudi di Madinah dan dekat yang bukan menjadi pelarian atau dibunuh, daripada menerima Islam – f. ex. Khaybar – dan tidak lebih diperlukan untuk mengatakan. Anda kadang-kadang bertemu dengan ketidakjujuran seperti ini di baru, muncul agama dan sekte. Ini adalah cara mendapatkan “berat” untuk laporan mereka, terutama ketika mereka memiliki beberapa fakta atau bukti untuk menunjukkan untuk diri mereka sendiri. Hanya satu fakta kecil yang menyangkal dongeng ini: The 700 orang Yahudi di Khaybar bisa menyelamatkan kehidupan mereka dan harta dengan menjadi Muslim di waktu. Untuk pria, mereka memilih untuk tidak.

033 17/108a: “And they (Jews and Christians when they hear the Quran*) say: ‘Glory to our Lord! Truly has the promise of our Lord been fulfilled (and the Messiah has come*)!” Made up propaganda. See 17/107 just above.

034 17/108b: “And they (Jews and Christians) say: “Glory to our Lord! Truly has the promise of our Lord been fulfilled!” As for the likeliness that this is true, see 17/107 above. But Islam (in this case “The Message of the Quran”) tells that it may refer to all the mentioning of Muhammad in the Bible (of which we have found none that is not just wishful statements that are obviously wrong – see “Muhammad in the Bible?”), but that it most likely means joy for finally getting the Quran, which Allah had promised and now finally had sent. There is no reference to a promise of something like the Quran in the Bible, and Jews and Christians at all times did reckon the Quran to be so wrong and so distant from the Bible, that it was not even heresy. Verse 107 and 108 simply are fairy tales made up to back up Muhammad – a not unusual technique to use by emerging new sects or religions. It may be based on a few converts at that time, or free fantasy – dishonesty happens when new religions and sects are made. And later.

035 17/109: “They (Jews and Christians*) fall down on their faces in tears (when they hear the Quran*)”. As honest as 17/107 and 17/108 just above.

*00f 17/111a: “- – – Allah, Who begets no son – – -”. Well, Jesus called Yahweh “father”. Besides it is funny to read the Quran scolding Arabs to believe Allah had daughters – al-Lat, al-Uzza and (al-) Manat – because it is plain stupidity to believe a god who wanted family, would choose to have daughters. He was sure to choose sons. That imbecility was enough proof in the man-centred old Arabia, to “prove” that the very idea had to be wrong. But when Yahweh may be wanted some company – a son – that is an utter impossibility in spite of this. Even more funny because the Quran, Muhammad, Islam and Muslims tell it is impossible for mere humans to understand a god – – – but everyone seems to be sure that a god wants to be alone, and neither do they ask if a god perhaps has a reason (that we may or may not understand for having a son, nor ask if he just wants company. Who knows a god’s wishes?

*00g 17/111b: “- – – and has no partner in (His) dominion – – -”. Nah, Islam mengatakan bahwa Allah adalah tuhan yang sama dengan Yahweh. If we discuss from that hypothetical statement just here: In the very old Hebrew religion there was a female partner/wife of Yahweh – his Amat (source: New Scientist and at least two others). Dalam budaya Semitik ketat maskulin Amat itu terlupakan selama berabad-abad. Tetapi mungkin dia masih ada semua sama pada saat Muhammad – dan mungkin bahkan hari ini?

Surah 17: At least 35 mistakes + 7 likely mistakes.

SURAH 18:

001 18/1a: “- – – Allah, Who hath sent down to his Servant the Book”. Well, the sinister question is: Can a book that full of mistaken facts and other facts, really be sent down by an omniscient god? If yes, does that mean that Allah is not omniscient/omnipotent? If no, does it mean that someone else who is/was not omniscient, has made (up) the Quran? The last question is most sinister, especially if it means that Islam is a made up religion, and even more so if this (may be?) made up religion blocks the road for its “believers” to a real religion (if such one exists). The answers have got to be: No omniscient god would make such an unreliable book (among other reasons because man had to see the mistakes sooner or later), and it is likely it is made by one or more humans at the time of Mohammad (among other reasons because the mistakes and many of the stories are in accordance with what one believed in Arabia at that time).

002 18/1b: “(Allah*) hath allowed therein no Crookedness.” In a book that full of mistaken facts and other mistakes, there is a lot of crookedness. Especially the use of invalid “signs” and “proofs” smell.

003 18/2a: “(He (Allah*) hath made it) Straight (and Clear) – – -”. A book that full of mistaken facts and other mistakes, f. ex. linguistic ones, (and perhaps religious ones, too – why should they be exceptions?) is neither straight nor clear.

004 18/2b: “- – – Glad Tidings – – -.” At best only partly right. See 2/97c and 17/9b above and 91/13 below.

00a 18/4: “(It is wrong*) that Allah hath begotten a son”. Well, we are back to the old facts that Jesus according to the Bible – written on the background of thousands of witnesses/listeners – many times called God/Yahweh Father, that humble humans – f. ex. Muhammad – are unable to understand completely the ways and wishes of a god (may be Yahweh wanted a son for some reason), and that Islam has to deny that Jesus was the son of Yahweh, in order to make (or pretend?) Mohammad the greatest prophet. Besides: Where are Islam’s proofs? – in spite of Islam’s glorifying of blind belief – a psychologically wise slogan when all one have are doubtful and at least partly wrong texts from a doubtful, self proclaimed “prophet” of at least as doubtful character – it is naïve in the extreme to believe blindly in so serious matter as eternity. If your chosen religion is a made up one – which every blind believer in every religion believes just their religion is not – where do you end if there is a next life? – and what if there is a real religion that you have not found, because of your blindness. Perhaps all religions are made up and just is a result of an inner longing in some people for something absolute (science have found that many weak – and some stronger – souls have such a longing in their genes or psyche), but in that case one at least does not have to make life as miserable for ones fellow men (and even more for the women) as Islam preaches – hate, rape, stealing, enslavement, and war.

*005 18/5a: “No knowledge have they (the Christians*) of such a thing (that Yahweh may have a son*)”. Salah. There is a lot of information in the Bible. Now of course Muhammad, the Quran, and Islam all declare that the Bible has been falsified – they have to, as that was the only way for Muhammad to explain the differences between his “quoting” the Bible and quoting of religious legends, fairy tales, etc., and the Bible proper (it also is common among religious sects or religions to say that other sects or religions have misunderstood or falsified information), and also between Islam and Christianity. But science clearly has shown that the Bible is not falsified.

But the Quran is based only on what a single man said – only one man. A man that lived 600 years later, who brings not one single proof or witness – only claims and statements taken from nowhere and from legends. Also a man for whom it was essential (just read the Quran and see) to be the greatest of prophets, which meant he had to reduce Jesus. And a man who craved very much for power – once more; just read the Quran and see how he glues himself to his platform of power; his religion and the god of that religion – which meant that his teachings had to gain priority over other teachings. And a man telling he got his teachings directly from an omniscient god – which meant it was impossible to accept that there were mistakes in the teachings (a problem that today is a nightmare for Islamic scholars, because there very obviously are lots of mistakes, and it is difficult to find good enough ways of “explaining” the mistakes away, except for to people with no – or not enough – knowledge, or not able to think for themselves – – – or believing so strongly that they anyhow do not want to see facts that do not fit what they believe.)

Whereas the Bible is written by many different persons, and as for NT many of whom knew Jesus or his closest co-workers, the Disciples, and nearly all wrote at times when there still were thousands of witnesses alive that had personally heard and seen what Jesus said and did.

We do not say that the Bible is right. We even less say that all details in the Bible are right, as it is clear that some details are wrong also in the Bible, at least in Genesis (creating it all).

But there is no doubt that according to all rules for evaluating information, the Bible should be more reliable than the Quran. The OT is written some 1000 years earlier and consequently 1000 years closer to what happened, and also had at least a lot of verbal traditions to build on. And NT was written 450 – 600 before the Quran, and with lots and lots of witnesses to what had happened still alive when much of it was written. Muhammad on the other hand had few sources, and they were mixed up with fairy tales (like the Child Gospels, from which he f. ex. has got the story of the bird Jesus made from clay) or so-called apocryphal gospels or books – all of which are proved to be made up or propaganda for sects, or – well – fairy tales. Ok, he said he got his information from a god – but that is very easy and very cheap to say – many a founder of many a sect or religion have said the same thing. And there is not a single proof – not one single – for it being true in all the Quran, in spite of wishes and demands from both sceptics and followers. Questions that at best were answered with some fast-talk about what Allah could do if he wanted (but he never “wanted”) or that none of them would believe even if Allah sent real (supernatural) proofs (something any person that knows a little about people or about psychology knows is not true – supernatural proofs/wonders had made at least some believe. What is worse: Muhammad was a wise man who understood human nature – he had to know that he was lying each time he told just this). And do not forget: The glorified ideal Muhammad was in reality a highwayman and thief, an extorter, a rapist, a murderer and mass murderer, an enslaver, a warlord lusting for power, and a warlord telling that “war is betrayal”.

There also is the fact that science knows some 13ooo scriptures or fragments with relation to the Bible or biblical circumstances. Plus 30ooo+ other manuscripts with referances to the Bible. They all are in accordance with the modern Bible, and when they find that the translators of the Bible have misunderstood or not been quite exact enough, the translation of the Bible is corrected in later editions – one wants and strives for to have everything as correct as possible. In stark contrast: When Islam finds scriptures or fragments that is not quite the same as the 1-2 they use today, the findings are denied and hidden – a star example is the many copies of the Quran found in Yemen in 1972; when it became clear that details – some of them of significance – were unlike what was written in the Quran(s) of today, scientists were denied access to them any more.

Conclusion: Any student and any professor of history will say that according to normal rules for evaluation, the Bible is far more reliable than the Quran as a source for historical information. And any psychologist will confirm that Muhammad must have known he lied each and every time he said that (supernatural) proofs of Allah had made no-one believe in Allah anyhow. And more: No serioud scientist uses information from the Quran from before 610 AD in his science – it is not reconed to be reliable.

00b 18/5b: “What they (the “infidels”*) say (about Jesus being the son of Yahweh*) is nothing but falsehood”. Tell that to all the witnesses that heard Jesus say so. There were so many listening to Jesus, that if a thing like this (Jesus calling Yahweh his father, and obviously in a traditional meaning – though perhaps a created, not a born son) was a lie, but was written in scripts meant for many to read, there had been serious protests and corrections. We do not say Jesus spoke the truth – even if he is accepted also by Islam to be an honest prophet. But we say it is highly unlikely that he did not say – many times – that Yahweh was his father. There simply were too many witnesses to what he said.

*00c 18/9a: “Or dost thou reflect that the Companions of the Cave – – -”. Ini adalah cerita lama – sebuah legenda agama – yang tergabung dalam Quran. Cerita dari 7 tidur terkenal – dan hanya sebuah dongeng. 7 adalah orang Kristen dari Efesus di tempat yang sekarang Turki, yang melarikan diri ke sebuah gua selama pogrom di bawah “Cesar” Decius ceritanya.

Decius memiliki gua berdinding sampai membunuh mereka. Sebaliknya 7 tertidur, dan tidak bangun sampai pada tahun 30.th dari masa pemerintahan Theodosius saleh – yang ada di 448 AD. Decius mengekang selama lebih dari dua tahun di sekitar / setelah 250 AD. Itu berarti bahwa jika dongeng telah benar, mereka telah tidur sekitar 195 tahun (Quran mengatakan 300 atau 309 tahun – bahkan dalam dongeng itu salah). Islam has troubles explaining this story, and the “explanations” we have seen, are very “lofty” and diffuse – f. ex. that it really is told about an older Jewish fairy tale – or that it derives from misunderstandings about the Esseers – the members of the Qumran society (near the Dead Sea) but without giving any sources or documentation – only speculations. Selain usia tidak menjadi masalah – itu adalah sebagai dibuat bahkan jika itu harus terjadi yang asli adalah sedikit lebih tua. They also tell it is an allegory – which they mostly do when they have difficulties finding “explanations” that are possible to believe. But an allegory of what? And it obviously is not meant to be an allegory – among other things the meanings of an allegory in the Quran normally are very easy to see or are explained. Quran lebih lanjut biasanya memberitahu bila mengatakan sebuah alegori atau yang serupa, dan tidak kurang, Quran sendiri menekankan bahwa harus dipahami secara harfiah jika tidak ada lagi yang dikatakan. The tidur juga disebutkan dalam 18/13 – 18/22 – 18/25. Also see 18/13 below.

006 18/9b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

007 18/13: “We (Allah*) relate to thee their (the 7 sleepers) story in truth: – – -”. As this is a well-known fairy tale, and as the Quran has so many other mistakes, carefully said: At best it is only partly the truth. But note that it is stressed that the story is the truth – not an allegory, not made up, but the truth. .

008 18/14: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

009 18/17: “- – – the signs of Allah – – -.” There is not one single sign in the Quran that clearly is from Allah, and thus not one single “sign” that proves anything about Allah. Any priest in any religion can just as easy say they are signs of his god(s). Words are that cheap.

010 18/22: “(Some) say they (the 7 sleepers) were three, the dog being the fourth among them, (others) say they were five, the dog being the sixth – doubtfully guessing the unknown; (yet others) say they were seven, the dog being the eight”. If Muhammad got this story from a real story via a god, not from a well known fairy tale, the god had known their number (well, a god also had known the number that was told in a legend), but Muhammad obviously not. Also see 18/13 just above.

011 18/25: “So they (the 7 sleepers) stayed in their Cave three hundred years, and (some) add nine more”. See 18/13 and 18/22. (If one relies on some historical facts mentioned in the main variety of the legend, they slept some 195 years).

012 18/26: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

00d 18/27a: “- – – the Book (the Quran*) of thy Lord (Allah*): – – – “. Is it really the words of a god? – with that many mistakes?

013 18/27b: “- – – the Book (the Quran) of thy Lord (Allah*): none can change His Words (the Quran*) – – -”. Salah. Reality can change the words when the words are wrong. And many verses were abrogated (“We (Allah*) sends another as good or better”) – a few even by Hadiths – not to mention that the whole religion was changed in and after 622 AD from peaceful to war and hate and stealing and rape. Islam cannot admit this change, because it may expose mistakes in the religion, but people are able to read, and it is easy to find in the Quran.

014 18/29: “Say, ‘The Truth is from your Lord (Allah*)”. Allah’s words as presumed “referred” in the Quran at best is partly the truth – mind all the mistakes.

015 18/31: “- – – bracelets of gold – – -“. Which is right and which is wrong? – in 76/21 the bracelets are from silver. One of them has to be wrong. A mistake and one more contradiction – in spite of that “contradictions does not exist in the Quran – which is a proof for that it came from Allah”.

016 18/37a: “- – – Him (Allah*) Who created you out of dust – – -”. Wrong – man was not created out of dust. Lihat 6 / 2.

*017 18/37b: “- – – Him (Allah*) Who created you out of dust, then out of a sperm-drop – – -”, Wrong, or at best half true. Humans are not made out of a drop of sperm – though the Quran says so repeatedly. Humans – and animals – are made out of sperm + an egg cell. Arabs knew a lot about foetuses (from slaughtering of animals), but an egg cell is so small, that one does not notice it – hardly possible to see in all the blood and intestines and gore, etc. – so the Quran tells the semen is “planted” in a woman and grows to a being. Muhammad did not know better as that was an accepted theory at his time – Greek and/or Persian “knowledge” originally – but an omniscient god had known – – – so who made the Quran?

017b 18/50 (A53 – omitted in 2008): “Behold, We (Allah*) said to the angels,’ Bow down to Adam’: they bowed down except Iblis. He was one of the Jinns – – -.” But here is a clear mistake – or more likely; A. Yusuf Ali’s religion and al-Taqiyya may have suppressed his honesty: The original Arab text here do not say he was a jinn: It says something like (translated from Swedish): “He (Iblis*) belonged to the multitude of invisible beings”. The text here honestly and clearly indicates that he was an angel before he became the Devil. On the other hand the Quran other places tells he was made from fire, which in case means he according to this book in reality was a jinn. This is one more place where the Muslim scholars agree that the text in the Quran is wrong (though they never say this in clear words) as it here most clearly is indicated that Iblis was an angel.

018 18/51: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

019 18/55: “- – – now that guidance (the Quran) has come to them (the “unbelievers“)”. A book with so many mistakes is not really guidance.

020 18/56a: “- – – glad tidings – – -.” At best partly true only. See 2/97c above and 61/13 below.

021 18/56b: “- – – in order therewith to weaken the truth (the teachings of Muhammad/the Quran*), – – -”. To repeat the reality: With so many mistakes in the Quran, it can maximum be partly true.

022 18/56c: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

023 18/57: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

***024 18/86a: The next mistakes concern a certain Dhu’l Quarnayn – a name meaning “the Two Horned One“, and it is an Arab “nickname” for the famous Macedonian king Alexander the Great (see f. ex. “the Oxford Dictionary of Islam”), who lived around 330 BC (died 323 BC) – some 950 years before Muhammad. Muslims never tell that Dhu’l Quarnayn is Alexander the Great – perhaps because every educated European at once would know that a lot of the information about him in the Quran is wrong – we know a lot about him.

You will even meet Muslims denying Alexander is Dhu’l Quarnayn – “proving” their statements with f. ex. that Alexander today is well known to have been a polytheist, whereas the Quran indirectly, but very clearly tells he was a good Muslim (another one of the Quran’s mistakes).

It may be of interest to mention that Ibn Ishaq seems to have believed that Dhu’l Quarnayn was an Egyptian of Greek origin (page 139 in the 2007 edition from Oxford University Press, edited by A. Guillaume). And that Ibn Hisham in his note no. 186 to that book knew what he was talking about. He says that Dhu’l Quarnayn was a Greek (Alexander also was king of Greece) and simply states: “His name was Alexander. He built Alexandria and it was named after him” (Alexander the Great founded Alexandria – a well known historical fact). But Ibn Hisham refrains from using the full name Alexander the Great. It never was a secret for the learned ones that it was Alexander the Great who founded Alexandria, not even at the time of Ibn Hisham (dead ca. 840 AD), but to mention his full name might perhaps cause difficult questions from many quarters, as it was clear that at least some of what was told about Dhu’l Quarnayn obviously had to be recognized as fairy tales by anyone knowing the story of Alexander the Great. May be Ibn Hisham was brave by even identifying him as the founder of Alexandria?

18/86a“- – – he (Alexander) reached the setting of the sun, – – -”. To reach the setting of the sun means to go west. In addition to all the other mistakes in this story we know that Alexander never went west (the furthest west he ever was, was his homeland Macedonia north of Hellas, and Egypt). See also 18/8b and 18/86c just below.

**025 18/86b: “- – – when he (Alexander) reached the setting of the sun – – -”. Anyone who knows two millimetres about geography and astronomy knows this is wrong and ridiculous to the extreme: The sun does not set on Earth – and absolutely in a pond of dirty water. Also see 18/86a and 18/86c just above and just below.

***026 18/86c: “- – – he (Alexander the Great*) found it (the sun*) set in a spring of murky water”. This statement – or fairy tale – deserves a series of exclamation marks – anyone today who has finished primary school, knows among other facts:

  1. The sun is too big to settle anywhere on Earth.
  2. Not to mention that it is far too big to settle in a pond – murky or not.
  3. And that if the sun ever came within a million miles from the Earth, there would be no spring or pond any more – far too hot.

Muhammad did not know the size or temperature of the sun, but an omniscient god had known.Who made the Quran?

Muslim mencoba untuk “menjelaskan” itu dengan f. ex. telling that what he saw was the reflexion of a sunset in a spring. Think of the great warrior king Alexander – riding west and west and west with his men, day after day and week after week to find the place where the sun set. Then one day he hits upon one more pond – even one with dirty water. When he stands so that that dirty spring is in the straight line between him and the sun, he sees the red and yellow mirror image of the sunset in the muddy surface – a sight he has seen time and again and again before on the surfaces of ponds and springs and rivers and lakes and seas – and he hails his men: “Now we have reached our goal!! Here is where the sun sets!! Now let’s go home and tell about our great discovery“.

Believe it whoever wants.

But whoever believes it needs to see a professor of history – or a psychologist to mend his brain. Also see 18/86a and 18/86b just above.

027 18/90: “- – – he came to the rising of the sun – – -”. It is not physically possible to come to the place where the sun rises from the Earth as the Quran indicates, because it does not rise from the Earth – and if it had, both Alexander and the Earth had been rather fried. Also see 18/86 x 3 just above.

*00e 18/94: “- – – Gog and Magog -. – -”. These are from the Bible. In the Bible one is a country and the other a king – king Gog of the country Magog. In the Quran they are two bad people. Siapa yang benar? Remember that Muhammad did not know the Bible well. A god had known. Lalu siapa yang menyusun Quran?

**028 18/95: “He (Alexander*) said: ‘(The power) in which my Lord (Allah!!!*) has established me is better – – -”. The Quran clearly indicates that Alexander was a pious Muslim (some 950 years before Muhammad!). To make an understatement: That is wrong. Alexander was a polytheist. (Muslims sometimes try to use this mistake as a proof for that Dhu’l Qarnayn was not Alexander). Also see 18/86a, 18/96b and 18/96c below.

***029 18/95-97: A people that lived in a valley were terrorized by two other people – Gog and Magog. They (the locals*) asked Alexander for help. He said: “I will erect a strong barrier between you and them: ‘Bring me blocks of iron’”. And he let build a wall of iron blocks produced by the locals straight across the valley, strong enough to be impossible for the people of Gog and Magog to get through, and tall enough to be impossible to get over even with the longest ladders – be sure that Gog and Magog knew about ladders. But nowhere on the entire earth there existed that much iron blocks around 330 BC – blocks of iron the locals were asked to bring him. (Note here that 18/93 tells the wall had to cross “(a tract) between two mountains” under which mountains a people lived – the wall had to have some length to cross “a tract” big enough for a whole people to live – it took a lot of iron blocks.)

(Besides it is all ridiculous: Very few valleys – and no big valley – have only one possible way in and out – Gog and Magog could in case get around the wall. And if not, it always was possible to dig under the wall – this was a valley in which people lived, and such a valley would have soil under the wall.) See also 18/86a -18/86b – 18/86c.

**030 18/96a: “At length, when he (Alexander – or really the workers making the wall*) had filled up the space between the two steep mountain-sides, he said, ‘Blow (with your bellows)’. Then, when he had made it red as a fire – – -”. It would not be possible to make the whole of such a big wall red like fire at around 330 BC. They neither had the means – that kind of fire – nor the technology. It would be more than difficult even today. Fairy tale.

**031 18/96b: “Then, when he (Alexander the Great) had made it (red) as fire, he said: ‘Bring me, that I may pour over it, molten lead” (Dawood says bronze we think).

  1. We do not think there any one place on Earth was enough lead – or bronze – for such a job.
  2. Even if it did, metal was expensive – the locals had to be very rich to have so much lead/bronze. And this goes even more so for enough iron blocks to build a huge wall.
  3. It would not be technically possible to heat such a big and long wall to “make it (red) as fire” ca. 340 BC – it is hardly possible today.

**032 18/98: “This is a mercy from my Lord (Allah*)”. Salah. Alexander the Great was no Muslim, but a polytheist.

033 18/105: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

034 18/106: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

Surah 18: At least 34 mistakes + 5 likely mistakes.

SURAH 19:

001 19 / 7: “- – – namanya akan Yahya (Yohanes *): di tidak ada dengan nama yang Kami (Allah *) telah diberikan perbedaan sebelum”. But Johanan (John), son of Kareah, was a distinguished man in 2. Raja, 25/23. In addition our sources say that the word “distinction” is not in the Arab edition, but added by Yusuf Ali to circumvent an obvious mistake, as the name John was not unknown in Hebrew. (Komentar Yusuf Ali 2461). Lain penerjemah – f. ex. Muhammad Azad in “The Message of the Quran” – say in their comments to the point that the exact translation is (translated from Swedish): “We (Allah*) have never before named anybody with his (John the Baptist’s) name before”. But the name John (Johanan in Hebrew) is mentioned 27 times in OT = before John the Baptist – it was a quite common name. Dari sejarah yang relevan juga adalah imam-raja John Hirkanus dan Yohanes umum Essene. Ada banyak keduanya Johns dan laki-laki dari perbedaan bernama Yohanes sebelum Yohanes Pembaptis. Cukup salah.

002 19/10: “- – – Thy Sign – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*003 19/18: “- – – I (Mary, mother of Jesus*) seek refuge from thee to (Allah) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost fear Allah”. It is highly unlikely that a Jew – and especially one working in Yahweh’s temple – should seek refuge from a then highly polytheistic god from another country. As one see from what happened to Jesus, the monotheism and Yahweh were strong in Israel at that time. If the Quran tells the truth when it tells that Mary was working in the Temple, it is absolutely impossible – she had got into serious troubles if she addressed any other god than Yahweh (but then the Quran most likely is wrong also on this point – We have found nothing about Mary working in the Temple in the Bible or any other source, and if it had been true, most or all Christian sources had mentioned it, as it would mean one more connection between Jesus and Yahweh. (Actually it is incorrect that she worked in the Temple. This legend is taken from the apocryphal – made up – “’proto gospel’ after Jacob” – – – but Muslims all the same tell that the differences between the Quran and the Bible is because the bad non-Muslims have falsified the latter one – not because Muhammad ever so often used twisted fairy tales as basis for stories in the Quran.) Our Muslim sources also do not mention if there exists any other reliable source for this story in the Quran – which Islam frequently does not do when they have no sources, only statements built on nothing or like here on what legends and stories the story-tellers told in long evenings. Her work in the Temple simply is a fairy tale shined up and used like a true story in the Quran – by Allah or by Muhammad, and presumably sent down from Allah and copy from the Mother Book in Heaven, a book perhaps made by Allah, but most likely – according to Islam – never made, but existed from eternity (impossible as angels are speaking at least one place in the book – it must be made after the first angels were created. Not to mention that Muhammad speaks some 8 places in the book).

You are free to believe it if you want.

***004 19/24+25: “But (a voice) (the new-born baby Jesus*) cried from beneath the (palm-tree): ‘Grieve not! For thy Lord hath provided a rivulet beneath thee; ‘And shake towards thyself the trunk of the palm-tree (normally date palms are minimum 50 cm wide and strong – impossible for a human to shake*): it will let fall fresh ripe dates upon thee”. This story is “borrowed” from chapter 20 in an apocryphal – made up – “proto gospel” said to be after some Mathew. “Borrowed” by Muhammad or Allah, but presumably sent down as a copy from the Mother Book in Heaven. Believe the last if you want. There are few if any original stories in the Quran – mostly they are “borrowed” from different sources, but often changed a little. In this special case one also finds the story in “The Childbirth of Mary and the Salvador’s Childhood” if we remember the name correctly, and it has perhaps entered the Quran via “The Arab Childhood Gospel” (source; among others Ibn Warraq). As said before: Muhammad took stories from such fairy tales, and then accused the Bible of being falsified when it did not tell the same made up legends and tales. But no newborn baby is able to think rationally or to speak fluently – if it had really happened it had to be a miracle, and there is no chance that it had been forgotten in NT, as it had strengthened Jesus’ connection to something supernatural quite a lot.

00a 19/27: “O Mary! Truly a strange thing (the baby Jesus*) hast thou brought!”. Mary had had to be very fat and very lucky if none of “her people” had noticed she was pregnant – be it at home or in the Temple.

***005 19/28: “(Mary*) O sister of Aaron!” This is the most famous mistake in the Quran. The likely reason is that in Arab the names Mary and Miriam (the sister of Moses and Aaron) both are written Maryam. Muhammad was not well versed in the Bible, and thought it was the same woman, even though some 1200 years separated them. The Hadith tells that Muhammad was told by his followers that he was wrong, and tried to explain away the mistake, but without real success. Muslims today tend to “explain” the blunder by saying it was an age-old way of paying respect to a woman to connect her to a person of high standard, and similar “explanations” but the “explanations” generally are not accepted by science, even not by all Muslim scientists – this may be partly because Muhammad also has made the father of Moses, Imran, the father of Mary another place in the Quran. (This last fact is by some Muslims “explained” with that they are two different Imrans. But also this is not accepted by the science, as it is clear that it in both cases it is the same man it is talked about – the founder of “Imran’s house” or Imran’s tribe). Some Muslims say it is an allegory, but it clearly is not told like an allegory – to call stories that turns out to be wrong allegories also is a standard Muslim way of explaining away difficult points when other “explanations” fail. And remember: Both the Quran and Islam strains that the Quran is to be understood literally if nothing else is said. Allegories, etc., also have points very easy to see, or are explained (which is not the case here) if Muhammad had intended to make a point of something. A clear mistake according to science. This is even more clear as Hadith tells Mohammad himself was unaware he had made a mistake, and tried unsuccessfully to explain it away when he was corrected by his nearest co-workers

**006 19/30a: “I (baby Jesus*) am indeed a servant of Allah, – – -”. Lihat 3 / 51.

**007 19/30b: “(Allah has*) given me revelations and made me (the baby Jesus*) a prophet – – -”. Even Islam (f. ex. the learned Ikrimah, quoted by Tabari) accepts the impossibility that a baby is a prophet, but the explaining it away is vague and hypothetical. Sebuah kesalahan yang sangat jelas. Hal ini bahkan lebih sehingga tidak ada satu kesempatan pun yang bertanya-tanya ini telah dilupakan atau dihilangkan dari NT jika telah benar. Actually this is one of the points where many Muslim scholars accept there is a mistake in the Quran.

**008 19/30-33: The baby Jesus is talking and discussing in his cradle. Also this is “borrowed” from apocryphal Child Gospels – in this case as far as we know via “The Arab Child Gospel” – also called “The first Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ” – an apocryphal scripture from 2. abad. There is not a single chance that a wonder like this had been omitted from the Bible, as it would have strengthened Jesus’ position quite a lot. Hal ini bahkan lebih sehingga tidak ada banyak cerita tentang Yesus sebagai seorang anak, dan cerita ini akan membuat bagian hidupnya kurang kosong. Sekali lagi sebuah dongeng digunakan seperti kisah nyata oleh Allah atau Muhammad. Bahkan buku seperti “Pesan dari Quran” tidak dapat membela ini sebagai kisah nyata, tetapi hanya menawarkan spekulasi dan praduga untuk menjelaskan ketidakmungkinan. Also see 19/30b just above.

Sebuah cerita yang sangat jelas tidak benar – sebuah kesalahan yang jelas. Kami belum pernah bertemu seorang Muslim menjelaskan mengapa Quran sering mengambil cerita dari terkenal, tetapi dibuat legenda dan dongeng, dan kemudian menjelaskan perbedaan dari Alkitab dengan menekankan bahwa Alkitab adalah palsu.

“The Message of the Quran” (A24 – in 2008 edition A23): As baby Jesus impossibly could be a prophet, there has to be other explanations, according to the Muslim scholars. As said: ONE MORE PLACE WHERE mUSLIM SCHOLARS AGREE THAT SOMETHING MUST BE WRONG IN THE QURAN.

*009 19/34: “Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: (it is) a statement of truth, about which they (vainly) dispute”. We are back to what is the truth in the Quran – with all the mistakes it is a difficult question. What is sure is that Jesus did not say he was a servant of the known polytheistic, foreign god al-Lah/Allah (in that case he had had very few followers and had been killed much earlier), and that he called God/Yahweh “father”. In this case the text refers to verses 30 through 33 (see 19/30a, 19/30b, 19/30-33 just above), which already are shown to be clear mistakes. Another clear mistake.

00b 19/35: “It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah that He should beget a son”. Kami berharap itu benar-benar adalah tuhan yang berbicara di sini, karena jika itu adalah Muhammad, bagaimana manusia untuk mengetahui apa yang cocok untuk dewa? – Dan Mulia sering punya anak – banyak anak. F. ex. Ramses II memiliki 67 putra dan jumlah yang tidak diketahui anak perempuan, dan Djingis Khan punya anak banyak bahwa sains masih bisa melacak DNA-nya di Asia (sumber: New Scientist). And if this statement is true, there is the enigma of Jesus’ saying “father” and “my father” about Yahweh (the word “father” is used at least 163 times in the Bible, and the word “son” at least 66 times about the relationship between Yahweh and Jesus – frequently by Jesus himself) – both the Bible and the Quran says Jesus was honest – and science has shown that the Bible is not falsified in spite of Islam’s never documented claims. (Alao remember: Muhammad calls Yahweh Allah, as he insists it is the same god – something that is possible only if Yahweh/Allah is schizophrenic as there are too many and too grave differences between the two teachings.)

010 19/36: “Verily Allah is my (Muhammad’s*) Lord and your (Muslims’*) Lord – – -“. Ini adalah salah satu yang serius: Di sini jelas itu adalah Muhammad sendiri – Muhammad orang – yang sedang berbicara. Bagaimana mungkin dalam sebuah buku yang dibuat oleh Tuhan sebelum alam semesta diciptakan atau mungkin satu yang telah ada sejak kekekalan, dan salinan Buku Ibu dihormati diturunkan dari surga oleh Allah? (There are a few mistakes (?) like this (8?) in the Quran – see 6/114a.)

011 19/58: “- – – Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

012 19/65: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

013 19/67: “We (Allah*) created him (Adam) before out of nothing”. Man was not made out of nothing. Actually man was not created at all, but developed from earlier primates. Lihat juga 6 / 2. (Another small contradiction: In 52/35 and others it is indicated that man was not made from nothing.)

014 19/68: “So, by thy Lord (Allah*), without doubt, We (Allah*) shall gather them together – – -”. With all the mistakes in the Quran there are good reasons for doubts.

00ba 19/71: “Not one of you but will pass over it (the bridge Sirat – to be passed the Last Day*)”. mirip dengan Zoroaster, di mana jembatan ini bernama Chinavad Sangat.

016 19/73: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. There is not one single clear sign (=proof) for neither Allah nor for Muhammad’s connection to a god in all the Quran – only claims and statements backed by not proved words or by nothing.

017 19/77: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00c 19/88-89: “They say: ‘(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!’ Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!” See among others 19/35.

00d 19/92: “For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son”. See among others 19/35.

018 19/93: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

019 19/98: “- – – Glad Tidings – – -.” At best only partly right. See 2/97c and 17/9babove and 91/13 below.

Surah 19: At least 18 mistakes + 5 likely mistakes.

SURAH 20:

001 20/2: “We (Allah*) have not sent down the Quran to thee to be (an occasion) for thy distress – – -“. The main fact is that Allah (if he exists) did not send it down at all – no omniscient god makes that many and that obvious mistakes, etc.

002 20/4a: (The Quran is*) “A revelation from Him (Allah*)”. The unanswered question is: Would an omniscient god send down a book with so many mistakes? – not to mention if he would have it as a not perfect, but all the same deeply respected Mother Book in his perfect Paradise? There is an answer: Either it is wrong that Allah sent it down, or it is wrong that Allah is omniscient – if he exists.

003 20/4b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

004 20/6: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

005 20/47a: “Verily we (Moses and Aaron*) are messengers sent by thy (Ramses II’s*) Lord (Allah*) – – -“. Wrong – Ramses II was a polytheist. Besides: He might have heard about Yahweh (but would not respect the god of slaves very much), but never of Allah.

006 20/47b: “- – – we (Moses and Aaron*) come from thy (Ramses II’s*) Lord (Allah*)!” See 20/47a just above.

007 20/53: ”He Who has made for you the earth like a carpet spread out; – – -”. In the Quran the Earth is flat. May be round like a pancake, but definitely flat – not like a sphere. That is what Muhammad believed, as that is what geography was like at his time – but a god had known it was wrong. (Actually there are 7 Earths according to the Quran (65/12) – one on top of the other according to Hadiths.) See also 2/22 (?), 15/19, 43/10, 71/19, 79/30, 88/20.

008 20/54: “- – – in these (plants and cattle*) are Signs for men endued with understanding.” There are no real signs in the Quran – not for Allah, not for Muhammad’s religion, nor for Muhammad’s connection to a god. The only signs “men endued with understanding” gets from sentences like this in the Quran, is the question: Why did Muhammad have to use invalid proofs and twisted logic, and the conclusion: Muhammad’s use of invalid arguments proves that he had no real arguments/facts – if he had had, he had used them instead. And actually there is one more point: The use of made up claims and statements are the hallmarks of a cheat and a swindler.

009 20/55: “From the (earth) did We (Allah*) create you – – -”. Salah. Manusia tidak diciptakan dari bumi. Lihat juga 6 / 2.

010 20/69-70: The magicians of the pharaoh all became Muslims when they saw Moses performing areal miracle. All the same the Quran repeats and repeats and repeats that the reason why Muhammad was unable to perform miracles, (included making real prophesies), was that nobody would believe anyhow. This is one if the scenes that make it clear that Muhammad knew he was lying each time he used those excuses and “explanations”.

*011 20/71: “- – – I (Pharaoh Ramses II*) will have you crucified – – -”. If not our sources are very wrong, Egypt at that time did not crucify people.

*012 20/78: “Then the Pharaoh pursued them with his forces, but the waters completely overwhelmed them and cover them up”. May be the water covered up the troops, but not the Pharaoh – – – Ramses II did not drown, and he did not die until years later according to science. Another thing: They most likely did not cross the Red Sea proper. The original Hebrew Bible in reality uses a name that also has the meaning “Sea of Reeds”. The Sea of Reeds was a big, shallow lake south of the Bitter Seas in the area where you now find the Suez Canal. For Moses to walk past a big lake with his some 2 million Jews (600ooo men + women and children according to the Bible) and belongings and animals is one thing. To march down the western side of the Red Sea and plan to cross that sea by boats they did not have, is quite another thing – remember that they did not know that Yahweh would split the sea (and most of them hardly had believed it if they had been told). The fact that the Hebrew name for the sea they crossed (?) – Yam Suph – also means “the Sea of Reeds” is mentioned in footnotes many times in NIV – and in other literature.

013 20/85: “- – – the Samari had led them astray”. But the Jews still had not arrived in Samaria and there existed no Samarians (actually the name Samaria/Samarians as far as we can find, was not coined until 722 BC – more than 500 years after the exodus that happened (if it happened) ca. 1235 BC.). Muslims try to “explain” the mistake by saying may be it is meant “shmeer” = stranger, or “shomer” = watchman = samara in Arab – – – but if you cherry-pick from a whole language, it always is possible to find words that are look-alikes – and that the Arab word here is a look-alike, is totally irrelevant, as these Jews of the old hardly spoke Arab. But if the Quran means some other thing than it says here – or is possible to misunderstand – how many other places in the book are there similar or worse/religious mistakes?

014 20/87: “- – – the Samara – – -“. See 20/85 just above.

015 20/95: “- – – O Samari – – -“. See 20/85 above.

016 20/106+107: “He will leave them (mountains/mountain chains that will be removed*) as plains smooth and level. Tidak ada sedikitpun kamu lihat padanya di tempat mereka “. Hal ini akan benar pada bumi datar. But as the Earth is curved, there has got to be curved lines at least where the big mountain chains had been removed. Setiap dewa tahu.

017 20/113: “Thus We (Allah*) sent this (the Quran*) down – – -“. No book with that many mistakes is revered as a Mother Book by an omniscient god, and no omniscient god makes a copy of a book full of mistakes and sends it down as a holy book and the source for a religion dedicated to himself.

018 20/114: “High above all is Allah, the King, the Truth!” Allah as shown in the Quran at best represents partly truth and partly mistakes.

019 20/116: “Prostrate yourself to Adam”. Wrong, as Adam did never exist – man developed from an earlier primate. Kami berdebat dengan beberapa Muslim beberapa waktu lalu tentang hal ini, dan mereka penuh kemenangan memberitahu kami kami salah, untuk saat ini ilmu pengetahuan telah menemukan bahwa telah terjadi Hawa dan Adam. Yang cukup benar. But what they did not mention, was that this “Eve” lived about 160ooo – 200ooo years ago in the Rift Valley in East Africa, and represented a so called “bottleneck” – a time when the human race nearly died out – and only Eve had girl children, or the DNA of the other girl children died out later (this result is from tests of mitochondria DNA – mDNA – and mDNA only tells about the female side of the story, as mitochondria only goes from parents to child via the egg cell = from the mother – carrying only the feminine DNA). Then around 60ooo+ (64ooo?) years ago, something happened to Homo Sapiens (may be in the area south of the Caspian Sea). Dia masih Homo sapiens, tetapi sesuatu – ilmu pengetahuan tidak tahu apa – yang terjadi yang mulai dia di jalan menuju perkembangan teknis dan lainnya. Dan ada lagi hambatan – sesuatu yang mirip dengan apa yang terjadi pada “Hawa arkeologi” – terjadi sekali lagi. But this time it is readable in the Y chromosome, which only men – here named Adam – have, and consequently only shows the masculine side. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa semua orang yang hidup saat ini, memiliki “ayah” umum (oleh arkeolog tidak kebetulan bernama “Adam arkeologi” atau hanya “Adam”) – satu orang yang 140ooo tinggal (beberapa mengatakan 100ooo) tahun kemudian dari pada Hawa. That archaeologists named them Adam and Eve, in a way is quite logical. Tapi mereka tidak ada hubungannya dengan Adam dan Hawa dalam Alkitab atau dengan “Adam dan istrinya” dalam Quran – bagaimana mereka bisa f. ex. menjadi laki-laki dan istri ketika mereka tinggal 100ooo – 140ooo tahun terpisah, dan satu di Afrika, yang lain mungkin di Asia? Not to mention essential facts like this when they talk of the archaeological Adam and Eve and use this as a religious proof for creation, we find dishonest. And at least the scholars in Islam – the ones that teach their students and congregations and are interviewed and write and speak in the media – do know this. It is a well known scientific fact among learned people.

020 20/126: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

021 20/127: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

022 20/128: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

023 20/133: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. There is not one single clear sign (= proof) anywhere in the Quran neither for Allah nor for Muhammad’s connection to a god. Without exception all the “signs”, “clear signs”, and “proofs” only are claims or statements resting only on air and/or twisted logic or on other not proved claims. (There may be one exception; arguments taken from the Bible – but they in case tell about Yahweh, not about Allah. Islam likes to claim that they are one and the same god, but the teachings – especially as you find them in NT (the new covenant Muslims never mention – cfr. the last Easter of Jesus, f. ex. Luke 22/20) – fundamentally are so different, that it is impossible that the two can be one and the same, not unless the god at least is schizophrenic.)

SURAH 20: At least 23 mistakes,

Subtotal here: 795 mistakes + 112 likely mistakes.

About siapmurtad

Siap memaparkan kesalahan alquran
This entry was posted in KESALAHAN QURAN. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s