Bagian II – Sambungan 10

1000 Mistakes.com – Surah 21:

001 21 / 4: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2 / 22.

* 00a 21 / 6: “- – – bukan salah satu dari populasi yang Kami (Allah *) hancur – – -“. Muhammad mengaku bahwa reruntuhan berserakan dan merusak desa dan kota-kota yang dihancurkan oleh Allah karena penduduknya telah berdosa. Di daerah kering, keras dan suka berperang ini tidak adalah kebenaran penuh – mungkin kebenaran sama sekali.

002 21/10: “Kami (Allah *) telah mengungkapkan untuk Anda (hai manusia!) Sebuah buku (yang * Quran) – – -“. Sekali lagi: Memiliki dewa maha tahu mengungkapkan sebuah buku dengan begitu banyak kesalahan? – Atau telah Muhammad membuat banyak kesalahan ketika mengatakan apa yang Allah mengatakan kepadanya? Dengan kata polos: No (- atau memiliki Muhammad atau kaki beberapa dibuat semua itu dari fantasi dan pengetahuan yang sering salah?).

003 21 / 16: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

004 21 / 18: “- – – nay, Kami (Allah) melemparkan kebenaran terhadap kepalsuan, dan mengetuk otaknya, dan lihatlah, kepalsuan Sesungguhnya binasa!” Apakah sama terjadi jika seseorang melemparkan Quran dengan semua kesalahan nya? Dengan semua kesalahan nya, dll, Quran di terbaik adalah sebagian kebenaran.

005 21 / 19: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

* 006 21 / 20: “Mereka (semua makhluk di langit dan bumi *) merayakan (* Allah) memuji-Nya malam dan siang – – -“. Islam akan harus membuktikan bahwa semua hewan, burung, ikan, serangga, cacing, dll, dll benar-benar ini – dan semua manusia non-Muslim – sebelum seseorang dapat mempercayai mereka dan Quran dalam hal ini.

007 21/22a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

008 21/22b: “! Jika ada, di langit (* jamak dan salah) dan bumi, tuhan-tuhan lain selain Allah, akan ada kebingungan di kedua” adalah logika yang salah. Terdapat kedua sistem hierarkis dan paralel (satu bos untuk setiap departemen atau aspek) untuk manajemen. Satu bisa mengatakan akan ada kebingungan, tapi tidak akan ada. Buktinya tidak valid.

009 21 / 24: “Tetapi kebanyakan mereka tidak mengetahui Kebenaran – – -“. Nah, “kebenaran” seperti yang diberikan dalam Quran, di bagian paling terbaik adalah hanya sebagian benar – terlalu banyak kesalahan.

00b 21/26: “Dan mereka berkata ‘(Allah) Paling Suci telah keturunan diperanakkan’. Kemuliaan bagi-Nya! Mereka adalah (tetapi) hamba-hamba dibangkitkan untuk menghormati “. Kita tidak tahu apa kebenaran tentang al-Lat, al-Uzza dan Manat – anak-anak perempuan al-Lah/Allah dalam agama Arab tua. Tetapi Yesus setidaknya mengatakan berulang kali bahwa Yahweh adalah ayahnya.

** 010 21/30a: “Jangan orang-orang kafir melihat bahwa langit (jamak dan salah) dan bumi itu bergabung bersama (sebagai satu unit penciptaan), sebelum Kami (Allah *) pisahkan antara keduanya?” Adalah sebuah Surga optik ilusi – sebuah fakta yang terkenal hari ini, tetapi Muhammad tidak tahu – dan ilusi tidak bisa “terbelah terbelah” dari hal yang material. Kami juga telah bertemu mengatakan Muslim bahwa teori Big Bang membuktikan Quran. Tetapi “terbelah sesuatu cengkeh” Big Bang 13,7 miliar tahun yang lalu, sementara matahari (Helios atau Sun *) adalah 3. bintang generasi, dan itu dan planet-planet termasuk bumi hanyalah 4570000000 tahun. Perbedaan usia, dan jauh lebih fakta bahwa matahari kita adalah 3. generasi, (yang berarti bahwa hal-hal bumi – dan matahari – terbuat dari, telah melalui dua siklus menjadi bagian cairan dan campuran mantan matahari yang menjadi Novas super (bintang meledak) dan tersebar di sebagian besar kosmos di mana bercampur dengan sisa-sisa lainnya meledak Novas super, dan bergabung terakhir untuk membuat matahari dan planet-planet baru) membuat Big Bang sama sekali tidak relevan dalam hubungan ini – untuk semua 9 miliar tahun sebelumnya bumi dan matahari dan planet-planet hanya bertebaran atom, molekul dan fragmen dalam “mixer” langit – bukan Bumi, dll yang dapat diidentifikasi dan bisa “bergabung bersama” atau “terbelah clowen”. Setidaknya para profesor di Universitas Al-Ahzar mengetahui hal ini, dan itu adalah ketidakjujuran untuk mencoba menipu orang dengan menggunakan “argumen” di f. ex. “Pesan dari Quran” – sebuah buku yang berpura-pura untuk memberi, seperti yang terlihat dari sudut pandang Islam, informasi yang benar tentang dan penjelasan dari Quran, disertifikasi oleh salah satu kewenangan tertinggi di Quran di dunia Muslim, di atas- disebutkan universitas. (Hati-hati bahwa edisi terbaru dalam bahasa Inggris dari buku yang dibuat lebih konservatif “benar” daripada mantan).

011 21/30b: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

** 012 21/30c: “Kami (Allah *) yang dibuat dari air segala sesuatu yang hidup.” Salah – hal-hal yang hidup tidak terbuat dari air. Muslim mengatakan ilmu pengetahuan modern membuktikan Quran di sini, sebagai ilmu mengatakan memulai hidup di air. Beberapa Tapi hidup hanya dimulai pada air, itu tidak dibuat dari air – merupakan perbedaan besar di sana. Ada yang buruk hal yang benar-benar di sini, adalah bahwa ini juga kebohongan diceritakan oleh Muslim berpendidikan tinggi – f. ex. itu sepenuhnya dijelaskan dalam komentar 38 sampai 21/30 dalam “Arti Quran” – Muslim yang memiliki begitu banyak pendidikan dan pengetahuan yang mereka tahu perbedaan antara menjadi “dibuat dalam” air dan “dibuat dari” air yang sangat baik . Bagaimana dapat diandalkan kemudian hal-hal lain yang mereka klaim? Lihat juga 6 / 2. Kita dapat menambahkan bahwa ini adalah satu-satunya tempat dalam Quran di mana – mungkin – juga “penciptaan” tanaman disertakan, ini terlepas dari bahwa tanaman merupakan dasar bagi semua kehidupan.

013 21/31a: “Dan Kami (Allah *) telah mengatur di gunung-gunung bumi – – -“. Gunung-gunung tidak “set pada” Bumi – mereka miliki tanpa pengecualian “dewasa”, tidak peduli apakah mereka adalah hasil dari aktivitas tektonik atau vulkanik. Setiap dewa tahu ini, tapi Muhammad tidak. Apakah ini menunjukkan siapa komposer sebenarnya dari Quran?

* 014 21/31b: “Dan Kami (Allah *) telah mengatur di bumi gunung-gunung yang kokoh supaya itu harus kocok dengan mereka – – -“. Beberapa ahli tentang Islam dan Quran mengatakan ini merujuk pada disk yang Bumi (dalam Quran Bumi ini datar, tapi mungkin disk bulat) bisa goyang dan menjadi tidak stabil, dan karena ini dapat menyelinap pergi atau ujung sekitar dan drop segalanya – termasuk kemanusiaan – dari Bumi.

Kita lihat beberapa cendekiawan Muslim: Jalalan, (hal. 437), Baydawi (hal. 686), Tabari (p.589) dan Zamakhshari (bagian 4, hal 381): Mereka semua mengatakan bahwa “jika bukan karena gunung-gunung (!!*) teguh, bumi akan menyelinap pergi .”(!!!*)

**** Dan Jalalan, Baydawi, dan Zamakhshari semua mengatakan bahwa “- – -. Dia (Allah *) menempatkan gunung teguh (tidak lebih demikian maka mereka goyang selama gempa bumi *) di Bumi jangan sampai miring dengan orang-orang” Ini jelas adalah apa Quran benar-benar berarti, dan ini bahkan lebih jelas adalah Muhammad arti kata pengikutnya, karena apa yang dipelajari cendekiawan Muslim yakin adalah kebenaran.

Tapi ini “kebenaran” yang begitu konyol, yang membiarkan kita pergi ke penjelasan alternatif – salah satu yang sedang digemari dalam Islam sekarang bahwa mereka tahu “kebenaran” asli salah: Bahwa pegunungan menghalangi-gempa bumi.

Itu tidak benar. Nah, hal tersebut sangat jauh dari kebenaran, yang bahkan tidak salah – kadang-kadang kebalikan dari kebenaran:

  1. Menurut f. ex. kelas berat seperti “New Scientist” dan “Alam” pegunungan kadang-kadang dapat PENYEBAB gempa bumi karena cukup berat dan tekanan pada bawah tanah. Ya, bahkan variasi dalam jumlah air (= berat) di danau gletser gunung besar atau kadang-kadang menyebabkan gempa kecil dan menengah. Hal yang sama berlaku untuk berat salju jatuh di pegunungan kadang-kadang – salju di pegunungan dan hujan di bawahnya adalah fenomena biasa = ketidakseimbangan dalam berat badan. (Ada f. ex gempa lebih di utara di musim dingin daripada di musim panas.).
  2. * Hal ini juga diketahui hari ini bahwa gunung-gunung dibuat karena aktivitas tektonik (gempa bumi yang selalu menyebabkan – meskipun kadang-kadang terlalu lemah untuk manusia sehingga merasa) atau aktivitas gunung berapi yang sering menyebabkan gempa bumi. Itu berarti bahwa gunung-gunung pada kenyataannya dibuat oleh gempa bumi (atau sebenarnya dengan mekanisme yang sama yang membuat gempa bumi terbanyak), itu tidak menghalangi dewa quakes.Any seperti itu mengetahui hal ini, tapi Muhammad tidak – ini adalah pengetahuan baru untuk manusia. Lalu siapa yang menyusun Quran?

* 015 21/31c: “- – – dan Kami (Allah) telah dibuat di dalamnya (di pegunungan *) jalan raya luas (antara pegunungan) – – -“. Kami benar-benar tidak tahu Allah – atau tuhan apapun yang lain – jalan raya dibangun. Dan di sini kita bisa membuat lelucon murah (memberitahu kongres Anda-laki-laki (atau serupa) untuk meminta Allah membangun jalan Anda, daripada menghabiskan semua uang pajak itu). Tapi kami menahan diri dari itu.

Yah, akan ada kemungkinan untuk Muhammad untuk mengatakan – benar atau tidak benar – bahwa Allah menunjukkan pelancong pertama di mana untuk melakukan perjalanan. Tapi dalam kasus tidak ada Allah membangun jalan – atau jalan tol. Kecuali Islam benar-benar membuktikan dia – tapi Islam tidak pernah membuktikan, mereka hanya memberitahu atau negara atau klaim, meskipun mereka menuntut bukti dari orang lain. Atau mereka mengatakan dikatakan demikian dalam Quran, dan yang membuktikan hal itu. Namun buku dengan banyak kesalahan memiliki sedikit nilai sebagai bukti – dan disamping itu secara logis tidak mungkin untuk menggunakan Quran untuk membuktikan Quran, sebagai bukti melingkar yang tanpa nilai.

016 21/32a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

017 21/32b: “Dan Kami (Allah *) telah membuat langit (* jamak dan salah) sebagai kanopi – – -“. Salah. Langit seperti yang kita lihat itu, tidak dibuat sebagai kanopi – bahkan tidak material. Langit seperti yang kita lihat itu, hanya sebuah ilusi terbuat dari bending cahaya oleh hari, dan dari ketidakmampuan kita untuk melihat 3 dimensi yang benar pada saat-jarak pada malam hari.

** 018 21/32c: “Dan Kami (Allah *) telah membuat langit (* jamak dan salah) sebagai kanopi dijaga dengan baik – – -“. Muhammad tidak dapat melihat perbedaan antara bintang dan bintang jatuh. Dalam Quran itu diberitahu bahwa penembakan bintang (salah untuk menjadi bintang biasa) adalah “panah” digunakan untuk mengusir roh jahat atau jin (makhluk “dipinjam” dari cerita rakyat Arab lama dan tidak diketahui untuk setiap “nabi” selain Muhammad) yang ingin untuk memata-matai Surga. Setiap hari anak tahu perbedaan antara bintang nyata dan bintang jatuh, dan juga apa yang akan terjadi pada dan untuk bumi jika bintang jatuh bintang-bintang nyata. Bahkan dewa kurcaci bayi sudah mengetahui hal ini – tapi Muhammad tidak, karena pengetahuan modern. Pertanyaan relevan atau kurang ajar adalah: Siapa yang kemudian menyusun Quran?

019 21/32d: “- – – Tanda – – -“. Valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 dan 20/54 di atas.

Sebenarnya: Dalam buku “Pesan dari Quran”, bersertifikat oleh Al-Azhar Al-Sharif Akademi Riset Islam di Kairo (salah satu 2-3 universitas ternama di dunia Muslim pada subyek tersebut) dalam surat tertanggal 27. Desember 1998, diakui agak enggan bahwa tidak ada bukti untuk Allah, dan bahwa tidak mungkin untuk membuktikan bahwa dia. Jalur tambahan yang di sini adalah bahwa jika tidak ada ptoof bagi Allah dan tidak mungkin untuk membuktikan dia, secara otomatis ada juga ada bukti untuk, dan tidak mungkin untuk membuktikan hubungan Muhammad mengaku kepada Allah.

** 020 21 / 33: “- – – semua (benda-benda langit) berenang bersama, masing-masing dalam kursus bulat nya.” Salah. Hanya ada satu benda angkasa yang memiliki kursus bulat, dan kemudian hanya dibandingkan dengan Bumi: Bulan – Luna. Dan jika anda membandingkannya dengan matahari, tentu saja adalah tidak benar-benar bulat apapun, lebih tetapi semacam bergelombang, dan bahkan lebih jadi jika anda membandingkannya dengan galaksi. Matahari juga tidak memiliki program bulat, bahkan jika anda membandingkannya dengan galaksi – mengikuti semacam kurva sinus membungkuk di atas dan di bawah ekuator galaksi. Hal yang sama pergi untuk sangat banyak dari bintang-bintang yang kita lihat – lingkaran tidak, tapi membungkuk sinus. Tentu Bumi tentu berikut, tetapi lebih rumit karena yang mengelilingi matahari pada waktu yang sama. Dan galaksi kita – bersama-sama dengan sisa Grup Daerah galaksi (sebuah galaksi beberapa lusin) dan banyak lainnya – sedang dalam perjalanan agak linier terhadap sesuatu yang disebut “Penarik Besar” yang tak seorang pun tahu apa yang – – – sementara di saat yang sama walzing di dalam grup kami lokal, yang mengembara dan bagian dari kelompok yang lebih besar dari seribu atau lebih galaksi. Anda tidak menemukan program bulat di angkasa, kecuali jika Anda memilih ceri-gerakan bagian – dan semua program dapat kita lihat tanpa teleskop memiliki arah utama agak linear karena gerakan ini ke arah “The Penarik Besar”, tetapi tidak teratur karena lokal berputar-putar atau mirip.

021 21 / 37: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

022 21 / 45: “Aku (Muhammad *) dilakukan, tetapi memperingatkan Anda (orang *) sesuai dengan wahyu (dalam * Al-Quran).” Mungkin Quran wahyu dari Muhammad atau dari manusia lain atau dari beberapa kekuatan tak terlihat, tetapi bukan dari dewa yang mahatahu – ada Tuhan maha tahu membuat kesalahan, dan dalam Quran mungkin ada yang luar biasa 3000 atau lebih tempat dengan beberapa jenis kesalahan (termasuk pengulangan), jika Anda benar-benar menghitung segala sesuatu dan semua rincian. 5 untuk masing-masing dan setiap halaman dalam buku kami!! Dari Lebih Banyak dari kesalahan saja adalah rincian – tetapi tuhan tidak membuat bahkan rincian salah. Dan sejumlah kesalahan pasti lebih dari rincian.

023 21/50a: “Dan ini (* Quran) adalah pesan diberkati – – -“. Suatu pesan dengan yang banyak kesalahan, titik tidak valid dan bukti yang salah, tidak diberkati.

024 21/50b: “Dan ini (* Quran) adalah pesan yang diberkati yang Kami (Allah *) telah menurunkan”. Berapa banyak cara yang mungkin untuk mengajukan pertanyaan: Apakah itu benar bahwa Tuhan mahatahu telah diturunkan sebuah buku dengan sejumlah fakta salah, kontradiksi dan kesalahan-kesalahan lain – f. ex. linguistik dan mungkin agama kesalahan? Belum lagi: Bagaimana kemungkinan itu bahwa buku seperti kualitas yang sengsara, setidaknya tentang fakta yang salah dan bukti valid, dan sastra, dapat memiliki tempat yang menonjol sebagai Ibu Kitab dihormati di rumah seorang tuhan mahatahu dan mahakuasa? Ini hanya mungkin.

* 00C 21/50c: “- – – akan kamu (orang *) kemudian menolak itu (* Quran)?” Tentu saja kami akan menolaknya. Ketika orang-orang dengan beberapa kecerdasan dan pendidikan berhadapan dengan sebuah buku dengan banyak dan banyak kesalahan, kontradiksi, argumen memutar dan sebagai logika bengkok, dengan titik-titik di mana ia jelas narator tahu bahwa ia berbohong – dan segala sesuatu diceritakan dari satu narator tunggal dengan etika yang paling dipertanyakan dan moralitas, tetapi dengan keinginan yang kuat untuk wanita dan kekuasaan, dan agama platform utamanya untuk kekuasaan, sangat naif bahkan untuk menanyakan hal itu. Tidak, cerdas berpendidikan, bukan orang yang dicuci otak benar-benar memiliki pilihan lain selain untuk menolaknya jika tidak ada bukti nyata yang dihasilkan. (Dan Islam telah mampu memproduksi satu bukti nyata tunggal untuk Allah atau untuk diklaim sambungan Muhammad untuk dewa – setiap dewa – dan dengan demikian untuk Islam yang benar, pada tahun 1400 tahun – – – mengapa Anda berpikir Muhammad dan Islam memuliakan dan permintaan buta keyakinan?)

025 21/56a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

026 21/56b: “- – – Dia (Allah *) yang menciptakan mereka (manusia *) (dari apa-apa).” Salah. Manusia tidak diciptakan dari ketiadaan. Dia bahkan tidak diciptakan. Lihat 6 / 2.

* 027 21/56c: “- – – Dia (Allah *) yang menciptakan mereka (manusia *) (dari nothing): dan aku (Ibrahim) pagi saksi ini (kebenaran)” lelucon. Ini benar-benar adalah suatu yang tidak diinginkan. Hal ini mengatakan bahwa Allah melakukan sesuatu yang tidak benar – dan saksi Abraham bahwa itu adalah kebenaran, dan ini meskipun ia hidup jutaan tahun kemudian! Ya, ia bahkan hidup lebih lambat dari Adam diklaim, dan masih adalah saksi untuk penciptaan Adam! Beberapa bukti bagi Allah! Apakah mungkin bahwa Allah sendiri telah diturunkan ini? Tapi itu menceritakan beberapa hal tentang bukti-bukti dalam Quran – dan dari umat Islam. Juga lihat 6 / 2.

028 21 / 76: “Kami (Allah *) – – – menyerahkan dia (Nuh *) dan keluarganya dari bencana yang besar (banjir besar *)”. Salah: Quran sangat jelas bahwa salah seorang putranya (ia hanya memiliki 3 – Sem, Ham dan Yafet – menurut Alkitab (1 Mos 18/09)..) Tenggelam di banjir. Kesalahan dan kontradiksi yang solid. Klaim serupa di 37/76.

029 21 / 77: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

030 21 / 80: “Itu adalah Kami (Allah *) Siapa yang mengira dia (Raja Daud *) pembuatan lapis mail”. Tapi lapis mail dan serupa lebih tua dari ca. 950 – 1000 SM – waktu Daud.

031 21 / 82: “Dan orang-orang jahat (jin *) itu adalah beberapa orang yang (bekerja untuknya = Salomo *) – – -“. Islam akan harus membawa bukti-bukti yang kuat untuk ini. Ada dongeng seperti ini bahwa Muhammad bisa “meminjam” cerita dari, tetapi tidak pernah ada kasus terbukti jin pun benar-benar bekerja untuk siapa pun. Hal ini juga dalam kasus tidak telah dihilangkan dari Alkitab jika sudah benar – itu telah dimuliakan Solomen terlalu banyak untuk dilupakan.

032 21 / 91: “- – – Daftar – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah – atau Muhammad. Lihat 2 / 39 dan 20/54 di atas.

00d 21/96a: “- – – Gog dan Magog (orang) – – -“. Nama berasal dari Alkitab. Namun dalam Alkitab mereka adalah raja (Gog) dan negaranya (Magog), sedangkan dalam Quran mereka adalah dua orang buruk. Buku yang paling dapat diandalkan?

* 033 21/96b: “Sampai (orang) Gog dan Magog adalah membiarkan melalui (penghalang mereka), dan mereka cepat kawanan dari setiap bukit”. Gog dan Magog menurut Quran (surah 18) adalah dua kelompok orang (suku?) Dipenjara di sebuah lembah di balik penghalang, tinggi kuat terbuat dari besi blok didirikan oleh Dhu’l Quarnayn / Alexander Agung. Tapi tidak ada tempat di Bumi – apalagi di daerah Alexander perjalanan – sebuah lembah yang cukup besar untuk menghasilkan makanan untuk dua suku besar orang (“kawanan dari setiap bukit” = suku besar), yang tidak mungkin untuk keluar dari, bahkan jika lembah utama dan jalan keluar utama diblokir. Selain lantai seluruh omong kosong: Bahkan jika mereka tidak bisa melalui atau di atas seperti hambatan, mengingat waktu itu akan selalu mungkin untuk menggali di bawahnya. Bahkan jika telah didirikan di atas batu padat, sekitar 330 SM ketika Quran berpura-pura ini terjadi (Alexander meninggal 323 SM), orang tahu bagaimana membuat terowongan pendek bahkan melalui batu jika mereka benar-benar ingin, f. ex. melalui api + air. Dan akan selalu ada jalan melintasi pegunungan dari sebuah lembah yang besar. Selain: Dimana lembah? Hari ini setiap inci dunia adalah dipetakan, dan tidak ada tembok di lembah di mana saja. Tidak di timur di mana Alexander perjalanan, dan tempat lain. (Dan Gog dan Magog tidak akan dirilis sampai sesaat sebelum Hari Doom, menurut Quran, sehingga mereka masih harus di lembah).

034 21/104a: “Pada hari Kami (Allah *) gulung langit (jamak dan salah – seperti beberapa tempat 180 + lainnya dalam Quran di mana kata tersebut digunakan secara terpisah, dan setidaknya 199 tempat semua di dalam semua) seperti sebuah gulungan – – – “. Hal ini tidak mungkin untuk menggulung ilusi optik. Dan setidaknya Universe diamati adalah bola – diameter 27,4 miliar tahun cahaya – dan bagaimana untuk menggulung bola? (Tentu saja Islam bisa mengatakan bahwa alam semesta adalah (bagian dari) sebuah “brane” (sebuah “lembaran” tebal bintang beberapa trilyun tahun cahaya lebar) – lain bertentangan dengan Quran – tapi kemudian mereka pertama kali harus membuktikan bahwa “brane “ada, karena mereka hanya merupakan spekulasi fiksi ilmiah atau ilmu pengetahuan).

035 21/104b: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

00e 21/108: “- – – karena itu tunduk pada-Nya (* Allah) Apakah (dalam Islam).” Apakah itu suatu hal yang cerdas lakukan untuk cerdas, belajar orang-orang yang tahu berapa banyak yang salah dalam Quran, dan tahu yang sangat ragu latar belakang? Perlu bukti-bukti kuat untuk membuktikan itu adalah agama yang nyata dengan dewa nyata – dan jika tidak: Bagaimana maka jika ada sebuah agama yang benar di suatu tempat, dan Anda dilarang (f. ex Islam. Oleh) untuk mencari untuk itu -? itu akan menjadi kasar kebangkitan pada Hari Terakhir (jika ada).

036 21 / 109: “- – – dalam kebenaran – – -“. Dengan banyak kesalahan dan klaim memutar, Quran di terbaik adalah sebagian benar.

00f 21/112: “- – – terhadap hujatan Anda ucapkan!” Apakah penghujatan untuk meragukan apa yang menceritakan tentang Allah, jika ada alasan berat untuk keraguan? (- Semua dll kesalahan dalam Quran).

Surah 21: Setidaknya 36 kesalahan + 6 kesalahan mungkin.

Surah 22:

001 22/5a: “Kami (Allah *) menciptakan kamu dari debu – – -“. Salah. Manusia tidak diciptakan dari debu. Lihat 6 / 2.

002 22/5b: “- – – kemudian (Allah menciptakan kamu) dari sperma”. Salah. Manusia tidak diciptakan dari sperma, meskipun jelas bahwa Muhammad percaya begitu – Quran menunjukkan sperma yang ditanam pada seorang wanita dan tumbuh. Manusia dalam realitas yang dibuat dari 1 sel sperma + 1 sel telur, tetapi mungkin Muhammad tidak mengetahui hal ini – seperti sel telur terlalu kecil untuk dilihat di semua darah, usus, dan gore dalam karkas dibuka tanpa perbesaran . Keyakinannya juga sesuai dengan teori Yunani kuno. Lihat juga 6 / 2.

003 22 / 6: – – – Allah adalah – Reality – – “.” Tidak, kecuali Islam yang membawa bukti-bukti yang nyata. Terlalu naif untuk langsung percaya pada sebuah agama hanya didasarkan pada sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan, kontradiksi, memutar fakta dan logika tidak valid – diceritakan oleh seorang pria dengan yang sangat tersangka moral, tetapi keinginan yang kuat untuk wanita dan kekuasaan dan dengan agamanya sebagai platform nya kekuasaan.

004 22 / 7: “- – – tidak ada keraguan tentang hal – – -“. Dengan semua kesalahan dalam Quran, ada alasan untuk meragukan tentang cukup banyak hal.

005 22 / 8: “- – – (Quran adalah *) sebuah buku Pencerahan – – -“. Dengan semua kesalahan yang tidak. Lebih buruk lagi: Dengan semua kesalahan Anda tidak pernah tahu apa yang benar dan apa yang tidak.

006 22 / 16: “- – – Tanda Clear – – -“. Tidak ada tanda-tanda yang jelas (= bukti) bukan karena Allah, atau untuk koneksi Muhammad kepadanya dalam semua Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

007 22/18a: “Engkau tahu, bahwa kepada Allah sujud dalam ibadah segala sesuatu yang di langit (jamak dan salah) yang di bumi – – -? Tahukah” Tidak, kami tidak melihat bahwa. Ini hanya merupakan satu lagi kesalahan dan kata-kata murah / klaim – dan satu sampel lebih dari animisme – dalam Quran, kecuali Islam benar-benar membuktikan bahwa itu adalah kenyataan.

008 22/18b: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

009 22 / 23: “- – – gelang dari emas dan mutiara – – -.” Dalam f. ex.76/21 mereka dari perak.

010 22 / 26: “Sesungguhnya, Kami (Allah) memberikan situs, kepada Abraham, dari (suci) Rumah (Ka’bah *) – – -“. Abraham pernah mengunjungi Mekah. Lihat 2 / 127. Ini adalah dibuat cerita untuk memberikan ajaran Muhammad kepercayaan lebih, dan membuatnya lebih menarik di kalangan orang Arab.

** 00a 22/29: “- – – ritus (selama haji di Mekkah *) yang ditetapkan untuk mereka (umat Islam *) – – -“. Upacara di Mekah selama haji semuanya diambil alih dari pagan / kafir kali di Arab – dan di samping mereka pernah begitu kekanak-kanakan dan primitif; lari 7 kali bolak-balik antara 2 bukit-bukit kecil, berjalan 7 kali di sekitar bangunan, melemparkan beberapa batu tanda menyamar sebagai setan, dan membunuh satu atau lebih hewan tak berdaya untuk berkorban, mereka adalah tindakan utama.

  1. Siapa yang diresepkan ritus pagan tua untuk menjadi yang tepat hanya untuk dianggap saja, dewa yang nyata?
  2. Siapa ritual begitu dangkal dan kekanak-kanakan diresepkan untuk dianggap tak terduga, tuhan “dalam”?
  3. Siapa yang diresepkan bahwa baik setiap ritus dari tempat lain di dunia atau sesuatu yang baru dan jiwa-sustaining dari Allah seharusnya digunakan dalam agama dunia dianggap – hanya yang lama, ritual pagan dangkal bangsa-bangsa Arab lama?

00b 22/33: “- – – tempat pengorbanan adalah dekat Gedung Kuno (Kabah *).” Salah. Tempat pengorbanan adalah di Mina, kilometer dari Kabah.

011 22 / 34: “Tiap-tiap umat telah Kami (Allah *) mengangkat ritus (pengorbanan) – – -.” Hanya satu masalah: Orang Kristen tidak diberi / memerintahkan segala jenis pengorbanan – ritus atau seperti itu “.

00C 22/37: “Bukan mereka (hewan kurban ‘) daging atau darah mereka, yang mencapai Allah: itu adalah ketakwaan Anda yang mencapai Nya – – -“. Apakah seorang dewa maha tahu harus melihat Anda membunuh binatang tak berdaya untuk melihat bahwa Anda seorang percaya yang saleh? – Tidak jika dia benar-benar mahatahu. Jika Allah benar-benar mahatahu dan jika hanya tujuan dengan mengorbankan hewan adalah untuk Anda membuktikan kesalehan, maka pengorbanan dalam realitas adalah tanpa makna, sebagai tuhan maha tahu sepanjang waktu tahu betul apakah Anda percaya saleh atau tidak. Sebenarnya banyak tempat Quran membuatnya sangat jelas bahwa Allah juga tahu sudut-sudut terdalam bahkan bagian terdalam jiwa Anda. Untuk apa faedah dan apa arti dan apa logika merupakan “tes” atau “bukti” kesalehan Anda, jika Allah sudah tahu jawabannya pada sebelumnya? – Dan dengan cara: Hal yang sama berlaku untuk pengujian kesalehan Anda dalam perang dan pertempuran dan membunuh dan dibunuh, sesuatu yang bahkan tidak ada artinya jika Allah adalah dewa yang baik – belum lagi jika dia tahu jawabannya sudah.

* 012 22/40a: “Apakah Allah tidak memeriksa satu set orang dengan cara lain, di sana pasti akan ditarik ke biara-biara, gereja-gereja, rumah ibadat, dan masjid – – -.” Salah – ini adalah jauh dari satu-satunya cara tuhan mahatahu dan mahakuasa bisa mengelola dunia. Salah satu alternatifnya adalah f. ex. untuk mengubah seorang pria kecil dan mengajarkan dia bagaimana untuk hidup dalam damai. Hanya anggota budaya dan agama perang dan penjarahan dan menekan tidak segera melihat ini. Hal ini hanya merupakan alibi buatan untuk perang dan penaklukan – dan penindasan dan penjarahan.

* 013 22/40b: “- – – biara-biara, gereja, sinagoga, – – -, di mana nama Allah diperingati – – -“. Nama Allah tidak diperingati di sana – yang bertentangan nama Yahweh (atau hanya Allah) adalah apa yang memperingati ada. Pada umat Islam akan mengklaim bahwa itu adalah tuhan yang sama – seperti biasa tanpa membuktikan apa-apa – tapi ajaran dasarnya begitu berbeda , bahwa itu tidak mungkin bahwa mereka adalah sama kecuali dewa ini mental sakit parah. Juga mereka akan mengklaim bahwa alasan perbedaan ajaran adalah bahwa Alkitab adalah sengaja dipalsukan – sesuatu ilmu lama telah terbukti untuk satu hal yang tidak benar (bahkan suci tertua seperti hari ini, kecuali untuk kesalahan kecil normal ketika naskah adalah disalin dengan tangan), dan untuk yang lain secara fisik tidak mungkin (tidak mungkin untuk membuat pemalsuan yang sama di semua ribuan naskah yang tersebar di ribuan kilometer dan dimiliki oleh ribuan pemilik yang berbeda – yang sering bahkan tidak setuju (bahkan sangat kadang-kadang) di banyak topik ). Bagaimana Anda f. ex. Yahudi membuat dan Kristen sepakat tentang apa dan bagaimana memalsukan dalam PL Alkitab? Tapi itu satu-satunya jalan keluar dan hanya cara Muhammad bisa nya menyelamatkan agamanya dan platform kekuasaan ketika ia akhirnya mengerti berapa banyak yang berbeda di antara ajaran-ajaran dan .

00d 22/47: “Sesungguhnya, Hari di mata-Mu (* manusia ‘) Tuhan (Allah *), adalah seperti seribu tahun menurut perhitunganmu”. Nah, pada 70 / 4 itu seperti 50ooo tahun. Kontradiksi lain bahwa “tidak ada dalam Quran” dan dengan demikian “membuktikan” bahwa buku ini dari Allah.

013 22 / 51: “- – – (* Allah) kami Tanda – – -“. Tidak ada satu single sign jelas dari Allah dalam semua Quran. Dengan pengecualian mungkin beberapa diambil dari Alkitab, bahkan tidak ada satu tanda tunggal yang terbukti dibuat oleh tuhan – tuhan manapun. (Dan yang dari Alkitab dalam kasus membuktikan Yahweh, bukan Allah – dua dewa yang sangat berbeda (terutama saat kita bertemu Yahweh dalam PB dan perjanjian baru di sana -. Yang Muslim tidak pernah menyebutkan) jika tidak Islam benar-benar membuktikan sebaliknya Tetapi Islam tidak pernah membuktikan apa yang mendasar).

014 22/52a: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

015 22/52b: “- – – Allah penuh pengetahuan dan kebijaksanaan – – -.” Tidak jika Quran representatif untuk pengetahuan dan kebijaksanaan – Islam akan harus menghasilkan bukti-bukti yang nyata dan dapat diandalkan jika mereka bersikeras bahwa Allah memiliki banyak pengetahuan dan kebijaksanaan.

016 22 / 53: “- – – yang zalim berada dalam penyimpangan yang jauh (dari kebenaran)”. Di terbaik mereka jauh dari “potongan-potongan kebenaran”, setidaknya sebagai kebenaran adalah pura-pura dalam Quran, sebagai buku yang terbaik berisi potongan-potongan dari apa yang benar.

017 22/54a: “- – – (Quran) adalah Kebenaran – – -“. Dengan banyak kesalahan, argumen bengkok, dll, itu di terbaik adalah kebenaran sebagian saja.

018 22/54b: “- – – (Quran) adalah kebenaran dari Tuhanmu (Allah *) – – -.” Salah. mahatahu Tidak ada tuhan yang pernah dibuat, atau dihormati, atau diteruskan, atau agama yang dibangun di atas sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan, kontradiksi, dan ragu-ragu, klaim belum terbukti,. Sebuah iblis yang menyamar atau laki-laki keinginan untuk platform kekuasaan mungkin melakukannya tetapi bukan tuhan mahatahu dan mahakuasa.

019 22/54c: “-. – – Allah (* Al-Quran) adalah Panduan orang-orang yang beriman, ke jalan yang lurus” Salah – sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan, fakta memutar / logika, dll tidak mewakili lurus jalan, setidaknya tidak ke surga.

020 22 / 55: “Mereka yang menolak Iman (Islam *) tidak akan berhenti menjadi ragu-ragu tentang (Wahyu)”. Mungkin benar – mungkin akan ada wahyu yang dibuat oleh beberapa waktu dewa (mungkin dengan Yahweh) beberapa. Tapi kita tidak yakin sama sekali bahwa ada alasan baik untuk keraguan yang serius tentang Quran klaim laporan, dan deskripsi – kenapa klaim dan pernyataan kami tidak dapat memeriksa lebih dipercaya daripada yang kita dapat, dan di antara yang kita temukan terlalu banyak orang ingin atau salah?

021 22 / 57: “- – – kami (* Allah) Tanda – – -.” Tidak ada satu tanda tunggal dalam semua Al-Qur’an secara jelas dibuat oleh Allah. Hanya (terbukti) klaim.

** 00e 22/62: “- – – Allah – Dia adalah realitas – – -“. Yah, itu adalah salah satu poin besar yang baik Quran maupun laki-laki maupun Hadis belajar Islam telah mampu memberikan bukti sedikit pun. Bahkan beberapa intelektual Muslim mengakui begitu. Ini meskipun semua “tanda” dan “bukti” yang berkata demikian dalam Quran – mereka memiliki satu kesamaan: SATU DARI MEREKA TIDAK MEMBERIKAN SATU BUKTI VALID TUNGGAL ALLAH – mereka semua klaim atau pernyataan yang dibangun di udara atau di tidak terbukti “fakta” atau tagihan lainnya atau pernyataan yang tidak terbukti. Sebuah kenyataan bahwa “bau”. Dia hanya mungkin sesuatu yang dibuat dalam imajinasi Muhammad yang berpura-pura Allah untuk menjadi avatar – atau identik dengan – Yahweh. Yang terakhir adalah tidak mungkin, karena esensi dari dua ajaran terlalu berbeda, tapi Muhammad bisa berpura-pura begitu. Dan: Kecurangan adalah ciri khas cheater.

022 22 / 64: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

00f 22/65: Apakah Muhammad Ali membuat sebuah “al-taqiyya” (bohong halal) di sini? Dia mengatakan bahwa Allah “menahan langit (hujan) dari yang jatuh di bumi”. Tetapi menurut “Pesan dari Quran” teks Arab mengatakan bahwa Allah menahan langit jatuh ke bawah di Bumi. Cukup kesalahan ilmiah dalam kasus. Dan juga sebuah ketidakjujuran dari Yusuf Ali dalam kasus.

023 22 / 67: – – – kamu (Muslim *) seni pasti tentang Hak “Way.” Itu hanya benar jika Quran sudah benar – – – dan Quran mengandung banyak kesalahan, memutar argumen, logika bengkok, beberapa langsung kebohongan, dll (semua yang keunggulan untuk menipu, penipu dan penipu – orang biasanya mencari uang, perempuan dan / atau kekuasaan dengan cara yang tidak jujur ​​-. Muhammad suka wanita dan kekuasaan dan uang untuk “hadiah” dan suap kepada pengikutnya mungkin) .

024 22/72a: “- – – (* Allah) kami Tanda Clear – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2 / 99.

025 22/72b: “- – – Tanda ini – – -“. Valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 dan 20/54.

* 026 22/78: “Ini adalah Dia (Allah *) Siapa yang bernama Anda Muslim, baik sebelum dan dalam hal ini (Wahyu) – – -“. Salah. Nama itu pernah dipakai sebelumnya – ada semacam jejak di mana saja. Ini adalah salah satu kasus di mana Islam akan harus membuktikan klaim mereka.

Surah 22: Setidaknya 26 kesalahan + 6 kesalahan mungkin.

Surah 23:

001 23/12: “Man Kami (Allah *) telah menciptakan dari saripati (berasal) dari tanah”. Kami tidak pernah mengerti apa yang saripati tanah liat, tapi itu benar-benar yakin itu salah: Untuk satu orang hal yang tidak diciptakan – menurut ilmu ia berkembang dari primata sebelumnya. Untuk hal lain – bahkan jika seseorang telah menerima pernyataan Islam bahwa manusia diciptakan, Adam sama sekali tidak bisa saja dibuat dalam banyak cara – lihat 6 / 2. Dan untuk hal yang ketiga: Manusia tidak diciptakan dari hanya satu atau beberapa mineral seperti di tanah liat.

002 23 / ​​13: “Kemudian Kami (Allah ‘) menempatkan dia (bayi masa depan *) sebagai (setetes) sperma di tempat istirahat – – -” Salah.. Muhammad percaya sperma jenis benih yang dapat tumbuh menjadi manusia (dan jika orang itu mencapai klimaks pertama, menjadi anak laki-laki, sedangkan jika wanita mencapai klimaks pertama menjadi seorang gadis, menurut dia dalam hadis). Kenyataannya adalah bahwa sperma tidak ditanam pada seorang wanita, tapi menyatukan dengan sel telur dan zigot yang dihasilkan kemudian mulai tumbuh.

*003 23/14a: “Then We (Allah*) made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood – – -”. Salah. Dan ganda salah:

  1. Sperma tidak dibuat menjadi gumpalan darah yang membeku.
  2. Sperma (1 sel dari itu) menggabungkan dengan sel telur dan menjadi zigot.

Muhammad tidak tahu lebih baik, karena ini adalah apa yang diyakini di Arabia pada waktu – tanpa mikroskop tidak mungkin untuk melihat secara tepat apa yang terjadi. Tapi dewa sudah tahu. There is a saying that “the taste is the proof of the cake”. Muhammad and the Quran and Islam and Muslims had and have very busy times to find “explanations” – some of them rather unlikely – to “explain” why Allah/Muhammad did not produce one single real proof for that a supernatural being was involved, even tough many friends and as many foes asked sincerely for it. Yes, Allah did not even have to make the slightest miracle to prove his existence. All he had to do was to tell the truth in all these cases that now are proved to be wrong – like in this case. If Allah really did exist, and if he really was/is omniscient – why then did he make up so many wrong answers? – when all he had to do was to tell the truth – like the reality of how a foetus is made – and little by little there would be the strongest of proofs for his existence and for that Muhammad spoke the truth. Dia tidak pernah melakukannya. Actually in all the Quran there is not one single scientifc “fact” that is not in accordance with what one believed to be the truth in Arabia at that time (and much of it actually Greek or Persian “knowledge”.)

Like it is now, all these facts are incredibly strong proofs for that there was no omniscient god involved in creating the Quran – and what then about Islam? – is it a made up, false religion? Not to mention: What will then in case happen in a possible next life to all humans – Muslims – who have had their chances to look for a real religion (if such one exists) blocked by Islam?

*004 23/14b: “- – – then We (Allah*) made a (foetus) lump; We made of that lump bones and clothed the bones with flesh”. Salah – 100% salah: Daging dibuat terlebih dahulu, dan kemudian mengembangkan tulang di dalam daging janin. Ini harus mengatakan bahwa Muhammad kisah tentang bagaimana bayi dibuat, sesuai dengan keyakinan lama medis Yunani – f. ex. dokter terkenal Galen dan Aristoteles – yang dikenal di Timur Tengah pada saat Muhammad. Setiap dewa tahu yang lebih baik. Lalu siapa yang membuat Quran?

005 23/17: “And We (Allah*) have made, above you, seven tracts (= seven heavens*) – – -”. Salah. There are no seven (material) heavens. Lihat 2 / 29.

00a 23/19: “Also a tree springing out of Mount Sinai, which produces oil, and relish for those who use it for food”. Muslim scholars agree on that here it is meant olive trees. But there have been questions – the area around Mt. Sinai is quite dry, and absolutely not known for olive trees.

*006 23/27: (Said by Allah to Noah*)”- – – take thou aboard pairs of every species, male and female – – -”. Impossible. There simply are too many animals + necessary food for any ark or boat or ship to take two of each. Even a modern super tanker fixed up for such a job, had been far too small – and the ark was a wooden boat. See 11/40. And who did the feeding, watering and cleaning for all these animals? And who gathered them and gathered the food for all of them – and how was the food stored so as not to spoil?

Muslims try to tell that most likely Allah meant only the domesticated animals. But that is not what the Quran says. And the Quran is to be understood by the word, if nothing else is said – see 3/7. Besides: Islam tells the Ark stranded on a 2089 m high mountain in Syria (Mt. Al-Jedi), and in that case there had to be so much water on Earth that all animals had drowned if they were not in the ark.

007 23/30: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*008 23/39: “(The prophet (Muhammad*)) said – – -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories).

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet as he did not have the gift of prophesying. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

009 23/45: “- – – Our Signs – – -“. There are no signs in the Quran that clearly come from Allah – see 2/99.

010 23/48: “- – – and they (Pharaoh and his chiefs*) became the ones who were destroyed (drowned*))”. But at least the pharaoh (Ramses II) was not destroyed/drowned. Ramses II did not die by drowning. And we know he died only some years after the (possible) exodus.

011 23/49: “And We (Allah*) gave Moses the Book – – -“. Salah. Moses never got something even remotely similare to the Quran or the Bible. What he got according to both the Bible and the Quran, was the 10 Commandments. That was all he physically got according to the Bible. But he was told the Laws – later part of the Book of Moses – and wrote them down later himself. Science tells that what is called The Book of Moses is several centuries younger.

012 23/58: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

013 23/66: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

014 23/70a: “Nay, he (Muhammad*) has brought them the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. At very best bits and pieces of what Muhammad brought may be true – see all the mistakes.

*015 23/70b: “- – – but most of them (the non-Muslims*) hate the truth”. Salah. It seems that the ones really seeking the truth, mostly are non-Muslims. Muslims, and not to mention many of their religious leaders, seem to be seeking – or inciting to and glorifying – blind belief in spite of real knowledge; they seem to be the ones hating the truth in all cases where the truth is not what their religion says.

I myself started to study the Quran some years ago to find the truth concerning Islam. The main thing I have found till now, is that real truths show that there are so many mistakes in the Quran, not to mention contradictions, invalid “signs” and “proofs” – hallmarks of deceivers and cheats – etc., that it impossibly can come from an omniscient god. And so many mistakes that it is impossible to trust what is said in the book, unless one has solid extra proofs, or at least confirmation from other, reliable sources.

And also that Muhammad in at least some cases has had to know he was not saying the truth – on a few points what he says, contradicts the fact that he was a wise man understanding people. He simply was lying. But then one of his slogans was: “War is deceit”, and he also told that the result counted more than even keeping one’s oath sworn by Allah. Maaf.

016 23/71a: “If the Truth (as told in the Quran*) had been – – -”. At most bits and pieces of the Quran are true. See all the mistakes.

017 23/71b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

018 23/85: “They (non-Muslims*) will say, ‘To Allah’”. Salah. If they name the name of a god, they will say the name of their own god (in old Arabia that might have been the polytheistic al-Lah).

*019 23/86: “Who is the Lord of the seven heavens – – -?” Wrong. There are no 7 heavens (and remember: They had to be material ones, because according to the Quran, the stars are fastened to the lowest heaven, and you can fasten nothing to something non-material). Lihat 2 / 29.

020 23/87: “They will say,’ (They belong) to Allah”. Salah. See 23/85 above.

021 23/89: “They will say,’ (It belongs) to Allah”. Salah. See 23/85 above.

022 23/90: “We (Allah*) have sent them (non-Muslims*) the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. Either Allah is not omniscient or someone else has made the Quran – it at best is partly true only.

023 23/90: “We (Allah*) have sent them the Truth – – -”. At best bits and pieces of what is sent (= the Quran) are true. Too many mistakes.

00b 23/91: “No son did Allah beget – – -”. Mungkin tidak. But if Islam still says that Allah = Yahweh, it is sure that the Bible says that Jesus called Yahweh his father many times and to MANY listeners. And we have found far fewer mistakes in the Bible – and especially in NT – than we have found in the Quran, even though we red also the Bible with critical eyes. And: Also the Quran tells Jesus was honest. And finally: Science has clearly shown that the Bible is not falsified – in spite of Islam’s never documented claim.

024 23/105: “- – – My (Allah’s*) Signs – – -“. There is not one single sign in all the Quran clearly made by Allah – only claims that any priest in any religion can make.

025 23/116: “Therefore exalted be Allah, the King, the Reality – – -“. If there is one thing that is not proved in Islam, it is the reality of Allah. Everything in the religion rests only on blind belief in a tale told by a man with very dubious moral, but a strong wish for power – a man using his religion as his platform of power (like many others). And a self proclaimed prophet unable to make prophesies (= a stolen or “borrowed” title).

Surah 23: At least 25 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 24:

001 24/1a: “A surah which We (Allah*) have sent down – – -.” Also this surah contains mistakes, and is consequently not sent down by an omniscient god.

002 24/1b: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. There are no clear signs for Allah anywhere in the Quran – the “signs” either contain twisted facts or twisted logic or both or rest on nothing that is proved, and are thus without logical value. Lihat 2 / 99.

003 24/18: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

004 24/25: “- – – Allah (= the Quran*) is the (very) Truth – – -“. With all the mistakes, etc. the Quran (Allah’s words) at best is partly true.

005 24/34: “- – – verses making things clear – – -”. A book with this many mistakes does not make many things clear. At least not correctly.

006 24/35: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

007 24/41a: “- – – it is Allah Whose praise all beings in the heavens (plural and wrong) and on earth do celebrate – – -“. This has not been documented or clearly shown anywhere or any time.

008 24/41b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

009 24/42: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

010 24/44: “It is Allah Who alternates the Night and the Day – – -“. It is nature that alternates night and day – but words are cheap, and any religion can tell it is their god(s) that do it. Islam will have to produce proofs for that it really is Allah that makes the Earth spin around in the light from the sun – the reason for the alternation. But Islam rarely proves anything – only claims. And Islam also has Al-Taqiyya – the lawful lie – no other of the big religions have it.

* 011 24/45: “Dan Allah telah menciptakan setiap binatang dari air”. Sederhana dan jelas salah. Lihat 6 / 2. Beberapa Muslim mencoba mengatakan bahwa ilmu pengetahuan telah membuktikan ayat ini (+ dua orang lain – 21/30 dan 24/54) sebagai ilmu pengetahuan telah menunjukkan bahwa kehidupan dimulai pada air air. Tetapi ada perbedaan besar antara “dari” air dan “dalam” tempat. Tidak ada dalam Quran bahkan ada bisikan tentang kehidupan yang diciptakan dalam air, hanya dari. Kami juga menyebutkan bahwa dalam Quran tidak ada dikatakan tentang bagaimana tumbuhan diciptakan, meskipun tanaman merupakan dasar untuk semua kehidupan di Bumi. Mungkin dari air seperti binatang? Salah sederhana.

012 24 / 46: “Kami (Allah *) memang diturunkan tanda-tanda yang membuat hal-hal yang nyata – – -“. Apa yang diklaim diturunkan, adalah Quran, dan sebuah buku dengan begitu banyak kesalahan, dll, membuat nyata apa-apa – kecuali mungkin skeptis terhadap agama dan kepada Muhammad.

00a 24/58: “- – – doff pakaian Anda untuk kesehatan siang – – -.” Quran dikatakan salinan Kitab Ibu di Surga, dan bahwa salinan tersebut telah dikirim ke nabi lain untuk Allah seluruh dunia dan waktu – 124.000 atau lebih dari mereka, menurut Hadis, dan untuk semua orang – juga menurut Quran. Apakah seorang nabi di antara suku Inuit atau Samoyed dalam dingin utara bahkan memahami hal ini? Dan satu di antara pribumi tua di Australia atau Indian di Amerika Selatan sebelum 1492 – apa yang akan dia mengerti dari salinan dari Kitab Ibu, berbicara tentang sapi dan domba dan unta dan adat istiadat Arab dan aturan – dan tentang Muhammad dan istri-istrinya dan pertengkaran keluarga ? Jika Kitab Ibu dimaksudkan untuk seluruh dunia, seperti klaim Islam, mengapa hanya berkonsentrasi pada Saudi dan terutama satu nabi jauh ke masa depan untuk sebagian besar para nabi benar-benar tua Islam bercerita tentang? Ada yang salah di sini. (Pikiran Anda: Kita bicara tentang Kitab Ibu mengklaim bahwa Quran diklaim menjadi salinan – Buku Ibu untuk semua manusia – semua nabi – di mana-mana dan melalui setiap saat.)

013 24 / 58: “- – – dengan demikian tidak Allah membuat jelas Daftar untuk Anda – – -.” Lihat 24/61 bawah.

014 24 / 59: “- – – dengan demikian tidak Allah menjelaskan ayat-ayat kepada Anda – – -.” Lihat 24/61 tepat di bawah.

015 24 / 61: “Demikianlah Allah menjelaskan ayat-ayat kepada Anda – – -“. Tidak ada satu tanda yang jelas berlaku logis (= bukti) dari Allah atau koneksi Muhammad untuk dewa manapun dalam Quran. Mereka tanpa pengecualian hanya klaim atau berdasarkan apa-apa atau klaim yang tidak terbukti lain.

016 24/64a: “Jadilah cukup yakin bahwa ke Sesungguhnya kepunyaan Allah apa yang ada di langit (* jamak dan salah) dan di bumi.” Tidak mungkin untuk memastikan bahwa pada dasar buku seperti Quran dengan banyak kesalahan , kontradiksi, fakta memutar, dan bahwa logika tidak valid banyak, dll

017 24/64b: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

Surah 24: Setidaknya 17 kesalahan + 1 kesalahan mungkin.

Surah 25:

001 25 / 1: “Maha Suci Allah (Allah *) yang telah menurunkan para Kriteria (yang * Quran) – – -“. Quran tidak dibuat oleh tuhan mahatahu – terlalu banyak kesalahan, dll

002 25/2a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

00a 25/2b: “- – – no son has He (Allah*) begotten – – -”. If Allah is another god than Yahweh, this may be correct. If Islam insists Allah is just another name for Yahweh (which it can not be, because fundamental aspects of the teachings are too different) it may be another question, as Jesus frequently called Yahweh his father in front of many witnesses. The word “Father” is used at least 163 times in the Bible for Yahweh’s relationship to Jesus, and “son” at least 66 times for Jesus’ relationship to Yahweh.

*00b 25/2c: “- – – nor has He (Allah*) a partner in his dominion – – -”. Well, if Allah should happen to be just another name for Yahweh: In the very old Hebrew religion there was a female deity – Yahweh’s Amat (woman or wife). (Source: New Scientist among others). In the very masculine society there, she simply was forgotten. And then there is the question of Jesus and of the Holy Spirit, which even the Quran mentions a few (3 ?) times – a kind of partners? At leasr underlings.

003 25/4: “But the Misbelievers say: ‘Naught is this but a lie which he has forged, and others have helped him at it.’ Sebenarnya itu adalah mereka yang memiliki mengajukan sebuah kejahatan dan kepalsuan “. Dengan banyak kesalahan dalam Quran, itu adalah pertanyaan yang sangat terbuka bila ia adalah misbelievers yang sudah mengajukan dusta. Bahkan mungkin Muhammad. The Quran at least is not from an omniscient god – too many mistakes, etc.

004 25/6a: “Say: ‘The (Quran) was sent down by Him (Allah*) Who knows the Mystery (that is) in the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth – – -”. Same old question: Can a book with hundreds of mistakes have been sent down by an omniscient god? – and if not: Who composed it? Not an omniscient Allah.

005 25/6b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

*006 25/20: “And the messengers whom We (Allah*) sent before thee (Muhammad*) were all (men) who ate food – – -.” Wrong. There were sent angels as messengers at least to Abraham (who was frightened because they did not eat food) (11/69), Lot (11/77) and to Mary, mother of Jesus (19/17). And also Jinns were sent as messengers that were not men according to the Quran (6/130).

007 25/33a: “- – – We (Allah*) reveal to thee (Muhammad or the Muslims*) – – -”. Did a god reveal a book with that many mistakes, contradictions, loose statements and invalid “signs” and “proofs”? No

008 25/33b: “- – – We (Allah*) reveal to thee (Muhammad or the Muslims*) the truth – – -”. At most bits and pieces of the “revelation” (the Quran) are true – see all the mistaken facts and other mistakes – f. ex. linguistic ones, and not unlikely religious ones as they should make no exception.

009 25/33c: “- – – We (Allah) reveal to thee (Muhammad or the Muslims) the truth and the best explanations (thereof).” The best explanations are never – never – built on a lot of mistaken facts. Quran juga banyak tempat menyatakan bahwa kepercayaan dalam Islam dibangun di atas kecerdasan, kapasitas intelektual, dan pengetahuan. Apakah itu?

Kadang-kadang tampaknya seperti itu dibangun pada keyakinan buta belaka dan penindasan fakta yang sebenarnya. (“The Message of the Quran” even tells that it is primitive not to be able to see that the Quran is made of a god, without any proofs. And another place that it is a no good believer that search for real proofs. The sorry truth is that it is primitive and naïve to believe only because something is said or written, or because your forefathers and -mothers believed so. Or because a man of very ubious moral said so. )

010 25/35: “- – – We sent Moses the Book – – -”. Salah. The Torah (containing those books) was written many hundred years later according to science – may be as much as 800 years later. (Moses got the 10 commandments in writing + the law verbally and wrote it down himself later, according to the Bible. The law is a part of the Book of Moses.)

011 25/36: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

012 25/37: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

013 25/45a: “- – – He (Allah*) doth prolong the Shadow!” It is the turning of the Earth that prolongs shadows. Any god had known, but Muhammad not – it is new knowledge. Lalu siapa yang membuat Quran? Bukan tuhan mahatahu. Dan Allah dikatakan maha tahu – atau dia?

*014 25/45b: “If he (Allah*) willed, he could make it (the shadows) stationary!” The only way to do that is to stop the Earth spinning. Islam will have to prove that Allah is able to do that – especially since all the mistakes in the Quran give serious and reasonable doubt about if he is omnipotent – and omniscient.

We also will remark that sayings like “If Allah willed – – -” are frequent in the Quran. The phrases are typical for some ones that have to boast to gloss over that they are not able to prove themselves – you f. ex. often hear it from half bully children trying to impress others. Jika itu terjadi di sini, itu adalah baik Allah atau Muhammad yang sering harus bermegah seperti itu. (Lihat bab terpisah).

015 25/49: “- – – with it (water*), We (Allah*) may give life to a dead land – – -“. If all it takes to awaken the nature is water, the land is not dead, but alive with roots and seeds – it only looks dead.

016 25/54: “It is He (Allah*) Who has created man from water”. Datar yang salah. See 6/2 and 24/45.

* 017 25/56: “- – – kabar gembira – – -“. Salah. At the very best one can say that the Quran brought some glad tidings to all the bad ones, wanting loot and slaves, and among some longing for a strong religion – – – if it was not because the Quran itself proves 100% that something is very wrong in the book. Jadi yang salah itu tidak dapat dibuat atau dihormati oleh dewa – bahkan oleh mini kecil dewa. Terlalu banyak yang salah dalam buku ini.

***018 25/57: “No reward do I (Muhammad*) ask of you – – -“. Nothing – – – except 20% of everything stolen or extorted in/after raids and wars, 100% of what was looted or extorted without fighting, plenty of women and total and unrestricted power. And 2.5% (up to 10%) of your possessions each year in “poor-tax” – – – partly for the poor, but also at least as partly to pay the lukewarm to become or stay Muslims, and not to forget to use for waging war. And a little to himself and all his women and few children (may be not of the “poor-tax”). Hypocrisy.

****To be exact the “poor-tax” – zakat – according to Hadiths after Al-Bukhari (comment 1 to Chapter 24) is for 8 different purposes:

  1. 1 The “Fuqara” – a cathegory of poor people.
  2. The “Al-Masakin” – another cathegory of poor people.
  3. The persons administrating the zakat.(Originally Muhammad).
  4. Bribing people to become Muslims and in other ways to promote Islam.
  5. Bribing lukewarm Muslims to stay Muslims.
  6. To free Muslim captives.
  7. To help indebted persons.
  8. To wage war for the religion – and its leader(s).
  9. To assist travellers (often pilgrims to Mecca).

It seems that a sizeable percentage was used for points 4 and 7. (You also will find claims that there are 5 purposes for the zakat. Then they lump 1 and 2 together and omit often 6 and 8. We some plases in this book have used that list.)

*019 25/59a: “He (Allah*) Who created the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth and all that is between, in six days – – -”. Salah. It took 4.6 billion years. (Actually the latest numbers are 4.57 billion). Even in the Quran you can find contradicting information saying it took 2 + 4 + 2 days = 8 days.

020 25/59b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

**021 25/62: “And He (Allah) is it Who made the Night and the Day follow each other”. Salah. It is the turning of the Earth that causes this – any god had known.

**We may add that the Quran many places talks about natural phenomena, and says Allah makes it or causes it. This needs solid proofs, as it is things that happens by itself from physical laws – and especially since words and statements are very cheap, and even more so AS ANY PRIEST IN ANY RELIGION CAN SAY JUST THE SAME ABOUT HIS GOD(S) FREE OF CHARGE – words are that cheap. Strong claims demand strong proofs, scientists say, and Muhammad did not prove one single of these statements or claims. Not one single.

022 25/73: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah or anything. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

Surah 25: Setidaknya 22 kesalahan + 2 kesalahan mungkin.

Surah 26:

001 26 / 2: “- – – Buku yang membuat (hal) jelas – – -“. Dengan semua kesalahan, itu membuat sangat sedikit jelas, sebagai salah satu tidak bisa bergantung pada apa yang dikatakan, tanpa mengendalikannya.

002 26 / 4: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah atau apa. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

003 26 / 6: “- – – kebenaran dari apa yang mereka (orang-orang kafir *) diolok-olok!” Paling-paling Quran merupakan sebagian kebenaran – terlalu banyak kesalahan, dll

004 26 / 8: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

005 26 / 15: “- – – (* Allah) kami Tanda – – -“. Tidak ada tanda-tanda berlaku untuk Allah dalam semua Quran. Lihat 2 / 39 dan 2 / 99.

006 26 / 16: “- – – dunia – – -“. Tidak ada 7 dunia, meskipun bahwa Quran mengatakan demikian. Lihat 65/12 bawah.

007 26 / 23: “- – – semesta alam – – -“. Lihat 26/16 tepat di atas. Dan 65/12 di bawah ini.

008 26 / 24: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

*009 26/29: “If thou (Moses*) dost put forward any god other than me (the pharaoh*), I will certainly put you in prison.” Wrong – in Egypt one had many gods. Even more: According to one of Islam’s tries to explain away the mistake of placing Xerxes’ man Hamon at Ramses II’s court – and hundreds of years wrong – the high priest (Ha-Amon) of one of the main gods – Amon – even was present and one of the pharaoh’s main advisers at this meeting (a “fact” that makes this sentence impossibly illogical).

00a 26/42: “- – – ye (the sorcerers*) shall in that case (if you win over Moses*) be (raised to posts) nearest to my person (Ramses II).” It is highly unlikely that the mighty pharaoh Ramses II said that to a flock of sorcerers – and especially for winning over an after all small opponent.

010 26/47: “- – – the Worlds – – -“. See 26/16 above and 65/12.

011 26/49a: Pharaoh Ramses II said: “Surely he (Moses*) is your (the sorcerers’) leader – – -.” Wrong. Ramses II knew Moses and knew he had been away for 40 years (according to the Bible – an unspecified number of years, but years, according to the Quran) – he could not be the leader of the local sorcerers.

012 26/49b: “- – – I (Pharaoh Ramses II) will cause you (Moses and others*) to die on the cross!” But the old Egypt did not use crucifixion for punishment.

*013 26/63: “Then We (Allah*) told Moses by inspiration: ‘Strike the sea with thy rod’. So it divided, and each separate part became like the huge, firm mass of a mountain”.According to science the Jews started the exodus (if it ever happened – and if it did, it happened ca. 1235 BC during the rein of Ramses II – one of the greatest pharaohs ever – and some years before Ramses II’s death (Muslims often wants to change this – preferably to around 1500-1600 BC – because we know Ramses II did not drown, but science is clear on this point)) from Goshen in the north east of Egypt – to be specific: In the Nile delta. They travelled south roughly parallel to what is now the Suez Canal, and to the west of it. Then they turned south east, before they again headed south – still roughly parallel to what is now the Suez Canal, but now to the east of where the canal now is. Then they continued south parallel to the Red Sea. Before the Suez Canal came, between the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea, here was unbroken low and quite flat land with some scattered lakes, the biggest of which were the Bitter Seas.

According to science the Jews may have been cornered against one of the seas during the above mention leg towards southeast, a sea named the Timsah Sea – or Yam Suph in Hebrew. In the old Hebrew scriptures the Jews were cornered against Yam Suph, which can mean the Red Sea (the most frequently used translation) or the Sea of Reeds – both names are possible. The Sea of Reeds was a shallow sea – as for the exact depth our sources are vague, but quite likely just a few meters at most. (The longest reed we have been able to find, is a special kind of rice growing in the Tonle Sap Lake in Cambodia. It can be up to 5 -7 m. The reeds growing in Egypt are shorter, and to get the name “Sea of Reeds”, the lake had to be shallow enough for the reeds to get their “heads” above the water over at least a large part of the lake). To guess: From one or two and up to a few meters deep as indicated above.

In such shallow seas there simply was not deep enough water to make “each separate part – – – like the huge, firm mass of a mountain”. Wrong in case – and it is likely this is the case, even if the more dramatic Red Sea most often is used as a translation. This because for Moses it had been plain stupidity to march south along the western side of the Red Sea when he wanted to go east to Sinai, and then have to cross that sea to reach his destination, with all those people, equipment, animals, etc. in boats they did not have. (The Bible tells they were 600ooo men, which means some 2 mill. included women and children – a number that is mathematically possible (though not likely) after the 430 years the Bible says the Jews lived in Egypt).

014 26/66: “But We (Allah*) drowned the others (the Egyptians).” Wrong, at least for Ramses II himself – he did not die from drowning, and he did not die until some years later.

015 26/67: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah or anything. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

016 26/77: “- – – the Worlds – – -“. The Quran tells there are 7 (flat) worlds – Hadiths adds that they are placed one on top of the other, and names them. Salah. Lihat 65/12.

017 26/98: “- – – Lord of the Worlds – – -“. See 26/77 just above and 65/12.below.

018 26/103: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

019 26/109: “- – – lord of the Worlds”. Salah. See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

020 26/119: “- – – in the Ark filled (with all creatures).” Wrong. No boat could take that many tens of thousands of animal (included insects and similar) pairs + food for them. And even more so not a wooden boat – not possible to build big enough and strong enough for such size. See 11/40.

021 26/121: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

022 26/127: “- – – Lord of the Worlds.” Wrong. See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

023 26/139: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah or anything. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

024 26/145: “- – – Lord of the Worlds.” Wrong. See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

025 26/158: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

026 26/161: “- – – their (the people of Sodom and Gomorrah*) brother Lot – – -“. Salah. Lot adalah orang asing ke dua kota, dan sangat jelas baik dari Quran dan Alkitab bahwa ia tidak berbaur dengan baik dengan orang-orang penduduk setempat. He came – together with Abraham – from Ur in Chaldea (in south Iraq). He was no “brother” of them – not even in the figurative meaning of the word. (The word here obviously is used to make Lot and the mentioned people fit the pattern the Quran claims is universal: That the prophets come from the people they are to teach. But here and in a few other cases that is incorrect). Also see 27/56 – it is very clear Lot was no brother of theirs – also not a naturalized “brother”. (“Drive dari para pengikut Lut (Lot *) dari kota kami – – -“.)

027 26/164: “- – – Lord of the Worlds.” Wrong. See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

028 26/174: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

029 26/180: “- – – Lord of the Worlds.” Wrong. See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

030 26/190: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah or anything. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

031 26/192a: “Verily, this (the Quran*) is a revelation from the Lord of the Worlds (Allah*)”. If is true that it is a revelation, Allah is not omniscient or Muhammad made a lot of mistakes when reciting it, or Muhammad made it up himself, or there have been a lot of mistakes when compiling the book around 650 AD and later copying it. Something definitely is wrong.

032 26/192b: “- – – lord of the Worlds – – -.” Wrong. See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

*033 26/193: “With it (the Quran*) came the Spirit of Faith and Truth”. If truth came down with the Quran, it must have been mutilated later. NB: This is one of the places where Quran mentions “the Holy Spirit”.

**034 26/196: “Without doubt it (the Quran*) is (announced) in the revealed Books (the Torah, the Bible*) of former peoples.” There is very much doubt about that, as the basic elements of the teachings are too different – especially compared to NT and “the new covenant” that is the fundament for Christianity. And it also is absolutely sure that the Quran is not announsed in the Bible or in any Jewish scriptures. Also see the chapter about Muhammad in the Bible.

**035 26/197: “Is it not a Sign to them that the Learned of the Children of Israel knew it (is true)?” In the Quran and also in Hadith, it is claimed there were one or a very few learned Jew(s) who accepted Muhammad as may be a prophet. The stories might even be true. But we are back to the old truth: “One swallow makes no summer”. It is absolutely sure that the Jews as a group – learned or not – did not accept his teachings for the truth even in the face of death (f.ex. in Khaybar), one or a few exceptions may be excepted. The same is the truth today.

No, it was no valid sign.

***036 26/209: “- – – and We (Allah) never are unjust”.

  1. A man correctly telling that a woman has been indecent, is lying to Allah if he cannot produce 4 witnesses – even if an omniscient Allah has to know he is speaking the truth.
  2. Seorang wanita yang telah diperkosa, dilarang untuk mengatakan siapa orang itu, kecuali ia bisa menghasilkan 4 saksi JANTAN YANG SEBENARNYA YANG MELIHAT ACT. If she cannot produce 4 such witnesses, and all the same tells who the rapist is she shall have 80 whiplashes for slander.
  3. **A woman who is raped and cannot produce 4 MALE witnesses (that on top of all will be punished for not helping her if they witness about what they saw) that saw the very act, is to be strictly punished – may be stoned – for indecency – if she is unable to hide she has been raped – . Probably the most unjust and amoral law we have ever seen in a “modern” society.
  4. It is 100% permitted for an owner to rape his female slaves or prisoners of war (may be this is why Muslims so often rape women during conflicts – f. ex. earlier in Bangladesh and earlier and now in Africa). The Quran even directly tells that it is no sin to rape also your married slaves or prisoners of war, as long as they are not pregnant.
  5. **It is glorious and the Muslims’ right to steal, rob, plunder, enslave and to kill non-Muslims during jihad – and almost any conflict is declared jihad (holy war). It is “just and good”.

Ada lagi jika Anda melihat. Permohonan tidak pernah mengatakan kepada kita bahwa Allah seperti yang dijelaskan dalam Quran tidak pernah tidak adil. These 5 points – and more – are morally horrible. Some of it actually the most unjust we have ever seen in any law.

*037 26/210-211: “No evil ones have brought down this (Revelation). Ini tidak akan sesuai dengan mereka – – – “. May be no evil spirits have brought down the Quran. But is definite that no omniscient god has done so – too many mistakes, etc. It also is definite that no good or benevolent god or spirit did it – far too inhuman, full of hate and suppression and blood – not to mention the wretched ethic and moral in the book. All the same it is possible it was not sent down by bad or evil forces (even bad supernatural forces would be too intelligent to make a book with so many mistakes, contradictions, invalid logic, etc., as they had to know they would be found out sooner or later and loose their cresability) – it simply is possible, and even likely, that it was made by one or more men (all the wrong science and “knowledge” in accordance with the local beliefs in and around Arabia at that time, and a lot more points in that direction). But what is absolutely sure, is that an Islam like the one one finds in the surahs from Medina suits evil spirits and forces very well: Inhumanity, stealing, blood, hate, war. Muslim hanya meminta apa yang mereka pikir tentang Mongol menyerang mereka di timur. Agama di Mongolia di bawah dan setelah Djingis Khan pada dasarnya cukup mirip dengan Islam. When Islam used their war machine and inhumanity in f. ex. India and other places, they according to all Muslims were heroes. Lalu mereka bertemu Mongol yang tidak hanya sama untuk Muslim – – dan Mongol adalah monster yang mengerikan. But then the southern Mongols became Muslims and continued in the same way like before, but now against non-Muslims – – – and now they were great heroes according to Islam. Tanyakan kepada mereka jika f. ex. mengingat nama Timur Lenk (Timur Lenk).

Islam as described in the surahs from Medina, definitely suits evil forces/spirits.

*038 26/211: “- – – nor would they (non-Muslims*) be able (to produce it) (something similar to the Quran*)”. Wrong. In spite of all the glorious words Muslims use about the Quran, the book is not good literature. There are lots and lots of mistake. There is lots of wrong logic. There are numbers of linguistic mistakes. There are lots and lots of contradictions. There hardly is anything original in the book – the stories are taken from the Bible and a few other old books, from made up religious tales, from folklore and from fairy tales and just changed a little, and the fundamental thoughts borrowed from neighbouring cultures – mainly Jewish and Christian, but also some from the east (Zoroastrians f. ex. and perhaps a little from Buddha – the Arabs had connections as far east as China, and at that time Buddhism was strong in parts of what is now Pakistan and India (but was later drowned in blood by Islam). Also in laws and morality there was little new – if any; there were a few changes compared to the old Arabia, but also here the ideas came from neighbouring cultures. And the same stories are told again and again – most boring. But good writers – not the original composer – polished the Arab language in the book for some 250 years (until ca. 900 AD).

There would be no problem for a good or medium writer to write something with similar – or better – contents.

Claims like that the Quran is good literature you can tell to the naïve, uneducated illiterate natives of the old (and for that case modern) times. Skip saja ketika Anda berbicara dengan orang berpendidikan modern yang tahu Quran (terlalu sedikit tidak – banyak telah jijik) dan tahu sedikit tentang sastra. The Quran may be intelligent religious tales for its time, but it is not a good piece of literature. Boring, repetitive, a melee of this and that – no logical system in the tales, the tales and thoughts all “borrowed” from others and well known, etc.

Surah 26: At least 38 mistakes + 1 likely mistake.

Surah 27:

001 27/1: “- – – a Book (the Quran*) that makes things clear – – -”. The more mistakes, contradictions, etc. there are in a book, the less clear it can make things. It simply looses credibility. The Quran in many cases simply is incredible – literally speaking.

002 27/2a: “A Guide (the Quran*)”. See 27/1 just above.

003 27/2b: “- – – glad tidings – – -“. Salah. At the very best one can say that the Quran brought some glad tidings among all the bad persons, wanting loot and slaves, and among some longing for a strong religion – – – if it was not because the Quran itself proves 100% that something is very wrong in the book. Jadi yang salah itu tidak dapat dibuat atau dihormati oleh dewa – bahkan oleh mini kecil dewa. Terlalu banyak yang salah dalam buku ini.

004 27/6a: “(Allah is*) All-Knowing”. If that is right, he has not composed the Quran – far too many mistakes. Or to be blunter: The composer of the Quran is someone who is not all knowing.

*005 27/6b: “- – – the Quran is bestowed upon thee (Muhammad/Muslims*) from the presence of One who is Wise and All-Knowing (Allah*).” Islam claims that the Quran is the copy of the Mother Book that is revered in Heaven by Allah and his angles there. It further is claimed that the book either is made by the omniscient and omnipotent god Allah – the only god – or has existed since eternity, and is so fundamental that it is not made even by the god. This verse may be understood as a strengthening of the last claim: The Quran is not said to be made by or sent down by or from Allah, but sent down from “the presence of “Allah. The fact that spoils this lofty and undocumented claim (claims normally are undocumented in Islam – though they demand documentation and proofs from anybody else) is the huge number of mistakes, twisted facts, contradictions, twisted and invalid logic, etc. in the book. No god – omniscient or not – has ever made such a sloppy work. And also: A large number of the mistakes, rites, ways of thinking, etc. are in accordance the culture and “knowledge” in what we now call the Middle East around the time of Muhammad – but no omniscient god would have to use mistaken science, customs and rules and ways of thinking from a special century and a special, small area and from a short time periode on the miniscule planet Earth, when he made the book – or it in other ways came into existence – before the universe was created (which happened 13.7 billion years ago according to science). Propaganda? At least it is wrong.

There is one more fact that makes it impossible that the book is from eternity: There is at least one place in the Quran that angels (sccording also to Muslim scholars) are speaking (and at least 8 places where Muhammad is speaking). That means that the book cannot have been made – or at least not finished – until after the first angels had been created (they could not speak in the book before they were created). It is clear in the Quran that the angels are not from eternity – Allah created them from light. And It cannot have been made in a time that makes it impossible for Muhammad to have his say at least the mentioned 8 times.

006 27/8: “- – – the Worlds.” The Quran falsely tells there are 7 Earths. See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

007 27/9: “- – – I am Allah – – – the Wise!” Not very wise if he made the Quran and all its mistakes, etc.

008 27/14: “- – – see what was the end (death by drowning*) of them (pharaoh Ramses II and his men*)”. Wrong at least for Ramses II personally – he did not die until some years later, and not by drowning.

*00a 27/16 – 44: These stories – also repeated other places in the Quran – about King Solomon, the ants, the jinns slaving for him, the hoopoo, and not to mention the Queen of Sabah – are fantastic like were they from a fairy tale – – – which is what they are: They are “borrowed” from the made up – apocryphal – scripture “Second Targum of Ester”. No god needs to steal old fairy tales and retell them with small – or big – twists to make them fit his religion/tales, and then call them facts. But Muhammad often did so. That is the reason why his contemporaries so often said that what he told just were old tales – they simply recognized the legends, fairy tales and stories.

009 27/16: “We (King Solomon*) have been thought the speech of the Birds.” Wrong. One thing is that there is not one bird “speech” but one for each of at least 2000 different kinds of birds, and actually even more, as some birds have different “dialects” from one place to another – even if you were thought cockney English, you would not understand Italian or Arab or Swahili. More fundamental is the fact that the birds’ brains are too small for developing coherent speech. The last years science has found that birds brain may be more efficient that our, gram for gram, but that all the same it is far too small for this – the minimum size where it is theoretically possible for a brain to get faculties rudimentarily similar to the human brain, is guessed to be a brain the size of a cat’s. Coherent, intelligent speech from birds simply is physically impossible.

*010 27/18: An ant spoke to other ants and in a way possible for King Solomon to hear. Salah. Ants do not have the brainpower for composing complicated (for non-human terrestrial beings) sentences – see 27/16 just above – and they do not have organs for pronouncing words – not even “ant -language” words. Not to mention that they lack the power to speak loud enough for humans to hear. Sebuah dongeng. (It is worth mentioning that Islam to a degree admits this. “The Message of the Quran calls it a legend – comment 17. But if this is a legend told like a truth, how many more are there like that in the Quran?)

**011 27/19: “So he (Solomon) smiled at her speech – – -”. Salah. See 27/16 and 27/18 just above. It would be impossible for Solomon to hear what the ant also could not pronounce – also because if it could speak and if it could speak loud enough for us the hear, the diminutive size of an ant would make the words far too high-pitched for our ear to register.

**012 27/22-26: A bird – the hoopoo – making long, coherent speech/sentences of its own composition. No bird on Earth can do that – they do not have the brain capacity (see 27/6b). Sebuah dongeng.

013 27/24: “I (the hoopoo*) found her (the queen of Sabah*) worshipping the sun – – -“. Sabah was at the southern end of the Arabian Peninsula – approximately Yemen today. In the old times this whole peninsula had a moon religion, not a sun religion – al-Lah (whom Muhammad later renamed to Allah) originally was a moon god. It is documented that also in old Sabah the main god was the moon god (source; “The Lunar Passion and the Daughters of Allah”). We may add that Muslims say that even if the moon religion was the dominant, there also may have been sun worshippers. That is true, but not for the ruler of the country – the ruler has to be very strong or be a member of the official and main religion, if not there will be problems (look at Kashmir f. ex. – it all started with a Hindu ruler over a majority of Muslim underlings).

Besides she – the queen – did not worship Allah, because that name was not created yet. Perhaps the moon god al-Lah (later as mentioned renamed by Muhammad to Allah) or the old El.

014 27/25: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

015 27/28: “Go thou (the hoopoo*), with this letter of mine, and deliver it to them: then draw back from them, and (wait to) see what answer they return….” No bird is able to do this. Not even the pigeon brings letters – it only is able to return with a letter. (The pigeons have to be brought in cages from the one who is to receive the letters, to the ones that are to send the message. Then when the bird is let loose, it simply wants to return home – – – and carries the letter to its nest, where the receiver can collect it. This is the only possible way for using birds for carrying a letter. Except in fairy tales.)

00b 27/36: King Solomon is a good Muslim. Anyone is free to believe it if he wants to.

**00c 27/37: King Solomon is offered gifts from Sabah but answers with anger: “Go back to them (the rulers/queen of Sabah*), and be sure we shall come to them with such hosts (armies*) as they will never be able to meet (= attack them*) – – -.” This answer has no logical reason or meaning, especially as the gifts were rich (“abundance of wealth”- 27/36). Also Islam agrees to that something is wrong here, as “a prophet could not answer good gifts with a war of aggression”, but they do not have any good explanations – only rather lame speculations about perhaps it in reality is Allah who is speaking and threatening them with what he will do if they do not become Muslims (1500 years before Muhammad! – King Solomon ruled 961 – 922 BC give or take maximum 10 years according to Wikipedia). “Let there be no compulsion in religion”? BUT THIS IS ONE OF THE PLACES WHERE MUSLIM SCHOLARS AGREE THAT SOMETHONG IS WRONG WITH THE TEXT IN THE qURAN.

*00d 27/39: “- – – (one) of the Jinns – – -”. Jin adalah makhluk dengan peran menyebar dalam Quran. They are “borrowed” from old Arab fairy tales and legends. Allah made them from fire, the book tells (or may be from the fire of a scorching wind – one of the many contradictions in the Quran). There is said little about their shape – perhaps roughly like humans. Mereka juga memiliki peran menyebar di “dewa” – mereka pasti tidak termasuk di surga, tetapi tidak di neraka. Ada yang hanya berkata apa-apa tentang di mana mereka berada. Baik adalah segala sesuatu dikatakan tentang peran mereka dalam “hidup” dari surga dan neraka atau koneksi sebenarnya mereka “warga” mereka dua tempat – atau untuk penduduk dunia. As we said; much is diffuse concerning them and their life, except that they must be beings that can die – and end in hell mostly it seems. As said they are borrowed from old Arab folklore and fairy tales and mostly seem not really to belong in the religion, though they are mentioned quite frequently. Umumnya kita merasa mereka adalah tersangka sedikit sebagian besar waktu, tetapi tidak selalu. Beberapa f. ex. servants (or slaves) for King Solomon (but only according to the Quran, not to the Bible), and in the older times – not 100 years ago – there shall have existed laws for marriage etc. between humans and Jinns, though no marriage ever took place!!

Apakah mereka benar-benar ada di dunia yang tersembunyi? – Atau apakah mereka dalam realitas hanya sesuatu dari dongeng yang digunakan untuk efek misterius? Another curiosity: No other prophet ever mentioned jinns – creatures created from fire, able to marry humans, and creatures that go on to a next life, though most of them to Hell.

016 27/44a: “- – – she (the Queen of Sabah*) thought it (the floor*) was a lake of water (though it was slabs of glass) – – -“.

  1. They did not have the technology to make that quality of glass ca. 1000 BC. (Solomon ruled from ca. 961 BC till 922 BC (plus or minus max 10 years)).
  2. They did not have the technology to make big slabs – and they had to be really big to make the cracks so few that they were not noticed – of glass ca. 1000 BC. Even today it is difficult, as it needs days and weeks and even months of very exact and slow cooling for that big slabs not to crack. (Cfr. the making of large astronomical telescopes).

017 27/44b: “- – – the Worlds.” Once more: There are no 7 worlds in spite of the Quran (and the Hadiths). See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

018 27/52: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

019 27/60: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

020 27/61: “(Allah*) made rivers in its (the Earth’s) midst – – -”. Salah. Quran percaya bumi itu datar, dan kemudian ada suatu tengah. Tapi Bumi adalah sebuah bola, dan permukaan bola telah tengah tidak. Besides: Is it Allah or rain that makes rivers?

021 27/63: “- – – glad tidings – – -“. In this case it refers to rain. That is glad tidings in deserts like in Arabia, but hardly in f. ex. Amazonas or England or a lot of other places. Another of the many “Arabiaisms” in the Quran. In Muhammad’s local area rain was glad tidings, in the area of a world religion that claims at best only is partly true – but why is Arabia the only cultural and otherwise centre of the Quran if it is for all the world – and from an omniscient god?

022 27/65: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

023 27/76: “- – – this Quran doth explain to the Children of Israel most of the matters in which they disagree”. Sangat salah. For one thing the Quran is so different from the Mosaic religion (and even more different from Christianity), that it clearly is not the same. For another: A book with that many mistakes, etc. can explain very little.

024 27/77a: “And it (the Quran*) certainly is a Guide – – -.” A book with that many mistakes and worse, certainly is no Guide – at least not a good or reliable one.

*025 27/77b: “And it (the Quran*) certainly is – – – a Mercy to those who believe.” With all its aversion against knowledge (except religious and related knowledge – f. ex. astronomy to follow the dates, special days, etc. exactly), its demand for hate and war, its dark and total dominance over all aspects of life, etc., – and the suppression of half its members (the women) – it is no mercy even to believers.

026 27/79: “- – – for thou art (on the path of) manifest Truth (the contents of the Quran*)”. But the contents of the Quran is a mixed lot, and maximum some of it really is true – see all the mistakes.

027 27/81: “- – – Our (Allah*) Signs – – -.” There are no logically reliable signs from/about Allah in all the Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

028 27/82: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs.” Wrong. See 27/81 just above and 2/99.

029 27/83: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs – – -“. Salah. See 27/81 and 2/99 above.

030 27/84: “- – – My (Allah’s*) Signs – – -“. Salah. See 27/81 and 2/99 above.

031 27/87: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

***032 27/91: “For me (Muhammad*), I have been commanded to serve the Lord (Allah*) of this City (Mecca – from 615-616 AD when Muhammad still lived there*) – – – “. This is a serious one: It is Muhammad who is speaking once more – – – in a book presumed to be copy of a “mother book” in Paradise, a book that may be existed from eternity or perhaps was made by Allah. Pikthall and Dawood both camouflage this very revealing mistake (there are a few more where either angles (37/164-166) or Muhammad speaks) by adding the word “say:”, but that is not in the original, according to Ibn Warraq, “Why I am not a Muslim”, p.175. Tidak jujur ​​oleh Pikthall dan oleh Dawud dalam kasus. Tapi kemudian hal itu terjadi, Anda bertemu ketidakjujuran ketika umat Islam mencoba untuk “menjelaskan” hal – bahkan dalam buku-buku Anda harus percaya adalah intelektual berkualitas tinggi dan moral. (Like Al-Azhar University, Cairo, certifying that the Big Flood could be explained by the filling up of the Mediterranean See. They know very well that both the time and the way it happened prohibit that explanation – some 4 – 5 million years ago and “slowly” over a period of perhaps 100 years, and not least; wrong place, as the Garden of Eden is believed to have been situated in what is now south Iraq (if it ever existed)).

Bagaimanapun saat yang bagus untuk Muhammad – ia suka kekuasaan. (Coba lihat bagaimana ia terpaku dirinya ke platform Nya kekuasaan; dewa nya).

033 27/93: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah or anything. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

Surah 27: At least 33 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 28:

001 28/2: “These are verses of the Book (the Quran*) that makes (things) clear”. With that many mistakes, contradictions, and suspect arguments in the book, at most some things can be made clear.

*00a 28/3a: “We (Allah*) rehears to thee some of the story of Moses and Pharaoh in Truth – – -”. The story about Moses differs not a little from the one told in the Bible – which for this part is more than 1000 years nearer in time to what (may be) happened – and with stronger traditions concerning Moses. It is a question, which one is most reliable. In any case: Both have the death of Pharaoh Ramses II wrong (but when it comes to the Bible it is possible to explain this – not so with the Quran, which is told by Allah, and Allah is omniscient (the human narrator of the Bible can have mixed Ramses II with one of his 67 sons or one of his generals – for Allah such a mistake is impossible)).

002 28/3b: “- – – in Truth – – -“. With all the mistakes etc. in the Quran, it at best is just partly true.

*00b 28/6: “- – – Haman – – -”. In the Quran Haman is a high leader of some sort under the Pharaoh. But science says this is the Haman from the book of Esther in the Bible. Haman was according to the Bible a powerful minister under the Persian king Xerxes (Hebrew: Ahasuerus) (486 – 465 BC) and a central person in the mentioned book – Muhammad may well have heard about him. In that case something is very wrong, because Ramses II naturally was king/pharaoh in Egypt, and on top of that lived some 800 years earlier. Haman could not be his top minister.

Muslims want to explain this with that it was another Haman. But science is not in doubt, it is the same. Another question here is: Was the name Haman at all used in Egypt? – it is said to be a Persian name.

**Here Islam has another explanation that just might have been true: One of the main gods in Egypt at that time was Amon. According to “The Message of the Quran” the title of the high priest of Amon, was Ha-Amen – which could be understood as Hamon. Not very likely, especially as that is the kind of “explanations” one frequently finds when Islam has problems finding better stories. But after all possible. Except that a god does not make such mistakes . And except for 28/38a: “Pharaoh said: ‘O Chiefs! No god do I know for you but myself – – -”. Pharaoh cannot at the same time be the only god in Egypt (very wrong as said) and have the high priest (Ha-Amen) of another god as his second in command. Like so many times Muslim “explanations” covers only part of the picture and thus is proven wrong. Also see 38a below.

The question also is how Muhammad could have heard about Ha-Amen nearly 1900 years later – after Amon and his high priest had ceased to be part of a large religion, in contrast to Haman, who was part of the Jews’ religious traditions. This even more so as there were thousands of Jews in Arabia at that time, who could have told Muhammad, but few from Egypt. Of course Muslims will say that Allah knew. But if an omniscient Allah had told this, he – as said above – had not made any mistake with the name. And if the mistake came from Muhammad after Allah had told him: How many more mistakes did Muhammad make?

00c 28/8: “- – – Haman – – -”. See 28/6 just above.

003 28/30: “- – – Worlds – – -“. The Quran falsely tells there are 7 Earths. See 26/77 above and 65/12 below.

004 28/35: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs – – -“. See 27/81, 2/39 and 2/99 above.

005 28/36: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Clear Signs – – -“. See 27/81 and 2/99 above.

*006 28/38a: “Pharaoh said: ‘O Chiefs! No god do I know for you but myself – – -”. This is one of the really good ones, because Egypt at the time of Ramses II had a good number of gods, included some central ones with a strong clerical organisation – not to mention: How then explain Islam’s own story about Ha-Amen in 28/6 above? ( It is typical for many “explanations” of mistakes in the Quran that Muslims “explain” something, but are then unable not to “collide” with other information in the book – f. ex. explaining the heavens as the modern universe without telling how the stars then could be fastened to the lowest heaven). But at the time of Muhammad the old gods were reduced – Egypt was partly Christian (the forefathers of the present-day Copts). A real god had not made this blunder, but Muhammad could not know. Lalu siapa yang menyusun Quran?

Islam tries to explain this away with that it is not meant literally – only that Ramses II was the top. But in this case it is very clear what the Quran says. And also remember that the Quran – and most Muslims – say that the Quran is to be meant literally where nothing else is said – – – and that to call something an allegory or say it is figuratively meant, we think is the for Islam the most used means of explaining away of things/mistakes in the Quran that has no explanation.

00d 28/38b: “- – – Haman – – -”. See 28/6 above.

*007 28/40: “So We (Allah*) sized him (Ramses II*) and his hosts, and flung them into the sea – – -”. Wrong at least for Ramses II himself – he did not drown and he died years later.

008 28/43: “We (Allah*) revealed to Moses the Book”. Salah. Moses got no book. The books of Moses were written centuries later – they just were named after him. (Moses got the 10 commandments only in writing according to the Bible. In addition he was told the law, which he himself wrote down later. The laws are parts of the later Books of Moses).

009 28/45: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs – – -“. No omniscient god would use invalid signs. See 27/81, 2/39 and 2/99 above.

010 28/47: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*011 28/48a: “- – – When the Truth (the Quran*) has come to them (the Quraysh – the leading tribe in Mecca*) – – -”. If it was not because the word “truth” is so central and so disused in Islam, we had stopped commenting on it long time ago – it is so obvious that the Quran can be only partly the truth. See all the mistakes – some small, some big blunders, some repeated many times and really cemented – – – but even one mistake is impossible for an omniscient god. Is Allah omniscient? Or did someone else compose the Quran? If Allah is not omniscient, that means something is wrong with the religion. If Muhammad or another human composed it, it is a false religion.

***And if it is a false religion and there somewhere exists a real, true one, to which Islam blocks the road to for its believers – – – what then for the Muslims?

012 28/48b: “- – – (the Signs) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

013 28/49: “Then bring ye (people*) a Book (the Quran*) from Allah, which is a better Guide – – -“. A book that full of wrong facts, twisted arguments, contradictions, invalid statements and as invalid logic is no good guide for anyone.

*014 28/52: “(Jews and Christians*) – they do believe in this (Revelation) – – -“. Datar yang salah. A few became Muslims, but the overwhelming majority had to flee, were made slaves, or were killed/murdered/executed because they refused to believe in Muhammad’s tales. Cfr. f. ex. what happened in and around Medina in the years after this surah was told (in 621 AD or later). One more place where an intelligent man like Muhammad knew he was lying.

*015 28/53a: “They (Jews and Christians*) say: ‘We believe therein, for it is the Truth from our Lord – – -“. Well, this is what Muhammad claimed. The reality as clearly told in Islamic written sources you find in 28/52 just above – and like in 28/52 also here Muhammad had to know he was lying. Also see 28/48a and 28/48b.

016 28/53b: “- – – the Truth – – -“. The Quran at best only is partly true – too many mistakes, etc.

017 28/53c: “- – – indeed we (the Jews and Christians*) have been Muslims (bowing to Allah’s will) from before this”. Tidak ada komentar yang diperlukan – kecuali lihat f. ex. 28/52, 28/48a or 28/48b above.

018 28/53d: “- – – for it (the Quran*) is the Truth – – -”. No. With that many mistakes, etc., the Quran hardly is the truth – at best partly the truth.

019 28/53e: “- – – for it (the Quran*) is the Truth from our Lord (Allah*) – – -.” A book with that many mistakes, contradictions, and other errors is not from a god – omniscient or not.

*020 28/59a: “Nor was thy Lord (Allah*) one to destroy a population until he had sent to its Centre a messenger – – -”. Quran berbicara tentang banyak nabi – dalam hadits disebutkan 124ooo melalui kali dan di seluruh dunia. (Dan satu sopan, tapi bersangkutan pengingat: Muhammad tidak dapat membuat bernubuat nyata – ia pada kenyataannya tidak ada nabi, hanya “meminjam” judul buku besar). But with the exception of Israel and to a degree in Persia (and some rulers that did so on their own accord for political reasons + a small sect in Arabia, most likely inspired by Jews and Christians) there are no traces anywhere, any time after prophets for monotheistic religions – not in history, not in archaeology, not in literature, not in art, not in architecture – not even in folklore or fairy tales.

*Besides: MANY places were destroyed by war, famine or other catastrophes through the time without being visited by prophets for a monotheistic religion warning them first – in spite of the Quran’s saying all such things only happen in accordance with the plans of Allah.

Ayat ini salah. Dan kami juga tidak yakin bahwa seperti dewa pendendam dan keras adalah baik atau murah hati dewa – ketika seseorang mengatakan atau menyatakan satu hal, tetapi tuntutan atau melakukan sesuatu yang lain, kami selalu yakin bahwa tuntutan dan perbuatan lebih dapat diandalkan daripada kata-kata murah . Serupa klaim dalam 17/15 – 17/16.

021 28//59b: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs – – -“. No god would use invalid signs/proofs. Lihat 2 / 99.

022 28/75: “- – – then they (the non-Muslims*) shall know that the Truth is in Allah (alone) – – -”. That is to be hoped that if Allah is a god. But judging from the Quran, at most in him is partly the truth.

00e 28/82: “Mereka yang menolak Allah pasti tidak akan pernah beruntung”. Sebagai untuk diskusi kehidupan mungkin berikutnya benar-benar tidak mungkin – kita tahu apa-apa, dan bisa tahu apa-apa. Beberapa akan mengatakan mereka tahu, tetapi mereka akan sangat salah – apa yang mereka lakukan, adalah percaya kuat. Knowledge is not possible without solid proved facts, and the only real fact in Islam is that one single man told stories he either refused to or was unable to document – either because a god did not want to (with illogical and/or sychologically wrong excuses) or was unable to, or because a god did not exist. Ada banyak kata – tetapi kata-kata yang murah. Ada banyak laporan – namun pernyataan menggantung di udara tipis tanpa bukti adalah sebagai murah. There are lots and lots of “signs” – but a few are downright wrong, and the rest is completely valueless as proofs for Allah, as they in reality are just unproved claims or statements hanging in the air and only proves that words are cheap – they are statements that any priest in any religion can say about his god or gods, as long as he does not have to produce real proofs – – – like Muhammad steadfastly or from sheer necessity did not produce. Dan bahkan ada ayat-ayat Allah mengatakan mereka terbukti. But not one single of them proves anything about him – they are as valueless as the “signs” and for the same reasons – a few even are plainly wrong. Especially we should mention all the natural phenomena that the Quran says are signs indicating or proving Allah, but without one single time proving that it really is Allah that makes the phenomena, and thus the only thing they prove, is that Islam never has been able to produce s single real proof, for any priest in any religion can say exactly the same cheap words about natural phenomena and his god(s). Yang selanjutnya membuktikan bahwa Islam telah harus bergantung pada kata-kata murah untuk mempengaruhi jemaat mereka dan lain-lain. One can speculate about why.

*But when it comes to prosperity in this life, it is clear that the Quran is completely wrong. And it is likely to stay that way, as Muslim countries forces half their adult population not to work, and the culture is adverse to non-religious knowledge (“foreign knowledge”) and real or critical thinking – which among other effects means that all the Muslim world has fewer new patents a year, than the single state of California – and the difference is even worse if one looks at patents of knife-edge technique or technology. This among other reasons will forever keep Muslim states in second-class economy, if they do not have natural recourses like oil to sell. Or if they do not become strong enough to exploit or tax others.

023 28/84: “- – – the doers of evil are only punished (to the extent) of their deeds”. Flatly wrong. There is an abyss of injustice between what sins most sinners have committed, and the punishment they get in Hell.

024 28/87: “- – – the Signs of Allah – – -“. There is no sign clearly showing Allah in all the Quran. Each and every claimed “sign” can as easy be claimed by any other god – and actually they do not signify any god at all, as it is not proved they are made by a god. (Possibly some taken from the Bible may be valid, but they in case signify Yahweh, not Allah – Muslims like to claim (as normal for Muslims without proofs) that Yahweh and Allah is the same god, but the teachings are fundamentally too different).

Surah 28: At least 24 mistakes + 5 likely mistakes.

SURAH 29:

*00a 29/2: “Do men think – – – they will not be tested?” But why is it necessary to trst anyone if Allah is omniscient and knows everything before? – even decides everything before (in spite of the claim that man has (limited?) personal freedom to decide – though even Islam is unable to explain how it possible to combine the statement that Allah decides everything before, with the statement that man has free will (not strange, as it is a version of the time travel paradox, and that paradox is proved unsolvable)) – if all this, then why are tests necessary to find an answer Allah already knows?

001 29/15: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

002 29/23: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

003 29/28a: “- – – Lut (Lot*); behold, he said to his people (the people of Sodom and Gomorrah*) – – -.” Wrong. Those people for one thing were not Lot’s “natural” people, as he was a stranger from very far away (Ur in Chaldea in what now is South Iraq, but now living near the Dead Sea), and for another both the Bible and the Quran make it very clear that he also was not a naturalized member of those communities – he was an outsider. (May be the Quran tells they were his people so as to be able to say he was a prophet to his own people, like they falsely claim every prophet was – in spite of Joseph (Egypt), Moses (Sinai 40 years), Abraham (Canaan), Lot (Dead See area), Jonah (Nineveh).

004 29/28b: “Do you (men of Sodom and Gomorrah*) commit lewdness (homosexuality*), such as no people in Creation (ever) committed before you.” Wrong. Homoseksualitas adalah sesuatu yang baru – bahkan ada di antara beberapa “lebih tinggi” binatang, kadang-kadang sebagai tanda dominasi – dan itu adalah dalam DNA bagian kecil dari kemanusiaan. Jika Islam tetap menyala klaim mereka bahwa ini adalah sesuatu yang “tidak ada orang dalam kemanusiaan (pernah) dilakukan sebelum”, mereka harus membuktikannya.

005 29/35: “- – – an evident Sign – – -.” There are no evident or clear signs for Allah – or for Muhammad’s connection to a God – in all the Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

00b 29/39a: “- – – Haman – – -”. See 28/6.

006 29/44a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

007 29/44b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*008 29/45: “- – – remembrance of Allah is the greatest (thing in life) without doubt.” There is much doubt about this if he has composed the Quran – the mistakes proves he in case is very far from omniscience, the valueless “signs” and “proofs” proves he is not very good at logical thinking, and his use of invalid excuses and his inability to send proofs of his existence, proves he is not omnipotent. And if someone else made the Quran, the doubt is even greater, as then both the Quran and Islam are without any value at all – or with negative value, as much of the religion is rather inhuman (f. ex. wars, terrorism, suppression of all non-Muslims, suppression of women and freedom to rape many of them, thoughts about slavery, and enmity towards non-Muslims).

***009 29/46: “- – – our (Muslims*) and your (Jews and Christians*) god is one – – -”. Ini tidak benar kecuali dia adalah skizofrenia, aspek-aspek fundamental karena terlalu banyak orang yang terlalu berbeda antara dua ajaran. To mention a few points:

Islam: The New Testament:
Jangan membunuh tanpa alasan yang baik. Jangan membunuh.
Untuk upah perang adalah sebuah kewajiban agama. Jangan membunuh.
Mata ganti mata. Memberikan pipi yg lain
Anda tidak dapat membawa beban orang lain. Membawa beban sesama manusia.
Agama harus menjalankan negara. My land is not of this world.
Jadilah dibunuh karena Allah dan pergi ke surga. Menjadi seperti seorang anak untuk pergi ke surga.
Paradise = Earth-like luxury plus women Paradise = Surga bagi jiwa Anda.
(Untuk perempuan = mewah dan bagian dari suami). (Untuk wanita = Surga bagi jiwa Anda.)
Surga = dibangkitkan tubuh. Surga = jiwa hidup.
Jangan berbohong kecuali untuk alasan yang baik. Jangan berbohong.
Jangan berdukacita kafir. “Anak Domba yang hilang”.
Break sumpah dan membayar kerusakan untuk itu. Untuk memecahkan oat apapun adalah dosa berat.
Al-taqiyya – kebohongan halal Muslim ‘. Jangan berbohong.
To rob and steal may be “good and lawful” Jangan mencuri.
Memperkosa seorang budak wanita adalah “baik dan halal”. Jadi tidak bermoral itu bahkan tidak disebutkan.
Membantu orang lain untuk mendapatkan pahala di surga. Membantu orang lain karena mereka membutuhkannya – dan mendapatkan pahala di surga.

(For those who do not know: Jesus said that if someone hit you on one cheek, turn the other towards him = do not do the same and answer bad with good. And: Jesus said that a shepherd would search for a lost lamb = to save a lost soul is very valuable, and there is reason to mourn the not saved ones.)

We know both religions have been misused – though with one serious difference: Christ has been misused in contradiction to his teachings, Islam very often in accordance with its teachings, because of the Quran’s often bloody religion and lack of real moral. The sentences above are some of the teachings – some of the fundaments.

Only Islam says it is the same god – and they are wrong, unless the god is mentally ill.

010 29/47a: “- – – We (Allah*) have sent down the Book (the Quran*) – – -“. No god ever sent down a book with that many mistakes, etc. – not to mention revered it in his own “home” as the Mother Book.

011 29/47b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

012 29/49a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

013 29/49b: “- – – Our Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

014 29/52: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2 / 22.

015 29/54: “- – – of a surety, Hell will encompass the Rejecters (non-Muslims*) of the Faith (Islam*).” No, that is no surety with all the mistakes in the Quran strongly reducing a reader’s belief in the reality of the religion. Even more: If someone has made up the Quran, and there exists another, real religion, the rejecters of Muhammad and Islam have a chance of finding that religion.

*016 29/61a: “If indeed thou ask them who has created the heavens (plural and wrong – like at least 198 other places in the Quran*) and the earth – – – they (non-Muslims*) will certainly reply, ‘Allah’”. Salah. If they believed a god created it, they would certainly name their own god (which in the old Arabia might have been the polytheist al-Lah).

017 29/61b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

018 29/63: “And if indeed thou ask them (non-Muslims*) who it is that sends down rain from the sky – – – they will certainly reply, ‘Allah’”. Salah. See 29/61 just above.

019 29/68: “- – – rejects the Truth (the Quran*) – – -”. Salah. With such a number of mistakes, it maximum is partly the truth.

020 29 / 69: “Dan orang-orang yang berusaha di kami (Penyebab) – Kami (Allah *) akan pasti membimbing mereka untuk Jalan Kami – – -“. Dengan begitu banyak yang salah dalam Quran, kemungkinan bahwa ini adalah salah, juga. Setidaknya itu jauh dari kepastian.

Surah 29: At least 20 mistakes + 2 likely mistakes.

SURAH 30:

*001 30/2-4: “The Roman Empire (Bysantz/Constantinople*) has been defeated (by Persia*) in a land close by (Damascus 613 AD, Jerusalem 614 AD, Egypt 615-616 AD – may be a battle in Syria in 615 AD – just pick your choice (the surah is from 615 or 616 AD)); but they, (even) after (this) defeat of theirs will soon be victorious – Within a few (“bid”) years.” Bysantz defeated Persia in 628 AD after they first had had a number of defeats at the start of the war.

  1. 1. Kata “tawaran” Arab berarti “beberapa” dan “berarti sejumlah tidak kurang dari 3, tidak lebih dari 9” menurut komentar 2 sampai surat ini dalam “Pesan dari Quran”. Butuh waktu setidaknya 12 tahun.
  2. Ini adalah semangat-berbicara dengan para pengikutnya. Tidak seorangpun – bahkan Muhammad sendiri – mengatakan bahwa itu adalah bernubuat – – – kecuali bahwa banyak umat Islam mengatakan demikian setelah itu.
  3. It is very clear from the Quran that Muhammad did not have the gift of being able to make prophesies (a kind of miracles), and it is as clear that he never even pretended to or claimed to have that gift. This was just one of the (few) cases where a little of all that he said through his life happened to come partly true (actually: So much that he said and spoke it is a miracle that not more happened to come true – and more true than in this case. And NB: This is the only heavy claim Islam has about him being able to make prophesies (though there are other claims). There are a number of theories and claims about his ability which he as said did not claim or or pretend to have himself, but this is the only one Islam reckons to be a “heavy” claim”. Once – nearly – in a lifetime = a prophet?

002 30/8: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

003 30/9: “- – – Clear (Signs) – – -“. Clear signs about Allah and Islam does not exist in the Quran. One may wonder why Muhammad used invalid proofs – invalid proofs and arguments normally are the hallmarks of cheats and swindlers. It also indicates lack of real facts and proofs. See 2/39.

004 30/10: “- – – Signs of Allah – – -“. No omniscient and omnipotent god had used strongly suspect “signs”, etc. to prove himself , not to mention added his name for strengthening the claim. See also 2/39.

005 39/16: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

006 30/18: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

007 30/20: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*008 30/20: “Among His (Allah’s*) Signs is this, that He created you from dust – – -”. Salah. Manusia tidak diciptakan dari debu – benar-benar dia tidak dibuat sama sekali menurut ilmu pengetahuan. Lihat 6 / 2. There is an extra irony in the fact that the Quran uses a piece of wrong information to “prove” Allah. Contradiction of reality.

009 30/21a: “- – -His Signs – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

010 30/21b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

011 30/22a: “And among His (Allah’s) Signs is the creation of the heavens (plural and wrong) – – -“. Very clearly a wrong proof – a wrong “sign” – as there are no 7 heavens. Irony? At least a contradiction of reality.

012 30/22b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

013 30/22c: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

014 30/23a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

015 30/23b: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

016 30/24a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

017 30/24b: “- – – He (Allah*) sends down rain from the sky and with it gives life to the earth after it is dead: verily, in that are Signs (for Allah*) for those who are wise.” Wrong. If just water made the earth come alive, it meant that it just looked dead, but was alive with seeds, etc. And those who are wise will see the irony in using doubtful “facts” as proofs for Allah.

018 30/24c: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

019 30/25: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

020 30/26: “- – – all (beings*) are devotedly obedient to Him (Allah*).” Wrong. Tidak ada non-Muslim adalah taat setia kepada Allah. Dan tidak berdosa Muslim taat setia kepada tuhan manapun. Islam also will have to prove that also all non-human beings, included worms and slugs and microbes – are devotedly obedient to him. Yes, they will even have to prove that all Muslims are devotedly obedient to him and not hypocrites.

021 30/27: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

022 30/28: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*023 30/30a: “- – – no change (let there be) in the work (wrought) by Allah: that (Islam*) is the standard Religion – – -”. Tidak ada “standar” agama dapat didasarkan pada sebuah buku dengan kesalahan yang jelas begitu banyak. And hopefully no “standard” religion can be base on hate, suppression and blood. (This paragraph is one of the reasons why Islam states – or pretends – that the Quran is perfect, and why Islam can admit not even the most obvious mistakes – all mistakes must be “explained” away, because there can be no change in Allah’s work – the Quran).

*00a 30/30b: “- – – no change (let there be) in the work (wrought) by Allah: that (Islam*) is the standard Religion: But most among mankind understand not”. The impolite, but most pertinent, question is: May be it is really the non-Muslims that have understood? – understood that something may be wrong.

00b 30/32: “Those who split up their Religion, and become (mere) Sects – – -“. We have been told there have existed and exist some 3ooo Muslim sects. Kami belum bisa memverifikasi nomor tersebut, tetapi jelas ada cukup banyak – dari Wahhbism di Arab Saudi dan ketat, untuk Amaddiyyas dan lain-lain. Ini juga adalah jelas bahwa melalui sejarah telah ada lebih – sebagian telah dimusnahkan dalam darah bahkan, karena tidak ada paksaan dalam agama, menurut Islam. Seperti Quran dikatakan sangat jelas dan mudah dimengerti, satu pertanyaan kurang ajar adalah: Manakah dari sekte memahami dengan benar? – Dan mengapa semua orang lain memahaminya berbeda? – Dan terakhir, tetapi sangat jauh dari yang kurang: Apa yang benar-benar pemahaman yang benar?

024 30/37: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*025 30/42: “Travel through the earth and see what was the End of those before you (non-Muslims*) – – -.” In the Middle East there were ruins here and there. Muhammad claimed they all were from people punished because they were non-Muslims and sinners. In an arid and harsh area populated by warring and feuding tribes, there were many other reasons for empty houses. Islam will have to provide strong proofs for the claim that they all were result of religious disbelief, if they want to be believed on this point.

*00c 30/43: “- – – the right Religion (Islam*) – – -”. Is it possible that the right religion can be based on a book with that many mistakes, repeated or made by an Arab salesman, highwayman, murderer (he let at least 26 opponents and others murder – Ibn Ishaq names 10 of them), torturer and rapist (he – at an age of nearly 60 – at least raped the newlywed, 17 year old Safijja after he had let her husband Kinana be tortured to death, and Raihana bint Amr after he had murdered the male part of her family and made the rest slaves.) Source for this information: Muhammad Ibn Ishaq: “Life of the Prophet Muhammad” – the in Islam most respected of the old (dead 768 AD) writers about Muhammad. (Ini ditulis untuk khalifah Abbasside kedua di Baghdad, Mansur, sekitar 750 AD). Baik salesman Arab, atau perampok, atau penyiksa, atau pembunuh, atau pemerkosa memiliki yang terbaik dari reputasi untuk menjadi jujur ​​(bahkan jika Islam bersikeras dia, tapi Islam tidak merupakan sumber yang paling dapat diandalkan hanya pada titik). Ini salesman, Arab penyamun, penyiksa, pembunuh dan pemerkosa dan tidak manusiawi panglima perang, bahkan mampu memproduksi satu bukti kecil tunggal untuk ceritanya. But he (?) produced lots of loose statements and invalid “signs” and “proofs”.

He is the only source Islam is built on.

Can this be “the Right Religion”?

026 30/46a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

027 30/46b: “- – – glad tidings – – -“. Salah. At the very best one can say that the Quran brought some glad tidings among all the bad warriors, wanting loot and slaves, and among some longing for a religion – – – if it was not because the Quran itself proves 100% that something is very wrong in the book. Jadi yang salah itu tidak dapat dibuat atau dihormati oleh dewa – bahkan oleh mini kecil dewa. Too much is wrong in the book for that.

*028 30/47a: “We (Allah*) did indeed send, before thee (Muhammad*), messengers to the (respective) peoples – – -”. The Quran tells there were sent prophets by Allah too all peoples throughout the times – the Hadith (the second main “pillar” of “knowledge” about Islam) mention 124ooo, and even that may even be only a symbolic number. But neither in archaeology, nor in architecture (temples or stones reused for building f. ex.), nor in literature, nor history, nor folklore, nor even in fairy tales are there the slightest traces from those prophets. That so many prophets should leave not even a whisper of a trace – flatly no.

029 30/47b: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. See 2/99 above.

*030 30/48: “- – – then does He (Allah*) spread them (the clouds*) in the sky as he wills, and break them into fragments, until thou seest raindrops issue from the midst thereof – – -”. It is not possible to get it more wrong than this. What happens is not that the clouds break apart, but straight opposite: That droplets come together to form drops. Tidak ada komentar lebih lanjut. Tapi SETIAP tuhan tahu yang lebih baik.

031 30/53: “- – -Our (Allah*) Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 and 2/99 above.

032 30/58: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

033 30/60: “- – – the promise of Allah is true – – -“. The promises of Allah are expressed via Muhammad and the Quran. Muhammad was a man of highly suspect morality according to his deeds told in Islamic religious and historical (the Quran, Hadiths, Ibn Ishaq to mention the most central ones) literature. The second is a book dictated by that man, and containing huge numbers of mistakes, twisted arguments, twisted logic, inhuman ethics and moral, etc., etc. Islam will have to bring real proofs to be believed – and Islam has till now been unable to prove anything fundamental – – – they instead glorify and insist on naïve blind belief.

Surah 30: At least 33 mistakes + 3 likely mistakes.

Subtotal till now: At least 1076 mistakes + 142 likely mistakes.

About siapmurtad

Siap memaparkan kesalahan alquran
This entry was posted in KESALAHAN QURAN. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s