Bagian II – Sambungan 8

1000mistakes.com – Surah 6

001 6 / 1: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

*** 002 6 / 2: “Dia (Allah *)-lah yang menciptakan kamu dari tanah, – – -“. Ini adalah salah satu dari orang banyak cara (Adam) diciptakan sesuai dengan Quran – bahkan jika Adam diciptakan hanya sekali, menurut buku itu. Dia diciptakan dalam cara:

a. Dari tanah liat: 6 / 2 7 / 12 17/61 32 / 7 38/71 38/76.
b. Dari terdengar liat: 15/26 15/28 15/33.
c. Dari dering liat: 55/64
d. Dari tanah liat: 37/11
e. Dari esensi dari tanah liat: 23/12
f. Dari lumpur: 15/26 15/28 15/33.
g. Dari debu: 3 / 59 22 / 5 35/11 40/67.
h. Dari bumi: 20/55
i. Dari gumpalan darah yang membeku: 96 / 2
j. Dari air mani: # 16 / 4 75/37 76 / 2 80/19.
k. Dari apa-apa: 19 / 9 19/67.
l. Dari air: 21/30 24/45 25/54.
m. Dari bahan dasar: 70/39.

# (Hal ini tidak diberitahu di mana air mani berasal dari) .**

** Kebanyakan ketika berbicara buku tentang air mani, itu sehubungan dengan (membuat) anak-anak. Tapi juga anak-anak tidak terbuat dari mani – hanya merupakan 50% dari kebenaran. Seorang anak terbuat dari air mani + sel telur, tetapi sel telur sangat kecil, bahwa Muhammad tidak tahu tentang hal itu – telur manusia hampir tidak dapat dilihat dalam darah dan gore dalam bangkai atau hewan disembelih. Sebenarnya pada saat Muhammad salah satu tidak tahu bagaimana konsepsi terjadi – satu teori adalah bahwa air mani adalah benih yang tumbuh bila ditempatkan pada seorang wanita – meskipun jauh dari setiap kali. Anehnya ini adalah bagaimana Quran menjelaskan itu. Setiap dewa tahu yang lebih baik.

Sebenarnya semua cara yang berbeda dalam menciptakan manusia / Adam berarti bahwa Quran mengatakan bahwa manusia / Adam diciptakan dalam 13 cara yang berbeda, bahkan jika Adam diciptakan hanya sekali (pada kenyataannya ia tidak pernah diciptakan dan tidak pernah ada – manusia berkembang dari primata sebelumnya ). Jika satu benjolan serupa “kreasi” bersama, masih ada setidaknya 5-7 kreasi yang berbeda. Hanya satu bahkan dapat sesuai dengan Quran benar (seperti Adam diciptakan hanya sekali bahkan menurut Quran dan Alkitab) – dan ironi adalah ilmu yang sejak lama telah menunjukkan bahwa semua alternatif salah, sebagai manusia seperti kata berevolusi dari seorang Muslim primate.Some prasejarah menjelaskan bahwa Adam diciptakan dari tanah liat sedikit, sedikit debu, bumi yang kecil, sedikit darah, sebuah air mani sedikit, tidak ada yang kecil dan air. Tapi itu jauh dari apa Quran mengatakan – dan bahkan jika itu adalah kisah nyata Quran whatthe mengatakan, itu salah, sebagai manusia berevolusi dari makhluk sebelumnya. Dan di mana seorang pria Anda menemukan tanah liat, dll?

003 6 / 3: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

004 6 / 4: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

005 6/5a: “Dan sekarang mereka (non-Muslim *) menolak kebenaran (yang * Quran) – – -“. Dengan banyak kesalahan, dll Quran di terbaik adalah sebagian kebenaran. Juga lihat 13 / 1.

006 6/5b: “Dan sekarang mereka (pria / zalim *) menolak kebenaran (ajaran Muhammad *) saat mencapai mereka: – – -“. Al-Qur’an telah begitu banyak kesalahan – kesalahan fakta, dan kesalahan lain – yang paling-paling hanya sebagian kebenaran.

*** 007 6 / 7: “Jika Kami (Allah *) telah dikirim ke kamu (Muhammad *) tertulis (pesan) pada perkamen – – – orang-orang kafir (tidak akan percaya bagaimanapun *)”. Salah – dan Muhammad terlalu cerdas dan terlalu banyak tahu tentang orang-orang tidak tahu itu dan adalah kebohongan: Sebuah keajaiban yang nyata – atau lebih dari satu – telah membuat orang percaya baru, bahkan jika beberapa orang akan mencoba untuk menyebutnya sihir. Ini adalah salah satu tempat di mana orang pintar seperti Muhammad tahu bahwa ia berbohong.

* 008 6/11a: “Berjalanlah di bumi dan melihat bagaimana kesudahan orang-orang yang menolak Kebenaran”. negara tersebar di sekitar Saudi dan neighbouting ada reruntuhan tua, rumah-rumah desa dan kota-kota. Muhammad mengatakan ini adalah tetap ditinggalkan oleh orang-orang yang dihancurkan oleh Allah karena tidak percaya kepada Allah – yang tidak benar dalam kebanyakan kasus. Sejujurnya: Tidak satu profesor serius sejarah percaya dalam hal ini. Dan tidak satu buku ilmiah yang serius tentang sejarah menyebutkan klaim tersebut sebagai alasan yang kredibel untuk mengapa rumah atau desa atau kota atau kota-kota menjadi kosong. Ini akan mengambil bukti berat dari Islam untuk meyakinkan mereka.

009 6/11b: “- – – lihat bagaimana kesudahan orang-orang yang menolak Kebenaran”. Yang benar adalah tidak lebih handal di sini daripada di f. ex. 6 / 5 dan 6 / 11. Juga lihat 13 / 1.

010 6/12a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

011 6/12b: “Bahwa Dia (Allah *) akan mengumpulkan kamu bersama untuk hari kiamat, tidak ada keraguan apapun.” Dengan begitu banyak kesalahan, kontradiksi, logika begitu banyak yang salah dalam ajaran, tidak ada keraguan serius tentang apa pun dalam Quran dan dalam Islam – dan dengan alasan yang baik – termasuk hari terakhir apa yang disebut dan penghakiman oleh Tuhan.

012 6/14a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

** 6/14b 00a: “Tapi aku (Muhammad *) saya diperintahkan untuk menjadi yang pertama dari orang-orang yang tunduk kepada Allah – – -“. Bagaimana yang bisa mungkin? – Adam dan Nuh dan banyak lainnya adalah Muslim menurut Quran. (Muslim mengatakan bahwa hal itu berarti setiap orang yang disebutkan dalam Quran dengan cara ini, adalah yang pertama di kelompoknya atau suku atau bangsa atau sesuatu, tapi itu bukan apa Quran mengatakan Namun dalam hal ini salah satu Quran mungkin benar. -. dengan baik mungkin bahwa Muhammad adalah pertama pertama).

013 6 / 20: “Orang-orang yang Kami (Allah *) telah memberikan Kitab (Yahudi, Kristen *) mengetahui hal ini (bahwa Quran diturunkan kepada Muhammad, dll *) karena mereka mengetahui anak mereka sendiri”. Sangat salah – mereka punya banyak alasan untuk mencurigai sesuatu yang salah – sangat salah – dengan kedua Muhammad dan dengan agamanya.

014 6 / 21: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

015 6 / 27: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

** 016 28/06: “Tapi jika mereka (orang-orang berdosa *) kembali (dari neraka ke bumi *), mereka pasti akan kambuh untuk hal-hal yang mereka dilarang”. Ini adalah salah satu tempat orang pintar dengan banyak pengetahuan tentang orang-orang, seperti Muhammad, tahu dia berbohong – orang paling berpengaruh melihat dan mengalami neraka seperti yang dijelaskan dalam Quran, akan melakukan hampir apapun agar jangan sampai ada jika mereka mendapat kesempatan kedua.

017 6 / 33: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

018 6 / 35: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

019 6 / 37: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

* 020 6/38a: “Tidak ada yang telah Kami (Allah *) dihilangkan dari Kitab (yang * Quran)”. Salah. Banyak dihilangkan bahkan hal-hal penting (yang f. ex sebabnya Islam harus membuat undang-undang lebih banyak dari yang dikutip dalam Quran.), dan banyak fakta-fakta – dan mungkin pernyataan lain – salah.

021 6/38b: “Tidak ada suatu binatang (yang hidup) di bumi, atau suatu makhluk yang terbang pada sayapnya, tetapi (bentuk bagian dari) masyarakat seperti kamu”. Salah. Ada banyak binatang dan burung, belum lagi serangga, yang hidup sendiri – di antara serangga dan beberapa karnivora dan bahkan burung bahkan mungkin berbahaya untuk datang dekat dengan salah satu spesies sendiri, terutama jika Anda laki-laki.

022 6/38c: “Tidak ada yang telah Kami (Allah *) dihilangkan dari Kitab (yang * Quran) – – -“. Ada banyak hal yang tidak Anda temukan dalam Quran – f. ex. hukum tidak lengkap bagi kehidupan manusia, dan bahkan lebih lagi dalam masyarakat modern.

023 6 / 39: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

024 6 / 45: “Segala puji bagi Allah, Tuhan semesta alam”. Tidak ada 7 dunia seperti ini mengacu pada (65/12).

025 6 / 46: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

026 6 / 49: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

027 6 / 55: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

028 6 / 75: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

029 6 / 57: “- – – jelas Daftar – – -“. Tidak ada tanda-tanda yang jelas untuk Allah atau Muhammad di semua Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

* 030 6 / 57: “Dia (Allah) menyatakan kebenaran”. Mungkin ia tidak, tetapi dalam kasus luar Quran, sebagaimana apa yang dimaksud dalam Quran, hanya sebagian kebenaran – fakta salah terlalu banyak, terlalu banyak kontradiksi, terlalu banyak kesalahan dalam bahasa Arab menurut literatur, terlalu banyak tidak valid “tanda” dan “bukti” – dan mungkin beberapa kesalahan lain, juga – – – bahkan mungkin kesalahan agama (mengapa mereka harus pengecualian?) Sebenarnya: Dengan begitu banyak kesalahan yang Anda temukan dalam Quran, itu pada terbaik adalah sebagian kebenaran.

031 6 / 71: “- – – dunia – – -“. Mengacu pada 7 dunia yang ada sesuai dengan Quran. Salah. Lihat 65/12.

032 6/73a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

033 6/73b: “(* Allah) Firman-Nya (yang * Quran) adalah kebenaran”. Dengan banyak kesalahan, itu di terbaik adalah sebagian benar.

034 6 / 75: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

035 6 / 79: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

036 6/91a: “Siapa yang menurunkan Kitab yang dibawa Musa?” Salah – buku tidak ada. Musa hanya membawa turun 10 Perintah Allah. (Dia juga diberitahu hukum, dan kemudian menuliskannya, tetapi tidak ada yang lain, menurut Alkitab). The 5 buku Musa – Taurat – yang menulis beberapa 400-700 tahun kemudian menurut ilmu. . (Untuk menjadi tepat: Menurut Alkitab ia mendapat 2 tablet batu dengan 10 Perintah Allah, dan selain yang diperintahkan hukum, yang ia sendiri kemudian menuliskan hukum ini kemudian menjadi bagian dari Kitab Musa – Taurat Kitab Musa sering disebut sebagai “Hukum”, namun pada kenyataannya hukum membuat hanya sebagian kecil dari itu – seperti ketika Islam mengambil kata sentral dalam surat, dan menggunakan itu sebagai nama dari surat itu). . Alkitab juga menyebutkan bahwa ketika Salomo membawa Tabut Covenance ke kuil yang dibangun di Yerusalem, hanya berisi dua loh batu (1 Raja-raja 8. / 9). Hal ini disebutkan, meskipun, bahwa (kitab) hukum ditemukan lagi nanti di bawah Raja Yosia (2 Raja-raja 22. / 8).

037 6/91b: “Allah (dikirim itu (buku) Musa *) ke bawah)”. Seperti Musa tidak pernah – atau dibawa – buku-buku menurut Alkitab, mereka tidak bisa diturunkan oleh siapa pun. Mereka ditulis beberapa ratus tahun kemudian, menurut ilmu pengetahuan. Tapi lihat 6/91a tepat di atas.

* 038 6/91c: “- – – kamu (Yahudi *) menyembunyikan banyak (dari) nya’s = pertama (Taurat bagian dari PL * isi – – -)” salah. Sains telah pernah begitu jelas menunjukkan bahwa Islam ini adalah klaim – dokumen benar-benar tua banyak telah menunjukkan bahwa teks ini adalah seperti yang lama yang benar-benar -. Islam akan harus membawa bukti yang nyata untuk mengulangi klaim dalam Quran dan di tempat lain sampai sekarang mereka hanya memproduksi klaim tidak didanai dan kata lepas, dan kami telah kembali ke fakta lama: Jika Islam telah menemukan fakta keras menunjukkan bahwa Alkitab dengan cara apapun adalah dipalsukan, dunia telah diberitahu cepat dan dengan huruf besar. Hal ini karena Islam tidak memiliki satu bukti nyata tunggal untuk keberadaan Allah, untuk Gabriel sebagai utusan, untuk yang sambungan Muhammad untuk suatu dewa atau apa pun – segala sesuatu yang terletak hanya – hanya – pada apa Muhammad mengatakan, dan Muhammad sejarah (dalam bertentangan dengan gambar glossy Islam) adalah orang yang tidak akan diterima di pengadilan yang serius sebagai saksi yang dapat diandalkan. Sebuah bukti pemalsuan Alkitab akan menjadi indikasi bahwa Quran adalah benar pada jangan pada titik ini satu, dan sehingga sangat welcome. Namun dalam seratus tahun 1400 tidak ada bukti yang nyata telah ditemukan – hanya klaim dan kata-kata. Oleh karena itu bukti nyata untuk Alkitab dipalsukan telah berita besar di semua media Muslim dan untuk seluruh umat Islam selamanya setelah berdebat agama. Tidak ada bukti seperti yang pernah diproduksi oleh Islam.

Juga lihat 3 / 24, 5 / 13, 5 / 14, 5 / 15.

039 6/91d: “Katakanlah:” Allah “dikirim itu (* Quran) down – – -“. mahatahu Tidak ada tuhan yang pernah diturunkan buku dengan banyak kesalahan, logika salah, dll, belum lagi disimpan sebagai Buku Ibu dihormati dalam bukunya Surga sendiri.

040 6/92a: “Dan ini adalah kitab (yang * Quran) yang Kami (Allah) telah menurunkan”. Ini adalah pertanyaan jika sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan bisa diturunkan oleh tuhan mahatahu. Namun, jawaban atas pertanyaan yang memberikan sendiri: No

* 041 6/92b: (Quran *) “membenarkan (wahyu) yang datang sebelum itu (Alkitab *)”. Salah. Ada begitu banyak perbedaan mendasar, bahwa Quran ada konfirmasi dari Alkitab. Lihat f. ex. 2 / 89 dan 3 / 3 untuk penjelasan lebih lanjut.

* 042 6/92c: “Mereka yang percaya pada akhirat percaya ini (* Quran) (Book), – – -“. Salah. Ada banyak orang yang percaya dalam kehidupan berikutnya, tetapi tidak percaya dalam Quran – f. ex. Yahudi dan Kristen, tetapi juga banyak lainnya.

043 6 / 93: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

044 6 / 95: “- – -, maka mengapa kamu (non-Muslim *) dipalingkan dari kebenaran? (Quran *) “. Dengan banyak kesalahan dan bahwa logika salah banyak, dll, Quran di terbaik adalah sebagian kebenaran. Dan itu adalah sebuah pertanyaan terbuka yang sesat jauh dari kebenaran.

00b 6/96a: “Dia (Allah *) menjadikan malam untuk istirahat dan ketenangan – – -“. Satu fenomena alam lagi yang Muhammad mengaku untuk dewa nya – dan seperti biasa tanpa bukti tunggal. Tapi yang utama hanya di sini adalah tidur yang bukan merupakan prasyarat untuk hidup – pada tidur sebaliknya merupakan adaptasi yang dibuat oleh kehidupan kepada kenyataan bahwa ia adalah bagian dari waktu gelap.

045 6/96b: “Dia membuat – – – matahari dan bulan untuk perhitungan (waktu)”. Salah. Mereka – dan terutama matahari – adalah fenomena alam yang sangat penting untuk kehidupan di bumi (bulan mungkin telah penting untuk munculnya kehidupan, setidaknya pada lahan kering). Hal ini terjadi bahwa mereka ok untuk perhitungan waktu, tetapi mereka tidak dibuat untuk itu. (Sebenarnya mereka hampir tidak dibuat bahkan terutama untuk mempertahankan kehidupan di Bumi.)

046 6 / 97: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

047 6 / 98: “Ini adalah Dia (Allah *) yang telah menciptakan kamu dari satu orang (Adam *) – – -“. Satu hal yang bahwa Adam tidak pernah ada – manusia berkembang dari primata sebelumnya menurut ilmu pengetahuan. Hal lain adalah bahwa 1 orang – bahkan 1 sepasang orang – akan memberikan DNA terlalu sedikit-berbagai untuk membuat manusia sebagai ras yang layak.

048 6 / 99: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

049 6/101a: “- – – langit – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

00C 6/101b: “- – – bagaimana bisa ia (Yahweh *) memiliki anak padahal Dia tidak permaisuri topi?” Salah – dan Quran sendiri telah diberi satu solusi yang mungkin: Ini menyatakan bahwa dewa mungkin hanya mengatakan “Jadilah” dan itu. Mungkin TUHAN hanya mengatakan “Jadilah anak”, dan Yesus.

** Tapi ada yang lain, tetapi sedikit diketahui fakta: Dalam agama Yahudi sangat lama ada seorang dewa perempuan, juga. Mereka berbicara tentang dewa dan gelar Amat (sumber antara lain “New Scientist”). Dalam masyarakat yang sangat maskulin dari Ibrani lama, sang dewi itu terlupakan, meskipun, – – – tapi mungkin bagi TUHAN untuk memiliki anak laki-laki “dengan cara alami”. Dewa pasti tahu ini, tapi Muhammad tidak.

Tapi mengapa harus dewa membuat anak-anak dengan cara yang sama seperti manusia? Sebuah pernyataan naif.

050 6/101c: “-. – – Dia (Allah *) pengetahuan telah penuh segala sesuatu” Sesuatu serius salah di sini: Quran membuktikan bahwa baik Allah tidak membuat Quran, atau dia telah jauh dari pengetahuan tentang segala sesuatu.

051 6/104a: “Sekarang telah (Quran *) datang – – – dari Tuhanmu (Allah *) – – -“. Ada Tuhan mahakuasa yang pernah dibuat buku dengan begitu banyak kesalahan, begitu banyak kontradiksi, begitu banyak logika yang salah, dan jujur ​​begitu rendah kualitas sastra (walaupun dari semua kata mulia dari umat Islam), belum lagi disimpan sebagai Buku Ibu dihormati dalam bukunya Surga sendiri, seperti Quran sendiri mengklaim minimal 2 tempat. Lihat 13/39.

* 052 6/104b: “Sekarang telah (Quran *) datang kepada kamu (muslim *), dari Tuhanmu (Allah *), bukti – – -” Salah.. Dalam semua Quran tidak ada bukti yang sah di tunggal untuk Allah atau untuk Islam – atau untuk Muhammad menjadi nabi sejati. Tidak satu bukti tunggal yang membuktikan tuhan sama sekali. Ada MUNGKIN adalah beberapa pengecualian dalam kisah-kisah yang diambil dari Alkitab, tetapi mereka dalam berbicara kasus tentang Yahweh, dan Islam dalam hal harus membuktikan bahwa Allah dan Yahweh benar-benar adalah sama dewa – pernyataan hanya berdasarkan klaim belum terbukti dalam Quran dan Hadis, dan pernyataan bahwa tidak pernah dengan cara apapun telah didokumentasikan. Semua pernyataan bukan dari Alkitab (dan mungkin mereka juga), yang hanya didasarkan pada udara tipis dan murah kata – kata bahwa setiap imam dalam agama apapun dapat menggunakan sekitar dewa-nya (s). Mereka tidak layak sebagai bukti atau bahkan sebagai indikasi.

Quran beberapa tempat berbicara tentang “bukti” dan banyak tempat di mana itu berbicara tentang “tanda” (yang berbicara Islam-bukti). Mereka semua memiliki kesamaan bahwa mereka tanpa kecuali adalah tanpa nilai sebagai bukti, karena Quran dan Islam pernah membuktikan bahwa itu benar-benar Allah yang melakukan ini dan ini. Ingat: Sebuah bukti adalah satu atau lebih TERBUKTI fakta yang dapat memberi satu kesimpulan begitu. Jika surga dan bumi akan menjadi bukti untuk Allah, Islam pertama harus membuktikan bahwa itu benar-benar Allah yang membuat mereka – tidak hanya mengatakan. Jika hujan akan menjadi bukti bagi Allah, Islam pertama harus membuktikan bahwa itu benar-benar Allah yang membuat dan mengarahkan hujan, bukan hanya berkata demikian, karena agama apapun bisa mengatakan – tidak bernilai sebagai bukti (Baal membuat sungai lari ke bawah. Allah tidak dapat membuat mereka berjalan ke atas ERGO:. Baal adalah dewa nyata dan Allah hanya berdosa Etc, dll, dll tidak berharga “bukti”) Jika kehidupan di Bumi adalah menjadi bukti bagi Allah, Islam pertama kali harus.. membuktikan bahwa itu benar-benar Allah yang menciptakannya – tidak hanya menggunakan klaim kosong dan pernyataan imam apapun dalam agama apapun dapat digunakan secara gratis. Etc, dll, dll

** Quran sangat baik di menuntut bukti dari semua agama lain, tapi tidak pernah, PERNAH, menawarkan setiap bukti yang valid itu sendiri ketika datang ke disengketakan “kebenaran” (ia menawarkan “bukti” dan “tanda”, tetapi mereka dibangun hanya pada klaim yang belum terbukti atau apa-apa dan tidak valid). Dan itu adalah tambahan pemikiran bahwa waktu itu mengatakan bahwa ini dan ini adalah bukti, dan, banyak kali ia mengatakan bahwa ini dan ini adalah tanda, laporan tanpa pengecualian seperti dikatakan hanya klaim atau pernyataan yang diambil dari tipis udara atau dengan cara lain tidak dibangun di atas bukti nyata – tidak ada yang seorang hakim akan menerima sebagai bukti di pengadilan, kualitas netral baik. Tidak ada. Setiap dewa akan tahu laporan itu tanpa nilai sebagai bukti nyata, dan tidak menyebut mereka – atau petunjuk bahwa mereka – bukti. Itu hanya kata-kata murah dan demagogi bahwa setiap imam dalam agama apapun dapat digunakan. Maaf, tapi itu adalah kebenaran yang sangat sederhana – dan dalam kenyataannya lebih buruk lagi – – – dan ini adalah apa yang merangsang pemikiran: yang menggunakan klaim longgar dan pernyataan, argumen yang tidak valid dan bukti valid? – Menipu dan penyesat dan penipu. Ini sebenarnya mengatakan sesuatu tentang Tuhan jika ia mencoba untuk menipu simpleminded, orang berpendidikan – belum lagi apa yang menceritakan tentang dirinya jika ia tidak mengetahui atau memahami bahwa salah satu waktu manusia akan mendapatkan pengetahuan yang cukup untuk melihat melalui kecurangan tersebut, dan bahkan lebih jadi jika Allah tidak mengerti apa efek bukti seperti dari kesalahan dan menggertak akan di berpendidikan, orang-orang yang berpikir. Seperti merangsang pemikiran: Beberapa kesalahan dll jelas bahwa cendekiawan Muslim melihat, dan lain-lain – banyak orang lainnya – itu inbelievable jika mereka tidak melihat, tetapi mereka tidak memberitahu penonton mereka tentang hal itu. Sebaliknya: Mereka menceritakan segala sesuatu yang dalam Quran adalah sempurna semua. Berusia Pertanyaan muncul lagi: Jika Islam adalah terdiri agama, dan ada di suatu tempat yang nyata ada agama yang Muslim telah ditolak atau ditipu dari mendapatkan informasi tentang – apa yang kemudian kaum muslimin dalam kehidupan berikutnya mungkin?

** 053 6/104c: “- – – I (Muhammad *) bukan (di sini) untuk mengawasi perbuatanmu”. Ayat ini dikutip langsung dari Muhammad – itu adalah Muhammad yang berbicara sepenuhnya sendiri. Bagaimana datang – dalam sebuah buku dari keabadian dan salinan Kitab Ibu dihormati di surga Allah sendiri? Ada beberapa 8 kasus-kasus seperti dalam Quran, dan setidaknya satu kasus di mana malaikat yang berbicara – lihat 6/114a di bawah ini.

054 6 / 105: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

** 055 6 / 109: “- – – apa yang akan membuat Anda (umat Islam) menyadari bahwa (bahkan) jika (khusus) Tanda datang, mereka tidak akan beriman?” Salah. Jika ada bukti-bukti yang nyata dari dewa, setidaknya baik jumlah orang akan percaya – bahwa adalah fakta psikologis (lihat f. ex mukjizat. Firaun di penyihir dan hasil Yesus ‘dari). Kalimat itu benar-benar terdengar seperti cepat-bicara untuk “menjelaskan” mengapa Allah / Muhammad tidak mampu menghasilkan bukti tak salah lagi bagi Allah. Lebih buruk lagi: Seorang pria yang cerdas seperti Muhammad tahu argumen ini adalah kebohongan – dan semua yang sama ia sering menggunakannya. Ini hanya merupakan salah satu tempat dalam Quran di mana Muhammad tahu bahwa ia berbohong.

056 6 / 111: “Tetapi sebagian besar dari mereka (non-Muslim *) mengabaikan kebenaran ((Quran *)).” Dengan itu banyak kesalahan, yang salah logika banyak, dll, buku yang paling baik hanya sebagian kebenaran .

* 057 6/114a: “Katakanlah:” Apakah aku akan mencari hakim selain Allah? “” Menurut Ibn Warraq “Mengapa saya bukan seorang Muslim”, kata “Katakanlah” tidak dapat ditemukan dalam teks asli Arab. Yusuf Ali telah menambahkan untuk menyembunyikan bahwa di sini sekali lagi Muhammad adalah berbicara dalam sebuah buku yang berpura-pura dibuat oleh seorang dewa lama, dan salinan Buku Ibu dihormati di Surga Allah sendiri. (Ibn Warraq poin untuk setidaknya 8 tempat seperti dalam Quran: 2 / 286, 6 / 104, 6 / 114, 11/2-3, 19/36, 27/91, 42/10 /, 51/50-51 ).

058 6/114b: “- – – Dia (Allah *)-lah yang mengutus kepada kamu (muslim *) Kitab (yang * Quran)”. Diperhitungkan banyak kesalahan, yang diragukan – setidaknya perlu bukti solid.

059 6 / 114 c: “- – – itu (Quran *) telah diturunkan dari Mu (* Muslim ‘) Tuhan (Allah) – – -“. mahatahu Tidak ada tuhan yang pernah diturunkan buku dengan banyak kesalahan, kontradiksi, kesalahan logis, dll, belum lagi disimpan adalah sebagai sebuah buku Ibu dihormati di Surga-Nya sendiri (13/39), seperti Quran juga mengklaim – seperti biasa tanpa setiap dokumentasi atau bukti.

060 6/114d: “- – – itu (Quran *) telah diturunkan dari Mu (Muslim *) Tuhan (Allah *) dalam kebenaran”. Paling-paling sebagian kebenaran.

061 6/115a: “Kata-kata dari Tuhanmu (Allah *) Maha menemukan pemenuhan dalam kebenaran”. Seperti dikatakan berkali-kali: Dengan itu banyak kesalahan, itu maksimum adalah sebagian kebenaran.

* 062 6/115b: “- – – tidak dapat mengubah (* Allah) Kata-Nya”. Mungkin tidak ada muslim dapat, karena itu berarti ada sesuatu yang salah dalam pondasi dan fundaments Islam – mereka tidak mampu untuk mengubah setiap kata dalam Quran karena alasan itu. Tapi f. ex. ilmu pengetahuan dapat menunjukkan jika beberapa kata dalam Quran salah. Yang mereka. Juga ada perubahan dalam Quran – perbedaan di Qurans lama, berbeda “cara membaca” (cara yang tersamar untuk berbicara tentang apa yang pada kenyataannya adalah varietas teks), ayat-ayat dibatalkan dan perubahan dalam agama di sekitar / setelah 622 AD – oleh siapa dan mengapa?

063 6 / 118: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

064 6 / 124: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

065 6 / 126: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

066 6 / 130: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00d 6 / 145: “Aku (Muhammad *) menemukan tidak dalam pesan yang diterima oleh saya oleh inspirasi apapun (daging) dilarang untuk dimakan – – – kecuali daging mati, atau darah dituangkan benteng, atau daging babi – untuk itu adalah kekejian (tidak ada yang tahu mengapa dilarang *) – atau – – – (daging) yang namanya telah dipanggil, selain “Allah. surat ini “muncul” ca. 621 AD. Beberapa 6 tahun kemudian Allah atau Muhammad jelas menemukan mereka telah melakukan kesalahan dan lupa bahwa juga daging dari keledai dilarang untuk Muslim – ini sesuai dengan hadis (. F. ex Al-Bukhari) Kemudian ayat ini dibatalkan untuk menambahkan jenis yang daging dilarang. Ini adalah salah satu kasus di mana Quran dengan hadits. (Tetapi perlu diingat bahwa jika seorang Muslim dipaksa untuk memakan jenis daging – f. ex dari kelaparan tipis -. Atau tertipu memakannya – f. mantan seseorang mengatakan kepadanya bahwa salah sosis mengandung daging babi tidak ada dan ia percaya apa yang ada. berkata – maka tidak ada dosa).

067 6 / 146: “Bagi mereka yang mengikuti hukum Yahudi, Kami (Allah *) melarang (makan *) setiap (hewan) dengan kuku tak terbagi, dan Kami haramkan atas mereka lemak dari sapi dan domba – – -“. Melewatkan fakta bahwa Allah dan dewa orang Yahudi, Yahweh, tidak sama dewa – tidak kecuali dia adalah skizofrenia – yang benar adalah: -.. – – “Lemak sapi, domba atau kambing” (3 Mos 7 / 23). Sebuah kesalahan kecil, tapi tuhan maha tahu tidak lupa kambing.

**** 068 6 / 149: “Dengan Allah adalah argumen yang mencapai rumah – – -“:. Yang berarti Allah memutuskan segalanya. Tapi apa kemudian tentang diklaim akan bebas dari manusia? “Pesan dari Quran” menjelaskan hal ini dalam komentar nya 141 ini surat (diterjemahkan dari Swedia): “Dengan kata lain: Koneksi nyata antara Teman-pengetahuan Allah tentang masa depan (dan akibatnya tentang tidak dapat dihindari dalam apa yang terjadi di masa depan *) pada satu sisi dan manusia kehendak bebas (!!*) relatif di sisi lain – dua pernyataan yang tampaknya bertentangan satu sama lain – terletak di luar apa yang mungkin bagi manusia untuk mengerti, tetapi sebagai pernyataan keduanya terbuat dari Allah (dalam Quran *) keduanya harus “benar.

Argumen ini merupakan kekalahan utama untuk orang yang sangat makna di balik kata “Kebenaran”. Seorang pria dari karakter moral diragukan seperti Muhammad riil historis, telah mengatakan kepada seorang yang belum terbukti dan kisah tidak terdokumentasikan – – – dan itu adalah kebenaran hakiki juga dalam menghadapi ratusan kesalahan, kontradiksi, dan kesalahan lainnya, dan di sini dalam menghadapi yang benar-benar mustahil!

*** 069 6/151a: Ayo, aku (Muhammad *) akan membacakan apa yang Allah (telah benar-benar) dilarang kamu dari – – – (f. e x. *) lebih baik untuk Anda “orang tua.” Ini sangat jelas salah dan sedikit kontradiksi dibandingkan dengan tempat-tempat lain dalam Quran – Muhammad sangat jelas berarti kebalikan, yang Anda diperintahkan menjadi tuhan kepada orang tua Anda. Sebuah tuhan maha tahu tidak akan membuat kesalahan seperti itu. Siapa yang membuat Quran?

Juga sarjana Muslim sepakat bahwa di sini teks salah – itu benar-benar bertentangan dengan apa yang Quran mengatakan tentang hal ini semua tempat lain. Yang memberikan Anda sebuah bukti tak terkalahkan terhadap setiap membual Islam bahwa buku yang sedang tanpa kesalahan sama sekali. Sebuah bukti dan fakta yang disetujui oleh Islam!

Juga lihat 6/151b tepat di bawah.

Dan selain: Jika di sini adalah kesalahan, berapa banyak yang ada? Juga lihat 6/151b tepat di bawah.

Hanya ingat: 6 / 151 (6 di Skandinavia = seks, dan 151 memiliki seks di kedua ujung (1 + 5 = 6, dan 5 + 1 = 6) Mudah untuk mengingat..

070 *** 6/151b: “Ayo, aku (Muhammad *) akan berlatih apa yang telah Allah (benar-benar) dilarang kamu dari – – – (f. e x. *) tidak membunuh anak-anak Anda pada pembelaan inginkan – – – “= membunuh anak-anak Anda jika Anda terlalu miskin dibandingkan. Jelas salah untuk apa Quran mengatakan hal-hal lain seperti tempat tentang.

Juga di sini (lihat 6/151a tepat di atas) sarjana Muslim sepakat bahwa di sini teks salah – itu benar-benar bertentangan dengan apa yang Quran mengatakan tentang hal ini semua tempat lain. Yang memberikan bukti lain terkalahkan terhadap setiap membual Islam bahwa buku yang sedang tanpa kesalahan sama sekali. Sebuah bukti dan fakta yang disetujui oleh Islam!

071 6/154a: “Kami (Allah *) memberikan Musa Kitab, – – -“. Seperti dikatakan beberapa kali sebelum: 5 kitab Musa – juga disebut sebagai “Kitab Musa” – (Torah) ditulis 400-700 tahun kemudian menurut ilmu. Musa hanya mendapat 10 Perintah secara tertulis. Artinya: Dia juga mendapat “Hukum” – yang merupakan bagian dari “Kitab Musa” – tapi hanya secara verbal, dan kemudian menuliskannya sendiri kemudian menurut Alkitab. Tetapi hukum untuk satu hal yang hanya bagian dari buku ini, dan untuk lain: Ilmu semua sama berarti buku penuh ditulis abad kemudian.

* 072 6/154b: “(The * Quran) yang menjelaskan segala sesuatu secara rinci”. Hal ini menjelaskan jauh dari segala sesuatu, dan pasti tidak dalam rincian yang memadai – antara fakta lain tidak ada hukum cukup dalam Quran untuk menjalankan suatu masyarakat, itulah sebabnya mengapa umat Islam harus membuat banyak suplemen.

073 6/155a: “Dan ini adalah kitab (yang * Quran) yang Kami (Allah *) telah mengungkapkan – – -“. Dengan banyak kesalahan – apakah benar-benar dibuat oleh tuhan? – Dan sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan dan banyak hasutan untuk membenci dan perang dan penindasan orang lain dan wanita, berkat? Tidak untuk keduanya.

074 6/155b: “- – – Book a (* Al-Quran) yang kita (Allah *) telah mengungkapkan sebagai berkat”. Sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan dan bukti tidak valid dan bahkan salah tidak ada rahmat.

* 075 6 / 156: “Kitab (dalam hal ini * Alkitab) diturunkan kepada dua Peoples sebelum kami (Mohammad dan / atau Arab *)”. Salah. PL adalah untuk satu orang terutama – orang Yahudi. Tapi NT ditulis – tidak menurunkan – untuk banyak orang. Bab / surat bahkan ditujukan kepada orang-orang yang sangat berbeda. Selain itu ada agama-agama lain dengan buku – f. di Persia. Atau untuk melihatnya dengan cara lain – seperti “Pesan Quran” menjelaskan itu: Alkitab diturunkan kepada orang-orang Yahudi dan Kristen “satu-satunya yang sesuai dengan apa yang orang Arab tahu telah suci berdasarkan wahyu dari tuhan”. Bagian yang menarik dari penjelasan ini adalah alasan Islam memberikan atas kesalahan itu: Alasan itu adalah bahwa orang-orang Arab – Muhammad – hanya tahu tentang buku (s) orang-orang Kristen dan Yahudi. Apa orang Arab tahu sekitar 621 AD ketika Muhammad mendiktekan surat ini, harus benar-benar relevan untuk dewa maha tahu ketika ia membuat banyak aeon sebelumnya (itu)? Quran – Buku Ibu yang ia dan malaikat-malaikatnya dihormati di surga sendiri, sekarang dengan salah satu lebih kesalahan. Lalu siapa yang membuat Quran?

076 6/157a: “- – – sebuah Daftar Clear – – -“. Tidak ada tanda-tanda yang jelas / bukti baik bagi Allah atau untuk koneksi Muhammad untuk dewa dalam Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

077 6/157b: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

078 6/158a: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

079 6/158b: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

080 6 / 162: “- – – dunia – – -“. Lihat 65/12 bawah.

00e 6/163a: “Tidak mitra telah Dia: – – -“. Jika Quran di sini berarti Allah, itu mungkin benar. Jika menunjukkan Yahweh, kata-kata Yesus dapat dipahami seperti Quran di sini adalah salah. Juga lihat 6/101b.

081 6/163b: “- – – I (Muhammad *) saya yang pertama dari orang-orang yang tunduk pada-Nya (* Allah) akan. “Bagaimana itu mungkin jika Quran adalah benar dan banyak orang telah Islam sebelum dia, dan membungkuk kepada Allah? (Meskipun dalam kenyataannya sangat mungkin ia benar: Bahwa ia adalah orang pertama yang pernah). Muslim menjelaskan bahwa hal itu berarti yang pertama dalam masyarakat, tapi bukan itu yang Quran katakan.

Surah 6: Setidaknya 81 kesalahan + 5 kesalahan mungkin.

Surah 7:

00a 7 / 2: “Sebuah Buku (yang * Quran) diturunkan kepadamu (Muhammad *)”. Dapat sebuah buku dengan kesalahan begitu banyak diungkapkan oleh dewa maha tahu?

001 7 / 3: “Ikuti (O Orang!) Wahyu yang diberikan ke Anda dari Tuhanmu, – – -“. Lihat 7 / 2 dan banyak lagi. Tidak ada tuhan maha tahu telah membuat buku tersebut. Entah Allah tidak maha tahu, atau seseorang telah membuatnya.

* 00b 7 / 4: “? Berapa banyak kota yang Kami (Allah) menghancurkan (untuk dosa-dosa mereka)” Ada reruntuhan tersebar di Saudi. Muhammad mengatakan mereka semua hancur sebagai hukuman atas dosa-dosa mereka. Hal itu tidak benar.

002 7 / 9: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00C 7 / 11: “- – – Kami (Allah *) menyuruh para malaikat sujud kepada Adam, dan mereka tertunduk; tidak begitu iblis (Iblis masa depan) – – -.” Tapi Iblis adalah malaikat tidak, seperti itu menunjukkan di sini. Dikatakan beberapa tempat dalam Qur’an bahwa ia diciptakan dari api (f. ex 7 / 12.), Yang berarti dia adalah jin (sudut diciptakan dari cahaya, menurut Quran).

* 003 7 / 12: “Engkau (Allah *) pelayananmu telah menciptakan – – – Dia (Adam *) dari tanah liat”. Salah satu dari banyak cara Allah menciptakan Adam menurut Quran. Salah. Untuk informasi lebih lanjut lihat 6 / 2.

004 7 / 26: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

** 005 28/07: “Allah tidak pernah memerintahkan apa yang memalukan”.

  1. Allah memerintahkan / ijin seks dengan anak-anak. Untuk orang dewasa untuk menikmati seks dengan anak adalah benar-benar memalukan. Untuk orang dewasa untuk memperkenalkan anak untuk seks adalah tidak manusiawi dan bahkan mot memalukan. Muhammad tidak hanya kata, tetapi bahkan menunjukkan bahwa itu ok setidaknya dari gadis itu adalah 9 – dan lebih buruk: Dia – Aishah – menjadi istrinya favorit untuk sisa masa kecilnya.
  2. perintah Allah yang satu dapat mengambil budak dalam jihad – pertempuran dan atau perang di mana Muslim terlibat, dinyatakan jihad. Selama berabad-abad (sampai ca 1930 -. 1940) semua sekolah empat hukum Islam mengatakan bahwa jika bagian yang berlawanan adalah non-Muslim, itu alasan yang cukup baik untuk menyatakan jihad – teoritis bahkan setiap pemburu budak bisa melancarkan jihad. Untuk memaksa sesama manusia menjadi budak, untuk bekerja keras untuk gratis untuk Anda, untuk bebas bagi Anda untuk menjual atau menganiaya atau menggunakan untuk mainan seks, sama sekali tidak manusiawi, benar-benar egois, benar-benar tidak bermoral – dan sangat memalukan. Belum lagi bahwa itu adalah tindakan aneh untuk melakukan dalam nama dewa dianggap baik.
  3. Untuk pemerkosaan seorang tahanan anak / budak / korban grotesquely egois, tidak bermoral, tidak manusiawi dan memalukan grotesquely – – – tetapi Allah telah memerintahkan bahwa itu adalah ok.
  4. Memperkosa setiap tawanan wanita / budak / korban – sesama manusia – hampir sama egois dan memalukan dan buruk sebagai memperkosa seorang anak. Namun dalam Quran itu “baik dan halal” selama wanita tidak hamil.
  5. Untuk lawan pembunuhan – juga lawan pribadi – dalam nama dewa mungkin yang baik adalah sesuatu yang jauh lebih dari memalukan. Tapi dipraktekkan oleh Muhammad.
  6. Untuk menghasut diskriminasi, kebencian dan perang, dalam nama tuhan mungkin baik bahkan lebih buruk dari pembunuhan – dan bukti yang baik atau “nabi” penuh kemunafikan.
  7. To steal/rob/plunder and extort in the name of such a god – and with his permission as “good and lawful” is nearly a bad and as much hypocrisy as murders, hate, suppression and war.

Tapi semua poin memiliki kesamaan:

  1. They attract selfish, greedy warriors to a robber “prophet’s” army – and to his successors’.
  2. Mereka menarik prajurit tidak manusiawi kepada perampok tentara “nabi” – dan untuk ‘penerusnya.
  3. Mereka menarik prajurit primitif kepada perampok tentara “nabi” – dan untuk ‘penerusnya.
  4. Ini adalah cara yang murah untuk “nabi” Perampok – dan untuk penerusnya – untuk mendapatkan tentara – tentara murah.

Finally: Severe or capital punishment for a woman who has been raped, but is unable to produce 4 male eye witnesses to the very act most likely is the most inhuman, most immoral, most unjust, and most shameful law we have ever come across in any at least half civilized religion or culture, and Allah and/or Muhammad have introduced it. And to force a woman who wants to remarry her former husband under some circumstances to have sex with another man to be permitted to remarry him, also is rotten and shameful.

006 7/29: “My Lord (Allah*) has commanded justice – – -“. This only is partly true. See 7/28 just above.

007 7/33: “The things my (Muhammad’s or Muslims’*) Lord (Allah*) hath indeed forbidden are: shameful deeds – – -“. This only is partly true – see 7/28 above.

008 7/35: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

009 7/36: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

010 7 / 37: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

011 7 / 40: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00d 7 / 42: “- – – beban ada tidak ada Kami (Allah *) tempat di jiwa, tapi yang dapat menanggung – – -“. Apakah ini benar? – Juga di antara pembunuhan umat Islam sendiri (atau kematian mencari Allah, padahal alasan sebenarnya adalah hidup yang terlalu sulit), meninggalkan keluarga seseorang atau anak, beralih untuk kejahatan untuk dapat hidup, dll terjadi.

012 7/52a: “Kami (Allah *) telah pasti mengutus kepada mereka Kitab (yang * Quran), – – -“. Pertanyaan berulang: Apakah sebuah buku dengan banyak kesalahan – fakta yang salah, kontradiksi, bukti valid, ortografi dan bahkan mungkin kesalahan agama – benar-benar diturunkan oleh tuhan? Mustahil – tidak untuk mengatakan bid’ah terhadap segala dewa mahakuasa atau mahatahu.

* 013 7/52b: “- – – Buku (yang * Quran), berdasarkan pengetahuan, – – -“. Dengan banyak kesalahan, buku ini didasarkan pada pengetahuan hanya sebagian – atau untuk bagian yang lebih baik dari kesalahan; pada pengetahuan yang sudah ketinggalan zaman dan salah. Sebuah tuhan maha tahu tidak akan memiliki pengetahuan yang akan menjadi usang.

014 7/52c: “- – – Buku, berdasarkan pengetahuan, yang Kami (Allah *) menjelaskan secara rinci -“. Lihat 6 / 154.

015 7/54a: “- – – Allah, yang menciptakan langit (* jamak dan salah) dan bumi dalam enam masa – – -“. penciptaan mengambil jutaan tahun – dewa telah diketahui bahwa, Muhammad tidak. (Selain: Tempat lain dalam Quran yang dibutuhkan 8 hari.)

016 7/54b: “- – – langit – – -.” Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

017 7/54c: “Dia draweth malam sebagai cadar Aku tidur sehari – – -“. Malam hanya tidak adanya cahaya. Tidak ada. Hal ini tidak mungkin untuk menggunakan apa-apa sebagai jilbab atau untuk menggambar di atas apa pun – dan benar-benar tidak lebih dari cahaya hari. Muhammad ini benar-benar salah: sinar matahari dapat mempengaruhi kegelapan, namun kegelapan malam tidak dapat mempengaruhi siang hari. Benar-benar salah.

00e 7 / 56: “Apakah tidak ada kerusakan di muka bumi, setelah itu telah ditetapkan dalam rangka lebah – – -“. Menurut buku kami, pembunuhan, pemerkosaan, mencuri / merampok, kebencian, penindasan, enslaveing, pembunuhan, perang, dll kenakalan. Tetapi mungkin itu hanya terhadap Muslim yang tidak bermoral dan terlarang?

00f 7/57a: “Dia-lah yang Allahmenyesatkan angin – – -“. Angin yang dibuat oleh perbedaan suhu dan tekanan udara. Islam akan harus membuktikan bahwa Allah melakukannya – jika ia tidak.

018 7/57b: “- – – suatu negeri yang mati, membuat hujan turun padanya, dan menghasilkan setiap jenis beserta panen: – – -“. Sebuah tanah yang hanya membutuhkan air untuk tanaman untuk muncul adalah tidak mati – itu adalah penuh dengan benih hidup dan mungkin akar.

019 7 / 58: “- – – Daftar (s) – – -.” tidak valid sebagai bukti bagi Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

020 7/61: “- – – the Worlds!” The Quran tells there are 7 (flat) worlds (65/12). Hadiths adds the names, and that they are placed one above the other. Wrong to say the laest of it.

021 7/64a: “- – – We (Allah*) overwhelmed in the Flood those who rejected Our Signs”. Dan semua orang kecuali yang berada di bahtera itu tenggelam. Well, Islam claims quite correctly that the Quran does not directly say that the Big Flood covered all the Earth (but it says so indirectly, as it tells the ark ended on a mountain in Syria – impossible if the flood did not cover all the world – the water in case had disappeared to not flooded areas). But when they try to explain the Flood as described in the Quran, they not only stumble, but fall head-over-heel down a full hill. This especially as some of the facts they twist, are so well known among learned people, that they obviously have to know they are making up things and conclusions to cheat naïve and/or not learned people – – – some small al-Taqiyyas and/or Kitmans? (lawful lies and half-truths) – that is lawful (yes, al-Taqiyya even is an obligation) if necessary in promoting and/or defending the religion, which is much more essential than to find out what is the truth. But a religion that has to lie, also has things to hide – f. ex. that neither Muhammad nor Allah ever were able to prove anything about Islam.

***F. ex. they try to explain the flood with the filling up of the Mediterranean Sea and the Black Sea – which is not even scientific rubbish:

  1. The Mediterranean Sea was filled up via Gibraltar some 4-5 million years ago – long before Homo Sapiens – modern man – ever existed (Homo Sapiens developed in Africa some 160ooo-200ooo years ago, came out of Africa perhaps some 70ooo years ago, and then something happened in Asia (?) some 60ooo-70ooo (64ooo?) years ago that put him on the trail to or made him to what we are today.)
  2. The filling up took many years – to the tune of a hundred years, this because the opening was not very big in the beginning and the basin enormous. Therefore the water rose slowly – some meters a year. Drama and waves of the kind described in the Quran simply did not exist.
  3. Look at a map and please explain us how the slow filling up of the Mediterranean Sea could make a flood in south Mesopotamia – now approximately south Iraq – where Noah is presumed to have lived?
  4. The filling up of the Black Sea had no connection with the original filling up of the Mediterranean See at all – in stark contradiction to f. ex. 7/64, comment 46, in “The Message of the Quran”.
  5. The filling up of the Black Sea happened when the oceans had nearly finished rising because of the melting of the ice from the last Ice Age – we have seen 5700 years ago, (the main melting ended 10ooo – 12ooo years ago, but there have been som ups and downs – cooler and warmer periods) but the calculated time varies some. This happened faster, but far from fast enough to produce cataclysms like the ones described in the Quran – months or a few years. All the same one of the theories trying to explain the story of the Big Flood, is this filling up – the story have travelled (or Noah may be lived there and moved later?) and also it has been made more dramatic.
  6. **Islam claims the ark stranded on a mountain in Syria (not Ararat in Turkey). For the ark to get stranded on a high mountain, the water according to all physical laws must have covered the entire Earth – if not it had streamed to the empty lower places and disappeared/fallen. Muslim scholars know the elementary physical laws as good and well as anybody else. They know that these “explanations” about what the Quran may talk about a “local” flood are all sheer dishonesty. Or what the Quran tells about where the Ark ended, is wrong. At least one of these two has to be wrong – and they know it, but all the same tell what they know must be wrong to naïve and/or uneducated followers and proselytes.
  7. There also is a highly speculative theory that the flood was caused by the impact of an asteroide into the Indian Ocean. References to Chinese history and astronomical constallations in Hindu legends in case dates the start of the flood to 10. May 2807 BC. But as said the theory is highly speculative – and no traces of the impact have been found.
  8. The most likely explanation, though, and one we have not heard from Islam at all, is the fact that there have been found traces of an extreme flood in Iraq from a time that can roughly correspond with Noah (5200 years ago). It is strangely little known – we have seen it mentioned only 2-3 times, and we read a lot of such stuff. The clear traces were found – as far as we remember – in the 1920s by a British team, and we remember that in the 1990s (no. 7/1994?) the popular science magazine LEXICON had an article with picture from the deep layer of clay that flood had left behind. There were traces of human activity under that layer, which indicates that people lived there when it happened.
  9. In none of the explanations Islam gives, it is possible to explain the enormous weather the Quran describes. That only is possible in the last point just above and perhaps the asteroide impact – explanations we never have met from Muslims. And explanations that cannot explain how the ark could end up on a mountain in Syria like the Quran claims.

022 7/64b: “- – – Our Signs – – -“. “Our signs” is Quran-speak for “proof for Allah”. But there exists not one single proof for Allah – not in the Quran and not anywhere else. (Actually the only thing that can prove a deity, is a miracle – or more one. There are no miracles proving neither Allah, nor the Quran, nor Muhammad’s connection to a god in all the Quran. And the claimed miracles connected to Muhammad according to Hadiths, the Quran very clearly proves are made up legends – a fact that is admitted by Islam who says that the only miracle connected to Muhammad, is the Quran (a most questionable miracle, but that is another story), but all the same propagated to their audiences by Muslim “clergy”.)

023 7/67: “- – – the Worlds!” See 65/12 below.

024 7/73a: “- – – clear (Sign) – – -“. There is not one single unmistakable (= clear) sign from a god in all the Quran, with the possible exception of some taken from the Bible – but they in case are signs of Yahweh, not of Allah. Juga lihat 2 / 99.

00g 7/73b: Connected to the legend about the tribe Thamud, you time and again are told in the Quran that the self-proclaimed prophet Salih brought them a camel and told it was a sign – a proof – from Allah. Like it is told in the Quran it gives absolutely no meaning – just a claim hanging in the thin air. Bagaimana unta menjadi bukti bagi dewa di negara di mana ada 15 unta untuk selusin?

*But then we run across the explanation: This is taken from old Arab folklore – an old legend that everybody in Arabia knew at the time of Muhammad (but would an omniscient god who wanted to reach all the world, use an old fairy tale known only to Arabs – and in such a way that one does not understand if one does not know the rest of the story?)

Sangat singkat legenda berjalan seperti ini: Ada sebelumnya merupakan tebing gunung. Keluar dari hari itu satu tebing yang solid ada unta datang. unta ini kemudian menjadi seorang nabi untuk dewa.

Dengan latar belakang unta itu begitu istimewa, bahwa itu adalah tanda bagi sesuatu – hanya bahwa Quran hanya menceritakan bagian dari cerita, karena semua orang di sana dan pada saat itu tahu sisanya. But as we asked: Would an omniscient god wanting to reach the entire world, tell just part of the story, when he knew most of the world would not understand the point? (But as expected; in modern times you find Muslims telling that it was not this camel from the superstitious tale, but without giving a credible alternative.)

025 7/78: “So the earthquake took them (the tribe of Thamud*) unawares, and they lay prostrate (dead*) in their homes in the morning”. Salah. There never was an earthquake that killed absolutely everybody – nowhere on the whole Earth, and never. With the exception of for low quality high-rise buildings, it is a very serious earthquake that kills more than some 30% of the inhabitants. (Another fact is that in 69/5 Thamud is killed by a storm – one of the contradictions that according to Islam do not exist in the Quran.)

026 7/80a: “- – – dia (Lut / * Lot) berkata kepada umat-Nya (orang-orang di Sodom dan Gomora *).” Salah. The local people were not Lot’s people. Both the Bible and the Quran are unanimous: Lot was a stranger to the land and had come from Ur in Chaldea in south Iraq (together with Abraham). It also from both books is clear that he had not mingled enough with the locals to become one of them. (Muslims all the same use that for an explanation).

*027 7/80b: “- – – lewdness (homosexuality*) such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you?” Wrong. Homosexuality is an integrated part of some peoples’ nature. Science has even found what gene it is connected to – and that the reason why it has not died out, is that the same gene gives a tendency to cause many children when the person is hetero- or bisexual, without anybody can explain the mechanism. You even find homosexuality with some animals – there it sometimes is a proof of dominance.

028 7/85: “- – – a clear (Sign) – – -“. Lihat 2 / 99.

029 7/91: “But an earthquake took them (Shu’ayb’s people, the Madyans*), and they lay prostrate (dead*) in their homes before the morning.” Wrong. See 7/78 above.

030 7/96: “- – – they (non-Muslims*) rejected (the truth) (= the teachings of Muhammad*)”. With that many mistaken facts (and who knows how many mistaken religious points?) it at best is partly the truth. Juga lihat 13 / 1.

031 7/101: “- – – clear (Signs) – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2 / 99.

00h 7/102: “Most of them (people*) We (Allah*) found not men (true) to their covenance – – -“. “Pesan dari Quran” (7 / 102, komentar 81) mengatakan bahwa kata yang tepat untuk terjemahan-kata: “Kami menemukan oleh mereka apa-apa yang mengikat mereka untuk apa yang kebenaran dan kanan”. Dan buku yang terus dengan mengatakan bahwa hal ini mungkin mencakup kemampuan manusia untuk naluriah untuk melihat perbedaan antara benar dan salah.

Now the fact that some of the most fundamental moral questions get the same answer in many societies indicates that something deep inside man tells some common moral truths: You shall not steal, you shall not be a nuisance – or worse – to others, you shall not rape, you shall not kill, etc. But Islam and the Quran is the best proof for that these inner messages are easy to override for a charismatic leader and for a society, and make immoral behaviour praiseworthy a moral codex: To steal/rob, rape, enslave, murder, and more – it all is “good and lawful” if you just observe the right formalities in Islam.

032 7/103a: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

033 7/103b: “- – – see what was the end (drowning*) of those who made mischief. (Pharaoh and his men*)”. According to science the exodus happened (if it happened) around 1235 BC, during the reign of Ramses II. Ramses II did not drown. (Also the Bible – from where it is likely Muhammad got this story, at least indirectly – tells that the pharaoh drowned. But the Bible was made by humans. Humans might have mixed Ramses II with one of his generals or one of his 67 sons. A god had known the truth).

034 7/104: “- – – the Worlds – – -“. Salah. There are no 7 worlds, (one above the other according to Hadith). See 65/12 below.

035 7/105: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

036 7/106: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00i 7/114: “- – – ye (the sorcerers*) shall in that case be (raised to posts) nearest (to my person).” It needs strong proofs to certify that the mighty pharaoh Ramses II promised so incredibly much for so little – they were after all just sorcerers and Moses was no great danger to him.

***00j 7/120: After Moses made his miracle “the sorcerers fell down prostate in adoration” and convinced that the god of Moses was a strong and real one. This is one of the proofs for that Muhammad knew he was lying when he time and again told his audiences that it would have no effect to perform miracles, because disbelievers would not believe anyhow, and thus explained away the fact that he (and his presumed god) was unable to make miracles. Here he tells just the opposite – a psychologically much more correct tale on just this one point.

037 7/121: “- – – the Worlds – – -.” Wrong. There are no 7 worlds. Lihat 65/12.

00k 7/124a: “Be sure I (Ramses II*) will cut off your hands and feet on opposite sides – – -“. As far as we have been able to find out, Egypt at the time of Ramses II did not use this Arab way of punishment.

038 7/124b: “- – – and I (Pharaoh Ramses II*) will cause you all to die on the cross”. In Egypt at that time crucifixion was not used.

039 7/126: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

040 7/127: “He (Ramses II*) said: ‘Their (the Jews’*) male children will we slay – – -“. But they were already slaying the male children of the Jews – that was why the baby Moses had to be put on the Nile according to the Bible and not contradicted by the Quran. Both a mistake and a contradiction. And contradictions do not exist in the Quran? Lihat f. ex. 7/141 below.

00l 7/130: “We (Allah*) punished the people of the Pharaoh with years (of draught) – – -.” There is nowhere said directly how long time it took Moses to get his people free and out of Egypt. But the few sources indicate a limited time. But the Bible has one piece of information that gives a clear indication – and we had better once more mention that science has proved beyond any legal and any reasonable doubt that the Bible never was falsified, in spite of never documented lose claims and lose statement from the Quran and from Islam: Moses was 80 years old when he came to the Pharaoh to get the freedom for the Jews. Afterwards he and his people spent 40 years in Sinai, and he died 120 years old – which means it must have taken less than one year, because if not the numbers do not add up.

041 7/132: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

042 7/133: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

043 7/136: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

*044 7/137: “- – – We (Allah*) levelled to the ground the great works and fine Buildings which Pharaoh and his people had erected – – -”. There is no trace neither in archaeology, nor in history, literature or art, of such a catastrophe around the year 1235 BC (some years before the end of the reign of Ramses II) when this should have happened – at the time of the exodus from Egypt. On the contrary; Ramses II was one of the strongest and most successful of the pharaohs, and also a great builder leaving MANY great buildings behind after many years of – among other things – building. Has Muhammad put more drama to his story, believing it would be impossible to control if it were true?

045 7/143: “- – – and I (Moses*) am the first to believe”. Impossible, as according to the Quran Noah and Abraham and Ishaq and Jacob and a lot more were believers in Allah before him. And Moses and all the others were making a lie out of Muhammad’s saying that he – Muhammad – was the first. A number of contradictions. (2/127-133, 3/67, 6/14, 6/163, 26/51). Muslims like to say that in such cases it means the first if a group or something, but even that “explanation” is not possible here – many of Moses’ forefathers were Muslims according to the Quran and to Islam. But may be – may be Muhammad really was the first Muslim anyhow?

046 7/145a: “(Allah gave Moses the Law*) explaining all things.” The laws in the book of Moses explains far from all things.

047 7/146a: “- – -My Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00m 7/146b: “- – – even if they (non-Muslims*) see all the Signs (of Allah*), they will not believe in them”. Wrong: They would – – – if the “signs” of Allah really had been real signs of Allah. F. ex. see the pharaoh’s magicians.

048 7/146c: “- – – Our Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

049 7/147: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

050 7/149: “When they (the Jews) repented (before Moses came down from the mountain with the 10 Commandments*) – – -“. Salah. Both the Quran itself and the Bible tell that this did not happen until after he came down – and was very angry.

051 7/149-150: Here more is wrong. The Jews make the golden calf, but repents before Moses returns. Other places in the Quran – and in the Bible – they definitely did not repent until afterwards.

*00n 7/157a: “- – – the unlettered Prophet (Muhammad) – – -”. Islam frequently tells that Muhammad was an analphabetic (then he could not have made up the Quran, they say – which he could anyhow). But in science there is serious doubt about this – he was from a good family, he was intelligent and he run first a big business (the one of his first wife) and later a large organisation. It is highly unlikely that such a man did not learn how to read and write – and unlikely that his first wife had accepted him as the manager of her business if he was analphabetic).

You also can meet Muslims telling you that the “fact” that Mohammad could not read, “proves” that all his knowledge about the Bible he had to have gotten via holy inspiration – he could not have read about it. We find it distinctly dishonest to omit all the vocal storytelling that was very rife in Arabia (and most other countries) – and the fact is that most of the Biblical stories in the Quran are such tales and not really from the Bible itself.

052 7/157b: “Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -“. Remember that here according to the Quran Allah is now speaking to Moses. How could the people of Moses follow Muhammad who was born more than 1800 years later? (Islam tries to explain this away by saying it is just an incursion – which it most clearly is not: It is a contradiction).

**053 7/157c: “(Muhammad, whom they – the people of Moses*) ‘find mentioned in their own (Scriptures) – in the Law and the Gospel – – -‘“. May be the Law existed, that depends on when Yahweh (or Allah as the Quran claims) told Moses this and when the Jews really got the Law. But how could the people of Moses find the Gospels? – they did not exist until nearly 1400 years later!! Another strong mistake and another strong contradiction.

*054 7/157d: “- – – the unlettered Prophet (Muhammad*), whom they find mentioned in their own (Scriptures)”. You often meet Muslims claiming or stating that Mohammad is foretold in the Bible – as normal for Muslims without documentation. But we have never been able to find a complete list of where he is said to be mentioned – obviously because the educated Muslims mainly speak about 1 in OT and 1 in NT. In OT 5. Mos. 18/15 + 18 are mentioned, (and in NT mainly some verses from the Gospel after John). But here it is talk about a Jew (one translation says to the Jews “one from your own people, from your fellow countrymen”, another talks about a brother – but the brother of a Jew is a Jew, not an Arab, and the same for a fellow countryman of a Jew – he is a Jew. It may talk about Jesus, but not about Muhammad. Actually the word “brother/brothers/brethren/brotherhood” is used figuratively at least 255 times in the Bible, practically always about a closed group (Practically always Jews in OT – one exception for one country-to-country speech, one for Lot and some 3 about Edomites, as far as we se. And practically always Christians and/or Jews in NT, except a few places where everybody are potential brothers in Jesus) and never specifically including Arabs. The only (some 5 – 6) times we have found Arabs mentioned in OT, the tale is either neutral, like telling they paid tribute to King Solomon, or they were enemies – never anything like brothers.

What is worse: In the part of the Book of Moses where one finds the two quotes Muslims use as flagship, Deuteronomy (= 5. Mos.), you find the word brother/brothers used no les than 13 or 14 times in chapters 18 – 24 (the debated two are in chapter 18 – 18/15 and 18/18). The only one that is not about Jews, are mentioned specially by name – Edomites – and all the other 12 – 13 cases clearly are about Jews. The context is very clear (also not one single word is mentioned about Arabs or Ishmaelite – the claimed forefathers of the Arabs). There also is an interesting verse just after the two debated ones: 18/21. Yang satu ini mengatakan bahwa keunggulan bagi para nabi nyata adalah bahwa mereka membuat bernubuat, dan bernubuat yang menjadi kenyataan. Muhammad tidak pernah dibuat bernubuat. There were a few times where things he said were remembered because they came true – like always in any person’s life – but never real prophesy. It even is very clear from the Quran that Muhammad did not even pretend or claim to have the gift of prophesying. (Per definition a prophet is a person with the gift of prophesying). Muhammad did not have that gift and consequently was no prophet – he only had “borrowed” that impressive title. How could he be “a prophet like Moses” when he was no real prophet? The claim is not even wishful thinking, but rubbish. (Muslim tidak pernah menyebutkan ayat ini). Islam also confirms that Muhammad was unable to make prophesies, as a prophesy is a kind of a miracle, and Islam admits that the only miracle connected to Muhammad, is the Quran (!)

*And last, but not least: The word brother/brothers/brethren/brotherhood also frequently is used in the Quran (more than 30 times figuratively) – and in just the same way as in the Bible: About members of a group – here either Arabs or Muslims as groups. Dan sejauh yang kami dapat melihat, orang Arab yang nyata tidak pernah segala jenis saudara kepada orang Yahudi juga dalam Quran. Kami telah menemukan satu pengecualian kecil – orang-orang munafik dari breed apapun dapat menjadi saudara kepada orang Yahudi (!). Mengesankan dalam kasus ini.

Islam selalu menuntut bahwa titik-titik dalam kisah-kisah mereka harus dibaca dan dipahami dalam konteks penuh – terutama ketika mereka mengalami kesulitan menjelaskan beberapa poin yang sulit. But in this case the context completely destroys their wishful thinking and desperate need for a proof for Muhammad in the OT – desperate because the Quran declares he is foretold there, and no clear foretelling is to be found (this is a clear fact) – so they drop their own rules and quote two words far out of context and declare that the brother of a Jew is an Arab, even in a context where it is obvious that Moses talked to and about Jews, and where the context also directly tells that it could not be Muhammad he was talking about, because he talked about a future prophet, whereas not even Muhammad himself pretended to have the gift of prophesying. He was in reality no prophet – may be a messenger or an apostle of someone or something, but not a prophet – he only used that imposing title. meramalkan Musa seorang nabi besar di masa depan mungkin telah berbicara tentang Yesus, yang sangat jelas adalah seorang nabi baik menurut Alkitab dan Quran. But he could impossibly have talked about Muhammad who among other facts as said in reality was no prophet – he as said only “borrowed” that nice title without even pretending to have the gift the title in reality demanded – and also he was no Jew like Moses spoke about.

Tapi tanpa peduli tentang atau bahkan menyebutkan fakta-fakta tersebut, Islam sangat lurus ke depan dan lurus facedly mengklaim bahwa orang-orang Yahudi ketika berbicara tentang saudara-saudara di 5. Mos. 18/15 + 18 mereka berbicara tentang orang Arab dan meramalkan Muhammad karena itu adalah Musa satunya orang di sini dapat telah berbicara tentang. What that chapter really is about, is that Moses tells his Jews (we use the word Jews because of convenience – we know the word first was used centuries later) things about their future – that the Levites (one of the 12 Jewish tribes) shall not have any inheritance among their brothers (5. Mos. 18/1 – never mentioned by Muslims) – the rest of the Jews – and f. ex. that there once will raise up a prophet like (as great as) himself from among their brothers – from among the Jews.To make an overview:

  1. Muhammad bahkan tak pernah mencoba untuk membuat ramalan. There are a few quotes where what he said, happened – but so much as he spoke, it would be unnatural if not a little came true. But as for real prophesies, he never even tried to make such ones – and what real prophet is unable tell things about the future? – Itu adalah seperti hal yang biasa bahwa nabi sejati melakukannya, bahwa Musa bahkan tidak menyebutkan kasus seperti itu. Tidak bernubuat = tidak ada nabi. Not correct foretellings = false prophet – both according to Moses (5. Mos. 18/21).
  2. What a prophet tells that is not correct, is not from the Lord = a false prophet, according to the chapter (5. Mos. 18/21) and the man that Islam itself strongly quotes. Lihat semua kesalahan dalam Quran dan menangis. (Juga lihat bab yang terpisah mengenai klaim bahwa Muhammad adalah disebutkan dalam Alkitab).
  3. 5.Mos. 18/18 – pada kenyataannya ia mengatakan sama seperti 5. Mos. 18/15.
  4. Then from NT:John 1/21 – but that one is talking about John the Baptist. He says he is not the prophet. And Islam omits John 1/26-27 where John the Baptist tells that “the Prophet” was standing among the people just then” = was living just at that time – and definitely not was expected only 600 years later. “Cherry-picking” of words.
  5. ***From the NT the main claim is John 14/16 where Jesus tells his disciples:“And I will ask the Father (God/Yahweh*), and He will give you another Counsellor to be with you forever”. Untuk memberikan para murid Muhammad memiliki arti tidak – ia lahir sekitar 500 tahun setelah mereka mati, dan bisa tidak ada membantu mereka. But that is what Muslims claim, as they need a quotation from the NT, because the Quran tells he is foretold also to the Christians in the Gospels, and this is the only place where the texts can be twisted enough – because it takes a lot of twisting (see the chapter about the claim that Muhammad is foretold in the Bible). (This verse really is foretelling the Holy Spirit – it arrived some days later according to the Bible.) Muhammad also was not “with them forever” – he was not with them at all.

Strangely enough Islam never mentions the next verse (John 14/17) that continues: “- the Spirit of truth (Muhammad neither was a spirit, nor the truth (he cheated and lied – cfr. al-Taqiyya, and according to his point of view concerning this even his oaths could be broken*). The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you”. Try to make this fit Muhammad!! Also see separate chapter about the claims that Muhammad was foretold in the Bible.

*That is to say: from 14/17 they mention that the spirit is called “the Spirit of truth” and thus cannot be “the Holy Spirit”. But just like Allah and just like Muhammad it had more names – at least 5 – and besides it in the entire Bible is very clear that there only existed/exists (?) on Spirit closely connected to Yahweh.

“The Message of the Quran” solves the problem very simply: It tells that a verse in the Quran explains what the NT tells about Muhammad (surah 61, verse 6). The problem is that the Bible says nothing remotely similar to verse 61/6. (An “elegant” explanation is that it shall have been mentioned in the hypothetical Gospel Islam talks about because it is needed to explain how the child Jesus could learn the Gospel(s) before they were written – a Gospel that Mary and others 100% sure had taken care of or at least told about if it was not a fairy tale, because it would really have cemented an even more a special connection between Jesus and Yahweh/God. But a Gospel that could not exist, because no Gorpel could be written until after Jesus’ death).

**The relevant part of surah 61/6 says: “(Jesus said*): – – – I am giving glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after Me, whose name shall be Ahmad (= another version of the name Mohammad*)”. Tapi tak ada yang jauh seperti ini dapat ditemukan dalam Alkitab. Islam of course explains that with falsification of the Bible – that is the standard and cheap explanation whenever there is divergence between the Quran and the Bible, even though it is documented by science that Islam’s undocumented claim about such a falsification is wrong. Also a falsification would not work among all the thousands that had heard Jesus talking – and then the life and time scale (they expected Jesus back any month or year – if there was to come another prophet first, it would be likely to take at least a generation or more before Jesus would return) of the first Christians would have been different – not to mention that the contents of all the letters and the Gospels written by persons who really knew the story, had been different. Surah 61 / 6 bau terlalu banyak dari sesuatu yang dibuat untuk memberikan kepercayaan Mohammad.

***One small tit-bit: ForetelliNG in the Bible never mention names of persons in distant future, but in 61/6 ONE MOST CONVENIENTLY FIND AN UNMISTAKEABLE NAME. Jika seorang Muslim bersikeras memang benar, ia harus menghasilkan bukti berat.

**Finally there is a Greek word, “Parakletos”. This word in the Greek Gospel after John they use as an explanation .Muslims say must be misspelled, because if you take another word,“Periklytos” that looks rather similar, and translate it to Aramaic, you get a word that in Arab can be interpreted as Mohammad. Sangat meyakinkan (tapi ingat bahwa orang-orang Arab sejak zaman prasejarah telah hidup dalam budaya di mana teori konspirasi telah merajalela – mungkin karena mereka tidak memiliki informasi yang mereka bisa mengandalkan, dan kemudian mereka telah membuat Facebook dugaan dan cerita Situasi ini sebenarnya untuk yang besar. derajat sama di negara-negara Muslim modern – dan terlebih lagi di orang-orang yang masih belum banyak modern Pergi ke sebagian besar negara-negara Muslim dan Anda dapat melibatkan diri dalam cerita-cerita seperti itu dan teori).. Also see 61/6 and see the chapter “Muhammad in the Bible.” The claim is very incorrect.

***055 7/157e: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories).

***Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

056 7/158a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. See 2/22.

00o 7/158b: “- – – the unlettered Prophet – – -”. See 7/157.

057 7/158: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories).

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

058 7/160: “We divided them (the people of Moses*) into twelve Tribes or nations.” Wrong: They consisted of 12 brothers, then 12 families, then 12 tribes already since after Jacob (some 430 years earlier according to the Bible).

*059 7/162: “But the transgressors (Jews and Christians*) among them changed the word (of the Bible*) from that which had been given them – – -“. Well, well. The only way for Muhammad to save his religion and his power, was to claim that the Bible was falsified – and this he claimed and claimed without ever producing one single real proof. That is exactly the situation for Islam today: To save itself – and the positions of the leaders – it has to claim and claim – this and other things – without being able to prove one single thing. But today the position is more difficult, because science has so many old documents and fragments, that they know Islam is not speaking the truth. Lihat f. ex. 7/157a-d. The Bible never was falsified according to science.

060 7/163: “(Fish*) openly holding up their heads (above the water*) – – -.” It is not physically possible for fish in the sea to hold their heads over the water – they can jump and they can touch the surface, but they cannot keep their heads above the surface. Marine mammals can, but not freely swimming fish. Setiap dewa sudah tahu – tetapi tidak gurun Muhammad penghuni.

00p 7/166: Allah said to some “bad” people (according to the Quran): “Be ye apes – – -”. Hampir tidak mungkin bahwa mereka dipindahkan ke kera.

061 7/171: “When We (Allah*) shook the Mount (Sinai*) over them (the Jews*) as if it had been a canopy – – -”. This needs strong proof from Islam, especially as it in reality is from a fable taken from the old Jewish book “Abodah Sarah”.

062 7/181: “Of those We (Allah*) have created are people who direct (others) with truth, – – -”. If this refers to the truth in the Quran, it can at best be partly the truth.

063 7/174: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

064 7/175: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

065 7/176a: “- – -with Our Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

066 7/176b: “- – – reject Our Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

067 7/177: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

068 7/181: “Of course We (Allah*) have created are people who direct (others) with truth (Islam/the Quran*) – – -“. With so much wrong in the Quran, it at best is partly true.

069 7/185: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

070 7/187: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

071 7/188: “- – – glad tidings – – -“. See 2/97c above and 61/13 below.

072 7/189: “It is He (Allah*) who created you (man*) from a single person (Adam*) – – -“. Salah. Adam never existed, as man developed from earlier primates. And even if it had started with Adam and EVe (her name is never mentioned in the Quran), the DNA pool had been too small to make the race viable.

073 7/196: “- – – Allah, who revealed the Book – – -”. Well, that is an essential question: Is it really Allah who made a book with so many mistakes? Impossible.

Surah 7: At least 73 mistakes + 16 likely mistakes.

SURAH 8:

001 8/1: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories).

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

002 8/2: “- – – His Signs – – -“. There are no signs proving Allah or anything else in the Quran. See 2/39.

00a 8/5: “Just as thy Lord (Allah*) ordered thee (Muhammad*) out of your house in truth – – -“. That is one of the main questions – was Muhammad ordered? – and in case by whom? (The surahs from Medina makes one think more about the Devil than about a good god.)

003 8/6: “- – – the truth after it was made manifest (had appeared in the Quran*)”. That something appears in the Quran does not prove that it is true – far from it, as there are too many mistakes about a lot of things. Islam will have to produce proofs, not only claims about what is true and what not.

004 8/7: “- – – the Truth according to His (Allah’s) words (the Quran*) – – -“. With that many mistakes, etc. in the Quran, it at best is partly true.

005 8/20: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories).

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

005a 8/24: “- – – His (Allah’s*) Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. See 8/20 just above.

006 8/41: “- – – the revelation (the Quran*) We (Allah*) sent down – – -“. A book with that many mistakes, that much invalid logic, etc. is neither made by a god, nor revered as a Mother Book in his heaven, nor sent down by an omniscient god.

007 8/42: “- – – clear Signs – – -“. There is not one single clear sign/proof in the Quran – neither for Allah, nor Muhammad having connection to a god, nor for warriors going to Paradise, nor for Paradise as described in the Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

*008 8/51: “Allah is never unjust to his servants”. Wrong. A star example: That a woman is to be strictly punished for illegal sex after being raped, if she cannot produce 4 male eye witnesses to the rape, is one of the most inhuman, immoral and unjust laws that exists on this Earth – at least in civilized or semi-civilized cultures.

009 8/52: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

010 8/54: “- – – Signs – – -“. Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

011 8/65: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories).

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

011b 8/67: “- – – a Prophet – – -“. But Muhammad was no real prophet. See 8/65 just above.

012 8/70: “- – – Prophet – – -.” Wrong. See 8/65 above.

Surah 8: At least 14 mistakes + 1 likely.

SURAH 9:

001 9/9: “The Signs of Allah – – -“. There is no – not one single – sign in the Quran that with correct logic proves Allah. (There is not one single case in the entire book where it is proved that it really is Allah that has caused what is said to be signs. And then it proves nothing and signifies nothing – any priest in any religion can say just the same about his god(s)!! Words are that cheap ).

002 9/21: “- – – glad tidings – – -“. At best only partly right. See 2/97c above and 61/3 below.

003 9/29: (Islam is)”the religion of Truth”. It is not 100% – an understatement – the truth with that many mistakes, etc. in the Quran. The difficult additional question is: With that many mistaken facts – are there also mistakes in the religious parts? And in addition there are the facts of “al-Taqiyya” (the lawful lie) and Kitman (the lawful half-truth): At least it is not made by an omniscient god.

004 9/30a: “The Jews call ‘Uzayr (= the prophet Ezra*) son of God – – -”. This is wrong, and even Muslim sources admit that. But they say Jews in Arabia said so (which may or may not be correct) – which may have cheated Mohammad, but an omniscient god had known the truth. Then who created the Quran?

*00a 9/30b: “- – – the Christians call Christ the son of God – – – (in this) they but imitate what the Unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: – – -”. We are back to the old facts: Jesus himself called God “father”. There were lots of witnesses to this. It was written down a few years later. The Quran vehemently denies it. The Quran has neither witnesses nor any other proofs. The Quran was written more than 600 years later and all the same offers only claims and statements. Muhammad had a lot to gain if Jesus is not the son of God – if Jesus is closely related to God, Muhammad obviously is not the greatest of prophets, and though Muslims may be right that Muhammad personally did not care all too much about money, there is no doubt that he liked power – and women -and that he spent large sums for bribes “buying” followers (his lust for power is easy to see from the texts in the Quran and the Hadits). The end of the quote is rather sympathetic (?!) – – – and very different from the mentality in NT.

00b 9/30c: “- – – how they (among others the Christians*) are deluded away from the Truth! (that the god has no son*)”. For comments see among others 9/30b just above.

005 9/30d: “- – – the Truth! (the teachings of the Quran*)”. With that many mistakes in the book, the Quran at best is partly the truth. Juga lihat 13 / 1.

**00c 9/33a: “It is He (Allah*) Who hath sent Muhammad – – -“. That is one of the really big questions: Was he really sent? There are too many indications for that the Quran is not made by an omniscient god – actually it is 100% sure that no such god would make that many mistakes, etc. And if he all the same is sent, the some 22-24 surahs from Medina makes it as 100% sure that he was not sent by a good or benevolent god – the religion as it is painted in the Quran is by far too inhuman, immoral, and diabolic for that. In case he was sent, the surahs from Medina prove he in case was sent by some dark forces. May be by the Devil pretending to be Gabriel? Or by a sick brain? – f. ex. TLE.

006 9/33b: (Islam is*) “the Religion of the Truth, – – -”. For comments, see 9/29 and 13/1.

007 9/36a: “The number of months in the sight of Allah, is twelve (in a year) – so ordained by Him (Allah*) – – -“. Setahun adalah waktu Bumi perlu membuat lingkaran penuh mengelilingi matahari. A month is the time the moon needs to make a full circle around the Earth. Kedua lingkaran tidak disinkronkan. Because of this something is wrong in this statement, as 12 months (here moons) are some 11 days less than a natural year. The Islamic year is an artificial construction whether ordained by Allah or not. The Muslim year is not really a year (103 Muslim years = roughly 100 real years). Anda akan temukan muslim memuliakan tahun Muslim bahwa slide sepanjang tahun nyata, tetapi plusses jauh lebih kecil daripada kekurangan – – – ditambah itu membuat sesuatu yang salah dengan ayat ini: tahun Muslim hanya tidak setahun.

008 9/36b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. See 2/22.

009 9/48a: “- – – until the Truth (the Quran*) arrived, – – -”. With that many untrue facts, mistaken grammar, contradictions, and perhaps mistakes in the religious statements (why should they be exceptions?), the Quran at best is partly true. Also see 13/1

010 9/48b: “- – – the Decree of Allah became manifest – – -“. The “decrees from Allah” – the Quran – contains so many mistakes, etc., that they are not from an omniscient god. That is: Either Allah is not omniscient or it is not from Allah. Something is seriously wrong.

011 9/52: “Can you see for us (Muslims*) (any fate) other than the two glorious things – (martyrdom or victory)?” Definitely yes: We can see the war invalid. We can see the families destroyed because the husband/father is dead – or an invalid. We can on the other hand see men building their country instead of destroying neighbouring countries. And we are able to see the prise of war: Brutalized humans and destruction – a war never builds anything, it destroys. It may give some of the victors a chance to steal and suppress and become rich – but for a terrible price. But this price the Quran never mentions and never cares about.

***Islam seems to represent such a backward culture, that its members was and to a degree are unable to see – or care for – what catastrophes and destroied lives they inflict on others, as long as they themselves become rich and perhaps powerful. No price is to high for a good life – – – as long as others have to pay for it.

012 9/60: “- – – reconciled (to Truth) – – -”. See 9/48, 13/1 and many others.

013 9/65: “- – – His (Allah’s*) Signs – – -“. There is not one “sign” in the Quran that clearly is from Allah. Lihat 2 / 99.

014 9/70a: “- – – the Cities overthrown.” In what we call the Middle East and further eastwards there were ruins from cities and towns and dwellings. Muhammad explained that each and every of them had been destroyed by Allah because they had sinned against him. Wrong – in an arid and warlike area there are so many reasons why even cities from the old can be empty, that Islam will have to prove that Allah’s wreath was the reason for even one of them.

015 9/70b: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. There are no clear signs for Allah, etc. in the Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

016 9/73 “O Prophet (Muhammad*)!” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a and 30/46a.

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

**017 9/111: “Allah hath purchased of the Believers their persons and their goods; – – – they fight in his cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: – – -”. This is a really strong one:

If there is something that is absolutely sure, it is that you do not find orders or incitement to slaying or to religious physical war in the Gospels – this is 110% wrong. (The sword is mentioned, but the mentality is totally different from the Quran. Totally.)

018 9/113: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -.” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a and 30/46a.

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

019 9/116: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

020 9/117: “- – – the Prophet (Muhammad*) – – -.” See 9/113 above.

021 9/128: “- – – to the Believers (Muslims*) is he (Muhammad*) most kind and merciful.” Wrong. It is not kind to incite them and force them to go to war and “kill and be killed” – – – or maimed. It is not kind to incite hate. It is not kind to demand full submission and obedience. And it far from is merciful to mistreat seriously both mentally, morally, and socially the ones who would not go to war for him or in other ways did not obey him in other things. Actually he was about as kind and merciful as Hitler or Mao or “Uncle Stalin” or the aggressive Zulu king Shaka.

“When a man – or a god – says something,but demands or does something else, we believe in his demands and his deeds, not in his words.”

Surah 9: At least 21 mistakes + 3 likely.

SURAH 10:

001 10/1: “- – – the Book (the Quran*) of Wisdom.” With that many mistaken facts, it is not a book of wisdom – and when there are many mistakes you see, it is difficult to trust the rest of the text, too.

002 10/2a: “- – – We (Allah*) have sent our inspiration (the Quran*) to a man (Muhammad*) from among themselves?” With this many mistakes, etc., the Quran is not from an omniscient god.

003 10/2b: “- – – the lofty rank of Truth”. See 9/48 and 13/1.

004 10/3a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

005 10/3b: “- – – Allah, Who created the heavens (plural and wrong) and the earth in 6 days”. Even though the Bible say the same number of days, it is extremely wrong – – – and any god had known that. As bad: The Quran contradicts itself by saying 8 days one place. This even though the claimed lack of contradictions in the Quran, Islam claims is a proof the that Allah madr the book. (Consequently the presence of mistakes then prove that Allah did not make the book).

006 10/4: “The promise of Allah is true and sure”. The only known promises from Allah are found in the Quran. But in the Quran so much is wrong, that it is impossible to relay also on promises said to be from Allah. Therefore they are far from sure – or worse.

007 10/5: “- – – His (Allah’s*) Signs – – -.” There is not one sign in the Quran that is proved to come from Allah.

**008 10/6: “- – – heavens – – -”. This and word is used in plural something like 190 times in the Quran. (The words “heavens”, “seven heavens“,” firmaments”, “seven tracts“, and “seven firmaments” are used altogether at least 199 times in plural – there is no doubt that the Quran believes in 7 heavens). The plural of the word refers to what was correct astronomy in the Middle East at the time of Muhammad: That the stars, the planets, the sun and the moon were fixed to 7 invisible, but strong heavens formed like hemispheres (actually the Greeks knew the Earth was a sphere, so then the heavens there had to be spheres) over the Earth. Orang-orang Arab dan banyak orang lain punya gambar dari Yunani dan dari astronomi Persia. Muslims today of course know it is wrong, and are “explaining” the 7 heavens in different ways – from vague thoughts about space, to telling that it means something else as – they say – in old Arabia the number 7 also could mean “many” (as if that is more correct in this case than 7), and to referring to 7 layers in the atmosphere (without explaining how the stars were fixed to the lowermost of the heavens, or explaining how resurrected material humans can walk around up there, which the Quran tells), etc. Strangely till now none of our group have met a single Muslim mentioning that 7 heavens were the correct astronomy at the time of Muhammad – may be they prefer not to mention that, because the logical next question then is: A god knew there were no 7 heavens, Muhammad believed there were. Lalu siapa yang membuat Quran?

009 10/6: “- – – Signs – – -“. Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

010 10/7: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

011 10/13: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. There is not one clear sign for Allah or for Muhammad in all the Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

012 10/15: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. Salah. See 10/13 just above and 2/99.

013 10/17: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

014 10/18: “- – – heavens – – -“. Plural dan salah. Lihat 2/22a.

*015 10/19: “Mankind was but one nation – – -”. Manusia tidak pernah tetapi satu bangsa. Perhaps once one tribe, as some Muslims tries to explain, but never one nation – and that in case was some 200ooo years ago. You also sometimes meet Muslims telling in triumph that science has proved the Quran, because now they have found the prehistoric Eve and the prehistoric Adam – – – without mentioning that the prehistoric Eve lived some 160ooo – 200ooo years ago (the number varies some) in Africa, whereas the prehistoric Adam lived some 60ooo years ago only, and not unlikely in Asia. With Eve dead 100ooo years before Adam was born – and a long distance off – it is difficult to see how they can be the “parents” of man, and thus prove the Quran.

016 10/21: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

017 10/24: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. Lihat 2 / 39 di atas.

00a 10/27: “But those who earned evil will have a reward of like evil – – -“. Muhammad, his men and his successors did enormously much evil – stealing/robbing, raping, enslaving, destroying places and lives and lands and cultures, extorting, terrorizing, torturing, murdering, inciting to hate and war and mass killings and suppression of other humans – only that it was sanctioned by a god, according to Muhammad, though a god that in case neither was omniscient, nor omnipotent (he f. ex. had to explain away all questions for miracles – some times with obviously logically invalid claims) – it will take quite a lot to give them “a reward of like evil.”

018 10/31: “’- – – who is it that rules and regulates all affairs?’ Mereka (non-Muslim) akan segera berkata, “‘Allah’. Salah. Orang-orang dari agama lain akan nama dewa mereka sendiri (atau dewa). (Walaupun non-Muslim Arab pada saat itu mungkin mengatakan al-Lah -. Dewa lama atas politeisme Arab, nama yang terdengar seperti Allah)

019 10/32a: “- – – Truth (the Quran) – – -“. See 13/1.

00b 10/32b: “- – – apart from Truth, what remains but error?” It is very clear that much of what is said in the Quran is not true – and then “what remains but error”?

020 10/33: “Thus is the Word of thy Lord (Allah*) proved true – – -”. The trouble is that the sentence refers to nothing – there is nothing even remotely like a proof in the neighbourhood. It may refer to 10/31, but what is said there has nothing to do with a proof – and most non-Muslims would not even give the intended answer (and even if they did, it was no proof). This is not argumentation worthy a god – not even a minor, uneducated one hidden in a distant corner.

021 10/34: “- – – how are ye (people*) deluded away (from the truth (the teachings of the Quran*))”. The Quran at best is only partly the truth. See 13/1.

022 10/35a: “- – – He (Allah*) who gives guidance towards Truth?” The old question – it appeared already shortly after Muhammad started preaching: Is there really a god behind the Quran? – a book with that many mistaken facts? Not possible.

023 10/35b: “- – – towards Truth?” With that many mistakes the teachings of the Quran at best is partly true.

024 10/35c: “It is Allah who gives guidance towards Truth- – – “. No guidance in that many mistakes and invalid and even wrong statements and proofs. See 10/35a and 13/1.

025 10/35d: “Is then He (Allah*) who gives guidance to Truth – – -“. See 10/35 and 13/1.

026 10/36: “- – – Truth (the Quran*)”. See 10/35 and 13/1.

**027 10/37a: “This Quran is not such as can be produced by other than Allah – – -”. Sangat salah. Many a good writer can write stories as good as and better than the collection of surahs in the Quran. In spite of what Islam says, the Quran is not good literature. The same stories are repeated again and again. They frequently are not well told. There are no new stories or ideas – only stories and ideas borrowed from others. Honestly large parts of the book are rather dull reading. And the fabled high quality Muhammad’s Arab language? – what Muslims seldom mention, is that it took some 250 years to perfect the language – it was not until around 900 AD that it had got something like today’s language. It also existed in much more than one text. For one thing even Muhammad (according to Hadith) said it was sent down in 7 varieties that all were true ones – even if details were different. For another thing some of the old, original texts existed in the Muslim world for a long time after the “official” one was finished around 650 AD ( at some time there were at least 14 canonized varieties – 2 are used today: Hafs and Warsh, but most uneducated Muslims does not even know it). For still another thing the texts may have been slightly changed through the time – at least very old Qurans found in Yemen in 1972, had “small, but significant differences” from the modern edition. The dominating Quran today (Hafs), is the edition that was the official one in Egypt when first printed in 1924, according to what we have read. The version after Warsh is used in parts of Africa . Also see Preface (list of the then 14 canonized ones).

**028 10/37b: “- – – it is confirmation of (revelations) that went before it (the Bible*) – – -”. There are too many and too deep differences between the thinking and the morality in the Quran and the Bible – especially NT. The Quran is no conformation of it, as mentioned before – the differences are too fundamental.

029 10/37c: “- – – the Book (the Quran*) – wherein there is no doubt – – -.” Because of all the mistakes in a book said to be sent down from an omniscient good, there is a lot of doubt.

030 10/37d: “- – – the Worlds.” One more reference to the 7 worlds of the Quran (65/12). Salah.

**031 10/39: “- – – (the Quran*) whose knowledge they cannot compass, – – -”. For the uneducated, often analphabetic members of Muhammad’s early followers, that might be true, except for the question: Who has most knowledge – the one without knowledge, or the one with much wrong knowledge?. But it is in no case true today – and we see that a lot of the “facts” Muhammad used are wrong – something a god had known.

*032 10/47: “To every people (was sent) a Messenger”. Hadith mention 124ooo messengers or prophets. There is not one single trace from prophets teaching monotheism in the old times (except in Israel), neither in archaeology, art, literature, folk tales, nor in religions. Some of them should have left small traces at least, when they were so many. This verse is not true.

00c 10/52: “Ye (sinners*) get but the recompense of what ye earned!” Is there really real justice in the terrible and everlasting punishment in hell, compared to the after all not too big sins of many of the sinners?

033 10/55a: “- – – heavens – – -“. Lihat 2/22a.

034 10/55b: “Is it not (the case) that Allah’s promise (the Quran*) is assuredly true?” The Quran in this case like in others proves it is not true – too many mistakes, etc.

035 10/57a: “(The Quran is*) a Guidance – – -.” A book with that much wrong, is no guidance.

00d 10/57b: “(The Quran is*) a Mercy.” Can a book with that much suppression, rape, stealing/robbery, blood and murder and war, be a mercy?

036 10/64a: “- – – Glad Tidings – – -.” See 2/97c and 61/13.

***037 10/64b: “Hereafter; no change can there be in the words of Allah. Ini memang Felicity tertinggi “Kalimat pertama mungkin sebagian menjelaskan mengapa umat Islam tidak bisa mengakui kesalahan, tidak peduli seberapa liar” penjelasan “yang mereka gunakan.. Yang kedua adalah jelas salah – lihat f. ex. 10/39.

Also: This surah was dictated by Muhammad ca. 621. There were many changes in Islam after that – Islam even changed its fundament completely from rather peaceful to a religion of robbing, hate and war. There also were many mistakes which science now see that the “facts” are changed by reality, and there were many “signs” and “proofs” that the laws of logic in reality changed the moment they were pronounced (Muslims only do not know).

038 10/66: “- – – heavens – – -“. Lihat 2/22a.

039 10/67: “- – – Signs – – -.” See 2/39.

00e 10/68a: “Allah hat begotten a son!” An exclamation in disbelief. But Jesus many, many times called God/Yahweh his father (the word “father” (of Jesus) is used for God/Yahweh at least 163 times in NT and the word “son” (of God/Yahweh) is used for Jesus at lest 66 times.) Some of the times it is meant figuratively, but most times it is clear it is meant literally.

040 10/68b: “- – – heavens – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2/22a.

041 10/71: “- – – the Signs of Allah – – -“. There are no logically signs/proofs for Allah (or for Muhammad) in all the Quran. Lihat 2 / 99.

***042 10/73: “O Prophet! (Muhammad*)” But Muhammad was no real prophet. The definition of a prophet is a person that:

  1. Have the gift of and close enough connection to a god for making prophesies.
  2. Makes prophesies that always or at least mostly come true.
  3. Makes so frequent and/or essential prophesies, that it is a clear part of his mission.

A few things Muhammad said, came true – like it has to do for a person saying many things through many years – and most of what he said that did not come true, was forgotten (also this is what normally happens). The main things here are that Muhammad never indicated that anything of what he said was meant as prophesies, he never indicated, not to mention pretended to or claimed, that he had the gift of prophesying, that it nowhere is documented that all/most of what he said about the future came true (point 2), and finally both he and Islam said and says that there were no miracles connected to Muhammad “except the Quran” – prophesying is a kind of miracle. (This last fact also is a solid proof for that all the miracles connected to Muhammad mentioned in there Hadiths, are made up stories). Also see 30/40a and 30/46a.

Muhammad in reality simply was no real prophet. Perhaps a messenger for someone or something or for himself – or perhaps an apostle – but not a real prophet. He only “borrowed” that impressive and imposing title. It is up to anyone to guess why.

043 10/74: “- – – Clear Signs – – -“. Salah. See 10/71 just above and 2/99.

044 10/75: “- – – Sign(s) – – -.” Invalid as proof for Allah. See 2/39 above

*045 10/82a: “And Allah by His Words (the Quran*) prove and establish His Truth, – – -”. Salah. The words of the Quran proves nothing about Allah, until it first is proved that it really was made by Allah, and that Allah really has made and done what the Quran says. It is at best partly the truth only – too many mistakes.

046 10/82b: “- – – and establish his (Allah’s*) Truth, – – -”. It is well established that a large number of the facts in the Quran are wrong. At best the book is partly the truth.

047 10/87a: “Provide dwellings for your (Moses’*) People in Egypt – – -“. Wrong – and a contradiction with reality both according to the Bible and the Quran. According to the Quran the Jews had dwelled for a long time in Egypt, and according to the Bible this long time amounted to 430 years (1. Mos. 12/40). They had dwellings – no reason to tell Moses to provide such ones. Even more silly: Why provide (new) dwellings when all they wanted to do, was to leave Egypt?

048 10/87b: “- – – Glad Tidings – – -.” At best partly true only. See 2/97c above and 61/13 below.

**049 10/90a: “At length, when overwhelmed with the flood, he (pharaoh Ramses II*) said: – – -”. We know a lot about Ramses II – he was one of the really great pharaohs, and much material exists from his time. One of the tings we know is that he did not drown (was not “overwhelmed with the flood”).

*050 10/90b: “I (Ramses II) believe that there is no god except Him Whom the Children of Israel believe in: I am of those who submit (to Allah in Islam) (= became a Muslim*)”. One more thing we know about Ramses II (see 10/90), is that he was a polytheist and never a Muslim.

051 10/92: “- – – Our (Allah’s*) Signs!” There is not one single sign in the Quran that surely is from Allah. Not one.

052 10/94a: “- – – the Truth (the Quran*) hath indeed come to thee – – – “. Once more: With so many mistakes, the Quran at best is partly true.

053 10/94b: “- – – the Truth hath indeed come to thee from thy Lord (Allah*): – – -”. Also once more: Can a book with that many mistaken facts, be made by a god?

054 10/94c: “- – – be nowise of those in doubt (about Islam*).” With all the mistakes etc. in the Quran, it is sheer naivety not to be in doubt, and at least check the facts.

*055 10/95: “- – – the Signs of Allah – – -“. There are no real signs/proofs for Allah in the Quran – only claims not proved statements. Lihat 2 / 99.

***056 10/96: “Those against whom the Word of thy Lord has been verified – – -.” That is one of the main problems for Islam – as it was for Muhammad: There exists no real verification of Islam – not one single proof, and not one single place. Only cheap words and claims that in NO case are verified. But glorification of and demands for blind belief you find aplenty.

Whenever we meet people using bluffs and defending bluffs not to mention glorifying blind belief – like here – for us that strongly indicates not only that they have no real arguments, but also that they know it themselves, and just try to defend wishful thinking or beliefs they are mentally unable to question – and to defend it by means of dishonesty.

057 10/97: “- – – Sign – – -.” See 2/39.

058 10/101: “- – – heavens – – -“. Salah. Lihat 2/22a.

059 10/108: “Now truth hath reached you from your Lord (Allah*)”. See 10/94 and 13/1.

Surah 10: At least 59 mistakes + 5 likely mistakes.

Subtotal till here (Surahs 1 – 10): 517 mistakes + 73 likely mistakes.

About siapmurtad

Siap memaparkan kesalahan alquran
This entry was posted in KESALAHAN QURAN. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s